What "justice" has been done outside of a legal system? Some brands deciding not to sponsor them is entirely their prerogative, as is anyone deciding not to support his streams. Thats not something that gets decided by a court of law, nor do you require a legal reason to not want to support ANY streamer.
A few commentors on the internet labeling someone that way isn't optimal but like I said that's the way things are on the internet and the doc has taken part in thus sort of thing too. He knows the game. Would I label him that? No, but as I said earlier the social stigma of messing with minors makes this inevitable, thats not mob justice because it implies some coalition. Thats not whats happening. These are individuals commentating.
"The image we all picture in our heads" isn't the same image and thats what you have to realize. What may be frowned upon for some may be utterly reprehensible for another.
Dr. Disrespect is well beyond the point of getting any benefit of the doubt that he "didnt know better" because he frankly does. Hes been on the internet for ages. He knew what he was doing was wrong, and he knows it was wrong now. This isnt an inexperienced guy making a whoopsie, this is a grown man whos been engaging in internet culture for a decade that got caught doing something he knew he shouldn't have been doing. For some people thsts enough to write him off.
Im not keen to start throwing out streamer names, because again some people are going to feel different about some than others will. My general point, I think, is clear. Theres individuals that will get leeway here snd theres individuals that absolutely wouldn't, i don't think that's controversial or hard to grasp given the response to this we've seen. When situations like this arise peoples personal experience snd biases all come to roost, and no one is exempt.
