2San said:
Oh you didn't do research so why would a female protagonist be better again?
All right, this is going to be tricky people, I need to work backwards. I've annotated these quotes so that others can play along!
You said :
"
There is no indication that a game with a female lead will sell better." (True, but the article actually deals with some dubious research that suggests they wouldn't do well.)
I replied :
"If they aren't a stupid business they could do a little research (apparently not the kind they've been doing up till now though) and understand their main audience." (See, here I'm mentioning that their research is dubious).
You said :
"
Maybe they did?" (Apparently, you ignored the part of the article where the research was considered dubious. That's cool).
And your research is based on feelings? There is no proof that a female protagonist will sell better. Nor is there that male protagonist will sell better. So can't Activision do whatever they fuck they want? If you haven't noticed they aren't really open to innovation and just want to make money.
(I've apparently done research [not true, sadly]. You bring up the lack of proof research thing again, then you ask for Activision to be allowed to do what the fuck they want [which, ironically involves telling games publishers that they can't have female leads and makes your statement
2San said:
I'd rather have the creators themselves grow up, then others forcing their views on them.
very ironic.] You also wisely remind me that they are a business).
I reply :
"I've done research now? Sheeiit I should get me a grant or sumthin'." (Some light sarcasm, such is the curse of being British).
Then we finally get to your above claim :
"Oh you didn't do research so why would a female protagonist be better again?" (Once again you assert that I've claimed something which I never, ever claimed. Indeed, you may have missed the point by several miles)