Creative rip-offs, such as designs, are not going to win in court, especially in video games. That's why the Pokemon company is going for another route by suing gameplay elements instead of design.Yes, robot dinos aren't new. But look at the picture again. They didn't just make any random robot dinos. They made some that look almost exactly like the ones designed specifically for Horizon. And then they put them in promo material that blatantly rips off Horizon. All this after Sony rejected their pitch for a Tencent made Horizon game.
These are very different situations.
Look like Pokémon and dragon quest. Everything is fineTencent is literally larger than Sony Corp. More than than twice the market cap.
Lol Horizon being "boring and forgettable" has nothing to do with the problem here. Tencent asked Sony if they could make a Horizon game. Sony said no. So Tencent ripped off the game and made their own.
Unless you're suggesting theft is fine if it's stealing from someone you don't like?
Reminder of what Tencent is trying to defend here:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
What's your view on Palworld vs Pokemon?
same can be said pokemonThis is true; whoever supported Palworld needs to stand united against Sony too in this case and rally behind Tencent.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yes, it's universal knowledge at this point that the Horizon franchise is ripping off Zoids.same can be said pokemon
![]()
They don't look the same at all...Horizon ripped off robot dinos from Zoids
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It looks ripped-off in similar veins as Motiram to HorizonsThey don't look the same at all...
It looks ripped-off in similar veins as Motiram to Horizons
![]()
![]()
Robot dinos are not invented by PlayStation.
It looks ripped-off in similar veins as Motiram to Horizons
![]()
![]()
Robot dinos are not invented by PlayStation.
yep, but Nintendo even has a stronger case than Sony since the whole assets were ripped from Pokemon creature's assets. While Moritam is just a similarly looking design without any stolen assets.Neither are cute chibi monsters by Nintendo. This is why this whole IP conversation is retarded.
I never said they were. To say this is anything remotely similar to what Tencent is doing is disingenuous.It looks ripped-off in similar veins as Motiram to Horizons
![]()
![]()
Robot dinos are not invented by PlayStation.
Tencent is literally larger than Sony Corp. More than than twice the market cap.
Lol Horizon being "boring and forgettable" has nothing to do with the problem here. Tencent asked Sony if they could make a Horizon game. Sony said no. So Tencent ripped off the game and made their own.
Unless you're suggesting theft is fine if it's stealing from someone you don't like?
Reminder of what Tencent is trying to defend here:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
As I mentioned in the other thread, I don't see Sony winning this. It's almost certainly heading for a settlement, with Tencent making some minor, largely cosmetic changes so Sony can claim the lawsuit wasn't a waste of time and money.
Nvm someone already posted that Pokemon was a ripoff of DQ.So Palworld deserved to be aued by Nintendo and the latter to patented the pokemon imagery.
Please, sony just feels threatened by this since they know if tencent releases an MMO with a setting remotely similar to horizon, whatever chances they had of making a horizon MMO goes down the drain. We all know which of the two have better chances of releazing a successful live service game of this type.For most instances, I would agree, but this is clearly blatant. Tencent literally went to Sony, showed them the game, and asked them to license the Horizon name to them so they can release it as a Horizon game.
Tencent is literally larger than Sony Corp. More than than twice the market cap.
Lol Horizon being "boring and forgettable" has nothing to do with the problem here. Tencent asked Sony if they could make a Horizon game. Sony said no. So Tencent ripped off the game and made their own.
Unless you're suggesting theft is fine if it's stealing from someone you don't like?
Reminder of what Tencent is trying to defend here:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
alright which one of you works for tencent
My problem with that sentiment is the one who said it go wild and aggressive after he said it. It's completely an immoral behavior.![]()
Tencent says it's not ripping off Horizon Zero Dawn, calls it derivative
Tencent argues that Aloy isn't even that central to Sony's brand, among other things in a court filing seeking to dismiss a lawsuit over 'ripoff' gamewww.polygon.com
Here's Tencent's take, from a recent court filing:
Horizon itself was a rip-off from another franchise, so it's okay for another company to do exactly the same.Jesus, this is incredibly blatant.
I'm no fan of Sony, Guerilla or the Horizon games, but the fact that most people who watched the trailer for this game a while ago immediately clocked it as a HZD rip-off is telling.
it's still better than letting gigantic corporations sue who they feel like. I don't trust sony nearly enough to make this a one-time thing.
It's no secret that a good chunk of the designs in Palworld are, let's say, heavily inspired by Pokemon.yep, but Nintendo even has a stronger case than Sony since the whole assets were ripped from Pokemon creature's assets. While Moritam is just a similarly looking design without any stolen assets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
They are different cases.yep, but Nintendo even has a stronger case than Sony since the whole assets were ripped from Pokemon creature's assets. While Moritam is just a similarly looking design without any stolen assets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I can't believe we are almost a year later and people are still saying this nonsense. The models have absolutely nothing to do with the lawsuit. Nintendo's lawsuit is bullshit as are their, after the fact, patent claims. The only reason they are getting away with this is because the lawsuit is in Japan.yep, but Nintendo even has a stronger case than Sony since the whole assets were ripped from Pokemon creature's assets. While Moritam is just a similarly looking design without any stolen assets.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Because suing for likeness isn't going to win them a case, so they were going for another element instead of likeness, while Sony is suing for something that was never them to begin with.I can't believe we are almost a year later and people are still saying this nonsense. The models have absolutely nothing to do with the lawsuit. Nintendo's lawsuit is bullshit as are their, after the fact, patent claims. The only reason they are getting away with this is because the lawsuit is in Japan.
So you admit that it has nothing to do with likeness, which means it can't make their case stronger, so why say it? And the fact that they are pulling these idiotic patent claims just shows what a shitty company they are. This literally would not fly in any country other than Japan and they know it. I hope they lose their asses, because if they win it hurts the entire gaming industry. Some of the shit they are claiming they now own are literally features in games like Final Fantasy and Elden Ring. It's disgusting. Not only should they lose, but should be heavily punished financially. It should make us reexamine patent law, because it's so obviously broken that a company can claim rights, even after the fact, to mechanics that they didn't even invent in the first place and that are used in hundreds of competition products.Because suing for likeness isn't going to win them a case, so they were going for another element instead of likeness, while Sony is suing for something that was never them to begin with.
Second horizon has some monster hunter mechanics, you need to detach certain specific parts without broken them to upgrade weapons and armours, if sony want, they can push this aspect in the lawsuit to make it look like horizon is partially similar to mh.Creative rip-offs, such as designs, are not going to win in court, especially in video games. That's why the Pokemon company is going for another route by suing, gameplay elements instead of design.
Horizon has different gameplay than Moritan, which is closer to Monster Hunter games and survival games.
That's not gonna stick. On Palworld worked because they used throwing the ball to dispatch pals, the same as Pokemon. That's why they changed it to no throw the ball, but just summon directly the pal.Second horizon has some monster hunter mechanics, you need to detach certain specific parts without broken them to upgrade weapons and armours, if sony want, they can push this aspect in the lawsuit to make it look like horizon is partially similar to mh.
This is not about weak spots tho.That's not gonna stick. On Palworld worked because they used throwing the ball to dispatch pals, the same as Pokemon. That's why they changed it to no throw the ball, but just summon directly the pal.
On Horizon/MH wont work because you have in many other games the mechanic of stripping NPC of they armor to detect weak spots.
People mostly just hate them for being Chinese.WTF I love Tencent now...?!
And while I wouldn't call Horizon derivative (at least when it comes to its universe), it was boring and forgettable as hell. Which, at times is even worse.
Guerilla should just stick to doing Decima and license it out to studios that can actually make something great.