AGITΩ;39276483 said:They make these for fans...and kids, of course they will.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
With Vita sales the way they are they're not a large enough group to win over. Worse yet, with how low sales are right now I actually half expect at least 50% of them have a 3DS anyway, myself included.I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
With Vita sales the way they are they're not a large enough group to win over. Worse yet, with how low sales are right now I actually half expect at least 50% of them have a 3DS anyway, myself included.
... And the 3DS already has better cameras I believe while the speakers are a moot point if you plug in headphones, and most likely they ARE better and it's just hard to tell in a crowded area, the DSi XL had better speakers afterall.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
Better color at the least going by the IGN article.I thought the cameras were the same...?
I thought the cameras were the same...?
Put my Purple 3DS up for sale on Craigslist today.
It was fun while it lasted, haha.
AGITΩ;39276279 said:I think they are holding off on White and Black in the US because when Black and White 2 Come out, they are going to come out with a Special 3DSXL Bundle that comes preloaded with AR Searcher and Pokedex Pro.
I think the price drop is more likely linked to that, and that was the shot in the arm it needed, along with making the Vita not look as amazing of a value. If anything I think it might be just the growing prevalence of larger screens and possibly the desire to improve the 3D effect. I was afraid it'd be limited to a small screen, but if it can extend to a big one like that afterall then I think it'd be more comfortable for 3D gaming period.I get the impression the 3DS XL exists because Nintendo knee-jerk reacted to the Vita before everyone knew that the Vita was going to be a worldwide disaster.
I refused to buy things on the eshop because they're nontransferable, so that's not an issue for me.I'd do the same, but Nintendo being Nintendo means I can't since it would mean I'd lose the 40 dollars of eshop credit I have and the 3 games I already downloaded.
I get the impression the 3DS XL exists because Nintendo knee-jerk reacted to the Vita before everyone knew that the Vita was going to be a worldwide disaster. I don't really see any other reason for its existence at this point. I'm glad it exists, because I don't personally like the size of the 3DS screens, but this still feels like an odd move.
maybe it's in order to attract more western gamers, which usually have larger hands.
Yes.3DSXL camera is still 0.3mpxl right?
3DSXL camera is still 0.3mpxl right?
that is so bad it is pretty much worthless :/
The talk of some sort of filter has me worried. I definitely don't want anything like that with 3DS games.
If Nintendo doesn't do this I'm almost positive Nyko will make it. Their Circle Pad Pro + battery pack solution comes out in October.
Basically I'm waiting for more hands on impressions before I believe it has some kind of filter. I still think it could be larger pixels that are still smaller then the DSi XL's pixels giving this weird impression of a filter.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
Not really, theyre only gonna use as much pixels as the screen supports(and the screen is very low resolution). For example webcams arent gonna be taking 5 megapixel pictures because that would be useless for the most part(1080p is only 2mp)that is so bad it is pretty much worthless :/
.So they made it bigger, but still never thought to throw on a second analog stick on there. "So sorry, you will have to buy the add-on to get that".
Fuck off Nintendo.
i just wish the camera was good enough so that the photos don't look like JPEGs that have been compressed 5 times
that is so bad it is pretty much worthless :/
Looking at the materials, I wouldn't be surprised if the 3DS XL was cheaper to manufacture than the 3DS.I get the impression the 3DS XL exists because Nintendo knee-jerk reacted to the Vita before everyone knew that the Vita was going to be a worldwide disaster. I don't really see any other reason for its existence at this point. I'm glad it exists, because I don't personally like the size of the 3DS screens, but this still feels like an odd move.
Looking at the materials, I wouldn't be surprised if the 3DS XL was cheaper to manufacture than the 3DS.
?
Bigger screens would be cheaper how...?
that is so bad it is pretty much worthless :/
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
For a gaming platform meant to be affordable it's necessary. I'd love having a decked out God console assuming it was still permited to house a wide variety of games both ends of the budget spectrum, but unless you count an overpowered PC with GOG and Steam access that simply won't happen.I hate when nintendo and other companies just do things "good enough".
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
I don't understand Nintendo at all. They could have easily won over the Vita fans and monopolized the portable market with three minor changes...
1. A second analogue nub
2. Improved speakers
3. Improved camera
Instead they opt to let the Vita retain its edge.
More specifically quality software with mass appeal. There's definitely plenty of great stuff on Vita, more arguably than the 3DS had at this point (and some might even argue right now), but the likes of Uncharted and WipEout don't appeal to as many as Mario and Pokemon, and worse yet most of those that they appeal to would rather play the games on consoles. In the end a similar target is being satisfied with Vita as with the PSP: those who like Sony properties enough and value portability over visual fidelity (or just value the games most period), and those who like niche Japanese games.That lack of quality software is really the X-factor that's keeping Sony on top of the portable market.
That lack of quality software is really the X-factor that's keeping Sony on top of the portable market.
what?!More specifically quality software with mass appeal. There's definitely plenty of great stuff on Vita, more arguably than the 3DS had at this point (and some might even argue right now), but the likes of Uncharted and WipEout don't appeal to as many as Mario and Pokemon, and worse yet most of those that they appeal to would rather play the games on consoles. In the end a similar target is being satisfied with Vita as with the PSP: those who like Sony properties enough and value portability over visual fidelity (or just value the games most period), and those who like niche Japanese games.
Yes.
I wouldn't argue it, but I imagine some may feel there's a lot more they like on the Vita right now than on the 3DS up to this point.what?!