Xbox has announced a multi-year agreement with AMD to co-engineer new silicon chips for the next-generation of Xbox consoles

Man my brothers Amiga was so futuristic, and copied floppies, so many amazing games. Oh and wiggle the joystick porn who can forget that!!

Goat :

co2jht.jpg
Oh yeah great art and music, title piano song is so good 🎶 👌
N7BBocD.jpeg


Just took that photo, it literally takes 2 seconds to power this old beauty up. Modded with DVI out among other things to still keep it usable. I refuse to just leave the Amiga tucked away in some box in the attic!
 
Wouldn't supporting Steam on a home console hurt Microsoft's revenues and its own store?
Would probably kill it except for use through Gamepass.

Are there software revenue numbers posted in their earnings reports?
Maybe they already make so little from the store right now that it doesn't bother them to basically kill it off.
 
Last edited:
You also still see the "it's just a sticker on a PC" posts at least once a page, despite them specifically saying they're developing new silicon in the video, let alone posts from kepler or yourself. 🤷‍♂️
The silicon doesn't really matter when it comes to distinguishing b/w a console or a PC. If AMD makes a hardware, it will most likely be used for PCs anyway - sooner or later.

What matters more is whether the new device has the Windows or the Xbox OS. This will determine if it is truly a console or "just a sticker on a PC."
 
Last edited:
The silicon doesn't really matter when it comes to distinguishing b/w a console or a PC. If AMD makes a hardware, it will most likely be used for PCs anyway - sooner or later.

What matters more is whether the new device has the Windows or the Xbox OS. This will determine if it is truly a console or "just a ticker on a PC."

Silicon support is needed for BC due to legal reasons. Also technical in the case of Xbox 360 texture and audio formats.
 
Last edited:
Silicon support is needed for BC due to legal reasons. Also technical in the case of Xbox 360 texture and audio formats.
hmmm sounds like you are implying AMD could make a whole subset of PC CPUs that are Xbox BC and might even have an Xbox logo on them?

Am I hearing that correctly?

In theory I mean
 
hmmm sounds like you are implying AMD could make a whole subset of PC CPUs that are Xbox BC and might even have an Xbox logo on them?

Am I hearing that correctly?

In theory I mean

All AMD gaming APUs going forward outside ones for Sony and Valve.
 
Last edited:
Release with 24 tflops is better to not even come out. only if u talking about series s, 24 tflops in 2027 will be really weak. I expect the $1000 model to have 50 real tflops. a 10070 xt or 10080 xt udna gpu.
I guess they were thinking of RDNA 2, since the 9070 XT is already above 50 TF, and that seems a reasonable target for the PS6.
 
Watch the Lisa Su video lol. I knew about this since last June.
I don't understand the difference, the first two xbox CPU chips were not amd, so they have to be using hardware emulation/ rather than software emulation, which would seem to be easier and less costly to implement. Eitherway some sort of emulation is being used to play the older games. Why is hardware emulation ok and software not?
 
I don't understand the difference, the first two xbox CPU chips were not amd, so they have to be using hardware emulation/ rather than software emulation, which would seem to be easier and less costly to implement. Eitherway some sort of emulation is being used to play the older games. Why is hardware emulation ok and software not?

Software emulation is why you don't get the complete Xbox and Xbox 360 library on BC. They had to work with publishers to get permission.
 
Last edited:
Software emulation is why you don't get the complete Xbox and Xbox 360 library on BC. They had to work with publishers to get permission.

I guess I was thinking from a legality standpoint. Either method are is not using original hardware. I thought an issue was some companies not allowing the games to be emulated.
 
Last edited:
I guess I was thinking from a legality standpoint. Either method are is not using original hardware. I thought an issue was some companies not allowing the games to be emulated.

Your PC library aren't run using original hardware but they're not emulated.
 
Last edited:
This console will be for someone who wants to upgrade to PC gaming(wise decision) but does not want to leave their Xbox library behind that they've built up over multiple generations.
 
I guess they were thinking of RDNA 2, since the 9070 XT is already above 50 TF, and that seems a reasonable target for the PS6.
I mean real 50 tflops(rdna2).
Ps5 pro is around 16-17 real tflops.

It doesn't make any sense a new gen with 24 tflops. 9070 xt has real 24 tflops. That is not enough for a new gen. At least 40 or better to wait a bit more.
 
If the MS + AMD combo are building a complete lineup of gaming optimized APU chips for mobile, consoles and PC's, all those cases may warrant different memory setup. Mobile chips will be using LPDDR5X, console chips may use just GDDR7, but for the PC chips it would make sense to have non-unified memory with DDR5 + GDDR7. Maybe even next Xbox will use split pool of DDR5 and GDDR7 instead of unified memory pool?
 
Last edited:
If the MS + AMD combo are building a complete lineup of gaming optimized APU chips for mobile, consoles and PC's, all those cases may warrant different memory setup. Mobile chips will be using LPDDR5X, console chips may use just GDDR7, but for the PC chips it would make sense to have non-unified memory with DDR5 + GDDR7. Maybe even next Xbox will use split pool of DDR5 and GDDR7 instead of unified memory pool?

Everything will be APUs. So lpddr and (g)DDR only. There are no APUs using two ram pools outside the PS4 / PS5.
 
Last edited:
Everything will be APUs. So lpddr and (g)DDR only. There are no APUs using two ram pools outside the PS4 / PS5.
There could be.

Neither LPDDR5X nor DDR5 will not offer enough bandwidth for serious gaming GPU. And GDDR is not optimal for PC CPUs, and might not be cost efficient.

AI workstations can use just the LPPDR, like Nvidia GB10/N1X based systems, but I don't think that it would be feasible for serious gaming system.
 
There could be.

Neither LPDDR5X nor DDR5 will not offer enough bandwidth for serious gaming GPU. And GDDR is not optimal for PC CPUs, and might not be cost efficient.

AI workstations can use just the LPPDR, like Nvidia GB10/N1X based systems, but I don't think that it would be feasible for serious gaming system.

LPDDR6 top end can match the GDDR6 in PS5 / X. For gaming focused APU GDDR7 should be fine.
 
Last edited:
I mean real 50 tflops(rdna2).
Ps5 pro is around 16-17 real tflops.

It doesn't make any sense a new gen with 24 tflops. 9070 xt has real 24 tflops. That is not enough for a new gen. At least 40 or better to wait a bit more.
RDNA 4 improves performance per teraflop to get close to Ampere. The 26 TF 9060 XT is marginally slower than the 26 TF 5060 Ti and faster than the 17 TF 6800. So 24 RDNA 4 TF is already like 32 RDNA 2 TF.

But that comes at a big cost in terms of transistors and area, since the 9060 XT has more than double the transistors of the 7600 XT and the same area on a much more expensive process. The 9070 XT is already 357 mm^2 compared to the 279 mm^2 PS5 Pro GPU, and doesn't even include a CPU. So I don't think it's likely we'll get something much faster.
 
RDNA 4 improves performance per teraflop to get close to Ampere. The 26 TF 9060 XT is marginally slower than the 26 TF 5060 Ti and faster than the 17 TF 6800. So 24 RDNA 4 TF is already like 32 RDNA 2 TF.

But that comes at a big cost in terms of transistors and area, since the 9060 XT has more than double the transistors of the 7600 XT and the same area on a much more expensive process. The 9070 XT is already 357 mm^2 compared to the 279 mm^2 PS5 Pro GPU, and doesn't even include a CPU. So I don't think it's likely we'll get something much faster.
If it has at least a 32 tflops like 9070 xt then will be a good console for 1440@60fps upscaled, but since amd now has good upscale solution i don't see a problem. But it will be one more gen with a start at 4k and 2-3 years a lot of 1440p and 1080p games at medium settings.
 
If it has at least a 32 tflops like 9070 xt then will be a good console for 1440@60fps upscaled, but since amd now has good upscale solution i don't see a problem. But it will be one more gen with a start at 4k and 2-3 years a lot of 1440p and 1080p games at medium settings.

Brother in christ, you know full well that devs will prioritize 4k/30 fps on fixed spec hardware cause it shows off better :messenger_grinning_sweat:
 
I don't understand the difference, the first two xbox CPU chips were not amd, so they have to be using hardware emulation/ rather than software emulation, which would seem to be easier and less costly to implement. Eitherway some sort of emulation is being used to play the older games. Why is hardware emulation ok and software not?
Because the 3rd party licenses specify that they are for Xbox hardware only. Hardware emulation is still hardware, as long as it is custom Microsoft can say it is a mini-Xbox.

This is not an issue with newer titles, because Play Anywhere titles are designed to include PC license in it.
 
Why native 4K when you can use fsr4 and manufacture a smaller and cheaper die?

PS6 games can use FSR4 or the next generation version of PSSR, but what about PS4 and PS5 games?

I have no problem with PS6 try to run them at native 4k60.
 
Interesting turn of events. MS kept this very low key which I guess is probably a good move at this point. I'm guessing a Nov '26 launch is the aim as a Nov '27 launch is far away.

K KeplerL2 , IIRC you mentioned that Sony's APU would be ready this year....Is it possible Sony also could be trying to make Nov '26 or do you think they'll do their own thing this time? I can't help but think if the tech/specs are similar or the same they wouldn't want to give Xbox any head start with the big games.

Having said that they'll probably have a gentleman's agreement to launch at the same time like always!
 
Interesting turn of events. MS kept this very low key which I guess is probably a good move at this point. I'm guessing a Nov '26 launch is the aim as a Nov '27 launch is far away.

K KeplerL2 , IIRC you mentioned that Sony's APU would be ready this year....Is it possible Sony also could be trying to make Nov '26 or do you think they'll do their own thing this time? I can't help but think if the tech/specs are similar or the same they wouldn't want to give Xbox any head start with the big games.

Having said that they'll probably have a gentleman's agreement to launch at the same time like always!
They could rush it but there's no real reason for them to do it imo, unless they think Xbox having potentially a year of better performance on GTA6 is a big deal.
 
They could rush it but there's no real reason for them to do it imo, unless they think Xbox having potentially a year of better performance on GTA6 is a big deal.

Exactly that sort of risk is what makes them (well the accountants!) nervous hence why they tend to mirror each other.

Hopefully we get another Xbox tease at this years TGA's.

HeisenbergFX4 HeisenbergFX4 Have you heard anything on the Sony side recently or is it still quiet on their end right now?
 
Top Bottom