Technosteve
Banned
Leave Kare alone she's old and Android scares her.
How much is Kare being paid for her services in this trial? $550 an hour. How much has she collected to date? Around $80,000.
Kare said:Verhoeven makes the best of the situation by pointing out that Kare had previously said the SMS icon and the Fascinate icon "were not substantially similar." She agrees, but also points out that she noted several similarities.
That's... something. It's no coincidence that the phone icon is tilted at the exact same angle
and uses the exact same shape.
The contacts and music icons are next in line, but not as much as these.
The green might be forgivable, but why not use an icon like this;
The mimicry is no doubt blatant. The whole 'crisis of design' is one thing, but copying specific assets is another. That alone isn't a huge deal imo, but combine it with all the other factors and it's a compelling argument.
These numbers always blow my mind.
"They look nothing like our beautiful product!
They look just like our beautiful product!
But not really, except the parts that look the same"
Each icon doesn't exist in a vacuum. If you can see the similarities in the Music icons, you can surmise that the artistic source of the other similar icons came from the same thinking.Green call icons have been used on phones for a very, very long time now. I can accept the Music icon flying a little too close to home but the notes and call icon similarities are fucking ridiculous.
Does any of this arguing really matter? Cuz at the end of the day, all that matters is the court's descision. Unless you you're as experienced in law as the court (which I doubt), you really can't yell foul
Each icon doesn't exist in a vacuum. If you can see the similarities in the Music icons, you can surmise that the artistic source of the other similar icons came from the same thinking.
It's a jury trial.
It's a jury trial.
Actually, that makes sense.
But still, at the end of this nonsense, there'll be a definitive answer.
You have juries for civil cases in the US? The UK version makes so much more sense.
Actually, that makes sense.
But still, at the end of this nonsense, there'll be an appeal.
At the end of this nonsense, there'll be an appeal.
The American legal system thinks juries are the bees knees. It's why Americans complain so much more about jury duty than any other country on the planet.
Fixed.
Certainly for the case where Apple wins, and almost certainly for the case where Samsung wins.
how come apple is fighting samsung alone in this? surely they should be fighting google/android too...
You're ignoring the context."Blatant" mimcry? Apple didn't invent the phone symbol with a green background, though they have a trademark on one manifestation of it.
So you're saying if android were to come out before iOS did, that the icon would still look like that? Just because the shape has existed before doesn't mean a lot in this context.I see similarities between the the contacts and memo icons.
I also see similarities between the basic components of the phone icon. However green has always been call, and red has always been disconnect. The angle is 45 degrees on both, which is the best way to show said phone icon. That has been the case for oh so many phones in the past where a physical button would have a green phone at either a 45 degree angle for squarish buttons or cutting through the diagonal for non square icons. The phone itself is different.
The note and the CD are exactly the same as the iTunes icon. That black and white icon at the top right is the old iTunes icon.I see no similarity between the music icons. There is no representation of a CD in Apple's icon, the note has always been a universal symbol for music and it's not centred in Samsung's icons.
The note and the CD are exactly the same as the iTunes icon. That black and white icon at the top right is the old iTunes icon.
The note and the CD are exactly the same as the iTunes icon. That black and white icon at the top right is the old iTunes icon.
No but I think a lot of those rip off OS's early on would steal the old OS X iTunes logo (with CD) and slap into mobile interfaces all the time. That's probably the argument they're going for, but I agree that the music icon is fine. There's too much a dissimilarity for it to be recognizable as iTunes or iMusic or whatever in any way imo.. Especially with the actual music icon being sized and placed way differently from the iTunes logo.Aaaah! Okay. Was it ever used on the iPhone?
So you're saying if android were to come out before iOS did, that the icon would still look like that? Just because the shape has existed before doesn't mean a lot in this context.
Really? That's the most blatant one to me that shows no unique design thinking. There is no CD player on their phones. Why does the icon have that?I see nothing. It looks like a dime and dozen audio/musics CD icons out there.
Yeah yeah like I said, blatantly copied. Irrelevant to this case if it was never used for music on the iPhone though because Apples argument is that people would confuse the phones because of said icons.Really? That's the most blatant one to me that shows no unique design thinking.
I'm willing to bet it's the same reason everyone's icon for save is a floppy disk. Or why the phone icon looks like an old timey phone. Or why the contacts book looks like an address book. Or why the memo needs lines. Etc...There is no CD player on their phones. Why does the icon have that?
Really? That's the most blatant one to me that shows no unique design thinking. There is no CD player on their phones. Why does the icon have that?
Really? That's the most blatant one to me that shows no unique design thinking. There is no CD player on their phones. Why does the icon have that?
http://www-bgr-com.vimg.net/wp-content/uploads/itunes_icon1.jpg[img]
[img]http://www.talkandroid.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Samsung_vs_Apple_Music_Icons.jpeg?3995d3[img][/QUOTE]
When you compile all the variations of that icon it may look similar, but overall it isn't really obvious. MAYBE Galaxy Ace and Exhibit 4G's versions, but otherwise it's really not the same or confusable.
Yeah yeah like I said, blatantly copied. Irrelevant to this case if it was never used for music on the iPhone though because Apples argument is that people would confuse the phones because of said icons.
That matters? Samsung copied they're icon but since it wasn't used in exactly the same way all is fine?
Well, yeah. Gtalk's been using the speech bubble for messaging since 2006. Are we gonna say that Apple copied Gtalk's icon for messaging?
They did.I honestly don't see what's unique about icon with a picture of CD and a musical note in front. Pretty sure Windows also used it for Audio Disc.
I honestly don't see what's unique about icon with a picture of CD and a musical note in front. Pretty sure Windows also used it for Audio Disc.
I think it'd be pretty funny if all music players just used orange lightning bolts because of Winamp.
I can't even a Gtalk icon.
Heh, true. XP below, using both single and double notes.
![]()
Yeah, this comparison was a bit hilarious;Well, yeah. Gtalk's been using the speech bubble for messaging since 2006. Are we gonna say that Apple copied Gtalk's icon for messaging?
Heh, true. XP below, using both single and double notes. The 16 color icon suggests it's been used since '98 or '95.
http://i.imgur.com/U9M22.png[IMG][/QUOTE]
Let's get real, though. That icon represented nothing, it wasn't really an application icon in any way, neither did it look identical or anything (unless you count a solitary 16x16 indicator :p).
No, I'm saying that it's an understandable position against Samsung. Looking at this one icon doesn't mean much, but again, all of these similarities don't individually exist in their own vacuums.Yeah but lightning bolts aren't universal symbols for music. Notes are. And when you think CD you think audio CD. Seriously are you arguing against skeuomorphism?
No, I'm saying that it's an understandable position against Samsung. Looking at this one icon doesn't mean much, but again, all of these similarities don't individually exist in their own vacuums.
Yeah, this comparison was a bit hilarious;
![]()
So incriminatingly similar! :lol
That's... something. It's no coincidence that the phone icon is tilted at the exact same angle and uses the exact same shape. The contacts and music icons are next in line, but not as much as these.
Really? That's the most blatant one to me that shows no unique design thinking. There is no CD player on their phones. Why does the icon have that?
It's not tilted at the same exact angle.
Whilst a lot of people can say most of these icons were before the iPhone, I'd like to think of it like this
Take two design teams and put them at the other side of the globe with no contact. From Janurary to March get them to design an icon for Music, contacts, phone and messages. Id predict that none of them will match what Samsung did so closely
Yes Apple drew inspiration of other, but I highly doubt Samsung would have anything similar to what the iPhone has if they released before the iPhone IMO
Take two design teams and put them at the other side of the globe with no contact. From Janurary to March get them to design an icon for Music, contacts, phone and messages. Id predict that none of them will match what Samsung did so closely
That shape is far different from what Samsung or Apple use.all this stuff is BS.
apple did not invent many of their icons, they've merely rehashed old well known icons.
here's what payphone icons look like in some places.
![]()
That shape is far different from what Samsung or Apple use.