• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

Monitoring the situation in Iran

Oh but it's so liberal over there .. there's whole YouTube channels that show it for proof! Even though YouTube is banned there and those YouTubers have privileges to places that no one else does. 🤷‍♂️

Most Iranians had access to Youtube through VPN.


Nearly 90% of internet users in Iran rely on VPN services to navigate widespread internet disruptions, according to the latest report from the Tehran E-Commerce Association published on Sunday, August 3.

The report, which ranks Iran as 97th out of 100 countries for internet quality, also criticizes Iranian authorities for failing to address calls to improve national connectivity, the Iran International reported.

The use of the best VPN services and other circumvention tools, like Starlink, keeps rising despite a law enforced in February 2024 outlawing their usage without a legal permit.

"Our findings show that 93% of youth and 86% of the general public use VPNs," said Pouya Pirhosseinlou, head of the Internet and Infrastructure Committee of the Tehran E-Commerce Association, the Iran International reported.

Despite easing some internet restrictions like those against WhatsApp back in January, many websites remain filtered in Iran at the time of writing, forcing Iranians to find alternative ways to stay connected.

"Today, around 700,000 small businesses operate on Instagram. At least one million jobs are tied to that platform alone. Disruptions here directly hit people's livelihoods," explains Pirhosseinlou.

Yet, via a reliable virtual private network (VPN), people in Iran can trick their local internet service provider and gain access to Instagram and other restricted platforms within seconds.

This surge in VPN usage may also contribute to worsening the precarious connectivity level of Iran's internet. Citizens' traffic is forced "through distant, inefficient routes and lowering speed," Pirhosseinlou explains, adding: "Even on unfiltered websites, users keep VPNs on –further degrading national internet performance."

This isn't the first time that the Tehran Electronic Commerce Association – an independent body that monitors and evaluates the internet situation in Iran – has placed Iran's internet among the worst worldwide. In another report dated January 2024, experts precisely blamed the President and Iranian officials' lack of knowledge for this "self-inflicted" situation.

Commenting on the latest findings, Pirhosseinlou said: "Even if we had America's infrastructure, Iran's internet would still be full of disruptions because of the current filtering.[..] Filtering equipment is inherently disruptive. It causes serious malfunctions across many emerging protocols and websites."

Using a VPN in Iran – all you need to know

Despite being increasingly a necessity, authorities have been actively working to prevent the use of Iranian VPN over the years.

For example, in 2023, Iran was second only to China for VPN censorship. This also occurred in 2024, when Iran topped the VPN censoring list across the country's official app stores.

Not only VPN-targeted blocking, though. The regime has even challenged the legality of using a VPN in the first place. In February 2024, Iran outlawed "unauthorized" VPNs, de facto banning their usage without a legal permit. Three months later, the government also resurrected an internet bill that could put VPN usage at risk even more.

Cybersecurity experts have also recently found a new spyware campaign mainly targeting Iranian Android VPN users via infected fake VPN apps.
 
Last edited:
Isn't it a bit of semantics though given the rest of the caption? It tells you he is a terrorist given the description of his actions.

No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.
 
Last edited:
Check who is fundings the mosques in the West, then report back. Spoiler: it's not Iran. In fact Iran is a sworn enemy of the country funding the mosques.

But hey, looks like global economy going down the drain to own…who exactly?

I would prefer we have a state of existence where they all hate each other instead of us, but each president always has to do something to fuck that up.
 
No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.

They are also deliberately allowing the reader to assume the perpetrator is aligned with the protest.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
 
Last edited:
No, it is very explicit they are calling him an activist and not a terrorist. This is how they codify different political movements, the right is expressed as radical/far right/white supremacists while the left are activists even if they are burning cities, bombing teslas or throwing bombs into a crowd. They are good, right wingers are bad and deserve the consequences from such behavior.

So you are telling me that you need the media to label something because people are too stupid to read and comprehend a description??

Is there really a difference here?
Terrorist.
Activist with a homemade explosive just before throwing it at Officers and protestors.

I would argue the 2nd is much more powerful than simply a stupid label that can be tossed around to anyone and anything.


Lastly, (Those that work in news media will know this), AFP pictures require a caption when being submitted and if a news agency uses it they must use the Caption. So ABC looked up stock Photo of event for the news article and used it with the "tame" caption. Now I would argue to look at the article that was attached to the picture and see what they are referring to.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
I wouldn't call it upper hand.

However I do agree with the sentiment that this was a miss calculation by the Administration and that we are in for something much greater than they anticipated.
 
Doesn't sound like it would be a good idea to allow such people to acquire nuclear weapons.
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
 
I think people in this thread don't realize how serious all this situation is.
The str8 of ormuz will not be open any time soon and it doesn't matter what the US does. It doesn't matter if the US bombs harder or stops the war. Iran will not open the str8 and will continue to bomb oil facilities all around. Let's see what will happen when all those petrodolars stop flowing to the us stock market.
You might not like it but Iran has the upper hand here.
Time to face the obvious. These attacks were a major fuck up by Trump.

Don't bother posting "that's bait" gifs.
This is just the arsh reality of all this situation.
Don't you understand they had a master plan to "break things" in a region absolutely key to the functioning of the global economy and then run away without taking responsibility for anything? Really quite genius of them but not everyone can understand it.
 
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
That's a false equivalency though. Iran is a Theocracy and while I concede that this administration has governed much more like an autocracy than a democracy for the last 13 months.. There are still real guardrails that have bitten back and curbed its power when things have been pushed to the limit. As of now we still have elections in this country and we don't let religion dictate our actions.

Having said that.. There is a thinking that countries without Nuclear weapons are now incentivized further to try and get em. If not they run the risk of getting bombed and/or decapitated.
 
We can say the exact same thing about Trump. Trump with nukes is 10 times more dangereous that any ayathola.
So the US can bomb iran oil facilities but iran can't bomb the US allies oil facilites? Explain me that.
It wasn't Iran that attacked...it was attacked.
I'm not sure if you're being serious or not, but when Trump starts oppressing the American people, carries out mass executions, uses the military and security forces to torture and rape protestors, imprisons journalists and political opponents, then and only then can you make the argument that he is more 'dangerous than any Ayatollah'.
 
Top Bottom