Comparison of Obama and Trump inaugurations: Trump turnout way down

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://mobile.twitter.com/dberrygannett/status/822562690988208131

B1Ss5YV.jpg

Sure it did bro

4kbU0Lo.png

Cleveland Browns' home games look more lively than this.
 
Well, one could argue that many of the many of the Trump supporters are lower income people from central America, while many of the Obama supporters are centered around the coasts. A lot easier for people living on the east coast to attend such an event than people from the middle of America.
 
Well, actually, his turnout is slightly lower than Bush's SECOND inauguration. You know, the one after he started a war the public hated him for.

And he still had slightly more numbers than Trump.

I mean, it doesn't matter, you are right. Just saying. This is not "normal" numbers for a first inauguration.

We're getting a little revisionist here - Bush's approval rating was close to 60% at the time of his second inauguration. And the turnout for the second was actually higher than the first. In terms of your claim about "normal" for a first inauguration, from PolitiFact:

Barack Obama, 2013: 1 million

Barack Obama, 2009: 1.8 million (generally considered a record for people on the National Mall)

George W. Bush, 2005: 400,000

George W. Bush, 2001: 300,000

Bill Clinton, 1997: 250,000

Bill Clinton, 1993: 800,000

George H.W. Bush, 1989: 300,000

Ronald Reagan, 1985: 140,000 tickets sold, but record cold moved the swearing-in ceremony indoors

Ronald Reagan, 1981: 10,000, according to the New York Times. This was the first year the ceremony was performed on the west side of the Capitol.

According to WaPo's guy they use, his first guess for Trump is a third of Obama, so around 600,000. Miles away from Obama, and less than Clinton, but significantly higher than any Republican.
 
My favorite thing that's come out of this is Trump "supporters" saying no ones there, cause they're at their jobs. What you guys been complaining about for the last decade then if you have jobs?
 
It was bizarre seeing a couple of people lie about it here. "I just saw it live on TV. It's filled in."

As if we weren't watching ourselves.

Well they might have just seen the low angle shot which gave the illusion it was packed. But the ones who saw that pic with the timestamp and still fought are lost causes.
 
Was down there in 2009 however did not make the actually inaugration. Too much partying went to a party at a large three floor warehouse arrived 8pm left at 4am free bevedere for first couple hours everyone was there from jayz, beyonce, jeezy, bow wow, ti, akon it was a crazy night. Our car got broken into the previous night so it put a damper on the trip but it ended well. It was about ten of us from ny, texas and Tennessee.

Edit found a vid of the party and this was just the 2nd floor

https://youtu.be/9NIACFqoHAY
 
well they showed up at the polls

Sure 60 million + voted for both candidates but it's still embarrassing given there was supposedly going to be a record crowd coming to DC. At least 1-2% of folks who voted for Trump should have been excited to make this once in a lifetime event. Americans are staying home and being lazy instead of making America great again.
 
Obama's inauguration was historic. People came from all around the world. He was a global phenomenon and a cultural/charismatic icon the likes of which comes across once or twice in a lifetime in the political sphere.

Why anyone would compare the crowds to Trump's inauguration is beyond me. Hillary's would have been huge because of similar historic significance, even with her pathetic approval ratings. But you know what, guys? She lost. And staring at pics of 2008 and saying "we had a bigger crowd" isn't going to change that, sorry.
 
Obama's inauguration was historic. People came from all around the world. He was a global phenomenon and a cultural/charismatic icon the likes of which comes across once or twice in a lifetime in the political sphere.

Why anyone would compare the crowds to Trump's inauguration is beyond me. Hillary's would have been huge because of similar historic significance, even with her pathetic approval ratings. But you know what, guys? She lost. And staring at pics of 2008 and saying "we had a bigger crowd" isn't going to change that, sorry.

Because we just want to be petty as fuck. That's why. We have had to deal with there BS for years and now its payback.
 
Obama's inauguration was historic. People came from all around the world. He was a global phenomenon and a cultural/charismatic icon the likes of which comes across once or twice in a lifetime in the political sphere.

Why anyone would compare the crowds to Trump's inauguration is beyond me. Hillary's would have been huge because of similar historic significance, even with her pathetic approval ratings. But you know what, guys? She lost. And staring at pics of 2008 and saying "we had a bigger crowd" isn't going to change that, sorry.
Trump has constantly said his win was historic and how he got huge crowds together. But on his actual inauguration, he couldn't.
 
I don't know why people are acting like this was a surprise. The Obama inauguration was a historic, once in a lifetime event for a president that was liked on both sides of the fence pretty well.

Trump is just another white dude and he has his supporters but it's not even comparsble in terms of significance and Obama really inspired people in huge numbers to get out and support him.
 
Obama's inauguration was historic. People came from all around the world. He was a global phenomenon and a cultural/charismatic icon the likes of which comes across once or twice in a lifetime in the political sphere.

Why anyone would compare the crowds to Trump's inauguration is beyond me. Hillary's would have been huge because of similar historic significance, even with her pathetic approval ratings. But you know what, guys? She lost. And staring at pics of 2008 and saying "we had a bigger crowd" isn't going to change that, sorry.

I mean the POTUS wants to talk about crowds. We are letting him set the agenda. We wouldnt want to disrespect him.
 
Also want to add that by disrespecting everyone and calling the american people enemies in one of his tweets didn't motivate people to attend.
 
Obama's inauguration was historic. People came from all around the world. He was a global phenomenon and a cultural/charismatic icon the likes of which comes across once or twice in a lifetime in the political sphere.

Why anyone would compare the crowds to Trump's inauguration is beyond me. Hillary's would have been huge because of similar historic significance, even with her pathetic approval ratings. But you know what, guys? She lost. And staring at pics of 2008 and saying "we had a bigger crowd" isn't going to change that, sorry.

When you're done spinning and have a chance to read the full thread, you'll find out that his numbers were down from Bill Clinton and George W Bush's as well.
 
I don't know why people are acting like this was a surprise. The Obama inauguration was a historic, once in a lifetime event for a president that was liked on both sides of the fence pretty well.

Trump is just another white dude and he has his supporters but it's not even comparsble in terms of significance and Obama really inspired people in huge numbers to get out and support him.
Why are blind idiots acting like it isn't true then?
 
LMAO! Fucking Stewart and Colbert had a bigger crowd..orange fuck..

Isnt DC is a predominately liberal city? Who the hell travels cross country to be at a presidential inauguration.

Plenty, and in bus loads. Churches organize trips as well. Folks even skip town and rent their houses out because they don't want to be around for all the out of town travelers and hoopla..
 
I'd make the argument that so many Trump voters weren't diehard supporters like people assume they are. Probably like half of the people voted for him just casually didn't want to vote for a woman, or thought they were voting between "two evils".
 
I'd make the argument that so many Trump voters weren't diehard supporters like people assume they are. Probably like half of the people voted for him just casually didn't want to vote for a woman, or thought they were voting between "two evils".

So you are saying a large swathe of his voters are sexists and ignorant because they didn't care about his policies but rather vote for him because its a white guy? Yep, that does sound like the reasonable conclusion.

I hope none of this information was tweeted out by a government organization or they would have their twitter privileges taken away like the Park Service after they dare state that no one showed up to the concert Thursday compared to Obama's even 2013.
 
Isnt DC is a predominately liberal city? Who the hell travels cross country to be at a presidential inauguration.

You'd be surprised. I was taking the train up yesterday to go back to school, and it was packed before we got up to DC, but once we stopped there, just about the entire train emptied out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom