Added new video in the OP that shows only the important bits (gameplay).
Also (courtesy of TheOddOne):
![]()
my impressionssome serious fucking talent working on this. here's hoping the gameplay matches the visuals.
Strange thing to show off at a movie theater. I was expecting more shootbang.
i still find it hard to comprehend a halo game with good graphics. im just so used to setting the bar low with bungie.
I think there was a trailer for Halo 2 they showed in theaters as well
they've been alright, but never competitive or leading the pack.Reach is pretty good looking in the main, but not on these levels.
I think the idea is that you go to see batman and watch this as an aside.I wouldn't want to go to a movie theater to see an infomercial for 343 Studios' offices.
Its clearly evident that even when plans for a Halo movie fell throughg, MS really REALLY wants a studio to change there mind and invest in making a movie out of the franchise.
Trailer to sell the game, the numerous live action commercials and such.
I'd assume are nothing more than to try and interest someone in giving the game a film treatment.
Is this good marketing? I don't know ... it just seems like an odd thing to aim at casuals.
The link in the OP has the whole panel.Holy schmokes. Is the whole panel available for view pleasures anywhere?
No presh.Is that Jimmy Falon?
I'm pre-ordering Batman tickets tomorrow, I planned to see it after a few days so the crowds die down. I can totally wait another week to see it for this trailer.
What I really want to know is if this trailer will be made available to people who don't feel like seeing a movie any time soon. Will it go to iTunes? Waypoint?
Will it be in UK cinemas? IMAX?It has distribution limited by guild rules but there might be ways to distribute outside of theaters. This runs in ad blocks - Fandango, Coke etc, not in trailer reels.
"...but unlike films/movies that are a singular vision"
Well, that isn't true at all.
"...but unlike films/movies that are a singular vision"
Well, that isn't true at all.
Talk about pretentious. "VIDEO GAMES ARE ART TOO! OH AND DID YOU KNOW VIDEO GAMES ARE ART TOO? ALSO THEY ARE LIKE MOVIES IN THAT THEY ARE LIKE ART."
The point is that a movie is locked to the final cut - you can certainly get more out of a movie with successive watches, but it doesn't actually change - only your comprehension of it changes. And we're not saying one thing is better than the other, we're saying they have similarities, but that the primary difference is that the viewer isn't passive, but has agency.
It's hardly pretentious, it's just a simple comparison.