YeulEmeralda
Linux User
Why do Chinese players not count?! I know Americans are mad that someone is contesting their Empire but they are still human beings.
You're using hypothetical scenarios to downplay Steams success, it happens in every single thread. What was the uncles laptop meme again? Old gaf meme.Coping with what exactly? It's just a fact.
Good old fashioned racism!Bots I get, but why single out Chinese players?
You havent heard? Chinese players dont count. Wukong actually sold like shit.Bots I get, but why single out Chinese players?
mine auto launches, based on steam data they dont buy new games so it doesnt matter if they "play games" ive had steam auto open for years and not played a single game in months to almost an entire year.Does it matter? They are people logged in, but the amount of people playing will also go up as people logged in increases. You also have to be "logged in" in order to buy games, which is how Valve get their money.
No I'm not. I never said this is the majority of users or how it has hit that number. I just said hypothetically it's the parents which shouldn't count and the kids logging in to play are the legit users. You're just upset by this fact though for obvious reasons as if it were some slight against steam. It's just a simple fact I was providing:You're using hypothetical scenarios to downplay Steams success, it happens in every single thread. What was the uncles laptop meme again? Old gaf meme.
Yes, a Steam user is counted as a "user" even if they are not actively playing a game on the platform at the moment, as long as they are logged into their Steam account and considered "online" on the service; this means their account is technically active, contributing to the overall user count, even if they are simply browsing their library or not actively playing anything.
Key points to remember:
- Logged in counts:
The key factor is being logged into your Steam account, which means you are considered a "user" even if you are not currently playing a game.
- No double counting:
Steam does not double count users, so even if you have multiple tabs open with Steam, you are only counted once as a user.
- Inactive accounts:
Steam might eventually remove accounts that are completely inactive for a prolonged period, but generally, any logged-in account contributes to the user count.
I'm just interested to know what percentage of accounts are created from China or belong to Chinese players, pure curiosity, nothing more than that, I'm interested to see what influence China has on the market.Bots I get, but why single out Chinese players?
yes, it does matter.
They do, just not so much years old, full priced Sony first party ports, which you're still salty about.based on steam data they dont buy new games
I love to use it as my game launcher, even if I havent bought a game on steam, I can still add it in my library. Big picture mode basically turns my pc into a console, it's brilliantThe in-game number is 12.5 million, but then again the in-game number 6 years ago was 5.2 million, so the growth has been rather massive.
Obviously most PC gamers have Steam running in the background, even when they might be playing something not on Steam, like a game from Epic, Battle.net, GoG, or League so the actual "PC" in-game count is far higher.
Apparently his son has been heavily involved with the business for a while and (so far) intentioned to keep the same operating line the day he will be in charge.We're going to be in for so much shit when Steam inevitably goes public, or finds some other way to become crap. Apparently Gabe has a plan for when he's on his way out,
That's the meme! good times.Also important to note that many prankster uncles have been installing Steam on old ladies computers and have been for years. These numbers are included in the concurrents and likely invalidate the whole thing.
![]()
idgaf about sony ports, are you okay kid?They do, just not so much years old, full priced Sony first party ports, which you're still salty about.
"good reason one of the key metrics" for what? people just having it downloaded but not buying games on it?It actually doesn't. Daily Active Users is for a good reason one of the key metrics that you want, and you are one.
I read something to that effect a while ago, yeah (didn't know it was his son), but that's kinda the thing: Who knows how new leadership will move? Especially in a volatile market like gaming, there's always the chance the C-Suits are going to sell out for something they either deem "necessary" or "beneficiary" (Saudi-Money). Gabe has clearly proven himself, but I do think people like him are the exception, even if they start out with good intentions. Who knows how long the son (or whoever Gabe appoints) will actually stay in charge even.Apparently his son has been heavily involved with the business for a while and (so far) intentioned to keep the same operating line the day he will be in charge.
"good reason one of the key metrics" for what? people just having it downloaded but not buying games on it?
Man, people surely love to make these stupid arguments as if they meant something.90% just online playing nothing.
no they dont buy it, i already saw the stats STEAM shared, they dont buy new games. New game sales are NOT up, they play GAAS gamesI read something to that effect a while ago, yeah (didn't know it was his son), but that's kinda the thing: Who knows how new leadership will move? Especially in a volatile market like gaming, there's always the chance the C-Suits are going to sell out for something they either deem "necessary" or "beneficiary" (Saudi-Money). Gabe has clearly proven himself, but I do think people like him are the exception, even if they start out with good intentions. Who knows how long the son (or whoever Gabe appoints) will actually stay in charge even.
Mate do you really not see the significance? If there's a new game out, there's a good chance you'll buy it on steam, since you HAVE IT ALREADY RUNNING ON YOUR OS ALL THE TIME ANYWAY. You're basically one good marketing campaign away from spending money, this is music to everyones ears who wants to sell something (all of them).
Epic is trying to give people I don't know how many free games to get what you're giving Valve for free.
The flaw is he's comparing peak concurrent users on Steam to total PS5 units sold. I would bet that the # of monthly active Steam users is at least 10x the peak concurrent #.A bit of a flawed comparison since Steam has been around for over 20 years while consoles effectively reset every 7 years.
they play GAAS games
I'm fine mate, it's the Sony zealots who come in to cry in every single one of these threads.idgaf about sony ports, are you okay kid?
4 new games a year is very small, having a launcher for your WZ or other GAAS game is not the positive you want to spin it as
im not bitter, been a steam user for like 20 years, im just not delusional like you.I'm fine mate, it's the Sony zealots who come in to cry in every single one of these threads.
There are an incredible amount of users of Steam, lots of people still buy new games, but obviously the vast majority play older and cheaper games. That's just logical, but of course you will spin it into a negative to downplay Steam's success. Stop being bitter for no damn reason, we're all gamers.
Meanwhile: Over 1 million concurrent players in Monster Hunter Wilds.no they dont buy it, i already saw the stats STEAM shared, they dont buy new games. New game sales are NOT up, they play GAAS games
stop cherrypicking my comments, jfc, i said they dont buy new games DAU are just sitting on a launcher NOT BUYING THE GAMES because its easier to play your EA and ABK games on there not to look at the storeWhich again brings us to Daily Active Users. We've been over this. I hope you're as stoned as I am otherwise I worry about your ability to think a point through.
im not bitter, been a steam user for like 20 years, im just not delusional like you.
You cant look at stats in silos
You're either confused and don't know what that means or you're off to the deep end. Either way. Yahtzee!cherypicking
low iq, holy, cant think past one word.You're either confused and don't know what that means or you're off to the deep end. Either way. Yahtzee!
yep, one game doesn't tell the whole story, you're gonna mention BlackMyth next? Just because people only buy 1-2 games a year and you name the 1-2? So if i go all the way back to PUBG and how many played then i could say "wow MH is doing so poorly because its lower than PUBG, PC gaming must be dying." You see how disingenuous that is? (i know it was semi-free, also had a paid element)Meanwhile: Over 1 million concurrent players in Monster Hunter Wilds.
low iq, holy, cant think past one word.
I don't think that shines a much better light on you mate. I haven't cherrypicked anything, there's no cherries in the crap you write.stop cherrypicking my comments, jfc,
Piss off.yep, one game doesn't tell the whole story, you're gonna mention BlackMyth next? Just because people only buy 1-2 games a year and you name the 1-2? So if i go all the way back to PUBG and how many played then i could say "wow MH is doing so poorly because its lower than PUBG, PC gaming must be dying." You see how disingenuous that is? (i know it was semi-free, also had a paid element)
im not making things up, im telling you thats how it is, steam told usOh, you think whatever crap you posted gains in merit when I quote the full "sentence"?
I don't think that shines a much better light on you mate. I haven't cherrypicked anything, there's no cherries in the crap you write.
I already adressed your nonsense about "not buying games" and how that's not the strong argument you think it is, I'm not surprised that you don't get it though, but I'm done explaining it to you because clearly there's no point in that.
Steam doing well upsetting people as per![]()
Alright boys, what are we fighting about?
Yes if we eliminate all the games people are buying then we can say that no-one is buying games.yep, one game doesn't tell the whole story, you're gonna mention BlackMyth next? Just because people only buy 1-2 games a year and you name the 1-2? So if i go all the way back to PUBG and how many played then i could say "wow MH is doing so poorly because its lower than PUBG, PC gaming must be dying." You see how disingenuous that is? (i know it was semi-free, also had a paid element)
im not making things up, im telling you thats how it is, steam told us
how does that sound bitter at all, im just telling it like it is, its biggest on PC, you relax lolThe only platform that isn't completely dominated by GaaS is Nintendo. You sound so bitter dude. Relax.
Since the start of 2024, 19 paid games have had a CCU count of over 100k. If you drop that down to something like 50k CCU (so still millions sold) that number gets significantly higher.yep, one game doesn't tell the whole story, you're gonna mention BlackMyth next? Just because people only buy 1-2 games a year and you name the 1-2? So if i go all the way back to PUBG and how many played then i could say "wow MH is doing so poorly because its lower than PUBG, PC gaming must be dying." You see how disingenuous that is? (i know it was semi-free, also had a paid element)
Steam doing well upsetting people as per
Okay but do you think you'll still spend time thinking about "interesting" industry changes for Steam in 30 years? For me it's just too far out. I doubt I'll use Steam or play video games at all in 30 years, maybe I'll play checkers on some retirement home lolMy account already is over 20 years old, so it's not really off to think of a scope like that.
how does that sound bitter at all, im just telling it like it is, its biggest on PC, you relax lol
I never said valve is cooked, i'm just saying its not entirely something to celebrate or post every time they hit a tiny record of users.So the same games that are popular on PsN are more popular on PC? Slam dunk dude. Valve is cooked.
![]()
Basic extrapolation and a very generous one. PSN is probably around 5m.
Those would be legit. It's more the parents on their laptops whose kid has used. The concurrent users of steam counts any booted laptop which has steam installed.
Okay but do you think you'll still spend time thinking about "interesting" industry changes for Steam in 30 years? For me it's just too far out. I doubt I'll use Steam or play video games at all in 30 years, maybe I'll play checkers on some retirement home lol
![]()
Alright boys, what are we fighting about?
Then why did you even bring it up?The gap in popularity. There is no valid comparison to be made anymore.