Game Developers celebrating assassination of Charlie Kirk (Sucker Punch, Bungie, The Coalition etc) [Update] Sucker Punch Dev Fired

Adolf_Hitler_-_Wien_Oper.jpg

i guess you would have zero problem buying this piece since you "separate the art from the artist" right ? its from an infamous Austrian painter.
Very cute baby also
 
The complete rant, if you listen to it, is about him complaining that affirmative action leads to dumb and untrained people to jobs of responsability.
If Group A has to meet higher standards than Group B to train for / perform Job X, it is perfectly reasonable and logical that you would be more confident in the ability of someone from Group A.

It does not mean that nobody from Group B can meet the standards Group A had to meet; it means that you know the person from Group A had to meet those standards, whereas you do not know that about someone from Group B.

The suspicion caused does not result from the innate characteristics of Group B, but from the lowering of standards to prioritise sufficient representation of each group ahead of producing the highest collective ability levels possible.
 
I'm American/Muslim and I am neutral to all of this. The far left is mostly vocal but they've given me far too much shit on talking about certain issues due to their fragile egos and are a mindhive of shattered glass. The far right thinks I am sub-human thanks to Zionist propaganda against Muslims/POC which has worked quite well in almost 2 decades plus which Kirk was advocating.

How many of you are non-white and have gone through racially based violence? I have and its dehumanizing. I know the lefties would still have empathy for me but could betray me any moment if I stepped a little to the right. And after watching Mehdi's show on the White Supremacists on Jubilee, I know exactly why I don't have sympathy for Kirk. For me he was a bought shill by Israel.

Personally, I give no fucks for either side. Have at it at each others throats, but why are our games being politicized by so many of you especially? Gaming is not the platform for war, let people have their opinions. And forcing others to empathize or mourn for someone who literally didn't want people like me to exist through discrimination or empathize for anyone outside of their own race is fascism in its own right. Everyone has their reasons and with Kirk's assassination I find myself in the middle of all this but definitely leaning left on the issue. You see its complex and some of you very American people do not think with caveats in mind outside of your own borders.

Also, to the dudes talking about Gays, Trans, Queers being pelted and thrown of buildings. In which countries out of Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan and Iran (the most ideologically extremist Islamist countries) do you see this happen outside of occupational CIA/Mossad tributaries like ISIS being created? That's 3/57 of OIC states. Some of you really need to see Muslim countries that are not war torn and peaceful.

Also some AI stuff since I was curious:

'Number of plots/attacks / incidentsFrom 2015–2020: about 267 plots/attacks attributed to far-right extremists. Same period: about 66 incidents attributed to far-left extremists.
Fatalities / deathsIn that 2015–2020 window, the far right was linked to about 91 deaths in those plots/attacks. Far left: about 19 deaths in those incidents in the same period.
Longer-term trend (since 1990)Since 1990: far-right extremists have committed far more ideologically motivated homicides. One NIJ report cites 227 events by far-right extremists causing over 520 deaths. Same period: far-left extremists committed 42 attacks causing about 78 deaths.

Relative lethality, kinds of targets, types of violenceRight-wing extremist acts tend to be more deadly, more often using firearms, targeting civilians (minorities, religious targets, etc.), or making large scale attacks. Left-wing extremist incidents are more often less deadly, more likely to involve property damage, protests, clashes, smaller scale violence.

Based on multiple studies (NIJ, CSIS, START, etc.), far-right extremists are responsible for more incidents of political violence and far more deaths in ideologically motivated attacks in the U.S. in recent decades than far-left extremists.

The far left does commit violence, especially protests that turn violent, property damage, etc., but as a source of lethal, ideologically motivated extremist violence, it has been much less active compared to the far right.'
I went through the sources of some of these studies some years back because someone was using them against me in an argument, and the way they qualified things as right and left was extremely odd. They would only qualify extreme left wing nuts as ideological, yet everyone with just a slight connection with the right was viewed as far right.

For example, a lot of these studies wouldn't include things like BLM or school protests as left wing violence.
 
I went through the sources of some of these studies some years back because someone was using them against me in an argument, and the way they qualified things as right and left was extremely odd. They would only qualify extreme left wing nuts as ideological, yet everyone with just a slight connection with the right was viewed as far right.

For example, a lot of these studies wouldn't include things like BLM or school protests as left wing violence.
That's how it works.
The guy debating is 'a radical right-winger", but those celebrating this person's death think they're moderates.
 
Last edited:
I saw a lot of them, none of them were functioning societies.

Nice ragebait pal. How did you conclude or observe your findings?

I went through the sources of some of these studies some years back because someone was using them against me in an argument, and the way they qualified things as right and left was extremely odd. They would only qualify extreme left wing nuts as ideological, yet everyone with just a slight connection with the right was viewed as far right.

For example, a lot of these studies wouldn't include things like BLM or school protests as left wing violence.

I wonder where they would put me since I have my own category of "terrorist" 😂. Probably the right which would be hilarious.
 
How fucking hard is to mind your own business. These clowns a searching for drama and this time might not like what they find.
As I said before - this is a logical outcome of people being told for 20 years to share their thoughts and feelings unfiltered on social media. They don't know there is other way.
 
Best case scenario, Charlie Kirk was joking calling the suspect a Patriot
Charlie Kirk did not call the suspect a patriot, jokingly or otherwise. Could you please double check the lies you have so quickly been programmed with before parroting them.

"I hope the guys name is Mario so Luigi knows his bro got his back"
Which pretty obviously indicated support for both attacks from the outset rather than just a tasteless joke. This interpretation was only increasingly confirmed by her conduct going forward.

If she had encountered pushback and promptly and sincerely clarified that she did not mean to imply support for assassinating people and that it was just a tasteless joke, it probably would have helped to some extent yes. But it wasn't meant as just a tasteless joke, and she apparently had no intention of 'betraying her cause' by pretending that it was. Whether it would have sufficed I don't know, but not doing so probably turned this into an easy call for the company.
 
We have no confirmation she was fired, we only know she updated her LinkedIn to say she stopped work at SuckerPunch.......what shes doing next no one knows.
Keep you eyes open on those credits, I can all but guarantee she will be within Washington
Harass this individual so they never work again? Got some crazies in here.
 
Last edited:
Oh no...You mean to tell me people with conservative right wing views who dont like the left, doesnt want to support a game by devs who could have left wing views? Im shocked!

Shocked Futurama GIF


Some people werent going to buy this game anyway just because of the main voice actress. I took a peek, and literally everyone who said they wont buy the game now is already on my blocked list, lol. I saw through the bs long ago. If you're going to let some else opinion change your decision to enjoy a form of entertainment, than it just shows hypocrisy, and how the right have become the snowflakes they accused the left of being.

This is literally the same country that rewarded a women with 800k in donations for calling a 5 year old black with autism a racial slur. If any devs get fired from this, they can always set up a GoFundMe and nearly become millionaires overnight. The moral compass of having sympathy for other despite political differences went out the window years ago. Charlie Kirk didnt have it either. The man said Civil Rights was a mistake and called George Floyd a scum bag. Lets not pretend like he was Martin Luther King. He was a fucking podcaster who liked debating and was close to Trump, lol.

I'll still be getting my copy day one. Any studio that makes a game I want will always get my support. Hell I'm playing through Ghost of Tsushima DLC right now. Feel like a total bad ass slicing throats, throwing ninja stars and being a "one man army". I really want to cleanse my pallete with a proper next gen graphical showcase after seeing so many people glaze Hollow Knight Silk Song. "Like you guys dont know what your missing with this $20 game that took 7 years to build."
 
Last edited:








These news aren't excactly easy to find, as it is usual the common folks revealing stuff like this because the left media doesn't. Also, many of the tweets or social media posts has been deleted and are long gone, making it pretty difficult to actually get the resulsts again.

The only reason I mentioned Nintendo is because they are a japanese company, first and foremost. I haven't seen any hateful message in their games. Nintendo are pure evil when it comes to company greed, and the hunt for emulation, where they ruin people's life, but the reason I said Nintendo probably is the only company not doing this is not to say Nintendo are the good guy, because they do so much damage to the gaming industry thanks to all their insane patents lately.
I was talking purely from a political view, and nothing else.


That's a lot of research for nothing. Posting a bunch of unrelated random information does not help your case.
Bottom line is you still have no clue for this particular case. Also, not clicking those video's and giving that video and giving that one chick clicks.
She feeds off people like you.
 
Last edited:
Harass this individual so they never work again? Got some crazies in here.
Harass! :messenger_tears_of_joy: If someone doesnt want to spend his money for a company employing this person...isnt really harassment....but a very wise consumer decision (imho). You can also keep yr eyes open for the credits and deciding to buy off everything, because you support her actions. Its upto you, mate! But stop with these pathetic buzzwords trying to criminalize a trivial decision of buying/supporting a product or not.
 
Having a law degree myself I can 20000% assure you it does NOT take intelligence to obtain that piece of paper.
Maybe true, but I tend to think Michelle Obama is likely reasonably intelligent.

Obviously "reasonably intelligent" can be interpreted pretty differently based on perspective.
 
Maybe true, but I tend to think Michelle Obama is likely reasonably intelligent.

Obviously "reasonably intelligent" can be interpreted pretty differently based on perspective.

Yes I don't think the Obamas are an example of DEI that some seem to believe- is she brilliant - I don't think so but hardly an abject moron
 
Harass! :messenger_tears_of_joy: If someone doesnt want to spend his money for a company employing this person...isnt really harassment....but a very wise consumer decision (imho). You can also keep yr eyes open for the credits and deciding to buy off everything, because you support her actions. Its upto you, mate! But stop with these pathetic buzzwords trying to criminalize a trivial decision of buying/supporting a product or not.
What? Youre free to do what you please, I could care less. I just find it crazy you're openly suggesting to track a credits page of X company to ensure this person doesn't work there.

Curious, do you research every individual that took part in creating products that you buy? If you dont, that isnt a very wise consumer decision (imho)
 
Last edited:
Why do y'all go to such extremes to say I wont buy or support a developer if only a few say something negative for smthing you disagree with?

Like how is that rational? Why do you think that means they represent all hundreds of them instead of just those individuals speaking their mind?
 
Top Bottom