• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Microsoft / Activision Deal Approval Watch |OT| (MS/ABK close)

Do you believe the deal will be approved?


  • Total voters
    886
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

feynoob

Banned
Topher Topher
DDM7UXU.jpg
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
I know it's hard to get a decent conversation on this topic without fanboy extremism... But I just read what an EU commissioner said on the topic. There's a lot of people that think politicians are out of touch with Tech but I have to say I do agree with his assessment.


An EU official, on the other hand, said that the UK regulator had ā€œoverstatedā€ the position that Microsoft held in the cloud gaming market. In its report, the CMA had declared that the gaming giant already "accounts for an estimated 60-70% of global cloud gaming services." However, it seemed to many people that the regulator had included all Xbox Game Pass subscribers in its calculation, which is not necessarily an accurate interpretation of the numbers.

Xbox Game Pass offers a variety of perks to subscribers, mainly access to a rotating selection of games, including first-party day-one releases. Ultimate members also receive access to EA Play's exclusive library of titles, two free games a month via Xbox Live Gold, discounts, and the ability to stream games using Xbox Cloud Gaming. The CMAā€™s analysis did not seem to take into account that many gamers who subscribe to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate do so for the free games and sales, and a lot of people have no interest in and donā€™t use the cloud gaming service.
As far as I saw yesterday when I skimmed the 400 page CMA report they had MAU figures (not total subscriber counts) and were also taking in to account internal projections and the opinion of external parties šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø
 

Bernoulli

M2 slut
I know it's hard to get a decent conversation on this topic without fanboy extremism... But I just read what an EU commissioner said on the topic. There's a lot of people that think politicians are out of touch with Tech but I have to say I do agree with his assessment.


An EU official, on the other hand, said that the UK regulator had ā€œoverstatedā€ the position that Microsoft held in the cloud gaming market. In its report, the CMA had declared that the gaming giant already "accounts for an estimated 60-70% of global cloud gaming services." However, it seemed to many people that the regulator had included all Xbox Game Pass subscribers in its calculation, which is not necessarily an accurate interpretation of the numbers.

Xbox Game Pass offers a variety of perks to subscribers, mainly access to a rotating selection of games, including first-party day-one releases. Ultimate members also receive access to EA Play's exclusive library of titles, two free games a month via Xbox Live Gold, discounts, and the ability to stream games using Xbox Cloud Gaming. The CMAā€™s analysis did not seem to take into account that many gamers who subscribe to Xbox Game Pass Ultimate do so for the free games and sales, and a lot of people have no interest in and donā€™t use the cloud gaming service.
Fake "insider" news, Post the EU official stating that officially

Here are some official news for you

Expanding Xbox to new players is central to our ambition of helping games and developers find an easy path to the worldā€™s 3 billion gamers. We are doing this by embracing multiple devices and providing a consistent Xbox experience wherever you log in, whether thatā€™s on your Xbox Series X|S, PC, Xbox One, Android device or ā€“ starting in Spring 2021 ā€“ your Windows PC and iOS device from the cloud.

 
Last edited:

Topher

Identifies as young
H Hitchyhero not sure why the EU commissioner is spreading disinformation however the CMA did not just look at total Game Pass Ultimate subscribers for their calculations.


TSVFxs7.jpg


hEJQRIT.jpg


SrsC23q.jpg

Section 8.91 explicitly talks about the MS numbers being said to have been "overstated" and "misleading". And......

"In any case our concern is about Microsoftā€™s future position based on our assessment of its strength, and its substantial number of users now indicates that it may continue to attract a large number of users as cloud gaming grows."

It is irrelevant either way.
 
Last edited:

Astray

Member
I am %100 positive that someone at Microsoft is ruing the decision to make gold convert to GPU instead of normal Xbox Gamepass.

That small decision alone probably accounted for GPU being a hard to ignore percentage in Microsoft's GP customers, taking the number of cloud customers up with it and resulting in getting flagged by whatever analysis the CMA did.
 

jm89

Member
I am %100 positive that someone at Microsoft is ruing the decision to make gold convert to GPU instead of normal Xbox Gamepass.

That small decision alone probably accounted for GPU being a hard to ignore percentage in Microsoft's GP customers, taking the number of cloud customers up with it and resulting in getting flagged by whatever analysis the CMA did.
On the flip side whoever at sony decided to make ps+ premium meh should be asking for a promotion.
 
Last edited:

adamsapple

Or is it just one of Phil's balls in my throat?
I am %100 positive that someone at Microsoft is ruing the decision to make gold convert to GPU instead of normal Xbox Gamepass.

That small decision alone probably accounted for GPU being a hard to ignore percentage in Microsoft's GP customers, taking the number of cloud customers up with it and resulting in getting flagged by whatever analysis the CMA did.

GIF by Giphy QA
 
Last edited:

feynoob

Banned
I am %100 positive that someone at Microsoft is ruing the decision to make gold convert to GPU instead of normal Xbox Gamepass.

That small decision alone probably accounted for GPU being a hard to ignore percentage in Microsoft's GP customers, taking the number of cloud customers up with it and resulting in getting flagged by whatever analysis the CMA did.
Normal gamepass doesn't have online mode.
 

Bernoulli

M2 slut
I am %100 positive that someone at Microsoft is ruing the decision to make gold convert to GPU instead of normal Xbox Gamepass.

That small decision alone probably accounted for GPU being a hard to ignore percentage in Microsoft's GP customers, taking the number of cloud customers up with it and resulting in getting flagged by whatever analysis the CMA did.
Would have made for sense to completely drop Xbox live gold and go gamepass only
BUT with online play
If they make online play without subscription they will lose every gamepass and gold subscriber because the Majority of the subscribers either on PS+ or Gold are just For games like COD and Fifa
 
As far as I saw yesterday when I skimmed the 400 page CMA report they had MAU figures (not total subscriber counts) and were also taking in to account internal projections and the opinion of external parties šŸ¤·ā€ā™‚ļø

The issue with that is just what was stated. The MAU on GPU likely contains a healthy amount of players that never used cloud gaming at all. Given the numbers Nvidia has posted, you can almost guarantee that Nvidia dominates MS in minutes played per month on the cloud.
 

Goalus

Member
Why are doing this even though the acquisition is blocked as of now?
Do they already know that this will change in the future?

Gears 5 works exceptionally well on xCloud by the way. I played through half the game via cloud and experienced maybe about 10 brief moments of noticable lag.
 
Last edited:

gothmog

Gold Member
Why are doing this even though the acquisition is blocked as of now?
Do they already know that this will change in the future?

Gears 5 works exceptionally well on xCloud by the way. I played through have the game via cloud and experienced maybe about 10 brief moments of noticable lag.
Because Microsoft has a plan and this is part of it. They may replace the people at the top from time to time but they still follow the same playbooks around FUD and EEE.
 

wolffy66

Member
Please, for the love of Christ, leave these braindead responses on Twitter where they belong with the rest of the low IQ Xbox shills.

This agreement cannot be amended until it reaches its conclusion in July at which point both parties have to decide whether to extend the agreement or not.
So it can be amended. Spare me the fake hostility next time
 

GHG

Gold Member
Why are doing this even though the acquisition is blocked as of now?
Do they already know that this will change in the future?

Because gamers having access to stream their games via other services shouldn't be dependant on the deal. People should have freedom of choice in terms of which cloud streaming service they want to use, especially so given the huge factor that server proximity plays in the overall experience for an individual.

So much for being pro-consumer, the facade slips time and time again:

Luckily MS are not enganging in anti-consumer practices and let me play their games on the hardware of my choice instead.

Anti-consumer like forcing me to buy the latest piece of hardware to play their games.

Now that we have a rare instance where they are actually behaving in a pro-consumer manner you are questioning it? Ridiculous.
 
Last edited:

Bernoulli

M2 slut
Because gamers having access to stream their games via other services shouldn't be dependant on the deal. People should have freedom of choice in terms of which cloud streaming service they want to use, especially so given the huge factor that server proximity plays in the overall experience for an individual.

So much for being pro-consumer, the facade slips time and time again.
and the EU believed the PR that it was possible only by approving the deal
 
  • Like
Reactions: GHG

Goalus

Member
Blocked/Deal
Sounds biased and would suggest that the woman is not up for the job.

Now that we have a rare instance where they are actually behaving in a pro-consumer manner you are questioning it? Ridiculous.
I am not questioning it, I am wondering what the reason might be. Because there is none (from MS' perspective) unless the deal is approved.
 
Last edited:

FritzJ92

Member
H Hitchyhero not sure why the EU commissioner is spreading disinformation however the CMA did not just look at total Game Pass Ultimate subscribers for their calculations.


TSVFxs7.jpg


hEJQRIT.jpg


SrsC23q.jpg
The issue is how they separated GPU users that use cloud gaming vs those that do not. Everyone on Gampass is paid, and everyone with GPU has access to cloud gaming but this does not make them all users of cloud gaming. I also think Sony's percentage dropped because they changed their Subscription tiers, separating cloud gaming into something specific
 
Last edited:

Topher

Identifies as young
Could it be? And could the trade off be Nvidia publicly supporting the deal?

Very interesting. If so it was all to put pressure on regulators.

Pretty much. Nvidia came into this whole thing against the acquisition. And based on Nvidia's reputation I'm pretty sure they were angling for a deal the whole time. Now if the other cloud providers get the go ahead and put MS games on their services then that's one thing, but otherwise it seems to me Nvidia said if you want our endorsement then we get the deal no matter what happens with Activision. Purely speculation on my part, obviously.
 

DeepEnigma

Gold Member
Sounds biased and would suggest that the woman is not up for the job.
Bobs Burgers Straws GIF

Pretty much. Nvidia came into this whole thing against the acquisition. And based on Nvidia's reputation I'm pretty sure they were angling for a deal the whole time. Now if the other cloud providers get the go ahead and put MS games on their services then that's one thing, but otherwise it seems to me Nvidia said if you want our endorsement then we get the deal no matter what happens with Activision. Purely speculation on my part, obviously.
mUsT bE sOmE sTrAnGe cOiNcIdEnCe
 
Last edited:

jm89

Member
The issue is how they separated GPU users that use cloud gaming vs those that do not. Everyone on Gampass is paid, and everyone with GPU has access but does not make them users of cloud gaming. I also think Sony's percentage dropped because they changed their Subscription tiers, separating cloud gaming into something specific
I'm running out gifs that visualise the word repeat.
 

Topher

Identifies as young
The issue is how they separated GPU users that use cloud gaming vs those that do not. Everyone on Gampass is paid, and everyone with GPU has access but does not make them users of cloud gaming. I also think Sony's percentage dropped because they changed their Subscription tiers, separating cloud gaming into something specific

Read section 8.91
 

GHG

Gold Member
I am not questioning it, I am wondering what the reason might be. Because there is none (from MS' perspective) unless the deal is approved.

Give me one good reason why they shouldn't be doing that regardless of the Activision Blizzard acquisition.
 

GHG

Gold Member
A reasonable assessment:



So now you're for this happening regardless of the deal? Because Florian told you it was good?

planned parenthood chelsea GIF


In order to promote their own cloud offering.

But Mr. Pro-consumer, please explain to us how consumers only having one cloud streaming service as an option for certain games is a good thing.

Do you only care about what's good for Microsoft or do you care about what's good for you? (maybe this is a stupid question given what I've witnessed)
 
Last edited:

zapper

Member
what's the point of celebrating these deals if activision and bethesda games were on geforce now in the past and then they removed them? at now, with no permanent time constraints, these agreements just look like a trojan horse for microsoft imo
there is no guarantee that microsoft will take them down in the future..?
 
Last edited:

Goalus

Member
So now you're for this happening regardless of the deal? Because Florian told you it was good?

planned parenthood chelsea GIF

But Mr. Pro-consumer, please explain to us how consumers only having one cloud streaming service as an option for certain games is a good thing.
Why would I be for this? You seem to be seriously lacking the necessary reading comprehension.

First, I was questioning MS' decision process, and now I am commenting on FOSSpatents' assessment of the situation.

Do you only care about what's good for Microsoft or do you care about what's good for you? (maybe this is a stupid question given what I've witnessed)
Ask yourself and the usual suspects the same question and replace "Microsoft" with "Sony".
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom