http://www.insideline.com/subaru/brz/2013/2013-subaru-brz-full-test-and-video.html
Acceleration, 0-30 mph (sec.) 2.7
0-45 mph (sec.) 4.8
0-60 mph (sec.) 7.3
0-60 with 1 foot of rollout (sec.) 7.0
0-75 mph (sec.) 10.4
1/4-mile (sec. @ mph) 15.3 @ 92.1
0-30 mph, trac ON (sec.) 3.0
0-45 mph, trac ON (sec.) 5.2
0-60 mph, trac ON (sec.) 8.0
0-60, trac ON with 1 foot of rollout (sec.) 7.7
0-75 mph, trac ON (sec.) 11.1
1/4-mile, trac ON (sec. @ mph) 15.7 @ 90.5
Braking, 30-0 mph (ft.) 28
60-0 mph (ft.) 114
Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) 69.1
Slalom, 6 x 100 ft. (mph) ESC ON 66.6
Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) 0.92
Skid pad, 200-ft. diameter (lateral g) ESC ON 0.88
Sound level @ idle (dB) 44.2
@ Full throttle (dB) 81.6
@ 70 mph cruise (dB) 69.0
Engine speed @ 70 mph (rpm) 3,050
I will give this car the benefit of the doubt, it can do a 0-60 in 6.9. I'll count that 2nd gear redline of 59.2MPH as 60MPH. And that'll dip the car into the high-hiiiigh 14s in the 1/4. But again, for what? A car that stops worse than a base 370Z? A car that has a less refined interior? A car that is 2 seconds slower to 60 and through the 1/4? 15MPH slower through the 1/4? A car that has less grip/smaller contact patch?
Would I really walk into a dealership with all of those sacrifices in mind...to save $3K? Fuck no. What's worse is that a lot of "enthusiasts" are going to buy this car and spend money on upgrading the brakes, adding chunkier tires to it, possibly even going to 18s, possibly then looking for power bolt-ons, etc. They'll end up spending those $3-5K that they wanted to save over the 370Z and Mustang on things that won't improve the car much at all...at the end of the day it'll stay a slow boxer-4.
And the worst part? You could've bought a Genesis 2.0T with 270HP for LESS than the BRZ. And at that point, you'll just want to punch yourself in the nuts.