The fact that you mentioned that the pro is also not available shows that your argument is wrong. The pro is not a gimmick at all, it's the next iteration of the PS4 so being a niche gimmick really doesn't have anything to do with it.
Even at PCVR launch (when libraries were in fact, rather thin) this was simply not true.SkylineRKR said:
It mainly makes a difference to your brain - it can perceive certain elements(it's mainly near-field motion really) being less smooth than expected from "real" world. Whether that's noticeable or not will vary greatly depending on what games themselves have you do though.spazchicken said:
That is what that means unless you're suggesting that hundreds of PS4 games will not work on the PS4 Pro come launch.
What are you talking about? It means they will be supported by both as in they will both run on the pro and the base. That does not mean in any way they are required to make the pro version run any differently or better which is what I was replying too.
I'm not quite sure what you're trying to argue for, but if I think I'm reading what you're writing you don't seem to have a very good grasp of how things work in software development.
I was replying to a post that said all games will run better in pro mode and that every game coming after Sept.(which was the wrong month any way). What Im saying is that all Sony has said is all games will run on both consoles. They never said new games will have to look better on the pro.
The games have to support PS Pro. It is a requirement
Yeah I get what your saying. But I've watched probably 20 hours of PSVR coverage this week and most of it was the second screen feed. Nothing looked as terrible as Tomb Raider. Either way, my point was that even running at 1080p and a good framerate there is still room for improvement if they wish to take advantage of it.
That is the requirement. A Pro mode. Added features are a requirement.
So what you're saying is that despite additional resources being available and how these are inherently consumed due to the nature of how software routines are executed that developers are going to go out of their way to fine-tune the PS4 Pro execution path to work the same as the PS4 Regular execution path.
No they are not. Show me a source that says devs are required to make games look or run better on the pro.
Where is the source for that? It looks like an article about the Neo leaks.
But it must be them going out of their way, because the PS4 Pro has more available processing resources.
Yes the Giant Bomb report that has been 100% accurate.
Did I say that? No. I said if they get the game to run optimally on the base. i.e. 1080p 30 fps locked
That's an assumption made based off the leaked information. All those leaked slides are available to read now and they say nothing about that. As the poster above said, games will have to run at 1080p. That's the only requirement.
People need to realize that Pro compatibility means only this. Everything else is extra and not guaranteed.
In one post you're talking about the games not running well and no improvements on PS4 Pro and now you're talking about 1080p locked 30 fps.
You've seen the thread about Amy Henning right?
And?
But benny, devs are lazy as fuck and rather not do anything extra so clearly your point is moot. There is just no guarantee from the devs cuz devs don't give a fuck. Even if it's as simple as doing simply nothing on their end. There is just no guarantee that they'll even do nothing for the extra benefits that comes with Pro.
