What happened to RPS?

RockPaperShotgun used to be my favorite gaming outlet. When I first started visiting the website in 2008, I was immediately hooked by Rossignol's and Kieron Gillen's witty reporting as each author contributed in their own style. In part, it felt like a continuation of Old Man Murray and while they started out small, the site quickly grew an amazing community glued together by the writer's enthusiasm, humor and passion for gaming. They managed to set themselves apart from the usual cut and dry corporate speech of their bigger competitors. To put it simply, back then it was fun being a gamer on RPS. Despite the humor, there certainly was enough room for serious criticism, but it was all conveyed by a certain levity that made it easy for regular readers to get behind and discuss whatever new nefarious trend plagued our shared hobby.

One could see that RPS was their pet project as they squeezed every ounce of their creativity into it. Gillen, Walker, Meer, Smith and Rossignol were quite different personalities and after a while you didn't even need to look at the byline in order to guess the author. Despite their differences, one always had the impression that they were friends, riding on the same wave, like Snake Plissken in Escape from L.A.

I used to visit their website on a daily basis and at some point I even became a supporter... until it all went downhill a couple of years ago. With the radical politicization of the hobby one could notice a massive shift in tone and culture. When Kieron left for greener pastures in the comics industry, Jim went into the game developer business and Walker became more and more frustrated with the hobby and its surrounding community, the whole thing kinda fell apart. It all became so damn serious and gloomy, with Walker's seething discontent oozing out between every single line of his writing.

Long story short, RPS and me parted ways a couple of years ago. I realized with a heavy heart that it wasn't me who has changed, but RPS. When they were acquired by Gamer Network and then by Reedpop, the website suffered a major redesign and a fundamental restructuring of their forums that fractured the whole community even more. When I decided to pay them a visit a couple of days ago, RPS was basically unrecognizable. If you take a look at their site statistics, things don't seem to go well for them, with traffic only taking a recent nosedive:

qAmzLiU.png


Their short-time traffic is kind of in an uptrend since the redesign, but people don't seem to stick around.

I stumbled upon this forum post which kinda exemplifies the problems that have plagued the website since 2014. Diversity is all well and good, but the growing list of freelance contributors has robbed them of their identity. RPS used to be their website, their pet project, but nowadays it feels like they have been thrown out of their own home. Worst of all is the self-flagellating discontent with themselves that their new community seems to have instilled into them. In response to the forum post linked above, this was Graham's reply:

If you’re not careful, it’s really easy for the pool of people to look like, well, white cis men with beards. [...] We did however go out of our way to solicit freelance submissions from a more diverse pool of people than normal however, so that the relative best of the bunch didn’t turn out to be more people who look like me.
...didn’t turn out to be more people who look like me.
...people who look like me.

Like what in the holy hell is even going on there?

First of all, there is nothing wrong with the way how Graham looks, absolutely nothing. What's important is the way he writes and Graham always did strike me as a nice person. Second of all, how inhumane has your own community become if it takes issue with the way you look? It kinda pains me to see the creators of a website that I once adored being held hostage like this by their own community. Despite everything that happened, it saddens me to see these once confident and brilliant writers to be reduced to mere husks of their former selves. Instead of celebrating their creative minds (something that everybody has the chance to cultivate if they wish so) they are now desperately apologizing to their own community for their immutable external characteristics.

So my question to you: Are/were you a reader of RPS? If so, am I alone in my assessment or do you have similar experiences to share? In any case, thanks for reading this lengthy post.

EDIT: I accidentally confused ALEXA rankings with website traffic and posted the wrong image. It should be fixed by now. I'm glad that they are doing better than I initially thought, but my criticism about their shift in political culture and their newfound community still stands. Sorry for the confusion.
 
Last edited:
Although I never followed them closely, I can echo your observation. Many, many years ago I first heard about the site during a Fox News "controversy" (some news article or piece about how a videogame was promoting violence and sex and whatever) and RPS stepped in and shredded them over the course of several articles. I believe it was either GTA4 or Bulletstorm.

Anyway, during the GamerGate "gamers are dead" coordinated wave of needless propaganda, I was puzzled to see RPS on the side of "gamers were a mistake". Never gave them attention after that.

You should write up your own content. I think the gaming community (note how I say "community" not "industry") needs fans who speak what's on their mind in a lucid fashion.
 

Grimmrobe

Member
RPS annoyed me from the beginning. Weak, shoehorned humor in every damn article and news-post; coverage of tons of "indie" tripe; defensive reviewing in the form of "Wot I think" instead of calling the damn review a damn review.

They were always wannabes and they are still wannabes. Casual game site.
 

bati

Member
RPS annoyed me from the beginning. Weak, shoehorned humor in every damn article and news-post; coverage of tons of "indie" tripe; defensive reviewing in the form of "Wot I think" instead of calling the damn review a damn review.

Nailed it. Shortly after they went into full preaching mode and fell even further into the bottomless pit of gaming journalism irrelevancy.
 

Lucumo

Member
Considering they got more and more traffic over the past two years according to the picture you posted, it seems to be going well for them in this regard.
 
H

hariseldon

Unconfirmed Member
Considering they got more and more traffic over the past two years according to the picture you posted, it seems to be going well for them in this regard.

downtrend.png


(apologies if I missed sarcasm)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The lower number is better. They have a high bounce rate though. I'm surprised that only 2.57% of traffic is from referrals.

What happened is that John Walker's antagonism and idiotic crusades ruined the site and they put shitheads in charge of the community.
Also that New Vegas review ranks somewhere between Stalin and Pol Pot.
 

Nymphae

Banned
Anyway, during the GamerGate "gamers are dead" coordinated wave of needless propaganda, I was puzzled to see RPS on the side of "gamers were a mistake". Never gave them attention after that.

Yeah they leaned hard into that, and I never went back. Gamergate was instrumental in getting me to completely stop caring about games journalism. Still interested in game coverage from fans, in depth looks at the industry and such, but nearly all of that comes from various youtube personalities. People who actually thank their fans in videos rather than tell them they're dead.
 
Last edited:

Lightsbane

Member
I don't understand why you posted that graph. Wouldn't you want your number to go down, instead of up?

Ideally, it would be 1, right?

"This is a downtrend"

Yeah, and that's what you want in this case, isn't it?
Rank 3000 sounds a whole lot better than rank 6000.
 
Last edited:

Denton

Member
I used to be a fan...die hard fan, just like you, when Gillen and Rossignol were around. Once they were gone and the site became Walker's deppressionganza, I moved on. They are hardcore about their identity politics these days, which is boring.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
i used to read their bad games column. it was wonderful, they would find horrible games, or just weird games, and do in-depth reviews on them. really good stuff.

didn't read anything outside of that tbh. then they shut down the column and i went somewhere else.
 

ROMhack

Member
I feel the same way and mentioned it a few weeks back. It was very easy to enjoy what their writing and I particularly liked how they drew attention to smaller titles with equal attention as bigger ones. All in all, they seemed to enjoy writing about games and I enjoyed reading wot they wrote.

A few years that went out of the window. They got a little bit too serious and started to solicit more freelance writers meaning the site lost its focus. It's now ended up being fifty pointless posts (edit: mostly boring reviews, or re-branded press releases) that I don't care about to one that genuinely interests me. It's become a numbers game fuelled by quantity rather than quality, meaning it feels like a job to trawl through their content. John Walker is also seemingly beyond saving - he's too serious , not about the games but rather about himself. It seems to have coincided with the site's overall lack of fun and slow build towards becoming the British version of Kotaku.

Beyond that, the website design is bland. I feel Gamer Network have done a terrible job with Eurogamer too.
 
Last edited:
(apologies if I missed sarcasm)
Sooo... uh... that graph is showing general improvement. The lower Alexa site rank is better : Google is #1
The lower number is better.

I'm terribly sorry for this mistake. I fixed the OP in order to avoid further confusion.

Best-21-im-sorry-memes3.jpg



That's a nice write-up by the way, perfectly encapsulates what I'm missing about the days of yore. Unfortunately the discussion seemed to miss a bit the point you were trying to make.

They got a little bit too serious started to solicit more freelance writers. It's now ended up being 20 pointless posts that I don't care to maybe 1 that I might. [...] It seems to have coincided with the site's lack of fun and slow build towards becoming the British version of Kotaku. Beyond that, the website design is bland. I feel Gamer Network have done a terrible job with Eurogamer too.

That's kinda how I feel about this too. I enjoyed their occasional guest writers, but now it has become too much for the site to keep its personality. Between this and the terrible redesign I feel like RPS is a corpse that is shambling on in name only.

It's funny that you mention Kotaku, because back then they used to be a joke among RPS regulars. People visited RPS because it was so different from Kotaku, but nowadays it seems that they have become exactly that. After witnessing the redesign and stumbling over that forum topic, I'm just kinda feeling a bit nostalgic about the golden days of the hive-mind and their Optimus Prime thumbs.

Anyway, during the GamerGate "gamers are dead" coordinated wave of needless propaganda, I was puzzled to see RPS on the side of "gamers were a mistake". Never gave them attention after that.

To be honest, I find it hard to blame them considering that one of their regular contributors was embroiled in this massive internet sh*tstorm. Like, I get that you want to protect your colleagues and friends, but there's absolutely no excuse for throwing your own community under the bus like that. Instead of allowing open dialogue, they just tumbled further down the rabbit hole.
 
Last edited:

Kadayi

Banned
The lower number is better. They have a high bounce rate though. I'm surprised that only 2.57% of traffic is from referrals.

What happened is that John Walker's antagonism and idiotic crusades ruined the site and they put shitheads in charge of the community.
Also that New Vegas review ranks somewhere between Stalin and Pol Pot.

^ this.

Much love for the RPS of old and the days of Kieron Gillen & Jim Rossignol, but Walker and Meer were always the Punt and Dennis of the foursome and the once the former departed for bigger and better things the nature of the site went rapidly downhill as they weren't around to keep Walker's constant foot in mouth excesses in check. The height of comedy for me was probably where Walker decided that the games industry was somehow responsible for how the Youtube Machinima Channel did their game coverage in this particular article: -

https://web.archive.org/web/2013070.../misogyny-sexism-and-why-rps-isnt-shutting-up

And then naturally opted to make the entire ridiculous diatribe 'comments off' because that's what people wholly confident in their thinking do as a matter of principle /s

This also amused me: -

https://web.archive.org/web/2018080...15/cardboard-children-cards-against-humanity/

Max Temkin, co-creator of the game, has been accused of rape. Temkin has addressed the accusation and asserted his innocence. It’s all really heavy and serious and it concerns one of the most successful card games ever released. I mean, that game is massive. So it’s weird not to talk about it, right? Why is no-one talking about it? Follow on.

A lovely piece by occasional RPS contributor Rab Florence, who makes great play about 'having a conversation' uses the website to bash Max Temkin based purely on hearsay and similarly opts to abuse 'comments off' to hide behind any criticism under the promise that 'comments would be unlocked later' (they never were). Where's the conversation Rab?

Anyway, I largely stepped away from the site proper once it went down the 'no comments' route. I think if you're going to put yourself out there then you need to be prepared to be called on it and hiding behind locked articles just smacks of intellectual cowardice IMHO.
 
Last edited:

120v

Member
huh? i haven't really noticed much of a change...

it's obvs more mainstream now. but so it goes when websites grow, eventually it becomes less of a hobbyist endeavor and more people come aboard. first i've learned about any kind of "diversity" initiative on their part, which is eh but i wouldn't know from the content. i mean it hasn't turned into kotaku or polygon scoring Far Cry 5 down a few notches because it doesn't tackle white supremacy or such nonsense those sites are wont to do.
 
Last edited:
I used to visit all the time back in 2011-2013 or so but their twee writing style really started getting old. That and they started covering games that looked absolutely terrible but that had a message so obvious they might as well have dropped an anvil on the reader's head. All these weird walking sims or short indie games made by their twee friends who all run in the same twee circles and who have the same upper-middle class trust fund baby opinions dominate the front page. I seriously doubt that any of their writers play games to enjoy themselves and just see the gig as a stepping stone to be a "cultural writer" at a place like Rolling Stone or something.
 
I stopped bothering with RPS after Walker's hit piece of Molyneux. Walker did nothing but take cheap shots at Molyneux knowing full well a large portion of the community would lap it up, his 'hard hitting' questions came across as cowardly to me.
 

Shai-Tan

Banned
I haven't read the site since the early days so maybe I'm missing the ineffable magic from back then but as it is it seems like a solid mostly game content and commentary focused site. I commented on one dumb article about diversity in Overwatch last summer I think but every other article there isn't labeling something problematic. I also don't get the complaints about diversity. Alice O'Connor I remember back from Shacknews ages ago as someone good on the news beat along with some sardonic jokes. And Katharine Castle as hardware editor seems to know what she is talking about in as much depth as you can go on a more game focused site that isn't aimed at geeks throwing around technical terms. I get that the complaint in its most charitable form (in contrast to the piling on of complaints from others) isn't really about diversity - more about diluting their original voice but the voice of a publication will always be changing as people move on to other things
 
Last edited:
If you guys want PC gaming news without the insufferable journo bullshit (political and/or incompetence) DSO Gaming is a pretty good site. News about game benchmarks, video cards, and PC games in general.
 

Mr Nash

square pies = communism
The early days were fun. The mood of the site was light and the caliber of the writing was much better than what other major sites were pumping out at the time. When Rossignol and Gillen left, things went downhill fast with Walker suddenly having such a big influence. His general miserableness seemed to seep into the entire site and it was hard to stay interested. Then as the years wore on it became more and more of a mish mash of contributors and staff writers that I'd never heard of, and whose writing was less passionate and lower quality than the original team. Now the place just feels like the PC gaming wing of Eurogamer. There's no reason to care about it.

The only PC gaming site I still go to on a regular basis these days is Blue's News.
 
Last edited:
^ this.

Much love for the RPS of old and the days of Kieron Gillen & Jim Rossignol, but Walker and Meer were always the Punt and Dennis of the foursome and the once the former departed for bigger and better things the nature of the site went rapidly downhill as they weren't around to keep Walker's constant foot in mouth excesses in check. The height of comedy for me was probably where Walker decided that the games industry was somehow responsible for how the Youtube Machinima Channel did their game coverage in this particular article: -

https://web.archive.org/web/2013070.../misogyny-sexism-and-why-rps-isnt-shutting-up

And then naturally opted to make the entire ridiculous diatribe 'comments off' because that's what people wholly confident in their thinking do as a matter of principle /s

This also amused me: -

https://web.archive.org/web/2018080...15/cardboard-children-cards-against-humanity/



A lovely piece by occasional RPS contributor Rab Florence, who makes great play about 'having a conversation' uses the website to bash Max Temkin based purely on hearsay and similarly opts to abuse 'comments off' to hide behind any criticism under the promise that 'comments would be unlocked later' (they never were). Where's the conversation Rab?

Anyway, I largely stepped away from the site proper once it went down the 'no comments' route. I think if you're going to put yourself out there then you need to be prepared to be called on it and hiding behind locked articles just smacks of intellectual cowardice IMHO.
Speaking of John Walker's habit of putting his foot in his mouth.
 
H

hariseldon

Unconfirmed Member
huh? i haven't really noticed much of a change...

it's obvs more mainstream now. but so it goes when websites grow, eventually it becomes less of a hobbyist endeavor and more people come aboard. first i've learned about any kind of "diversity" initiative on their part, which is eh but i wouldn't know from the content. i mean it hasn't turned into kotaku or polygon scoring Far Cry 5 down a few notches because it doesn't tackle white supremacy or such nonsense those sites are wont to do.


Actually, they don't do scores, but I'm pretty sure they spent a good deal of time in multiple articles and the review bitching about the game not tackling white supremacy etc. Personally I'm finding Far Cry 5 an absolute hoot, loads of fun.
 

Makariel

Member
I used to go to RPS regularly and was even a supporter. But then the whole GG thing happened where two increasingly polarized sides were arguing more and more about less and less. But only one side had access to the ban-hammer. The forum was becoming unusable, you would get banned for looking the wrong way, having the wrong opinion, being on the wrong side of the road, take your pick. I stopped being a paying supporter and left RPS alone, just occasionally I'd drop by to read the flare path but not even that for more than a year now. I didn't even know there was a redesign until it was pointed out to me. They seem to do ok in terms of Alexa rank, so I guess it works for them?
 

Jae Mara

Member
I still frequent there but not nearly as much as I use to. I liked their jovial British wit which streaked through their content while also making decent points about this that and the other. I think with some older staff moving on and the site trying to become more of a sustainable company is the crux of the issue, it had succumbed to pressures and loss its individuality which was its strongest asset, at least to me. There are a few bits here and there that remind me of the older RPS but with its freelance writers, the voice presiding over the whole site have become more generic and flat. I feel like I cant complain though, people have jobs and lives to get on with and I dont think older RPS was a winning ticket to success by any means. It might be more successful now than it ever has been but for me its lost most what I enjoyed so much about it, its just a bit of shame...

Also that whole Rimworld code hit piece debacle a few years ago... add that to fire of additional incidents over the years at RPS
 

Kadayi

Banned
Speaking of John Walker's habit of putting his foot in his mouth.


LOL. Albeit I dare say that they are at opposite ends of the political spectrum I do feel instances like this demonstrate why Walker is the Boris Johnson of game journalism. His mental ineptitude feels like its the result of many years of familial interbreeding distilled into a perfect storm of a dogged refusal to question his wild assumptions coupled with copious amounts of impotent rage.
 
Last edited:

Shai-Tan

Banned
The only PC gaming site I still go to on a regular basis these days is Blue's News.

All I remember about Blues News was it was a link aggregator like VoodooExtreme/ve3d (RIP Billy). Not much depth to it beyond the person running the site making a daily post that would be considered a blog post about their life today. It was kind of fun only because the flame wars in the comments sections with Derek Smart and other developers. I thought about that the other day when people were bagging on the Digital Foundry guy here (and we wonder why high profile contributors leave). One of the last comments I made on Blues News was to tell Mark Rein of Epic Games that it wasn't worth the effort to respond to a troll ;)
 
Last edited:

Hudo

Member
I stopped bothering with RPS after Walker's hit piece of Molyneux. Walker did nothing but take cheap shots at Molyneux knowing full well a large portion of the community would lap it up, his 'hard hitting' questions came across as cowardly to me.
Yeah, that interview was also my reason why I stopped caring about that site. I'm all for "asking the hard questions" but that interview came across as biased against Molyneux from the beginning and Walker came across as not really interested in the issues themselves, but rather to just take shots at Molyneux. Yes, Molyneux overpromised and underdelivered but that interview was not adhering to any journalistic methodology. And the community was celebrating Walker like peasants would celebrate the burning of a witch. I guess that's what you get when gaming bloggers try to be journalists without the necessary knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Am I the only one that thought this was about Warcraft III and 'Role Playing Strategies'? o.0

Guess I truly really only get my news from gaf haha.
 
Is the moral from the opening post that rage clicks sell more?

I know RPS because of some developer at Activision or something similar in a bigger interview said as a side remark he's proud how attractive the female characters look, and then the journalist flipped and the next bolded "question" in the interview turned into a 9 lines stern talking to about social issues and then the panicked developer answered it wasn't his intention, then the journalist doubled down with two more angry questions in the "interview", and a PR person intervened to tell the journalist the interview time ran out.
Then (of course) he had an appropriate headline with the developer's name and his crime and not so subtle calls to get that guy fired for that remark. The focus was especially vicious since they ran multiple articles about the same incident across many days.

I think they're a creepy bunch, personally.
 
Last edited:

YIKES

Member
I still have a copy of an 90's-early 2000's gaming magazine to remind me how the press surrounding used to be exciting and fun to read about, they were actually did a good job conveying/discussing some really innovative concepts, and were an exciting read with each editor having their own take on the (p)reviewed game.
The press nowadays just lazily reaches for the nearest "x happened and that's a good thing!" or "Gamers are (bad thing), you should feel guilty", these pseudopolitical platitudes are wearing thin very quickly, especially when you account for the fact that the editor rarely even play games or know what they're talking about.
This has worsened to the point that i consider *anyone's* opinion, even that of steam comments, or /v/ to be superior because i can trust that these people actually play a game before ragging on them.
 
Last edited:

ROMhack

Member
I still have a copy of an 90's-early 2000's gaming magazine to remind me how the press surrounding used to be exciting and fun to read about, they were actually did a good job conveying/discussing some really innovative concepts, and were an exciting read with each editor having their own take on the (p)reviewed game.
The press nowadays just lazily reaches for the nearest "x happened and that's a good thing!" or "Gamers are (bad thing), you should feel guilty", these pseudopolitical platitudes are wearing thin very quickly, especially when you account for the fact that the editor rarely even play games or know what they're talking about.
This has worsened to the point that i consider *anyone's* opinion, even that of steam comments, or /v/ to be superior because i can trust that these people actually play a game before ragging on them.

Admittedly the content tends to be inconsistent but I still like physical magazines as I find the political or clickbait aspect of them to be non-existent compared to online. Buying a copy of EDGE or PCGamer and slowly reading it over the month (usually over morning coffee) is pleasant in its own way.

I'm in the UK though so I'm not sure what magazines are like in other countries.
 
Last edited:
H

hariseldon

Unconfirmed Member
Agree with ROMhack ROMhack on the physical magazines - I enjoy reading PC Gamer, I get it on Readly (you get a shitload of magazines for £8/month - not a bad deal) and it's a decent read. Sometimes it's nice to slow the pace down.
 

Mr Nash

square pies = communism
Admittedly the content tends to be inconsistent but I still like physical magazines as I find the political or clickbait aspect of them to be non-existent compared to online. Buying a copy of EDGE or PCGamer and slowly reading it over the month (usually over morning coffee) is pleasant in its own way.

I'm in the UK though so I'm not sure what magazines are like in other countries.

Leaving politics and clickbait at the door would make a lot of outlets a lot more readable / watchable. I was reading that thread linked in one of the comments above from RPS' forums where users lamented the decline of the site, and over and over there were complaints about time being wasted on non-news (Bioware wants to make more Dragon Age games? Who'd of thought!) or doing reviews of games without actually talking about what players actually do in the game (their Monster Hunter review was particularly singled out as doing this).

If outlets went back to basics and simply talked about games they found interesting, then wrote why they were excited about them, these places would have much bigger, more loyal followings. As it stands, they're digging their own graves in the long term, creating content few people are interested in and that will only lead to further dwindling of their readership. It doesn't even have to be game journalism. Simply going down the curation route and being decent at selecting games that will appeal to this or that audience, then projecting that enthusiasm will garner a loyal following. There are plenty of YouTubers that have decent followings doing this, even if they focus on specific genres, be it FPSes, JRPGs, or whatever. People with similar interests to that content creator will eventually rally there and everyone is happy. Meanwhile, the folks obsessed with politics and clickbait will slowly disappear as people tire of their antics.
 

Kadayi

Banned
Speaking of John Walker's habit of putting his foot in his mouth.


I actually just had a Steam chat with a developer friend of mine and he laughed hard at that BS from Walker.

Devs have a capped number of free codes to give away, and in fact, Valve seems to be moving over to developers essentially gifting the games directly versus distributing codes. However, Devs can request further codes from Valve though that's time-consuming because they're manually generated at Valves end, not by the developers themselves.

I dare say bigger games like your Farcry 5's have bigger caps as standard versus your smaller developers.
 

ROMhack

Member
So I just came across this. They're blocking the site for people who use ad-blockers and their explanation as to why is quite arrogant.

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/20...k-users-well-probably-be-saying-goodbye-soon/

Highlights:
Over the last ten years, I’ve had a lot of discussions with a lot of people about advertising. I always start by pointing out that we aim to make our advertising unobtrusive.

I can respect a person attempting to live by a set of principles, but here’s the response I usually give: if you object to advertising in principle, then you shouldn’t read websites with adverts.

Ad blocking does not make websites better; ad blocking leads to advertising that’s more obtrusive, as it fights to get in front of you and get your attention by other means.

I am a reader of the internet and I know how bad advertising can be. I believe RPS’s adverts are some of the best in the business, and if you think they can be better still, then hit that email link and tell me.


Starting with the obvious, their advertising is indeed obtrusive given that it takes up about 25% of the page. Other points Graham makes are completely subjective and I feel he shouldn't be dictating them to anyone. The last part about their adverts being really good so it's okay is just bizarre.

Obviously there's loads of comments reacting negatively. They're well worth a read.
 
Last edited:

Sgt. Pinback

(L3) + (R3) | Spartan rage activated
Modern RPS is the epitome of why I feel so disconnected with modern 'gamer culture'. Bloggers who think they are political scientists (let alone journalists), hit pieces intended to destroy the careers and reputations of people because of some infraction of the rules or other, ridiculous amounts of both native and non-native advertising, and a disinterest for their audience that borders on pathological.

You don't want to hire 'more people who look like you'? Just fuck off. Go to archive.org and read old issues of Zzap! 64 or C+VG. Gaming media used to be enthusiasts who loved games and wrote about them as a celebration of the medium. RPS is the absolute antithesis of that spirit, and is everything rotten and insufferable about modern game publishing.
 
Last edited:

Fuz

Banned
So I just came across this. They're blocking the site for people who use ad-blockers and their explanation as to why is quite arrogant.

https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/20...k-users-well-probably-be-saying-goodbye-soon/

Highlights:









Starting with the obvious, their advertising is indeed obtrusive given that it takes up about 25% of the page. Other points Graham makes are completely subjective and I feel he shouldn't be dictating them to anyone. The last part about their adverts being really good so it's okay is just bizarre.

Obviously there's loads of comments reacting negatively.

Yeah, this has 0.01% chance to work.
Not to mention, AdBlockers can be programmed to bypass those restrictions.

Also, I want to point out some bullshit:
Ad blocking does not make websites better; ad blocking leads to advertising that’s more obtrusive, as it fights to get in front of you and get your attention by other means
Because when we didn't have Ad blockers we didn't have intrusive advertising, right?

The insane amount of ads, malware and intrusive shit was so high that we needed a countermeasure. That's why Ad blockers were born.
 
I still have a copy of an 90's-early 2000's gaming magazine to remind me how the press surrounding used to be exciting and fun to read about, they were actually did a good job conveying/discussing some really innovative concepts, and were an exciting read with each editor having their own take on the (p)reviewed game.
The press nowadays just lazily reaches for the nearest "x happened and that's a good thing!" or "Gamers are (bad thing), you should feel guilty", these pseudopolitical platitudes are wearing thin very quickly, especially when you account for the fact that the editor rarely even play games or know what they're talking about.
This has worsened to the point that i consider *anyone's* opinion, even that of steam comments, or /v/ to be superior because i can trust that these people actually play a game before ragging on them.

I still have all my magazines from the 2000s and like to revisit them from time to time.

It was some really wonderful stuff back then, especially in the mid-00s when it started to get a little more serious minded in response to attacks from guys like Jack Thompson and Leland Yee, but it was always 100% on games and gamers side and outside of that specific context was 100% free of politics.

But then most of the magazines died because people didn't want to pay for them and as the saying goes, you get what you par for.
 
Top Bottom