M.W.
Member
smh
Going for those views I see. This is a review thread.
I don't understand how anyone can look at the last 20% of any Uncharted game and claim the shooting and encounter design isn't anything but mediocre at best. Level variety, vertical variety, pacing, music etc. are all great but it's riddled with shitty monsters and/or bullet sponges and poor weapon feedback.
Wow, it actually looks basically the same imo. I think the cinematic angle of the first shot make it look more appealing and realistic, but otherside it honestly looks the same to me. Cant believe they managed to do it. I guess the various "best graphics ever" statements we've had so far about this game were really on point.
LMAO, the defensiveness and the salt is astonishing. Keep it up, "9 or 10 or your opinion is worth shit" guys, the fanboyism is hilarious.
And yes, quoting my posts of people acting shitty is a "wall of Shane" now ay lmaaao
Never change guys, always making a entertaining mess of a review thread.
I can sell you mine for $1,000 if you want.
the ayy is just supposed to be ayyy. and lmao. i've seen it a lot too and it can get sorta eh.
yeah chances are it could stay at 94 but at this point i don't think it's possible for it to be below 90, is it?
na i don't get it.
No, he's joking.You're not being serious, right?
LMAO, the defensiveness and the salt is astonishing. Keep it up, "9 or 10 or your opinion is worth shit" guys, the fanboyism is hilarious.
And yes, quoting my posts of people acting shitty is a "wall of Shane" now ay lmaaao
Never change guys, always making a entertaining mess of a review thread.
Agreed.
I would not be here if I did not enjoy playing the last 3.
you're the standout individual causing more of a mess than anyone else here, lol..
I've seen them, and I called them out as such. Apparently though some people here didn't actually read those somehow. There has been countless people here attacking reviewers for not giving it a 9/10, and for having issues with the game you don't agree with it.I really haven't seen very many posts like that in this thread. There's been a lot more people trying to bait meltdowns than actual meltdowns. I'd say the review thread has been a lot more civil than the recent QB and Star Fox threads.
Disagree.
I am not a huge fan of Uncharted 1-3 and I am extremely excited for Uncharted 4, based on the improvements in gunplay ND started with The Last of Us. I always felt Uncharted was a bit floaty, but after TLoU, I believed in them to bring those improvements over to Uncharted. The reviews and my hands-on with the MP Beta show me they have.
edit nvm
I've seen them, and I called them out as such. Apparently though some people here didn't actually read those somehow. There has been countless people here attacking reviewers for not giving it a 9/10, and for having issues with the game you don't agree with it.
This is somehow invalidated because a guy went out making a wall quote of my posts, and now people joined in on the bandwagon of a "wall of shame" literally having no arguments of their own whatsoever, and continously not being able to disprove what the people I was talking about were doing
But sure, those people now dont exist, magically. I love how quickly people went to pile up after that "wall of shame" post. Really shows they have no worthy rebuttal of their own at all.
I've seen them, and I called them out as such. Apparently though some people here didn't actually read those somehow. There has been countless people here attacking reviewers for not giving it a 9/10, and for having issues with the game you don't agree with it.
I've seen them, and I called them out as such. Apparently though some people here didn't actually read those somehow. There has been countless people here attacking reviewers for not giving it a 9/10, and for having issues with the game you don't agree with it.
This is somehow invalidated because a guy went out making a wall quote of my posts, and now people joined in on the bandwagon of a "wall of shame" literally having no arguments of their own whatsoever, and continously not being able to disprove what the people I was talking about were doing
But sure, those people now dont exist, magically. I love how quickly people went to pile up after that "wall of shame" post. Really shows they have no worthy rebuttal of their own at all.
what meltdowns?
i haven't been that active in this thread it's a busy day at work
Its ironic by the way you've been acting in this thread and then calling out someone being 12 lol. You complain about the thread being a mess but you're pretty much making things worse. Stop already.LMAO. The meltdowns continue.
Yes, someone having a different opinion is completely on purpose to be different from the club. Holy shit are you 12
That's how I felt listening to Kinda Funnys reviewListening to Gamespots review
![]()
This friggen game man... Wow
You've been a needlessly aggressive presence ever since you started posting in this thread I think. If this is a "mess of a review thread" then it's largely due to your contribution, since things were relatively peaceful beforehand.
This insane Twitter meltdown over an 8.8 score is absolutely beautiful:
https://twitter.com/weprime/status/728270526834192386
Not a single mixed review on MC yet; not even Bloodborne or TW3 avoided those!
I've called out shitposts of people spouting dumb statements such as thinking a review is invalid because its a 8/10' that they want to "standout" and "send a message". People that seriously spout such statements can't be argued with it.Dude, we're not pretending there weren't other dumb posts, but that doesn't validate your passive aggressive behaviour and downright disrespect to other members by talking them down. That's what we're saying, and you're flat out denial and acknowledgment of your attitude is exactly the problem. Just back away, learn from it and move on. You don't have to win this fight.
Yes. I'm the one calling reviewer's opinions "invalid" because they didn't give it a 9, I'm the one saying that a reviewer have it a 8 because they are "attention whores that want to stand out". But yeah, keep pretending such posts dont exist.Its ironic by the way you've been acting in this thread and then calling out someone being 12 lol. You complain about the thread being a mess but you're pretty much making things worse. Stop already.
This insane Twitter meltdown over an 8.8 score is absolutely beautiful:
https://twitter.com/weprime/status/728270526834192386
I've called out shitposts of people spouting dumb statements such as thinking a review is invalid because its a 8/10' that they want to "standout" and "send a message". People that seriously spout such statements can't be argued with it.
Yes. I'm the one calling reviewer's opinions "invalid" because they didn't give it a 9, I'm the one saying that a reviewer have it a 8 because they are "attention whores that want to stand out". But yeah, keep pretending such posts dont exist.
Not a single mixed review on MC yet; not even Bloodborne or TW3 avoided those!
I've called out shitposts of people spouting dumb statements such as thinking a review is invalid because its a 8/10' that they want to "standout" and "send a message". People that seriously spout such statements can't be argued with it.
Yes. I'm the one calling reviewer's opinions "invalid" because they didn't give it a 9, I'm the one saying that a reviewer have it a 8 because they are "attention whores that want to stand out". But yeah, keep pretending such posts dont exist.
I just watched this but didn't notice the dislikes.Gamesradar is critical in their review on youtube and they get a boatload of dislikes. People are so childish.
While it still looks mind blowing, I am pretty sure that the E3 2014 was never rendered on the PS4. It was likely prerendered footage from the engine. This is obvious from the hair which doesn't seem to be using the same Kajiya-kay hair shader as the E3 footage.
Also, you can see more polygonal edges on Nate's gun strap. The gouge in Nate's head looks a lot less intense and painted on in the final game. Most importantly, the overall lighting doesn't exhibit the global illumination in the original trailer, appearing a lot flatter with very little bounce light. Perhaps the lighting was faked by manually placing in a bunch of bounce lights, but it's obvious that the amount of bounce lights available in realtime even to fake an approximation was just not enough.
![]()
This is clearly the best looking game by miles and miles, but it pretty obvious to see that the original scene was prerendered. The gouges on Nate's face, the hair shader, and overall bounce lighting are not present in final game.
Real-time rendered in game. This is not CGI or pre-render, which means all the shading features for skin, hair, eyes need to be written in code.
Using Disney Diffuse model, GGX Brdf model and Screen Space Subsurface.
Hair is using Kajiya-kay Brdf model
I've seen them, and I called them out as such. Apparently though some people here didn't actually read those somehow. There has been countless people here attacking reviewers for not giving it a 9/10, and for having issues with the game you don't agree with it.
This is somehow invalidated because a guy went out making a wall quote of my posts, and now people joined in on the bandwagon of a "wall of shame" literally having no arguments of their own whatsoever, and continously not being able to disprove what the people I was talking about were doing
But sure, those people now dont exist, magically. I love how quickly people went to pile up after that "wall of shame" post. Really shows they have no worthy rebuttal of their own at all.
literally no one has said this in the thread
Guys, we don't need to bring more ammunition. If it's not form GAF and won't ADD to the discussion, maybe it's best to not post.
Well, that's factually incorrect.
no one has called any reviewer an attention whore
Shacknews and edge haven't weighed in yet.
QuarterToThree will likely break that trend >_<
I've called out shitposts of people spouting dumb statements such as thinking a review is invalid because its a 8/10' that they want to "standout" and "send a message". People that seriously spout such statements can't be argued with it.
Yes. I'm the one calling reviewer's opinions "invalid" because they didn't give it a 9, I'm the one saying that a reviewer have it a 8 because they are "attention whores that want to stand out". But yeah, keep pretending such posts dont exist.
Unfortunately, yes, someone did.
no one has called any reviewer an attention whore
Shacknews and edge haven't weighed in yet.
literally no one has said this in the thread
I've seen more than one post stating that the Sterling and IGN reviews were lower than the average simply because they wanted attention.