Count Dookkake
Member
If Pauly Shore ever starts a film podcast, he should call it The Wease-en-scène.
Spent the past week watching Taboo.
It grew on me a bit and Tom Hardy grunting his way through was fun, but almost everything about it felt so incredibly dull, safe and predictable.
Still in for seaosn 2 though.
YeahHaving Hardy walk around so sure of everything and arrogant that he will come out on top no matter the odds was super fun to watch. Loved the hell out of the season, despite the flaws. I hope some of the uncertain cast members come back ().Mrs Delaney and Tom Hollander
I watched Once Upon A Time In The West(1968) on Friday. It's been on my Netflix watchlist, but I was reminded of it when someone mentioned it earlier in the thread. Haven't watched many classic Westerns, but I wasn't as impressed with this as I expected, considering it's kinda supposed to be the pinnacle of Spaghetti Westerns.
The production design is absolutely amazing, and felt generally authentic. Also, just all the detail on the characters, like grime and sweat, really helps sell the setting. I also really appreciated how Leone isn't afraid to hold a static shot, and just let us absorb the image. The opening scene with the three bandits waiting at the train station was fantastic.
That being said, the movie as a whole felt overly long and the middle dragged quite a bit. Also felt the plot was a little thin, though I'm sure at the time it felt more novel. Didn't really love any of the characters (except Jason Robards, who had some great lines). Also Claudia Cardinale is just gorgeous.
Overall I'd give it a 4/5, mainly for the cinematography and production.
It's one of the best westerns of all time and one of the best films of all time period.Hmm, these impressions of OUaTitW are making me wonder whether I want to bury almost 3 hours into it, but I'll keep it on the short list for now.
I watched Once Upon A Time In The West(1968) on Friday. It's been on my Netflix watchlist, but I was reminded of it when someone mentioned it earlier in the thread. Haven't watched many classic Westerns, but I wasn't as impressed with this as I expected, considering it's kinda supposed to be the pinnacle of Spaghetti Westerns.
The production design is absolutely amazing, and felt generally authentic. Also, just all the detail on the characters, like grime and sweat, really helps sell the setting. I also really appreciated how Leone isn't afraid to hold a static shot, and just let us absorb the image. The opening scene with the three bandits waiting at the train station was fantastic.
That being said, the movie as a whole felt overly long and the middle dragged quite a bit. Also felt the plot was a little thin, though I'm sure at the time it felt more novel. Didn't really love any of the characters (except Jason Robards, who had some great lines). Also Claudia Cardinale is just gorgeous.
Overall I'd give it a 4/5, mainly for the cinematography and production.
you should ground him for that.
BvS is dope. and how old is he btw? I feel like Unbreakable might be dull for people under like...13-14.
When I first saw it as a kid I was pretty damn bored by it haha. but yeah later on when I rewatched it I found it to be one of the best of the genre for sure.
Your opinions on Tokyo drift will decide how I view your post for the rest of the yearWell I said I was going to do this, and I'm not one to turn my back on FAMILY, so let's ride...
(This is me, watching the entire Fast & Furious franchise, start to end, for the first time.)
The Fast and the Furious (6.5/10) - Yup, pretty much a poor man's Point Break. But for all that, still a decent and fun action movie. I liked Toretto and his family, but thought Brian's characterization was weak and his arc sort of unconvincing (part of that may just be how well Paul Walker can sell it, which is not much). It's also quite a silly film, from Toretto's whack philosophy ("I live my life a quarter mile at a time, nothing else matters"... but what about FAMILY?) to the hilarious special effects in that first racing scene (whether or not this was cool at the time, it's dated to the point now of looking like a Saturday morning cartoon). And it's also an uneven film because none of that silliness prepared me for how white knuckle it can get, with some genuinely engaging action scenes full of impressive, practical stunt work (Vince hanging off the side of the tractor trailer was a great sequence, even if Paul Walker's stunt double was hilariously front and center in every other shot). Overall, it was lean, entertaining and even a little endearing. The silliness and sincerity reaches its apex in that final scene, which is almost shocking good in how it summarizes the entire film, and the differences (and similarities) between Toretto and O'Connor, with one final symbolic drag race (and some cool, iconic imagery to top it all off). A mild thumbs up for this first installment.
2 Fast 2 Furious (5/10) - The weirdest part of stepping into this movie is realizing how much of the first film's abrupt ending (so many people get shot and the end, and it's like, who lives? who dies? what even happens now?) is just going to remain forgotten. Instead, we jump into the future, to Miami, to catch up with Brian O'Connor, who now lives in bad, cliché sequels. It's hilarious how many beats this film repeats without shame (you're not a cop anymore, but we have another undercover assignment for you). And if the first film is a poor man's Point Break, the crime plot in this thing is like a poor man's random episode of CSI: Miami. The film also takes the time to work through Brian's backstory, as if to retroactively make his decisions in the first film make a little more sense (there is one conversation that specifically addresses the ending of the first film), but it also just makes explicit things that probably could or should have been inferred in the first film, if it was a better film (or Paul Walker a better actor). The saving grace is Roman Pearce, a friend from Brian's past who gets dragged into the plot, and ends up being the only source of energy and levity (the backstory here is contrived as hell, but Tyrese is such an eager sport that he almost makes it work; and it's a miracle that these two have any chemistry at all, really, but Walker even manages to loosen up and become more convincing as the movie goes on). Overall, kinda of a lousy sequel. It has more action than the first movie, but none of it is as good. (But I did like all of the close-ups of eyes, squinting and darting back and forth, during the film's opening race; it was like a brief glimpse into a parallel world where Sergio Leone was making Fast & Furious sequels.) Also, it was neat I guess to see the introduction of a couple of the franchise's big players (I assume? I'm pretty sure I saw both Tyrese and Ludacris in the trailer for the new movie), but it does beg one important question... what happened to Ja Rule???
Anyways, off to watch Tokyo Drift now.
Is that spoiler really necessary?I just finished watching Rogue One for the first time. When I sawat the end, I actually teared up. Most unexpected reaction, I must say.Leia
BvS is dope. and how old is he btw? I feel like Unbreakable might be dull for people under like...13-14.
When I first saw it as a kid I was pretty damn bored by it haha. but yeah later on when I rewatched it I found it to be one of the best of the genre for sure.
aiight guys, whats everyone's favorite (or least disliked for many of you haha) Paul W. S. Anderson movie?
Personally it might be Three Musketeers for me
aiight guys, whats everyone's favorite (or least disliked for many of you haha) Paul W. S. Anderson movie?
Personally it might be Three Musketeers for me
Is that spoiler really necessary?
Linda Manz in Days of Heaven is responsible for the best voice over narration in film history.Stars Linda Manz (from Days of Heaven) who I always loved (I think unlike most people)
Linda Manz in Days of Heaven is responsible for the best voice over narration in film history.
I actually liked Soldier back in the day, but I don't remember anything about it now.
What a weirdo tangent. You're forgetting that the rest of the movie is about Kurt Russell becoming a goody two-shoes on behalf of some helpless refugees, and then using his good-guy status to single-handedly wipe out an army of genetically engineered fascist creeps.I remember the VHS had a editing fuck-up, that the older soldier gets overtaken during running exercise by a younger one, and that there is a fun little setup scene during his training with the 'save the hostage' trope scene and instead he wastes the shit out of both hostage and target (he then exchanges looks with the guy next to him in a 'well it worked, didn't it' type manner without having dialogue on it. That was great). Now that's my kinda guy.
I always find it so awful when a video game goes "oh no you can't do that", like, motherfucker this is a fucking warzone and you're pulling moral high ground on me versus me wanting to stay not-dead because I wasted my time on moral bullshit? Fuck yooouuu.
I liked that the movie was smart enough to admit that morals in battle get you killed.
I haven't seen all of his movies and certainly don't remember all of them in great detail, but I have a soft spot for Alien vs Predator. Last time I saw that was 2010, so take that opinion with a grain of salt.aiight guys, whats everyone's favorite (or least disliked for many of you haha) Paul W. S. Anderson movie?
aiight guys, whats everyone's favorite (or least disliked for many of you haha) Paul W. S. Anderson movie?
Personally it might be Three Musketeers for me