Compared to Rogue One, I totally agreeTFA was such a cowardly movie
Compared to Rogue One, I totally agreeTFA was such a cowardly movie
He did it for episode 6 though
Starkiller Base really renders their sacrifice meaningless. I mean a whole fucking system wiped out by the same basic concept.
God that was such a shitty idea. TFA was such a cowardly movie, just take concepts from the original trilogy and turn them up to 11.
The Rebellion would have been destroyed if they hadn't stolen the plans. Hardly meaningless.Starkiller Base really renders their sacrifice meaningless. I mean a whole fucking system wiped out by the same basic concept.
God that was such a shitty idea. TFA was such a cowardly movie, just take concepts from the original trilogy and turn them up to 11.
This keeps flying above a lot of people's heads.
I wonder why.
Not just that. It is also weird that you have a whole movie about how difficult it was to obtain the plans and how many sacrifices were made and that you wouldn't have any chance against this super weapon otherwise and then in TFA all it takes is a 2 minute brainstorming meeting at the planning table and an ex-janitor with some "inside" knowledge and e voila: the planet sized hyperspace shooting super weapon is toast.
Starkiller Base really renders their sacrifice meaningless. I mean a whole fucking system wiped out by the same basic concept.
TFA was such a cowardly movie,[
I know. That made more sense to me as a visual shorthand so people seeing it for the first time could see him next to Obi Wan, dressed like Obi Wan, and go "Oh, that's Luke's dad before he became Vader", and not have to have force ghost Fester Adams standing there.He did it for episode 6 though
Absolutely disagree.
Rogue One was the raison d'etre for the rebellion having any shot at success.
The future that led to The Force Awakens would have been hugely different had they failed to secure the Death Star plans.
You can always look to future movies for shit that should've been really obvious in hindsight. The rebels were never really in danger in ANH if they had enough time to plan an attack on the Death Star, because the very next movie shows that roughly the same amount of time would've been sufficient for them to evacuate their base.
Incredible film, and incredible effects work.
Assuming it was CGI, the scene with the shadow of the Deathstar's dish eclipsing the Star Destroyers as it passed across the sun marks the point where CGI has finally eclipsed model work. The later scene of one ISD "decapitating" another just seals the deal on the front.
Tarkin was breathtaking work, to the point my partner didn't realise it was CGi until I told him that Peter Cushing had died 20 years ago. Leia wasn't as good, but good enough for the quick shot they used.
I do feel like this film could have used an opening text crawl more than any Star Wars film since the original, the lack of an intro makes the first 30 minutes or so feel awkward and jumpy, and that's for someone like me who at least goes in knowing the basic premise of this story and an appreciation of the wider universe the story is set in.
But all of that is left behind by the next couple of hours, which are just incredible. This is right up there with Empire as one of my favourite Star Wars films. I was sceptical of these spin offs but Disney is now batting 1000 in my eyes, so I welcome the next few decades of Star Wars milking with open arms
They're weren't nearly as prepared to cut and run from Yavin as they seemingly were to split from Hoth. There's no indication they even had the ground to space ion cannon or a huge shield generator. I don't think they could have evacuated in 30 minutes.
This movie was the opposite of TFA. Where TFA played it too safe, Rogue One was risky and it paid off.
The TFA hate 1 year later is real, and justified. Revenge of the Sith is better than The Force Awakens.
Revenge of the Sith has its only female character sit around, give birth, then die from sadness.
No.
The 'hate' is a vocal minority. Rogue One did take more risks but TFA had to be a crowd pleaser to get people back on board and act as an introduction to new fans. I saw people with no interest in SW before get excited about the franchise because of it.I was thrilled that they killed all of the main characters at the end. Towards the finish of the movie I was disappointed in seeing all of the supporting characters go down while the main heroes will end up surviving somehow, so I was shocked that they elected to kill them too. When has there been a blockbuster movie in which almost all of the characters we meet die? Yet, it was still a happy ending.
This movie was the opposite of TFA. Where TFA played it too safe, Rogue One was risky and it paid off.
The TFA hate 1 year later is real, and justified. Revenge of the Sith is better than The Force Awakens.
The 'hate' is a vocal minority. Rogue One did take more risks but TFA had to be a crowd pleaser to get people back on board and act as an introduction to new fans. I saw people with no interest in SW before get excited about the franchise.
The other option is a badly written female version of Kirito from Sword Art Online.
Both suck.
Rogue One did it the way it's supposed to be done IMHO.
TFA hate lol
Anyway just saw this again and I'm backpedaling hard.
I have no idea who that is. You think Rey is as bad as a character as the way Padme was treated in episode 3? Get out of here with that nonsense.
I never said they were equal treatment.
I said both suck.
JOIN ME, BROTHERRRR
All Star Wars movie actually suck.
Leia knew the empire was tracking them before they ever reached Yavin IV.
They had much longer than 30 minutes to evacuate - at least enough time to analyze the plans and identify the weakness.
Seriously?
It was very easy to predict that Yavin IV, Tarkin, Leia, Vader, Mon Mothma, and Bail Organa would all get screen time, even though technically none of them needed to for the story to work. And beyond that they also brought back iconic pilot faces and voices from the original film.
Likewise, I think most people predicted that the entire Rogue One crew would die, and that the plot starting with Jyn's father being conscripted into helping build the Death Star meant that he was going to sabotage it by slipping in the fatal design flaw without them noticing. And that Vader would kill a bunch of people at the end.
They even borrowed from fucking Spaceballs with the hand scanner and the depiction of the shield gate, neither of which were a thing in other Star Wars films.
It was nice to see Rogue One do stuff that The Force Awakens kinda ignored (like space battles), but Rogue One was a stupidly safe movie.
For other films, true. But it's never been done in a SW film before. Making the rebels far less squeaky clean than they appeared in the OT was another interesting choice.This was also a story where the protagonists could die. I guess TFA would have been less safe if they killed all the new main characters despite it being the first part of a new trilogy. I don't think killing main characters makes something "risky." The movie wasn't that different from other installments.
Uh, you implied it.
The TFA hate 1 year later is real, and justified. Revenge of the Sith is better than The Force Awakens.
Revenge of the Sith has its only female character sit around, give birth, then die from sadness.
No.
Compared to Rogue One, I totally agree
From a women representation perspective, yes, Padme is much much worse. Insulting even.
We can agree to that.
But Rey is a character that everyone loves and that excels at everything because "mysterious past" or "The Force". To me that sucks too. Not as bad but still sucks
The difference is that Rey has 2 movies worth of reveals to get better, Padme is pretty much done.
To me, Jyn was great from start to finnish. A perfect balance of talents and flaws. My only complain is her little speech. She moved from not giving a fuck to hope speeches a bit fast for me
Rey is also portrayed by an actress with great charisma and is the clear focus of the film. Rey isn't just a great character because of "mysterious past" or "the Force." She is well written and well performed and the movie centers on her. Nothing about that sucks.
I wasn't privy to any Rogue One storylines prior to the release so everything that happened in the movie was unexpected to me. When I saw TFA I immediately thought to myself that I had just watched a rehash of A New Hope. There was so little originality in the plot that I was worried about the future of SW movies, that they were going to be cookie-cutter, conservative blockbusters much like many of the Marvel movies now.
For other films, true. But it's never been done in a SW film before. Making the rebels far less squeaky clean than they appeared in the OT was another interesting choice.
Rey is also portrayed by an actress with great charisma and is the clear focus of the film. Rey isn't just a great character because of "mysterious past" or "the Force." She is well written and well performed and the movie centers on her. Nothing about that sucks.
I'm probably late but after seeing a lot of people complaining about this they forget that Tatooine is a planet located in the outer rim, most of the time it was ignored by the republic and the galatic empire. The people living there probably don't know what a Jedi looked like because they have been considered extinct for 20 years. Obi Wan's robes look very similar to the robes most people use there too and even if he drew his lightsaber, it was inside a ghetto cantina were it appears killing is something normal, he didn't use any force powers so they may as well thought he bought/found the lightsaber. Also, the Empire wasn't on the planet before and they weren't on a Jedi hunt either, they were looking for the droids so they can conclude that is just an old guy killing another guy with a weird sword.2. Again, I find it unlikely that no-one in that bar would see the significance of the Saber, 'just another weapon', especially as the Jedi are treated as legend. I can't see a Saber sighting getting the same level of indifference as someone pulling out a blaster, because I would expect most people in such a setting to be carrying one. How many people on Tattooine would be carrying a Lightsaber except Ben Kenobi at that point? That's just not 'another' weapon that someone would randomly pull out, and I imagine the saber is a 'known' weapon, but not one you'd expect to see unless the wielder is a force user. No-one gave much reaction to it in the actual movie, true, but again that needs to be taken in the context of the story and lore being fleshed out. Yes, alot of people wear robes, not 'those' robes that are directly shown in the PT as being Jedi attire.
Using in-universe logic, someone who looks like this and wielding that...
![]()
in a public setting on a desert with obvious imperial presence should be setting off all kinds of sirens.
Don't bother. Really isn't worth the home arguing with the idiots who think Rey is a Mary Sue,
She's pretty much the only reason I care about Episode VIII. I like John Boyega, but the way Finn was written in the film just screamed "trying really hard to be funny and hip". Outside of Star Wars, it would have been completely fine, but it just seemed really forced in that. Hell, his character would have fit better in one of the more recent Star Trek films (which were more like Star Wars anyway...).
Don't bother. Really isn't worth the home arguing with the idiots who think Rey is a Mary Sue,
A totally changed ending could hint at a fundamental misunderstanding between director and studio, but rather than a sop to a playing-it-safe company that wanted a softer conclusion, Rogue Ones ending was tweaked to make it darker. Edwards says the original script had the main characters survive, rather than die during the battle of Scarif not because he wanted to keep them alive, but purely because he had assumed Disney wouldnt let him kill them off.
Speaking in the now-pulled podcast (which Empire says will reappear online on December 26th), Edwards says that after reading the script, the production staff saw only one way out for Jyn and friends. Everyone read that and there was this feeling of like, Theyve got to die, right? And everyone was like, Yeah, can we? But with the famously family-friendly Disney in charge, Edwards originally looked for another, lighter, more survivable ending.
That was, until Disney gave him the green light to kill everyone. We thought we werent going to be allowed to but Kathy [Kennedy, president of Lucasfilm] and everyone at Disney were like Yeah it makes sense. I guess they have to because theyre not in A New Hope, Edwards told Empire. From then on, he had his license to kill, and the survivor ending wasnt even filmed. I kept waiting for someone to go, You know what? Could we just film an extra scene where we see Jyn and Cassian, theyre okay and theyre on another planet? Edwards says. And it never came. No one ever gave us that note, so we got to do it.
its a good example of a studio giving a story and a director space to work on their own terms: rather than a change for the worse, the tweak to the script actually brought Rogue One closer to Edwards original vision. The result is a gut punch that works as a powerful ending something pop culture has been particularly bad at lately.
Like, even if she were one, I wish they'd atleast acknowledge that she is still a fun and compelling character. Even if you think having that much talent may be bad writing, we have plenty of other characters who are just great at shit with weak justification for why they have those abilities. The entire superhero genre is filled with people who are all super strong, super smart, super capable people and there isn't much justification to it than that they were born that way, or worked hard to be that way, or had some plot device fall on them to make them that way. Why is James Bond able to do pull the insane shit he does? Why is the Doctor able to outsmart everyone? How does has Indiana Jones been able to survive constant encounters with ridiculous opposition. Why is Anakin Skywalker so fucking special beyond that "the force chose him".
It's fun to watch awesome people do awesome shit. There is an argument to be made for why Rey isn't a Mary Sue, but I'm just sick of the presumptuous argument that if a character is talented, they must be poorly written. It's bullshit. It's not some writing crutch to make your character a cool, interesting person who is capable of doing insane stuff. Hell, literature might as well be founded on those kinds of characters.
I think a slight difference is other characters fail in a charming way but succeed in the end against the odds whereas she is charming but doesn't quite have the same struggle Indiana Jones and the like have that makes them appealing except at the end of Force Awakens her just hanging on while struggling. I don't really mind her character because she is fun as well but she was a bit one note for most of the film.
I do think it's a little unfair to knock her that much because male heroe crutches is oh, he drinks and gets battered which isn't great in comparison.