Batman v. Superman RT Thread: like standing ovations in rain

Status
Not open for further replies.
Iron Man 3 is a top 5 all time MCU film. Only Guardians, IM1 and Winter Soldier are better.


Guardians, IM3, and Avengers are hard to rank. Avengers is the most fun on first watch... all those characters together. IM3 may be the best as a Tony Stark movie rather than IM movie. Guardians is the most inoffensive.

But Iron Man 1 is certainly the best live action superhero movie, and Winter Soldier is definitely the 2nd best MCU film.
 
Posting a pic like this ignores the fact that reviews don't just happen in a bubble, they're a product of the times. The mentality towards superhero movies is different now and has been that way ever since the Nolan Batman flicks and especially the Marvel films. People have different expectations and criteria for judging a Batman movie now, so juxtaposing two aggregated percentages together doesn't really tell the whole story

RT is just a like/dislike aggregator...if Batman Forever came out today, it'd probably get like a 20% rating.

Even so, a 19% difference would still be terrible.
 
Calling Man of Steel's action one-note disaster porn is absurd, Clark even rescued people, but he wasn't Superman yet in Man of Steel he was in the process of becoming Superman all the while being a lone character facing a global threat. Clark actively limits causalities BY beating the bad guy. Zod himself said he would stop at nothing which lead to the admittedly flimsy conclusion.

Whereas Age of Ultron somehow manages to have an entire scene dedicated to Hulk facing Iron Man with people littered throughout the entire runtime of that scene and somehow there is a not single person injured in this several city block destruction beatdown and correct me if I'm wrong, most citizens aren't directly attacked by Ultron or his bots so much as they're often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time. This is ignoring these rescues by Captain America and co whom would ultimately have served better actively working to directly stop the main threat.

I've heard this line of reasoning before and I don't agree with it. The comics handled Clark's development far better because even if he wasn't Superman in his prime yet, he still had the same values that were instilled on him by his surrogate parents on Earth. That's what makes Superman who he is. It's not just his extraordinary alien abilities, but the optimism and charm and sacrifice of the human part of him.

Man of Steel's Clark is all over the place. I like the oil rig sequence and I enjoy the sequence where he flies for the first time, but the character feels muddled and bereft of the qualities of comic book Superman. What's Clark's motivation? To understand his past? There's a muddled discussion of genetics in the movie and talk about Clark being a symbol of hope, but that never feels earned. Pa Kent's characterization is horrible and Lois Lane serves no purpose to the plot once Clark gets the suit, but she's roped along anyway because Clark has to romance someone.

The difference is that the climax of the Age of Ultron is spent trying to mitigate casualties when a huge mass of land comes barreling toward Sokovia, whereas Man of Steel is about Clark disabling a "World Engine" embedded within a ton of disaster porn that felt like overcorrecting after people complained that the Donner movies and Singer's Superman Returns didn't have enough scenes of Superman fighting bad guys.

Superman killing Zod and not be overly concerned with human life in the climax is the illusion of an arc because he honestly doesn't have one. Not one that's earned, anyway.

If you want an in-depth of Man of Steel's shortcomings, I think Film Crit Hulk's essay on it is solid.

This isn't to say Age of Ultron is flawless. Only that it works better than Man of Steel.
 
I could see people making the argument that Man of Steel is to Dawn of Justice as Amazing Spider Man is to Amazing Spider Man 2.

A movie that has some serious flaws followed by a mess of a sequel that has higher highs but jams in some unnecessary universe building without really solving any problems from the first.

I'm honestly not exaggerating here, ASM2 is the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. There's no possible way BvS can be as horrible.

Can it?

:(
 
I didn't think it was possible that it would do less than 900M WW but now I'm not so sure.

IIRC people expected MoS to do way more than 700M WW based on the Superman name recognition alone and coming of the success of TDKR year before.

With the RT score being as low as it is, I see word of mouth hurting it's legs a lot.

It's worth noting that Transformers 4 has an RT score of 18% (and an audience score of 51%) and made $1.1 billion WW regardless. BVS could absolutely still do very very well if it manages to really grab the international audience.
 
Iron Man 3 has my favorite action sequence in the MCU: barrel of monkeys scene.

It just blew my mind the first time I saw it on the big screen. On TV it doesn't quite have the same effect, but it was amazing.
 
I've seen the opposite argued about that Hulk scene. "He just scared them" was one of my favorite comments. It's amazing the leaps people take.

That'd be hilarious. Hulk rips apart cars like sardine came and busts through walls just so he can yell "BOO!" I'd watch the shit out of that.

People forget though that's not even the first time Hulk has killed, it's just the first shown. In Incredible Hulk, Ross lists several Hulk casualties.
 
I don't think the film will reach $1B like the Nolan films have, but I was wondering how much WB makes in merchandising revenues from the DC Universe, and not much it seems in the grand scheme of things according to Lincensingbiz.

Spiderman generates $1.3B in retail sales; Batman and Superman are at $494M and $277M respectively...

I thought they were bigger cash cows than that.

http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/superhero-earns-13-billion-a-748281
 
I'm amazed at WB's choices for screenwriters on these upcoming DC films.

Take the upcoming Wonder Woman film, for example. Jason Fuchs is writing the screenplay. He wrote Pan (RT rating: 27%) and Ice Age: Continent Drift (RT rating: 37%).

The idea that you can judge the quality of a screenwriter based on their previous movies is pretty dubious. Orci and Kurtzman had only done TV shows before JJ Abrams hit big. Chris Terrio was supposed to be hot after Argo, but that was the first script he ever wrote solo. Too many name directors want to write their own films for there to be a deep pool of writers to draw from.
 
Superman let Metropolis get destroyed. That's on him. That's what the trailers have been alluding to, that he let this happen.

Superman went to destroy the hivemind machine in order to shut down all the others, which took a lot out of him. It's not on him. He took that one down and prevented further destruction. The trailers are alluding to that because while we, the audience, know what went down (well, I'm starting to fucking wonder this) the populace in the film isn't the audience. Some of them see it as Superman's fault but they don't have the details, like we, the audience, and as we all know people love and need to have someone to blame.
 
Have a bet with my friend will this movie pass 1.5 bil ?

I dont think we need to worry about this film not making money. It needs legs and good WOM to hit 1.5b so its probably not going to happen, but it should clear 1 billion on the brands alone.

It will make a ton of money, just about all the big tent superhero films this year will. The only variable is whether or not they will be good films lol.
 
Superman went to destroy the hivemind machine in order to shut down all the others, which took a lot out of him. It's not on him. He took that one down and prevented further destruction. The trailers are alluding to that because while we, the audience, know what went down (well, I'm starting to fucking wonder this) the populace in the film isn't the audience. Some of them see it as Superman's fault but they don't have the details, like we, the audience.

They should forego trying to explain it and instead break the fourth wall by running a clip of Goyer apologizing for Man of Steel.
 
The Nolan films were 2D and released years ago. That isn't the upper end for a DC film that connects with its audience. The Dark Knight was the fourth highest grossing film of all time worldwide for a bit. Age of Ultron's international take was pretty close to TDK's worldwide take.
 
Even so, a 19% difference would still be terrible.

Yeah, therein lies the danger of review aggregator sites like Metacritic and RT - most times people only notice the percentage. They don't bother to see how many reviews a movie has or check when a film came out, let alone think about what the general mindset was in the era when it was being evaluated.

Pretty sure BvS will even out slightly once it's got 200+ reviews in the pile, but damn was I hoping for better
 
The idea that you can judge the quality of a screenwriter based on their previous movies is pretty dubious. Orci and Kurtzman had only done TV shows before JJ Abrams hit big. Chris Terrio was supposed to be hot after Argo, but that was the first script he ever wrote solo. Too many name directors want to write their own films for there to be a deep pool of writers to draw from.

Really, you're arguing that previous written work is not a good way to judge the quality of a writer and project future works of the same writer?
 
mj-laughing.gif

Explain how it's a bad film.

I hope laughing gifs ain't all you got.
 
I'm pretty sure the film doesn't pretend that no one was hurt or killed by the hulk in that sequence. It's kind of why the final act emphasizes reducing civilian casualties. And it would be completely against Cap's character to not save people even if it meant ultimately losing to the bad guys.
My point is he'd be saving more lives in the long run by actually facing the main threat, has nothing to do with taking an L against the bad guy. Also weren't the civilian casualties incredibly(bizarrely even) low considering all of the damage done? As per this post in the Civil War Final trailer:
The casualty counts seem low. They say:

New York: 74
Washington: 23
Sokovia: 177

I mean I'm not advocating for mass giant city destruction and death, but from what we saw to have less than 300 casualties seems low.
I saw Captain America save 40 people at most between both movies if I had to ballpark estimate.
Hulk undoubtedly kills some cops. He rips open the top of the car and reaches in just as the camera cuts away. Those guys are deader than dead. They highlight all the destruction and even show injured people after the fight concludes too but no bodies. Then again, you don't see bodies in MoS either, just a lot of strongly implied death.
Those police men didn't die: https://youtu.be/66im5Mi7x3A?t=52 and again most citizens in Ultron are often treated as being in the wrong place at the right time with not much if any implied casualties if ever.
 
I'm honestly not exaggerating here, ASM2 is the worst movie I've ever seen in my life. There's no possible way BvS can be as horrible.

Can it?

:(

The parallels between movie and sequel are the same.
But BvS is better than ASM2 even if they suffer from similar issues.
 
Iron Man 3 is hard for me to place because most of the movie is pretty solid, but that Mandarin twist fucking murders the pace of the movie and the final battle is not very good.
 
On rewatches, I'd put IM3 over Guardians. Shane Black knows how to do humor that survives repetition.

I've never been able to sit through a second viewing of IM3. The parts where he's bumming around North Carolina are too long and pointless. GotG moves from start to finish so its much easier to re-watch.
 
Iron Man 3 is hard for me to place because most of the movie is pretty solid, but that Mandarin twist fucking murders the pace of the movie and the final battle is not very good.

Mandarin twist literally ruined it altho they backpedaled on that with a short in the Thor 2 Blu-ray so it's no longer a complete waste. i enjoyed IM3 overall.
 
The Mandarin twist was great. The end fight was average to above average for a third act Marvel fight. I wasn't a fan of the stuff with Tony and that kid. They cram that sort of thing into a ton of comic films, and they are almost always goofy or awkward. See Joffrey in Batman Begins.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom