In either case - Both companies have a responsibility to their shareholders to update them on what they're electing to do...
Would it need to be "amended" once the "non-expiry" date passes?
MS can't do that. If AB walks in less than 25 minutes, sure. But after 25 minutes, ABK is free to walk away and take $3 billion from MS that Microsoft must pay, as per their contract, within 2 business days if I remember correctly.MY current thought is that Microsoft are leveraging the $3B to say they will litigate it if ATVI walk away, and ATVI are assessing the threat, versus their obligation to their shareholders.
I feel the deal is dying - and would have died - but is currently held in limbo/silence by a Microsoft legal threat over lulu tweets![]()
Stay strong, bitch. I believe in you.xchads i don't feel so good
I'd actually argue the opposite.We can all agree that this kind of silence is strange to say the least, right? Maybe everything will be extended at the end, but there are clearly some roadblocks and hurdles to extend the deal on autopilot. And yes, at this point MS needs this to happen way-way more than Activision.
Yes, this is important.I'd actually argue the opposite.
Microsoft's stock price went up 4% in one day today due to their new AI product.
On the contrary, their stock barely moved when they announced the ABK deal.
Investors have clearly shown they are far more bullish on AI than gaming.
I'd be willing to wager there's a few emails being swapped at Microsoft saying "wtf are we doing spending $70 billion on a deal in an attempt to, maybe one day, catch up to Sony".
If I were ABK, I'd be trying to get that extension signed ASAP.
We can all agree that this kind of silence is strange to say the least, right? Maybe everything will be extended at the end, but there are clearly some roadblocks and hurdles to extend the deal on autopilot. And yes, at this point MS needs this to happen way-way more than Activision.
edit: false alarm caused by the WSJ article.Theu moved to 75 billions
![]()
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard Still Committed to $75 Billion Merger
The companies have secured approval in Europe, China and other markets but hit roadblocks in the U.S. and the U.K.www.wsj.com
Wait here it says 75 tooBobby at it
Even more expensive for Microsoft now lol!
Bobby billions always winsBobby at it
Even more expensive for Microsoft now lol!
If nothing happens it means they're having trouble coming to an agreement.I kinda get the feeling that exactly nothing is gonna happen. They dont need to explicity extend the deal, so I expect this to be pretty anti-climatic until they close sometimes in august.
They will make money off of cod while it's multi platform, they will bolster gamepass with this. Have tons of ips get in the mobile game etc it's a win for msI told you guys that Bobby will likely ask for more money because he has Microsoft by the balls here. The usual braindead suspects were leaving laughing emojis on my posts. Look at MS now paying for $75 billion, only to keep COD multiplatform for 10 years lol
This figure was addressed earlier.Theu moved to 75 billions
![]()
Microsoft and Activision Blizzard Still Committed to $75 Billion Merger
The companies have secured approval in Europe, China and other markets but hit roadblocks in the U.S. and the U.K.www.wsj.com
The $69b that's often quoted is net Activision cash on balance sheet.
Please Bobby ask for moreOh okay, we jumped the gun then. The deal may not have jumped up to $75 billion as of now at least.
![]()
$80B might be too much. He wants to squeeze Microsoft but also don't want to make it impossible for them to continue.Please Bobby ask for more
At least 80B
![]()
But now Activision are doing much better than when MS made the offer$80B might be too much. He wants to squeeze Microsoft but also don't want to make it impossible for them to continue.
Unless there is a new buyer already waiting to scoop ABK, I don't think Kottick will gamble by that much. The problem is that there are only a handful of companies that can afford ABK.
Nice calling people braindead then changing your post when it might be the other way around, smoooooth.edit: false alarm caused by the WSJ article.
I agree somewhat in that Microsoft are not dependent on this deal but its certainly a big step forward for Microsoft regardless.I'd actually argue the opposite.
Microsoft's stock price went up 4% in one day today due to their new AI product.
On the contrary, their stock barely moved when they announced the ABK deal.
Investors have clearly shown they are far more bullish on AI than gaming.
I'd be willing to wager there's a few emails being swapped at Microsoft saying "wtf are we doing spending $70 billion on a deal in an attempt to, maybe one day, catch up to Sony".
If I were ABK, I'd be trying to get that extension signed ASAP.
Seriously you guys never stop with the nonsense, you think Microsoft will pay another 11 billion on top?But now Activision are doing much better than when MS made the offer
Just with COD and Diablo they can ask for 80B
And if it's true that the next COD will be on the new switch that adds way more value, switch games don't decrease in price
With low end smartphone becoming more powerful there is more players on mobile games and more micro transactions money
Yes, but Kottick also has $400 million personal money on the lineBut now Activision are doing much better than when MS made the offer
Just with COD and Diablo they can ask for 80B
And if it's true that the next COD will be on the new switch that adds way more value, switch games don't decrease in price
With low end smartphone becoming more powerful there is more players on mobile games and more micro transactions money
it's a big step for xbox, for Microsoft as a whole… eh jury's out.I agree somewhat in that Microsoft are not dependent on this deal but its certainly a big step forward for Microsoft regardless.
Bethesda's purchase did not work out for them as well as they thought it would. Console market share dwindled even further, and Game Pass did not grow either.it's a big step for xbox, for Microsoft as a whole… eh jury's out.
Gaming is a high capital, resource intense, cutthroat market, that only provides relatively small returns for Microsoft.
Possibly but I don't think they'd lay out 70 billion for small returns, obviously they have big long term plans that very much include Xbox.it's a big step for xbox, for Microsoft as a whole… eh jury's out.
Gaming is a high capital, resource intense, cutthroat market, that only provides relatively small returns for Microsoft.
Your claim is the author who wrote that article, or the publication itself, was bribed by Microsoft? Do you have anything to back that up, or is it just conjecture?
I'm sure they have plans, but their investors clearly told them today/ yesterday they like AI more than gaming.Possibly but I don't think they'd lay out 70 billion for small returns, obviously they have big long term plans that very much include Xbox.
Agreed.I suspect that they planned to close today but the CAT judge made them switch to Thursday. The assumption being that the CMA lifts their merger block.
Agreed.
And from ABK's POV it makes no sense to sign an extension and remove their leverage.
The thing that would concern me from a MS perspective is that the CMA don't seem to have answers that the judge wanted, and can they get it all together by tomorrow lunch time?
The CMA still needs to justify their change of heart by saying exactly which changes to the acquisition fit their initial demands.I suspect that they planned to close today but the CAT judge made them switch to Thursday. The assumption being that the CMA lifts their merger block.
We haven't even begun to see what the Bethesda deal will do for Xbox, Starfield? Elderscrolls? Doom?Bethesda's purchase did not work out for them as well as they thought it would. Console market share dwindled even further, and Game Pass did not grow either.
While ABK is a better, more high-impact purchase than Zenimax, I don't think it will prove to be a megaton either in terms of upping the key metrics.
That ain't happening, you don't put this much effort into a deal to then back out, business doesn't work like that.I'm sure they have plans, but their investors clearly told them today/ yesterday they like AI more than gaming.
Microsoft were very quick to put this deal in motion to begin with. Can be just as quick to back out. Will be an interesting few days.
that's why CMA wanted to submit yesterday at 5PMI suspect that they planned to close today but the CAT judge made them switch to Thursday. The assumption being that the CMA lifts their merger block.
But backing out means losing $3 billion. That's a lot of money for anyone to just lose without gaining anything.I'm sure they have plans, but their investors clearly told them today/ yesterday they like AI more than gaming.
Microsoft were very quick to put this deal in motion to begin with. Can be just as quick to back out. Will be an interesting few days.
lose 3B but you have 62B left to invest in AI to dominateBut backing out means losing $3 billion. That's a lot of money for anyone to just lose without gaining anything.
One article (I think it was from Reuters) said that the judge talked about the possibility of adding additional tribunal judges.Agreed.
And from ABK's POV it makes no sense to sign an extension and remove their leverage.
The thing that would concern me from a MS perspective is that the CMA don't seem to have answers that the judge wanted, and can they get it all together by tomorrow lunch time?
To be clear, I never ruled out the possibility of Activision asking for (and getting) more money or better terms, I was more suggesting that I don't think they're going to call the deal off (if that's what you're lightly suggesting)Obviously, and yet they haven't - or at least they have made nothing public.
What should we take from that?
I mean I assume that MS is gung ho to continue the acquisition.
So the fact there is seemingly no agreed extension and media is now reporting they're in talks, implies ATVI isn't quite so gung ho on it and so far hasn't agreed to extend.
What are those talks about? More money? Why wouldn't ATVI extend? They believe it's in their interest to keep the option to pull out?
I guess ATVI could say the want the $3 billion termination sum added to the buyout price. That's somewhere around a 4% uplift and would push the price per share to about $100 - ish.
Then there are new terms about when this version of the deal expires, and what additional payoff ATVI are entitled to if it remains blocked at that time?
If this is the kind of negotiation happening now, ATVI must have at least considered the possibility of pulling out vs continuing - that in itself is a megaton because it demonstrates ATVI is not convinced that a sell to MS on those terms is in their best interests now.
Or maybe their printer is out of toner and the stores are closed until tomorrow![]()
Yeah, opportunity costs and all.lose 3B but you have 62B left to invest in AI to dominate
they can reach Windows level of domination because it's still early
I agree, on balance, it's not likely.That ain't happening, you don't put this much effort into a deal to then back out, business doesn't work like that.
$3bn is literally a rounding error for Microsoft.But backing out means losing $3 billion. That's a lot of money for anyone to just lose without gaining anything.