DXB-KNIGHT
Member
Add
Japan, UAE and Bahrain to pro
Add
Yep.Because if Trump was going to go through all this trouble, go around Congress, go around our allies, and spend 70+ million to send a "warning" he could have disabled the damn base.
Now Syria is digging their heels and Russia's getting more involved.
The point of this wasn't to destroy the strip or the fleet. It was a warning. How many times does this need to be brought up?
This will be upscaled in Iranian and Hezbollah media although based on their media Saudi Arabia and Israel are already in bed.Lol
Funny seeing Israel and Saudi Arabia on the same side. For once!
If ai made a 70 million dollar warning I would be bummed at a 50% success rate.
and New Zealand and NetherlandsAdd
Japan, UAE and Bahrain to pro
Lol
Funny seeing Israel and Saudi Arabia on the same side. For once!
You think there's less likelihood that there's no collusion than there is that Putin and Trump together orchestrated a gas attack on Syrian civilians in order to give Trump public support for a missile strike on a Russian ally, with Russians present at the site of the strike, in order to provide cover for their secret collusion?
Yeah, accepting refugees and just letting Assad win might be the best option at this point.
Assad is fucking awful, but drawing out the conflict even longer hurts more innocents in the long run.
Because if Trump was going to go through all this trouble, go around Congress, go around our allies, and spend 70+ million to send a "warning" he could have disabled the damn base.
Now Syria is digging their heels and Russia's getting more involved.
Why are people questioning it was the Syrian Armed Forces that used sarin gas?
Does ISIS/rebels have an Air Force all of a sudden?
Wow, some people are actually saying that Assad wasn't the one ho used the chemical attacks and could be any of the neighboring countries.
WTF?
I should stop reading comments under news article![]()
The point of this wasn't to destroy the strip or the fleet. It was a warning. How many times does this need to be brought up?
First action of Trump I support. If Obama did it after the very first zarin attack, Siria could be at peace now. Divided on several states, probably, but at peace. Red lines mean nothing if you are not ready to act and your "partner" knows it.
Add
Japan, UAE and Bahrain to pro
The point of this wasn't to destroy the strip or the fleet. It was a warning. How many times does this need to be brought up?
So as I understand it, Syria is a no win situation. Either you take Assad out of power and ISIS ends up taking over the country or you attack ISIS and Assad continues to kill citizens who oppose him?
You never see the islamozionist nickname?Lol
Funny seeing Israel and Saudi Arabia on the same side. For once!
Lol
Funny seeing Israel and Saudi Arabia on the same side. For once!
The point of this wasn't to destroy the strip or the fleet. It was a warning. How many times does this need to be brought up?
Yeah, two nations guilty of mass genocide, one in Gaza and the other in Yemen, preaching morality. KSA literally bombed a funeral house killing hundreds and got away clean, guess it pays to be an American ally.
This will be upscaled in Iranian and Hezbollah media although based on their media Saudi Arabia and Israel are already in bed.
Thanks. Will read those all but already based on TheGuardian's article, seems pretty evident that it couldn't have just been some air strike with regular bombs hitting supposed chemical weapon storages that caused whatever poison it was to spread to such large areas.Guardian has some pretty decent catchup articles
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...cal-weapons-attack-what-we-know-khan-sheikhun
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/apr/04/syria-chemical-attack-idlib-province
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...oked-inside-syrian-town-after-chemical-attack
The Times but it requires a sub
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...ons-from-un-inspectors-experts-fear-hnn7ht6fz
Or the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-39513193
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-39531045 (just posted this in its own post below)
I mean you probably are just best to Google and read multiple sources. A lot of this comes from visual feedback/evidence as well. People, including children, were dying from chemical weapons, that's not disputable. It was civilian towns as well.
Warning's don't bring back the dead, a warning made after the Trump admin declared they had no intention of a "regime change". Trump to Assad: "Do your thing"... Oops.
Regardless, Syria took this as a slap on the wrist, and will continue their atrocities, while the US does the same.
what SA is doing to civilians in Yemen is bad and should be condemned but let's not kid ourselves in believing Iran hasn't done worse kiddo
but then again stating this isn't going to change your mind knowing you
ugh yeahThe most humane thing in this shitshow likely is to accept refugees. But........... MORE BOMBS!
A warning is sending a handful of tomahawks to strike a strategic target at the base. That let's them know who they're fucking with.
Letting 58 tomahawks fly...To not even damage the base in any meaningful way and only take out a few planes. That's just dumb.
We'll see. Trump has established that he is willing to use direct military force in Syria based on Assad's actions, so it will certainly give them pause. The implication is that if there is another chemical attack the resulting retaliation from the US would be more broad and effective.
Wow I thought for sure this was an act of war on our part. We bombed a country's military base and killed Syrian soldiers. I guess I just don't really get how it works, but I thought for sure Trump started WW3 last night due to the fact that Russian soldiers were also stationed there.
Sean Spicer
@PressSec
WH photo (ed for security): @potus receives briefing on #syria military strike fr Nat Security team
![]()
Wow I thought for sure this was an act of war on our part. We bombed a country's military base and killed Syrian soldiers. I guess I just don't really get how it works, but I thought for sure Trump started WW3 last night due to the fact that Russian soldiers were also stationed there.
First of all, I'm probably older than you.
Second, the difference being, Saudis can kill all they want and get away with it, I don't remember the Iranians bombing funeral houses, if they were I'm pretty sure they US would be sending Tomahawk warning shots in their direction as we speak.
Do we have word on who the terrorist in Stockholm was? Please dont be a Muslim. Please dont be a Muslim. Please dont be a Muslim.....
Looks oddly like the Obama raid photo.
Except at mar a lagoLooks oddly like the Obama raid photo.
Thanks. Will read those all but already based on TheGuardian's article, seems pretty evident that it couldn't have just been some air strike with regular bombs hitting supposed chemical weapon storages that caused whatever poison it was to spread to such large areas.
Mr Trump's National Security Adviser, H R McMaster, said measures had also been put in place to avoid hitting what were believed to be stores of Sarin at Shayrat, so that it "would not be ignited and cause a hazard to civilians or anyone else".
"Obviously, the regime will maintain the certain capacity to commit mass murder with chemical weapons, we think, beyond this particular airfield. But it was aimed at this particular airfield for a reason, because we could trace this murderous attack back to that facility."
We'll see. Trump has established that he is willing to use direct military force in Syria based on Assad's actions, so it will certainly give them pause. The implication is that if there is another chemical attack the resulting retaliation from the US would be more broad and effective.
Ya it doesn't really work that way. The US has a long history of firing missiles into other sovereign nations. Mind, Syria is more of a powder keg than others in the past, but a limited strike like this was never likely to start WW3... on it's own.
Assad doesn't need chemicals to wage war on his own people.
Strike wasn't, but say 20 Russian troops were killed?
Tensions spiraling out of control have a long history and is the reason for calculated responses and for the geopolitical institutions built after WWII.
Does anyone think this administration has any regard for either?
Would assume it's intentional. Makes for a good photo op for him I'd imagine.
Oh look, Bannon.
Where's Pence?