AP: Clinton clinches Democratic Nomination

Status
Not open for further replies.
But even though they're down 14 theres always the chance that the quarterback spikes the ball wrong and it flies out at just the right angle and another player catches the ball and runs past all the defense and gets a touch down and then get the onside kick and then get another touch down to tie it and then go into overtime and score more points to WIN
Don't forget the part where all of the players on the other team are arrested for jaywalking.
 
i find something very wrong with articles like this and people who keep supporting it.

Yes, she is very likely going to cinch the last actual delegates she needs before the convention. Yes the super delegates will likely not change. But it has not happened yet!
The reason people keep saying it's rigged in her favor is that the whole thing looks like it's rigged in her favor. Pledged SD's before the first caucus and articles like this just reinforce that idea.

Disclaimer: I do support Bernie, but I have absolutely no issue with Clinton.

Was the system rigged in Obama's favor in 2008?
 
AP calling it now is like an NFL announcer calling the game with 30 seconds left to go, because all the winning team needs to do is spike the ball take a knee.

It's possible the team gets indicted after the fact for filling the football with emails.
 
i find something very wrong with articles like this and people who keep supporting it.

Yes, she is very likely going to cinch the last actual delegates she needs before the convention. Yes the super delegates will likely not change. But it has not happened yet!
The reason people keep saying it's rigged in her favor is that the whole thing looks like it's rigged in her favor. Pledged SD's before the first caucus and articles like this just reinforce that idea.

Disclaimer: I do support Bernie, but I have absolutely no issue with Clinton.
Those of us who followed 2008 know that when Clinton was on the other side of this that Obama was called the presumptive nominee even though Supers hadn't voted and put him over the top yet.

It's hard to see things working the same way for Sanders now as they did for Clinton in 2008 and thinking there's some pro Clinton bias in the system.
 
AP is stupid. Bernie's statement is right, super delegate votes are not locked in and pledged delegates have yet to put Hillary over the top. It's just dumb to make a call prior to tomorrow's primaries.

She is going to be the nominee, but let the process play out.

I agree AP should have waited till tomorrow but no one "doesn't count" super delegates until they are "locked in". Even now Bernie's delegate total includes the small number of super delegates who have endorsed him.
 
Hot damn CNN interviewed some California Bernie or Bust people and they are exactly what you think they'd be.

Holy shit at that hippie chick getting emotional about how the reporter is on some script and how the Internet and social media has all the polls dude
 
i find something very wrong with articles like this and people who keep supporting it.

Yes, she is very likely going to cinch the last actual delegates she needs before the convention. Yes the super delegates will likely not change. But it has not happened yet!
The reason people keep saying it's rigged in her favor is that the whole thing looks like it's rigged in her favor. Pledged SD's before the first caucus and articles like this just reinforce that idea.

Disclaimer: I do support Bernie, but I have absolutely no issue with Clinton.

Supers have not switched this election except one that's gone from Sanders to Clinton, and the fact that there's a swell of them coming out now and others have not switched besides Bernie's pitch tells you what you need to know.

Supers telling a news org how they'll vote is an act in itself.
 
AP is stupid. Bernie's statement is right, super delegate votes are not locked in and pledged delegates have yet to put Hillary over the top. It's just dumb to make a call prior to tomorrow's primaries.

She is going to be the nominee, but let the process play out.

AP called the nomination for Obama June 3rd, 2008, on the basis of his superdelegates. Press called the nomination for Kerry in 2004 when Edwards dropped out, 1000 delegates before he had enough to win. Bookies paid out on Obama's win over McCain several days before the election. It's OK, Megyn Kelly doesn't need to visit the decision desk to assuage Karl Rove's anxiety.
 
AP is stupid. Bernie's statement is right, super delegate votes are not locked in and pledged delegates have yet to put Hillary over the top. It's just dumb to make a call prior to tomorrow's primaries.

She is going to be the nominee, but let the process play out.


REMINDER


They will do it as they have always done it. Count the Supers and call the nominee when it becomes clear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-rbr0MVtLM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYgP78iKKGw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81hCFwsnfJI


Despite what Bernies campaign would have you believe. Its always been done this way. It was never going to be handled differently just because it hurts Bernies feelings. This is how the elections work and have worked and will continue to work.
 
Wish this didn't happen until tomorrow...now the most cynical cynics can say that this wasn't legit.

Hopefully, California/New Jersey and the rest still comes out in full to vote tomorrow how they would've before today's announcement.
 
She's not perfect but after Biden she's the best person to lead America. Congrats to Hillary! Massive achievement.

I see Bernie's still going on about pledged delegates and the media smh. Well, if you want to play the convention game, be my guest. It will not help one bit. You are three million votes behind, son.

I will say though, losing Cali will be a little embarrassing for Hillary. I hope she wins.
 
Was the system rigged in Obama's favor in 2008?

I said it "looks like" not that it is, I do not buy into the theory that it is actually rigged.

And I don't recall the exact reporting for Obama so I don't have an opnion on that. ( I was dealing with pretty bad marriage at that time so my memory of his nomination is a fuzz of drugs, booze and fighting)


EDIT: just a follow up, our nomination process is stupid, archaic and needs to change. The opinions of all people should be counted before any final choice is made. Things like super delegates discredit the voices of many people.

also, I realized I'm arguing politics on the Internet, I'm going to just stop now as I'd rather play Xenoblade then follow this thread for the next 30 pages
 
AP called the nomination for Obama June 3rd, 2008, on the basis of his superdelegates. Press called the nomination for Kerry in 2004 when Edwards dropped out, 1000 delegates before he had enough to win. Bookies paid out on Obama's win over McCain several days before the election. It's OK, Megyn Kelly doesn't need to visit the decision desk to assuage Karl Rove's anxiety.

Yep. Though things like this do help to show how young a lot of people are in relation to 08' and 12'.
 
I said it "looks like" not that it is, I do not buy into the theory that it is actually rigged.

And I don't recall the exact reporting for Obama so I don't have an opnion on that. ( I was dealing with pretty bad marriage at that time so my memory of his nomination is a fuzz of drugs, booze and fighting)

I posted the videos above. Have a look.
 
I guess there's no such thing as a President-elect either until the electors cast their vote in December. Someone should have told McCain and Romney so they could throw a hissy fit for a couple weeks.

Maybe that's an argument Trump will use when he loses in November.
 
AP called the nomination for Obama June 3rd, 2008, on the basis of his superdelegates. Press called the nomination for Kerry in 2004 when Edwards dropped out, 1000 delegates before he had enough to win. Bookies paid out on Obama's win over McCain several days before the election. It's OK, Megyn Kelly doesn't need to visit the decision desk to assuage Karl Rove's anxiety.

Why? That's just fun to watch LOL. That was so entertaining.
 
Also LOL at this not being on /r/politics, aside from the mod post.

After they made the sticky they deleted all the other ones. They do that to prevent spam, although it's only selectively enforced, coincidentally on Hillary news. Bernie news can get 10 different news sources on the front page saying exactly the same thing.
 
Nope. SDs dont vote till July. Mainstream media continues to liquid shit the bed with inaccuracies.
Doesn't everybody vote in July? Hence presumptive. This is a really silly distinction to make; candidates have always been called with supers included.
 
AP called the nomination for Obama June 3rd, 2008, on the basis of his superdelegates. Press called the nomination for Kerry in 2004 when Edwards dropped out, 1000 delegates before he had enough to win. Bookies paid out on Obama's win over McCain several days before the election. It's OK, Megyn Kelly doesn't need to visit the decision desk to assuage Karl Rove's anxiety.

Yeah at a certain point the extra hoops she's being made to jump through are a bit...troubling.
 
REMINDER


They will do it as they have always done it. Count the Supers and call the nominee when it becomes clear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-rbr0MVtLM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYgP78iKKGw

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81hCFwsnfJI


Despite what Bernies campaign would have you believe. Its always been done this way. It was never going to be handled differently just because it hurts Bernies feelings. This is how the elections work and have worked and will continue to work.

If you look at the scroll in the first video Hillary was actually winning the popular vote when they called it for Obama
 
Nope. SDs dont vote till July. Mainstream media continues to liquid shit the bed with inaccuracies.

Inaccuracies? This is how the system has always worked. It's not the media's fault that some people are new to this.

The race has ALWAYS been called when a candidate reaches the required number of delegates+superdelegates. Sure, supers can change their mind, but it's rare, and it's usually announced. When a super announces their support, unless they later publicly rescind that support their vote is pretty much guaranteed.

This is EXACTLY how Obama was announced the presumptive nominee in '08.
 
And look, anyone still in denial before this announcement is going to remain in denial after it. It's still feasible that Bernie can win so they will hope. They will accuse the media of bias. They will call the system rigged even though the system is the only ly thing that let's him argue he still has a chance right now.

I do believe he'll concede shortly after Clinton has won a majority of the pledged delegates, but when neither candidate wants it called yet I do think it's jumping the gun a bit.

All this will be irrelevant tomorrow night though.
 
After they made the sticky they deleted all the other ones. They do that to prevent spam, although it's only selectively enforced, coincidentally on Hillary news. Bernie news can get 10 different news sources on the front page saying exactly the same thing.

Haha okay fair enough I didn't see that. I have routinely seen 10x of the same sanders stories on the fp, so I figured that wasn't a rule.
 
AP called the nomination for Obama June 3rd, 2008, on the basis of his superdelegates. Press called the nomination for Kerry in 2004 when Edwards dropped out, 1000 delegates before he had enough to win. Bookies paid out on Obama's win over McCain several days before the election. It's OK, Megyn Kelly doesn't need to visit the decision desk to assuage Karl Rove's anxiety.
I was trying to find out when the AP called it for 2008, and it looks like it was in the afternoon on the day of the CA (and other states) primary. You really think calling it a day before the primary is acceptable?

For what it's worth, I don't think it should've been called that early in 2008 on the basis of SDs, and calling it even earlier this election cycle in the midst of a tightening CA race is questionable IMO.
 
I guess there's no such thing as a President-elect either until the electors cast their vote in December. Someone should have told McCain and Romney so they could throw a hissy fit for a couple weeks.

Maybe that's an argument Trump will use when he loses in November.

Votes weren't even certified until January actually. Obama wasn't even president elect until January 2009. Should have kept that campaign up.
 
You think Bernie was thinking about running in 2024 as an 82 year old man? Seriously? This is quite literally 2016 or bust for his presidential aspirations.

I think he should concede as soon as the last primary closes, certainly, but there is no need for him to drop out now.
Did you not understand the meaning of me saying 'i can see how he feels that's not a luxury he enjoys?' It was me eluding to him being dead and grasping for dear life to keep this last (and only) chance alive.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom