XiaNaphryz
LATIN, MATRIPEDICABUS, DO YOU SPEAK IT
Cheerleading has been given provisional status for the Olympics:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1325748
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1325748
Might be better to target Dede Westbrook in the draft for that speed
I just can't believe that there would be some huge market for him, after just 1.5 games. But then there are no QBs in this draft, and SF, CLE, and JAX really need QBs
Cheerleading has been given provisional status for the Olympics:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1325748
Rodgers v Brady Super Bowl is still my dream game. I think it'd be an incredibly entertaining matchup to watch.
Outside the Packers, my preferred matchups are something like:
Falcons v Chiefs
Falcons v Raiders
Falcons v Broncos
Falcons v Steelers
Falcons v Texans
Falcons v Titans
Falcons v Dolphins
(Broncos being my least favorite of these)
Or maybe Tampa Bay instead of Atlanta. Hell I'd take Washington also.
The other NFC teams like the Vikings, Seahawks, Giants, and Cowboys can fuck off.
http://www.cbssports.com/college-fo...-didnt-uncover-dede-westbrook-arrest-history/The Tulsa World report included details of two incidents, both of which occurred in Westbrook's hometown of Cameron, Texas. According to police reports, Westbrook was accused of throwing the mother of his two children to the ground in 2012, when he was 18, and biting the same woman's arm and punching her with a closed fist in 2013.
Neither incident resulted in a conviction for Westbrook.
"There were some disagreements in the past that were cleared up years ago," Westbrook said in a statement to Tulsa World. "We have resolved our issues and are focused on the future."
I kinda would like to see Washington vs. Patriots just because that'd be the most fitting Super Bowl for Trump's America.
Cheerleading has been given provisional status for the Olympics:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1325748
I'm ready to skip to it.
Way better than watching the Cowboys win an Owl.
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1325665
This looks fantastic
In an age where we don't really get these types of arcade sports video games anymore, I'll be all over this on Day 1.
And DRCRemember when the Cardinals traded a 2nd round pick for Kevin Kolb?
Is there anyone who even believes that Dak is better than Romo?
The decision imo was always better QB vs. Hot hand.
Have I said how much I love that Dallas is sticking with Dak?
let's gooooI'm in for beer mode. Me and Greg v the world!
There isn't. It's just Mike Lombardi swinging off Belichick's nuts again.
Between Mallet and Cassel We've seen definitively what Patriots QB castoffs do in the wild.
A single WR isn't going to do it though. You need a #1 and a #2. If you think Jordan Matthews can be a #2, which he probably could, you need a slot receiver to replace him there. I would draft a WR in the 1st/2nd round, but I wouldn't draft two WR in the first four rounds at all. Need CB and LB to complete the defense.
Houston should've held off and traded for Bradford.I hope teams have learned from the Dak/Oswillier offseason. Don't go pay for unproven guys when there a bunch of unproven guys in the middle of the draft
Well I was making that with the assumption we'd also target a WR in FA, which I think we'll definitely do. So do that, draft another WR and go from there. Not a ton of WR talent in the draft.
I think our LB corps is alright, Bradham is good and hicks is a beast. Kendricks has been mediocre but we're in nickel a lot anyway so that's not as big a deal. I really think we should target two CBs in the first four rounds, maybe even 1st/2nd depending how the board shakes out. I think Foreman might be available in the 3rd as a good RB, and there's lower level WRs to take in the later rounds
Houston should've held off and traded for Bradford.
Turf toe is no joke.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/...eceiver-julio-jones-sprained-toe-not-turf-toeAtlanta Falcons coach Dan Quinn changed the wording on star wide receiver Julio Jones' injury Wednesday, referring to it as a "sprain" rather than turf toe.
"Julio has a toe sprain, it's not turf toe," Quinn said in an interview on Atlanta's 92.9 The Game radio. "But he does have a toe sprain. For him, we're going to take him day to day. He'll maybe do some of the walkthrough today, but he won't participate in the full-team activity at practice. So, he's still dealing with that sprain. It's definitely improving. But in terms of full-speed cutting on it, we're not there yet."
At a news conference on Wednesday afternoon, Quinn was asked about redefining Jones' injury status.
"Honestly, just for me, I didn't have enough information medically to speak on it," he said. "That certainly would have been a good thing to clear up last week, so I apologize for that."
Quinn said the injury isn't a long-term problem and that he expects Jones to be back shortly.
Quinn initially called Jones' injury "turf toe" after Jones was injured a few weeks ago against the Kansas City Chiefs. Turf toe is a sprain of the ligaments surrounding the big toe.
A sprain, however, could suggest a mild sprain to the metatarsophalangeal joint (big toe). Medical experts say such a mild sprain typically calls for one to four weeks of recovery.
Jones missed the game Sunday against the Los Angeles Rams.
During the radio interview, Quinn also reiterated that wide receiver Mohamed Sanu (groin) will return to practice on Wednesday. Quinn did not offer any details on the status of cornerback Jalen Collins, who was scheduled to get his knee checked Monday.
Houston should've held off and traded for Bradford.
Houston should've held off and traded for Bradford.
Garrapplo is GOAT material. Had like a 130 qb rating his first two games. Can Brock do that combing two games together?I hope teams have learned from the Dak/Oswillier offseason. Don't go pay for unproven guys when there a bunch of unproven guys in the middle of the draft
They're not THAT stupid.
Are you? Bradford is several orders of magnitude better then Brock. There is no comparing them, plus Bradford wouldnt have cost such an insane contract. There has never been a more clear case of a team making the worng choice in NFL history.
Are you? Bradford is several orders of magnitude better then Brock. There is no comparing them, plus Bradford wouldnt have cost such an insane contract. There has never been a more clear case of a team making the worng choice in NFL history.
Kaep lol
Kaep lol
I keep going back and forth on writing 'Trash' on the trash can.The Browns one got me lol
You're right. Bradford is several multiple times that zero Brock Osweiller.
Get a single server ninja they work really well.Alright old GAF. Anyone use a portable/single serving blender/mixer/juicer whatever?
Something like so:
![]()
Will probably just buy that one, but I don't really know what I'm looking for with these things.
I keep going back and forth on writing 'Trash' on the trash can.
It's very political cartoon, but something about it makes it extra funny.
Would the Texans be a better team this year with Bradford or not? Would Bradford have cost them less money?
I don't think Bradford was on the block when they signed Assweiler.
For a football team, 72 million dollars is far easier to replace than 2 first round picks.
For a football team, 72 million dollars is far easier to replace than 2 first round picks.
Thank you. Been saying it wince the signing money can be replaced , draft picks are gone forever.
Also the cap should be around $170 million next year, large jump from this year
For a football team, 72 million dollars is far easier to replace than 2 first round picks.
I get that you and Pep are drinking this guys Kool Aid but Bradford's ceiling is incredibly low. This great QB has never even started a playoff game.
Thank you. Been saying it wince the signing money can be replaced , draft picks are gone forever.
Also the cap should be around $170 million next year, large jump from this year
I got that exact one last yearAlright old GAF. Anyone use a portable/single serving blender/mixer/juicer whatever?
Something like so:
![]()
Nah, the LB corps is not as good as you think. Hicks would be better as a Will than he is as a Mike. He's a good Mike, but he's got such play making ability that I think he'd crush on the weak side. Need a bigger body at Mike. Bradham is fine, but who knows if he'll be suspended next season due to his pending legal issues. Kendricks isn't really ideal in this defense and should probably be traded. He's a great pass rusher but his tackling and coverage can be suspect at times. More to the point, there's little depth at that position. If they can get a solid MLB and move Hicks to Will they will have an outstanding set of LBs.
I am iffy on getting two CBs in the first four rounds because the offense could use some help. WR in the second, and RB in the third could work. They do have two fourth round picks though, so if you're going CB in the 1st I wouldn't mind picking up a second one in the fourth. It's hard to speculate at this point.