CNBC: US military has launched more than 50 missiles aimed at Syria: NBC News

Status
Not open for further replies.

Loudninja

Member
Because if Trump was going to go through all this trouble, go around Congress, go around our allies, and spend 70+ million to send a "warning" he could have disabled the damn base.

Now Syria is digging their heels and Russia's getting more involved.
Yep.
 
You think there's less likelihood that there's no collusion than there is that Putin and Trump together orchestrated a gas attack on Syrian civilians in order to give Trump public support for a missile strike on a Russian ally, with Russians present at the site of the strike, in order to provide cover for their secret collusion?

Absolutely. The House and Senate are investigating it. The leaks from the Intelligence Community already all but confirm collusion. Clearly something was going on between the Russians and Trump's campaign...
 

marrec

Banned
Because if Trump was going to go through all this trouble, go around Congress, go around our allies, and spend 70+ million to send a "warning" he could have disabled the damn base.

Now Syria is digging their heels and Russia's getting more involved.

Russian involvement wasn't an issue for the Trump administration up until 2 weeks ago. The chemical attack changed policy quite quickly... so it's hard to know where the Trump administration stands now. I don't think this is some grand strategy, I literally think this is just Trump and Mattis wanting to respond to the chemical attack and choosing to do so in as limited a way as possible.

I don't think it's about pressuring Assad or Russia into withdrawing or demureing.
 

Jackpot

Banned
Why are people questioning it was the Syrian Armed Forces that used sarin gas?

Does ISIS/rebels have an Air Force all of a sudden?

Wow, some people are actually saying that Assad wasn't the one ho used the chemical attacks and could be any of the neighboring countries.

WTF?

I should stop reading comments under news article :(

The current Russian deflection line is "why would crazy, psychotic people do something that shows how crazy and psychotic they are? Must be a false flag!"
 
First action of Trump I support. If Obama did it after the very first zarin attack, Siria could be at peace now. Divided on several states, probably, but at peace. Red lines mean nothing if you are not ready to act and your "partner" knows it.

Some of you have no idea what you're talking about or why thing happen (or don't happen). Spoiler: Hypocrites. Hypocrites everywhere.

Anyways... I'm fucking floored by how some of the most toxic Trump supporters are reacting, seeing it in real time in person... Those most racist motherfuckers over here saying "He bombed the country, unjustly". It's like I'm taking crazy pills here.

Of course, you also have a couple folks on some "bomb them all" (essentially kill all the brown people ), who think that's the endgame here, "That's how you do it!". I expect that.

So, both are misreading what's happening, and both are still horrible human beings for slightly different reasons. I have no interest telling the former he's off the mark here.
 

ISee

Member
So as I understand it, Syria is a no win situation. Either you take Assad out of power and ISIS ends up taking over the country or you attack ISIS and Assad continues to kill citizens who oppose him?

It is even much more complicated then this. There are rebels that fight against putin and assad, of course they are called is terrorist by the Syrian and Russian media. Then there are IS troops still holding some territory. Then there are kurds in the north which were supplied and trained by the germans which are supposed to fight the IS, but are right now busy fighting of a push by the Turkish military because they are terrorist in the eyes of erdogan. Then we have turkey which has German troops stationed at its border to Syria because they asked for german anti missile defence. And now we have the u.s. bombing Assad. It is a mess.
If assad falls we will have several parties rushing out for control while the kurds will try to found their own state while erdogan would try to stop them with force.
 
As much as I dislike this government at the moment, this was America pushing for Russia to hold up there end of the 2013 agreement that stated Syria would dismantle and dispose of there chemical weapon stockpile. Obviously that didn't happen.

Also this was a warning shot for sure, they didn't hit any key structures or even the runway. They hit a cafeteria/classroom, some busted MIG-23 fighters and a radar station.
 

Sijil

Member
Lol

Funny seeing Israel and Saudi Arabia on the same side. For once!

Yeah, two nations guilty of mass genocide, one in Gaza and the other in Yemen, preaching morality, laughable. KSA literally bombed a funeral house killing hundreds and got away clean, guess it pays to be an American ally.
 
The point of this wasn't to destroy the strip or the fleet. It was a warning. How many times does this need to be brought up?

Warning's don't bring back the dead, a warning made after the Trump admin declared they had no intention of a "regime change". Trump to Assad: "Do your thing"... Oops.

Regardless, Syria took this as a slap on the wrist, and will continue their atrocities, while the US does the same.
 
Yeah, two nations guilty of mass genocide, one in Gaza and the other in Yemen, preaching morality. KSA literally bombed a funeral house killing hundreds and got away clean, guess it pays to be an American ally.

what SA is doing to civilians in Yemen is bad and should be condemned but let's not kid ourselves in believing Iran hasn't done worse kiddo

but then again stating this isn't going to change your mind knowing you
 

royalan

Member
A warning is sending a handful of tomahawks to strike a strategic target at the base. That let's them know who they're fucking with.

Letting 58 tomahawks fly...To not even damage the base in any meaningful way and only take out a few planes. That's just dumb.
 

Famassu

Member
Guardian has some pretty decent catchup articles

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...cal-weapons-attack-what-we-know-khan-sheikhun

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/syria-chemical-attack-idlib-province

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...oked-inside-syrian-town-after-chemical-attack

The Times but it requires a sub

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...ons-from-un-inspectors-experts-fear-hnn7ht6fz

Or the BBC

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-39513193

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39531045 (just posted this in its own post below)

I mean you probably are just best to Google and read multiple sources. A lot of this comes from visual feedback/evidence as well. People, including children, were dying from chemical weapons, that's not disputable. It was civilian towns as well.
Thanks. Will read those all but already based on TheGuardian's article, seems pretty evident that it couldn't have just been some air strike with regular bombs hitting supposed chemical weapon storages that caused whatever poison it was to spread to such large areas.
 

necrosis

Member
been thinking a lot on this

provided that we aren't unilaterally deciding to put boots on the ground or something along those lines, i can support this

fuck assad and fuck weapons of mass destruction
 

marrec

Banned
Warning's don't bring back the dead, a warning made after the Trump admin declared they had no intention of a "regime change". Trump to Assad: "Do your thing"... Oops.

Regardless, Syria took this as a slap on the wrist, and will continue their atrocities, while the US does the same.

We'll see. Trump has established that he is willing to use direct military force in Syria based on Assad's actions, so it will certainly give them pause. The implication is that if there is another chemical attack the resulting retaliation from the US would be more broad and effective.
 

Lan Dong Mik

And why would I want them?
Wow I thought for sure this was an act of war on our part. We bombed a country's military base and killed Syrian soldiers. I guess I just don't really get how it works, but I thought for sure Trump started WW3 last night due to the fact that Russian soldiers were also stationed there.
 

Sijil

Member
what SA is doing to civilians in Yemen is bad and should be condemned but let's not kid ourselves in believing Iran hasn't done worse kiddo

but then again stating this isn't going to change your mind knowing you

First of all, I'm probably older than you.

Second, the difference being, Saudis can kill all they want and get away with it, I don't remember the Iranians bombing funeral houses, if they were I'm pretty sure they US would be sending Tomahawk warning shots in their direction as we speak.
 

ironcreed

Banned
A warning is sending a handful of tomahawks to strike a strategic target at the base. That let's them know who they're fucking with.

Letting 58 tomahawks fly...To not even damage the base in any meaningful way and only take out a few planes. That's just dumb.

But I'm sure his hands still feel much bigger now.

WhDxv1i.png
 

Vagabundo

Member
We'll see. Trump has established that he is willing to use direct military force in Syria based on Assad's actions, so it will certainly give them pause. The implication is that if there is another chemical attack the resulting retaliation from the US would be more broad and effective.

Yeah the attack was pretty conservative, probably because Russian were close. It was intended to be a show of force and send a message. I suppose Mattis would have brought this plan to Trump?
 

zethren

Banned
Wow I thought for sure this was an act of war on our part. We bombed a country's military base and killed Syrian soldiers. I guess I just don't really get how it works, but I thought for sure Trump started WW3 last night due to the fact that Russian soldiers were also stationed there.

Russia can't really afford to get into something like WWIII right now. Depending on the escalation from here, tensions could and probably will certainly rise, but jumping to the WWIII conclusion at this time is premature. There's too much at stake for...basically everyone.
 

marrec

Banned
Wow I thought for sure this was an act of war on our part. We bombed a country's military base and killed Syrian soldiers. I guess I just don't really get how it works, but I thought for sure Trump started WW3 last night due to the fact that Russian soldiers were also stationed there.

Ya it doesn't really work that way. The US has a long history of firing missiles into other sovereign nations. Mind, Syria is more of a powder keg than others in the past, but a limited strike like this was never likely to start WW3... on it's own.
 
First of all, I'm probably older than you.

Second, the difference being, Saudis can kill all they want and get away with it, I don't remember the Iranians bombing funeral houses, if they were I'm pretty sure they US would be sending Tomahawk warning shots in their direction as we speak.

No Iran just massacred hundred of thousands of people in Syria and Iraq

you just need to look at the Syria live map to see the never ending list for Iranian atrocities

plus US ones and Russian ones, etc...

the Saudis strikes in Yemen also should be condemned but compared to those three they are 4th place
 

Audioboxer

Member
Thanks. Will read those all but already based on TheGuardian's article, seems pretty evident that it couldn't have just been some air strike with regular bombs hitting supposed chemical weapon storages that caused whatever poison it was to spread to such large areas.

The BBC article I posted is a lot more damning

Mr Trump's National Security Adviser, H R McMaster, said measures had also been put in place to avoid hitting what were believed to be stores of Sarin at Shayrat, so that it "would not be ignited and cause a hazard to civilians or anyone else".

"Obviously, the regime will maintain the certain capacity to commit mass murder with chemical weapons, we think, beyond this particular airfield. But it was aimed at this particular airfield for a reason, because we could trace this murderous attack back to that facility."

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39531045

As above they also still believe Sarin could be at the airbase.

There comes a point when you have to ask yourself why you're airing on the side of Assad/Russian propaganda in the face of all the evidence (not necessarily yourself, just asking for reading/source material).
 
We'll see. Trump has established that he is willing to use direct military force in Syria based on Assad's actions, so it will certainly give them pause. The implication is that if there is another chemical attack the resulting retaliation from the US would be more broad and effective.

Assad doesn't need chemicals to wage war on his own people.
 
Watching the media trip over themselves to praise trump now like none of the prior issues even happened is just extremely disheartening.
 

TyrantII

Member
Ya it doesn't really work that way. The US has a long history of firing missiles into other sovereign nations. Mind, Syria is more of a powder keg than others in the past, but a limited strike like this was never likely to start WW3... on it's own.

Strike wasn't, but say 20 Russian troops were killed?

Tensions spiraling out of control have a long history and is the reason for calculated responses and for the geopolitical institutions built after WWII.

Does anyone think this administration has any regard for either?
 

marrec

Banned
Assad doesn't need chemicals to wage war on his own people.

Of course not. I don't think Trump cares much about that however.

Like I said earlier in the thread, it'll be interesting to see what Trump's response is when Assad barrel bombs another hospital.

Strike wasn't, but say 20 Russian troops were killed?

Tensions spiraling out of control have a long history and is the reason for calculated responses and for the geopolitical institutions built after WWII.

Does anyone think this administration has any regard for either?

Mattis can be trusted to be a check on any idiotic plan that would escalate to full on armed conflict. As much as this seems like a random action of a President lashing out, this was one of several carefully thought out responses that have likely been circulating for years within the armed services. The goal was to limit casualties (especially Russian).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom