Nightengale
Member
So much for Major saying it was 90 minutes. I don't like this.
Wait, where did Major say it was 90?
So much for Major saying it was 90 minutes. I don't like this.
I feel like the whole exclusive thing is mainly a list war in disguise.
MS spent billions for Minecraft. I don't really want to see it either but I get why it will be there. That is a huge investment that they need to continually push.That's so annoying. I get it's popular and all, but is the E3 conference really the time to talk about a game that's been out for years?
Mixed Reality will probably be part of their PC Show briefing I imagineTo me it sounds like it will be way too short. For me their shows never felt too long. They now are going to show Scorpio, the price, release date and name. Gameplay demos of Crackdown, Sea of Thieves and State of Decay 2. Didn't they also say more mixed reality stuff would be at the Xbox show? Jez Corden mentioned Minecraft for the Xbox show.
Surely they will talk about game pass, Xbox live and new features. Way too fucking brief. So much for Major saying it was 90 minutes. I don't like this.
Wait, where did Major say it was 90?
It was a while ago. Seems like they decided later on to make it a shorter show. That picture is real I assume?
MS spent billions for Minecraft. I don't really want to see it either but I get why it will be there. That is a huge investment that they need to continually push.
Mixed Reality will probably be part of their PC Show briefing I imagine
If Major Nelson said it's 90 min, then it is 90 min. Anyone has a link?
And what this talk about mixed reality stuff? I don't think we heard anything about that.
True, but them's the brakes.Yeah, I mean I understand that aspect. But I'm willing to bet 99% of the people watching the conference are familiar with Minecraft, if not everyone.
I guess I'm easy to please but a new beastly console is more than enough to get me very excited about E3. I understand that people want exclusives to justify their platform of choice but to me there's just so many games out there already and only so much free time that I don't value exclusives as much as a good platform running on powerful hardware.
I feel like the whole exclusive thing is mainly a list war in disguise.
Anyways I'm all up with MS delivering on 1st party games don't get me wrong, but its clearly not priority #1 for me and I feel I'm not the only one thinking this way.
Aaron Greenberg just responded to my tweet. It's 90 minutes after all.
https://twitter.com/aarongreenberg/status/869982313563570176
All is well again.Aaron Greenberg just responded to my tweet. It's 90 minutes after all.
https://twitter.com/aarongreenberg/status/869982313563570176
This is probably why people are "downplaying" things as you say:
2013:
Microsoft and Sony released their consoles at the same time, the PS4 is 40% more powerful while being 100$ cheaper.
2016:
Sony released a more powerful PS4 that can play games at 4K.
2017:
Microsoft will release a 40% more powerful console while being at least 100$ more expansive, a year later.
So as you can see, the scorpio being more powerful and releasing a year later is quite logical, can you say the same thing about what happend in 2013? there is your answer.
Aaron Greenberg just responded to my tweet. It's 90 minutes after all.
https://twitter.com/aarongreenberg/status/869982313563570176
Last year Sony conference was about an hour and that's with 5 minutes of orchestra, a few VR titles and they still manage to fit tons of content within the time frame.
60 minutes is fine, we can expect good pacing, no filler conference, this speak confidence of the content they have.
This is a conference 3 years in the making, it will be the best one yet.
ReCore was a game with a very short dev cycle. Around 22-24 months total. One year pre-production, one-year full production. It was announced just as it came out of pre-production.
Bolded is false. Scalebound was in development since 2013. It was in the oven for 2 years before its reveal in 2015. There was a game. The difference is MS likes to do first announces with CGi or in-engine non-gameplay trailer when the game is >1 year away.
Also, the timing was fine, but I wouldn't call ReCore's announcement great.
If Minecraft had not been confirmed to be there and also no hardware reveal and potentially mixed reality stuff too I would agree but that's not the case.
Good thing it's still 90 minutes after all.
You can't remember last year? Their reveals in 2016 were Horizon 3, State of Decay 2, and Dead Rising 4--i.e. the obvious next sequels by known partner studios. People aren't counting those type of things when talking about a paucity this year. No one's saying Forza 7, KI Season 4, and Moon Studios' followup will be absent. (Though the latter will have more impact if it's fresh and not Ori 2.)I can't remember an E3 where all they talked about was stuff that was already known.
But that's what they tried to do this generation, without success. They starved 360's end so they'd have a heavy-duty One launch lineup...and they absolutely did. They offered a much richer array than Sony. But it wasn't enough by itself.I could see Microsoft just kind of riding out this generation with having the best console hardware and a few successful service games while positioning themselves to slay the next generation.
Minecraft will be there according to common sense. You don't skip a billion-dollar franchise at the biggest show of the year.Minecraft will be there according to Jez Corden
This is probably why people are "downplaying" things as you say:
2013:
Microsoft and Sony released their consoles at the same time, the PS4 is 40% more powerful while being 100$ cheaper.
2016:
Sony released a more powerful PS4 that can play games at 4K.
2017:
Microsoft will release a 40% more powerful console while being at least 100$ more expansive, a year later.
So as you can see, the scorpio being more powerful and releasing a year later is quite logical, can you say the same thing about what happend in 2013? there is your answer.
The negative train.
Has left the station and the positivity express is pulling in ready for us to board. It's ninety minutes! Thank fuck![]()
If the show was a good one at 60 mins no one would care I don't think. Greenberg has clarified anyway so it doesn't matter.
This is probably why people are "downplaying" things as you say:
2013:
Microsoft and Sony released their consoles at the same time, the PS4 is 40% more powerful while being 100$ cheaper.
2016:
Sony released a more powerful PS4 that can play games at 4K.
2017:
Microsoft will release a 40% more powerful console while being at least 100$ more expansive, a year later.
So as you can see, the scorpio being more powerful and releasing a year later is quite logical, can you say the same thing about what happend in 2013? there is your answer.
So for a 90 minute show, we know we'll see:
- Scorpio details (along with an official Xbox One S price drop?)
- Game Pass talk
- Xbox One BC talk
- Forza 7
- State of Decay 2
- Crackdown 3
- Sea of Thieves
- Assassin's Creed Origins
- Shadow of War
- "something" Halo
- Minecraft
- Fall OS update
- ID @ Xbox
Don't forget that at least a 2 mins montage with Xbox One games that will receive a Scorpio patch (Gears 4, Forza Horizon 3, Halo 5 etc) is guaranteed
If major work toward improving first party operation has only really begun in the past few months, even 2018 might be too soon. I could see Microsoft just kind of riding out this generation with having the best console hardware and a few successful service games while positioning themselves to slay the next generation.
There's not much in your prediction list that's very interesting to me. I hope Microsoft can do better.
-Scorpio details
-Sea of Thieves
-something" Halo
That's a pretty good estimate, about as precise as "Scorpio is 50% more powerful than Pro." What do you think's wrong with it?Who the hell believes the OG PS4 is 40% more powerfull than the OG Xbox?
That's what Sony did in the PS3 era (though, of course, they tried to be successful THAT gen while investing to make sure they were well equipped for the next industry reset). MS seems to be trending the opposite way in terms of investment, but it's hard to tell from the outside. They could be sitting on a bunch of things, I just don't know how (or why) they'd secretly invest in new studios and not announce anything. It's something you announce publicly to staff up. They could be planning to do that, I don't know.
Somebody get Phil to confirm the show is 90 min because I don't trust Greenberg and his "typically 90 mins".
I just have a bad gut feeling that MS doesn't have much to show and aren't willing to double down on gaming. It's going to get ugly here next week![]()
I can't believe they're so willing to drop the ball after spending over a decade fighting for market dominance. Maybe I'm wrong but its not looking good so far.
Could be shorter or longer. We may have another FFXV situation this year if a crackdown boss or something can't be parriedYeah, I didn't like the way he said it, but he did also say the pic was wrong. Hopefully Phil or Major will speak up soon.