the retail version of the game will have the same standards
RIP image quality dreams.
the retail version of the game will have the same standards
RIP image quality dreams.
He's only talking about frame-rate not IQ SHUT UP DONT RUIN THE DREAM.
RIP image quality dreams.
O no Kagari why?!If the resolution isn't changing from those then I don't have a lot of faith they'll make it look good because the image quality at E3 was frankly poor. Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
Tabata said that they had technical limitations by the consoles, because he had bigger plans for certain areas,
and that he would add new features to the pc version in the future.
If the resolution isn't changing from those then I don't have a lot of faith they'll make it look good because the image quality at E3 was frankly poor. Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
Well before that he says he doesn't know how far they will end up pushing each console version so the final build can still show more improvements over the Titan demo. IQ will mostly depend on their AA quality anyway which isn't taken into consideration in his comments on resolution and fps specs.
Yeah FFXV can't even hit 1080p with a stable framerate and its world is empty as heck unlike game of the generation The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt available for PS4, X1 (and PC from Day One, not with a year late port) which has a good resolution spec and also its overworld is filled with things to discover.
Have anyone mentioned that the main characters in this game look like some emo band? I would be embarrased if someone caught me playing One Direction: The Game lol That Cindy character is good though. Guess I'l wait for World of Final Fantasy which looks miles better than this. Gosh I miss Nomura.
If the resolution isn't changing from those then I don't have a lot of faith they'll make it look good because the image quality at E3 was frankly poor. Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
If the resolution isn't changing from those then I don't have a lot of faith they'll make it look good because the image quality at E3 was frankly poor. Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
Yeah FFXV can't even hit 1080p with a stable framerate and its world is empty as heck unlike game of the generation The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt available for PS4, X1 (and PC from Day One, not with a year late port) which has a good resolution spec and also its overworld is filled with things to discover.
Have anyone mentioned that the main characters in this game look like some emo band? I would be embarrased if someone caught me playing One Direction: The Game lol That Cindy character is good though. Guess I'l wait for World of Final Fantasy which looks miles better than this. Gosh I miss Nomura.
If the resolution isn't changing from those then I don't have a lot of faith they'll make it look good because the image quality at E3 was frankly poor. Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
Final Fantasy XV may be a good game, but it won't be a good Witcher game.Yeah FFXV can't even hit 1080p with a stable framerate and its world is empty as heck unlike game of the generation The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt available for PS4, X1 (and PC from Day One, not with a year late port) which has a good resolution spec and also its overworld is filled with things to discover.
Have anyone mentioned that the main characters in this game look like some emo band? I would be embarrased if someone caught me playing One Direction: The Game lol That Cindy character is good though. Guess I'l wait for World of Final Fantasy which looks miles better than this. Gosh I miss Nomura.
Final Fantasy XV may be a good game, but it won't be a good Witcher game.
Is Noctis even morally grey?Could we please stop comparing it to Witcher 3, please?
I have hope that it'll be better. I don't know if you experienced anything different than I did, but at the very least their TVs at their booth were atrocious. I saw the Xbox version running at the MS booth and it wasn't as bad.
I just want them to get rid of whatever AA they have that is causing those weird blocking artifacts to appear:I agree with benzy, I think that the game would look miles better with decent AA even if it doesn't hit 1080p. The Titan demo at the Paris festival two weeks ago didn't look that bad, it shows that they are still improving the performance at least.
You can see around Noctis' neck that the cloth looks almost smudged. Duscae wasn't like this.
RIP image quality dreams.
I think we will see Noctis on Dissidia and KH III.
There's a whole lot of variables in this. How often will the res drop from 1080p? If it's 1080p the majority of the time and manages to maintain as stable a framerate as the Titan demo then the drop in resolution during intensive segments is absolutely worth it. Witcher 3 on console has some pretty notable framerate dips.
Doom doesn't have a constant 1080p but it remains at that resolution for the majority of the time and I doubt anyone actually notices when it does drop in resolution to keep its framerate.
And a 900p game with good AA can still look good. The majority of the image quality problems in XV is due to its AA, not res. We've seen improvements to their temporal AA so it's just a matter of whether or not the final build can keep it up now.
![]()
Yo, Kagari! Let us know when you're gonna stream again.
You lucky I saw the edit first Falk loli dunno about you but that water seems like a huge improvement over that area in platinum demo
edit: nm wasn't wearing my glasses
I have hope that it'll be better. I don't know if you experienced anything different than I did, but at the very least their TVs at their booth were atrocious. I saw the Xbox version running at the MS booth and it wasn't as bad.
WhatTabata said that they had technical limitations by the consoles, because he had bigger plans for certain areas,
and that he would add new features to the pc version in the future. That's if they do it of course.
What
Shame they probably won't make a constant 1080p on PS4 like The Witcher 3 did, if we're going to compare large games.
Dang.Take for example the waterfalls of the e3 2013 reveal of atlissa for instance. Either said waterfall got nerfed or complete removed.
![]()
![]()
Sitting here playing B&W right now, and I'm not willing to concede that.Maybe not. But let's remember that FFXV looks quite a lot better than The Witcher 3.
Take for example the waterfalls of the e3 2013 reveal of atlissa for instance. Either said waterfall got nerfed or complete removed.
![]()
![]()
I trust absolutely nothing about that 2013 trailer to be honestWhat? The second one is CGI.
is my sarcasm meter broken?
What? The second one is CGI.
is my sarcasm meter broken?
You know if you follow me it should email you when it goes live.
He withheld that glorious golden chocobo car skin and won't let me get it here in the states does that countNow Tabata's even taking waterfalls from us. What's next?
After how many months/patches? Honest question. I played it for the first time this year on my laptop and it ran pretty smooth and looked good on my rather small 720p TV from a few feet away at least, which I'm happy to be playing FFXV on because it has natural, free 16xAA for me basically![]()
Trust the parts where it looked like an unoptimized ps3 game as those were the only parts that were actually playable at that point in time. I feel they may have raised expectations too high in terms of visuals since they showed so many screens, prototypes and demo builds running on pc.I trust absolutely nothing about that 2013 trailer to be honest
Edit:btw called it with the thread discussion lol
I'm not sure how long it took them to get there, but Witcher 3 sure as hell wasn't stable 30 fps when I played it on PS4 at release. Not even close in some areas and conditions.
Somehow, it's still my GOTG. It's almost as if occasional frame rate drops aren't the sum total of a game's potential value.
Take for example the waterfalls of the e3 2013 reveal of atlissa for instance. Either said waterfall got nerfed or complete removed.
![]()
![]()
i think one its suppossed to be like a high render/ concept art and then the final game, i doubt even the PC version will look like that, we might have to accept it and move on
i think one its suppossed to be like a high render/ concept art and then the final game, i doubt even the PC version will look like that, we might have to accept it and move on
Maybe not. But let's remember that FFXV looks quite a lot better than The Witcher 3.
Now Tabata's even taking waterfalls from us. What's next?
not only did he take the ____ he even took the word ____
I'm happy with the end result tho, it's worth mentioning different time of day also gives a city a particular feel. Might be me but the morning time looks so bright not a big fan of it.
True, and it's not just the waterfalls that are gone - the whole area looks different. We should probably just accept that the first image was concept art and they made what was possible in the second image, which in my eyes is still eye candy.