• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

Oh but it's so liberal over there .. there's whole YouTube channels that show it for proof! Even though YouTube is banned there and those YouTubers have privileges to places that no one else does. 🤷‍♂️

Most Iranians had access to Youtube through VPN.


Nearly 90% of internet users in Iran rely on VPN services to navigate widespread internet disruptions, according to the latest report from the Tehran E-Commerce Association published on Sunday, August 3.

The report, which ranks Iran as 97th out of 100 countries for internet quality, also criticizes Iranian authorities for failing to address calls to improve national connectivity, the Iran International reported.

The use of the best VPN services and other circumvention tools, like Starlink, keeps rising despite a law enforced in February 2024 outlawing their usage without a legal permit.

"Our findings show that 93% of youth and 86% of the general public use VPNs," said Pouya Pirhosseinlou, head of the Internet and Infrastructure Committee of the Tehran E-Commerce Association, the Iran International reported.

Despite easing some internet restrictions like those against WhatsApp back in January, many websites remain filtered in Iran at the time of writing, forcing Iranians to find alternative ways to stay connected.

"Today, around 700,000 small businesses operate on Instagram. At least one million jobs are tied to that platform alone. Disruptions here directly hit people's livelihoods," explains Pirhosseinlou.

Yet, via a reliable virtual private network (VPN), people in Iran can trick their local internet service provider and gain access to Instagram and other restricted platforms within seconds.

This surge in VPN usage may also contribute to worsening the precarious connectivity level of Iran's internet. Citizens' traffic is forced "through distant, inefficient routes and lowering speed," Pirhosseinlou explains, adding: "Even on unfiltered websites, users keep VPNs on –further degrading national internet performance."

This isn't the first time that the Tehran Electronic Commerce Association – an independent body that monitors and evaluates the internet situation in Iran – has placed Iran's internet among the worst worldwide. In another report dated January 2024, experts precisely blamed the President and Iranian officials' lack of knowledge for this "self-inflicted" situation.

Commenting on the latest findings, Pirhosseinlou said: "Even if we had America's infrastructure, Iran's internet would still be full of disruptions because of the current filtering.[..] Filtering equipment is inherently disruptive. It causes serious malfunctions across many emerging protocols and websites."

Using a VPN in Iran – all you need to know

Despite being increasingly a necessity, authorities have been actively working to prevent the use of Iranian VPN over the years.

For example, in 2023, Iran was second only to China for VPN censorship. This also occurred in 2024, when Iran topped the VPN censoring list across the country's official app stores.

Not only VPN-targeted blocking, though. The regime has even challenged the legality of using a VPN in the first place. In February 2024, Iran outlawed "unauthorized" VPNs, de facto banning their usage without a legal permit. Three months later, the government also resurrected an internet bill that could put VPN usage at risk even more.

Cybersecurity experts have also recently found a new spyware campaign mainly targeting Iranian Android VPN users via infected fake VPN apps.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it a bit of semantics though given the rest of the caption? It tells you he is a terrorist given the description of his actions.

No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.
 
Last edited:
Check who is fundings the mosques in the West, then report back. Spoiler: it's not Iran. In fact Iran is a sworn enemy of the country funding the mosques.

But hey, looks like global economy going down the drain to own…who exactly?

I would prefer we have a state of existence where they all hate each other instead of us, but each president always has to do something to fuck that up.
 
No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.

They are also deliberately allowing the reader to assume the perpetrator is aligned with the protest.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
 
Last edited:
No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.

So you are telling me that you need the media to label something because people are too stupid to read and comprehend a description??

Is there really a difference here?
Terrorist.
Activist with a homemade explosive just before throwing it at Officers and protestors.

I would argue the 2nd is much more powerful than simply a stupid label that can be tossed around to anyone and anything.


Lastly, (Those that work in news media will know this), AFP pictures require a caption when being submitted and if a news agency uses it they must use the Caption. So ABC looked up stock Photo of event for the news article and used it with the "tame" caption. Now I would argue to look at the article that was attached to the picture and see what they are referring to.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
I wouldn't call it upper hand.

However I do agree with the sentiment that this was a miss calculation by the Administration and that we are in for something much greater than they anticipated.
 
Doesn't sound like it would be a good idea to allow such people to acquire nuclear weapons.
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
Don't you understand they had a master plan to "break things" in a region absolutely key to the functioning of the global economy and then run away without taking responsibility for anything? Really quite genius of them but not everyone can understand it.
 
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
That's a false equivalency though. Iran is a Theocracy and while I concede that this administration has governed much more like an autocracy than a democracy for the last 13 months.. There are still real guardrails that have bitten back and curbed its power when things have been pushed to the limit. As of now we still have elections in this country and we don't let religion dictate our actions.

Having said that.. There is a thinking that countries without Nuclear weapons are now incentivized further to try and get em. If not they run the risk of getting bombed and/or decapitated.
 
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not, but when Trump starts oppressing the American people, carries out mass executions, uses the military and security forces to torture and rape protestors, imprisons journalists and political opponents, then and only then can you make the argument that he is more 'dangerous than any Ayatollah'.
 

IEA approves release of 400m barrels of oil


The International Energy Agency will approve the release of 400m barrels of oil to offset the supply lost through the "effective closure" of the Strait of Hormuz, its executive director Fatih Birol has announced.

He says IEA countries voted "unanimously" to launch the "largest ever release of emergency oil stocks in our agency's history".

I believe they have over 1.2billion barrels in emergency reserves. So that's about 33% of it now being released.
 
Last edited:
Come on, now
Follow the responses, either being intentionally obtuse, or intellectually dishonest. And if neither, then ignorant AF.

You claim you're a lawyer, you know this.

The silly part is, the most recent response literally supported what I originally said and has been going on 1400+ years and counting. 🤷‍♀️
 
It's probably gonna still be an increase in the US for a while, at least.






Agreed. But American fuel is still dirt cheap even at those prices.

In the UK 1 Litre of Diesel right now is like £1.60.

3.785 Litres = 1 US gallon.

Which comes to £6 a gallon.

Converted to USD and that's around $8 a gallon of Diesel.

Petrol might be around 10-15% cheaper but even then you're looking at around $7. So double the US.
 
Last edited:
Agreed. But American fuel is still dirt cheap even at those prices.

In the UK 1 Litre of Diesel right now is like £1.60.

3.785 Litres = 1 US gallon.

Which comes to £6 a gallon.

Converted to USD and that's around $8 a gallon of Diesel.

Petrol might be around 10-15% cheaper but even then you're looking at around $7. So double the US.


It's not the national average but there are definitely places in the US where it touches that, namely California.

The price in my zipcode went from 2.70 to 3.50 in the week since the strikes started.
 
Last edited:
It's not the national average but there are definitely places in the US where it touches that, namely California.

The price in my zipcode went from 2.70 to 3.50 in the week since the strikes started.
California gouging and taxing the life out of their people. They should never be used as any form of litmus when it comes to energy costs.

Even when I was paying $2.98 for 93 here in an expensive part of FL a month or so ago, CA was sill in the $4.20-$4.50 range. :pie_eyeroll:


And it's still lower than the bleeding of us they did from 2022 - 2024. How soon we forget.
 
California gouging and taxing the life out of their people. They should never be used as any form of litmus when it comes to energy costs.

Even when I was paying $2.98 for 93 here in an expensive part of FL a month or so ago, CA was sill in the $4.20-$4.50 range. :pie_eyeroll:


And it's still lower than the bleeding of us they did from 2022 - 2024. How soon we forget.
Over $5 here now and it was rising before the Iran strikes because here we do "special blends" when it warms up and we've driven our refineries to closures from bad policies that choked them out.

California has lost population six years in a row(216,000 people in 2025 alone). Since 2019, more than 200 major businesses have relocated out of the state, including Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Charles Schwab, and Chevron.

Rather than examine why people and businesses are leaving, CA wants to squeeze more currency out of those who remain— or punish those who leave. There's a ballot measure in the works for a "one-time" 5% wealth tax on billionaires, retroactive to January 1, 2026 and exit tax proposals have been floated to penalize residents who dare to leave.

California has engineered a reverse Gold Rush, by chasing wealth from the state. Rather than covered wagons going West, we have U-Hauls leaving the state. By some estimates, California has already lost over a trillion dollars in investments and business.
 
Over $5 here now and it was rising before the Iran strikes because here we do "special blends" when it warms up and we've driven our refineries to closures from bad policies that choked them out.

California has lost population six years in a row(216,000 people in 2025 alone). Since 2019, more than 200 major businesses have relocated out of the state, including Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Charles Schwab, and Chevron.

Rather than examine why people and businesses are leaving, CA wants to squeeze more currency out of those who remain— or punish those who leave. There's a ballot measure in the works for a "one-time" 5% wealth tax on billionaires, retroactive to January 1, 2026 and exit tax proposals have been floated to penalize residents who dare to leave.

California has engineered a reverse Gold Rush, by chasing wealth from the state. Rather than covered wagons going West, we have U-Hauls leaving the state. By some estimates, California has already lost over a trillion dollars in investments and business.
Let me tell you. Washington state is doing the EXACT. SAME. THING. People are bailing and moving to Idaho, Wyoming, Texas, and Florida. I told my wife, if I didn't have kids in school, I would move to wyoming. I have 4 years starting in September then we make our exodus depending on college selection.
 
The price in my zipcode went from 2.70 to 3.50 in the week since the strikes started.

Pretty much where Im at. Then you go over to the ritzy town next door and its over $4 :messenger_grimmacing_

What Year Is It GIF
 
Agreed. But American fuel is still dirt cheap even at those prices.

In the UK 1 Litre of Diesel right now is like £1.60.

3.785 Litres = 1 US gallon.

Which comes to £6 a gallon.

Converted to USD and that's around $8 a gallon of Diesel.

Petrol might be around 10-15% cheaper but even then you're looking at around $7. So double the US.
How much was it before the war?
It's not the national average but there are definitely places in the US where it touches that, namely California.

The price in my zipcode went from 2.70 to 3.50 in the week since the strikes started.
Diesel in TX went up $1 to now $1.30. I think its like $4.69 right now.
 
There's worse wars you could have, Iran war didn't happen by accident and let's be clear, Iran's intentions towards Israel, Washington complaining about Iran's priorities (nuclear arms), now the other stuff is whatever, shots at Iran's neighbors, war junkies appreciate the aircraft carriers, of course the tactics (not to be celebrated but respected) Trump still has a better chance at coming out of this a winner than Bush with Iraq or Obama with Afghan.
 
Over $5 here now and it was rising before the Iran strikes because here we do "special blends" when it warms up and we've driven our refineries to closures from bad policies that choked them out.

California has lost population six years in a row(216,000 people in 2025 alone). Since 2019, more than 200 major businesses have relocated out of the state, including Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Charles Schwab, and Chevron.

Rather than examine why people and businesses are leaving, CA wants to squeeze more currency out of those who remain— or punish those who leave. There's a ballot measure in the works for a "one-time" 5% wealth tax on billionaires, retroactive to January 1, 2026 and exit tax proposals have been floated to penalize residents who dare to leave.

California has engineered a reverse Gold Rush, by chasing wealth from the state. Rather than covered wagons going West, we have U-Hauls leaving the state. By some estimates, California has already lost over a trillion dollars in investments and business.
Yamaha just announced they're leaving CA as well recently and moving to GA.
 
Last edited:
Over $5 here now and it was rising before the Iran strikes because here we do "special blends" when it warms up and we've driven our refineries to closures from bad policies that choked them out.

California has lost population six years in a row(216,000 people in 2025 alone). Since 2019, more than 200 major businesses have relocated out of the state, including Oracle, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Charles Schwab, and Chevron.

Rather than examine why people and businesses are leaving, CA wants to squeeze more currency out of those who remain— or punish those who leave. There's a ballot measure in the works for a "one-time" 5% wealth tax on billionaires, retroactive to January 1, 2026 and exit tax proposals have been floated to penalize residents who dare to leave.

California has engineered a reverse Gold Rush, by chasing wealth from the state. Rather than covered wagons going West, we have U-Hauls leaving the state. By some estimates, California has already lost over a trillion dollars in investments and business.
Why are you simping for billionaires?
 
How much was it before the war?

Diesel in TX went up $1 to now $1.30. I think its like $4.69 right now.
Before the war is was about £1.33-1.35 for 1 litre of Petrol and £1.39-1..42 for 1 litre of Diesel.

So prices are up about 15%.

There's a ton of extortion at the pumps so they will be making huge profits from such a jump when the fuel was purchased at considerably cheaper prices.
 
Before the war is was about £1.33-1.35 for 1 litre of Petrol and £1.39-1..42 for 1 litre of Diesel.

So prices are up about 15%.

There's a ton of extortion at the pumps so they will be making huge profits from such a jump when the fuel was purchased at considerably cheaper prices.
Aren't they price gouging at the moment?
 
Why are you simping for billionaires?
Here is the thing. You might just look at the overall business and say fine, later. The problem is you have micro economies based on those businesses like restaurants, hair salons, grocery stores, and schools. When the businesses leave, these micro economies dry up. The tech guys can follow the work if thry choose too but I am pretty sure these restaurant workers are not going to move.

Look at Detroit. If Washington keeps it up, I can see Seattle becoming the next Detroit...
 
Let me tell you. Washington state is doing the EXACT. SAME. THING. People are bailing and moving to Idaho, Wyoming, Texas, and Florida. I told my wife, if I didn't have kids in school, I would move to wyoming. I have 4 years starting in September then we make our exodus depending on college selection.
Isn't Delaware super wealthy due to 0 corporate tax ?
 
Here is the thing. You might just look at the overall business and say fine, later. The problem is you have micro economies based on those businesses like restaurants, hair salons, grocery stores, and schools. When the businesses leave, these micro economies dry up. The tech guys can follow the work if thry choose too but I am pretty sure these restaurant workers are not going to move.

Look at Detroit. If Washington keeps it up, I can see Seattle becoming the next Detroit...
Some people struggle to think beyond their guttural reactions and animosity towards opposing views.
 
Here is the thing. You might just look at the overall business and say fine, later. The problem is you have micro economies based on those businesses like restaurants, hair salons, grocery stores, and schools. When the businesses leave, these micro economies dry up. The tech guys can follow the work if thry choose too but I am pretty sure these restaurant workers are not going to move.

Look at Detroit. If Washington keeps it up, I can see Seattle becoming the next Detroit...
For business it is more complicated but How Money Works explains it very well will the "billionaire tax" - they won't leave. They won't leave their country clubs, friends, social circle to go live in another state or country to "stick it to the man".
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.


Ohh but you absolutely can bomb harder. To close the straights you need humans with heartbeats. Those can be stopped.

We haven't seen that level of total dedication to that. I wouldn't want to be anywhere near it with every major satellite and gun pointed at it.

It would suddenly become the most dangerous place in the world to be and how long are they willing to stay there and starve while the US cuts them off from food and their friends are being blown apart daily? Yeah we have not seen that level of focus yet, not even close.

Almost all the focus is elsewhere right now.
 
Last edited:
For business it is more complicated but How Money Works explains it very well will the "billionaire tax" - they won't leave. They won't leave their country clubs, friends, social circle to go live in another state or country to "stick it to the man".
They already have been leaving. Even Zuck moved from CA to FL due to that, and many corporations and their CEOs/executives are leaving with new ones announcing it every year.

With moves from Silicon Valley CEOs, I will not be shocked when the HQs are to follow.

Clanker edition:

Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan are relocating from California to Florida, purchasing a ~$170 million mansion on Miami's exclusive Indian Creek Island, known as the "Billionaire Bunker". This move is driven by a proposed 5% California wealth tax on billionaires. The move marks a significant departure amid a broader trend of tech, financial, and sports elites relocating to Florida, which has no state income tax.

Key Details of the Move:
  • Property: The couple purchased a roughly 30,000-square-foot, 2-acre waterfront estate on Indian Creek.
  • Cost: The purchase price is reported at $170 million, setting a new record for Miami-Dade County.
  • Location: Indian Creek is an ultra-exclusive, gated community with high security, often called "Billionaire Bunker".
  • Context: This move follows increasing pressure from a proposed one-time 5% wealth tax in California, which could cost Zuckerberg an estimated $11 billion.
  • Trend: Zuckerberg joins other high-profile individuals moving to the area, including Jeff Bezos, Tom Brady, and Ivanka Trump.

 
Hmm seems like powers that be do not want to Trump to taco or rather he doesn't have a good way to taco. Oil prices high, tech being targeted now, potentially US AI build out affected because all the gulf countries are heavily invested.

But hey at least we got the pre historic navy out of the way and took out an 85 year old man, that's a win.
 
Hmm seems like powers that be do not want to Trump to taco or rather he doesn't have a good way to taco. Oil prices high, tech being targeted now, potentially US AI build out affected because all the gulf countries are heavily invested.

But hey at least we got the pre historic navy out of the way and took out an 85 year old man, that's a win.
What's "taco" supposed to mean? I seen you repeat it in here. Is it one of those new cringe beep boop acronyms?
 
What's "taco" supposed to mean? I seen you repeat it in here. Is it one of those new cringe beep boop acronyms?
It was enacted during the Tariff flip flop of 2025 by the financial sector.
"Trump always chickens out" . As in he never goes through with anything big that could hurt the market. If the market reacts, he will chicken out.
 
Top Bottom