"Anti-obesity: The new homophobia?"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I've been eating potatoes nearly every day and still losing weight. Guess it's a lot healthier than what I used to eat. What about all the other stuff I listed? Make your own soup for cheap or make a rice dish or pasta. All healthier than the alternatives.

People make excuses, but it's healthier and cheaper.
Man loses 21 pounds on potato diet. There was a guy who lost weight eating nothin but twinkies. Some people oppose to the idea, but weight loss is mostly calories in - calories out. Healthy food is usually less calorie dense, and as a nice side effect it doesn't harm your body.
 
This is one of the few topics that pop up on neogaf that just make me cringe to see. these threads usually reek of hypocrisy, total lack of empathy, and contain alot of people just being flat out jerks; a far cry from the tone that's usually set on this board with other threads. the premise of the article in the op is ridiculous though and i won't waste my time addressing it.

"Shaming" fat people is becoming increasingly ridiculous in a society that as a whole promotes unthinking lifestyles, structurally encourages bad habits and unhealthy eating, and does everything it can to economically prosper off feeding people poorly and selling them diet plans at the exact same time.

It's like a Mad Magazine strip about hypocrisy. Only it's real. And everywhere.

By that same token, I think there's also an argument to be made that the "fat acceptance" organizations and movements may be playing into the hands of society, while trying to do the right thing in a misguided manner. They are attempting to respond to the hatred and scorn directed at the overweight, but rather than focus on a holistic picture about what's wrong with society, they focus on immediate defense only against mean people.

Some people approach the issue in simple terms, and think that because obesity and poor living are increasing rapidly in the west, everyone should just become more cynical, cruel, rude, and attack-oriented. I don't think that is problem solving.

Rather, the fact that such a society-wide phenomenon is spreading so fast points to sweeping problems that need to be addressed in a far more serious and objective manner than "LOL FATTIES UR STUPID CUZ U EAT LOTS". You don't change that much of society by pointing and laughing, but by engaging people.

In shorter terms, a lot of people who LOL at weight don't seem to have any interest whatsoever in the welfare of the overweight person, though they may pay lip service to it. They are just disturbed and expressing it defensively, by objectifying and dehumanizing the other.

agreed wholeheartedly.
 
Two years ago when I was comming out of a ACL surgery I was having real trouble finding electric cars at Waltmart because they were all taken by a bunch of lazy fat ass people.
 
What an outrageous claim.

Every able-bodied person can change their body's condition. It just takes effort, record keeping and time.

Please, do not respond with some claim about someone you know with some weird glandular issue.
 
Man loses 21 pounds on potato diet. There was a guy who lost weight eating nothin but twinkies. Some people oppose to the idea, but weight loss is mostly calories in - calories out. Healthy food is usually less calorie dense, and as a nice side effect it doesn't harm your body.
I'm eating lots more than I used too though. Also, that article linked says potatoes are good for you.

Potatoes are more nutritious than other starchy foods like rice and bread, and “are a good source of vitamins.” They have a lot of vitamin C (much more than a banana or an apple), and potassium levels slightly higher than potassium-rich bananas).
But the Obama Administration, which does not understand nutrition, has banned white potatoes from the WIC program (for school lunches and poor mothers), based on the false belief that potatoes are unhealthy.
Potatoes are a critical source of cheap, nutritious food for poor people.
 
Yes, but what I'm saying is that this either takes good planning on what meals will be cooked for the week, or it just takes the ability to tolerate the same old, same old for a while. "Chicken breast is on sale! I know what we're having all week!" Yeah, that can sound good on paper when you're at the store, but after night three in a row of staring down the same dinner, it can get to be kind of a "meh" reaction.

And if you aren't in the routine of knowing how to make a variety of dishes that are quick and easy, I think it's entirely possible to give into the temptation to take nights off, perhaps too often. "Ugh, the food isn't defrosted, I had to work late, I'm hungry, one or both of us doesn't even want another night of X... fuck it, let's just order pizza!"

Now, I'm not trying to make excuses. Just explain thought processes.

I don't necessarily disagree since I know I've had my fair share of, "Nope, need something different tonight" moments. That and I also enjoy cooking so I don't even dread preparing food. I just think that the whole, "Healthier eating == more expensive and bland" line of thinking is pretty false. I get the thought process, just saying that "correcting" that line of thinking should be one of the healthy eating goals for weight loss.

We do have a lot of "lol just eat less" rhetoric instead, though, which doesn't help the situation at all.

Even if you go the cheapest route possible, ie. a bag of frozen chicken, a bunch of bags of frozen vegetables (they don't last very long) and something long lasting for breakfast like oatmeal (which isn't even healthy), it's still going to cost more than $3 a day it'd cost you to eat like complete shit.

To be fair, chances are likely this person we're talking about is also spending more than $3 a day on McDonald's food. It's probably more of a $3 a meal situation.
 
...and the thread fills up proving the OP.

There is a certain amount of choice involved, and I do think smokers and drinkers get a pass more than the obese.

For something that doesn't involve choice, I think ageism is the new homophobia.
 
They are perfectly fine and there is nothing wrong with them.

Same goes with rice, bread, pasta, and several other carbs.

Except for the fact that there's little to no scientific data, not deriving from special interests groups in some fashion, that agrees with that assessment. The skin of the potato is the most nutritious part of the vegetable, and everything else is basically shoving sugar into your mouth.
 
I'm eating lots more than I used too though. Also, that article linked says potatoes are good for you.

I think there's two things to note about potatoes. One is that they're a bit high in carbs on their own, which isn't necessarily a dealbreaker. But two, the bigger issue is that they often aren't revered in just plain form. Fried potatoes are the most popular, and certainly not very healthy because of the frying. But beyond that, people often flavor them with stuff that isn't that great for you. Yeah, a baked potato may be fine, but they are often loaded with butter, sour cream, bacon bits, and other things. The same is true of mashed potatoes to some extent.

I often eat just plain baked potatoes, and I'm looked at as some kind of weirdo.
 
ibfj3Bo8WiXdgO.gif
 
What we need is better education at an early age, but it's never going to happen because it will eventually harm producers. Kids NEED to know and have it engraved into their skulls that:

-Sugar is bad. The end. Stay as far away from it as possible. Fruits are not inherently healthy, especially pulp-free fruit juices. Fruits should be consumed sparingly for good vitamin absorption and antioxidants.
-Not all vegetables are super healthy. Corn and potatoes are not very good for you while nearly all greens are.
-Complex carbs are horrible for you and break down into sugars which of course falls back into my first point.
-Exercise can help if done correctly, but isn't needed to maintain a healthy weight. You should still do it to make your body, organs, and muscles strong and healthy.
-DON'T drink regular pop. DON'T eat sugared candy/bakery.
-Staying in a near healthy weight range isn't hard when following the above.

You would see much less bad habits being formed if kids right away knew how bad this stuff was for them. Sure, you hear it every now and again "Pops bad for you, it will rot your teeth." That's not what they should be saying. They should be saying: "Pop will make you fat, will give you diabetes, and will ruin your quality of life. Be afraid and stay away."
 
The problem with potatoes on schools lunches is that the potatoes themselves are not unhealthy, its just the way they are prepared that causes problems. Everyone here knows there is only one way schools prepare potatoes, and that is as delicious, artery blocking french fries.
 
I think there's two things to note about potatoes. One is that they're a bit high in carbs on their own, which isn't necessarily a dealbreaker. But two, the bigger issue is that they often aren't revered in just plain form. Fried potatoes are the most popular, and certainly not very healthy because of the frying. But beyond that, people often flavor them with stuff that isn't that great for you. Yeah, a baked potato may be fine, but they are often loaded with butter, sour cream, bacon bits, and other things. The same is true of mashed potatoes to some extent.

I often eat just plain baked potatoes, and I'm looked at as some kind of weirdo.
But again, that's to do with education. I bake or microwave potatoes and put a healthy topping on it, usually tinned tuna as it's my favourite. I could easily eat them by themselves but I find putting tuna on it fills me up more.

I think a majority of obesity is how little people know about what they're eating. Even if you make a conscious effort to eat healthy, it can still be pretty hard if you don't know what you should be eating.
 
I have occasional weight problems. Ridicule from others is the only thing that ever worked to motivate me to do something about it. If people would applaud me for gaining weight and telling me how good and normal i look i would be obese by now.
 
What we need is better education at an early age, but it's never going to happen because it will eventually harm producers. Kids NEED to know and have it engraved into their skulls that:

-Sugar is bad. The end. Stay as far away from it as possible. Fruits are not inherently healthy, especially pulp-free fruit juices. Fruits should be consumed sparingly for good vitamin absorption and antioxidants.
-Not all vegetables are super healthy. Corn and potatoes are not very good for you while nearly all greens are.
-Complex carbs are horrible for you and break down into sugars which of course falls back into my first point.
-Exercise can help if done correctly, but isn't needed to maintain a healthy weight. You should still do it to make your body, organs, and muscles strong and healthy.
-DON'T drink regular pop. DON'T eat sugared candy/bakery.
-Staying in a near healthy weight range isn't hard when following the above.

You would see much less bad habits being formed if kids right away knew how bad this stuff was for them. Sure, you hear it every now and again "Pops bad for you, it will rot your teeth." That's not what they should be saying. They should be saying: "Pop will make you fat, will give you diabetes, and will ruin your quality of life. Be afraid and stay away."

I.......seriously doubt that.
 
Two years ago when I was comming out of a ACL surgery I was having real trouble finding electric cars at Waltmart because they were all taken by a bunch of lazy fat ass people.

well you should thank them, if you didn't just walk it off you'd be a damned lazy fat ass too.
 
Except for the fact that there's little to no scientific data, not deriving from special interests groups in some fashion, that agrees with that assessment. The skin of the potato is the most nutritious part of the vegetable, and everything else is basically shoving sugar into your mouth.

-Not all vegetables are super healthy. Corn and potatoes are not very good for you while nearly all greens are.
-Complex carbs are horrible for you and break down into sugars which of course falls back into my first point.

I think we are starting to get a bit overboard as far as saying what is healthy. I lift 4 times a week. Hit the gym hard and want to get bigger and stronger. I want and need my carbs. That means rice, potatoes, pasta, oatmeal, and whatnot. The average person can eat this and be fine. There is no need to avoid carbs completely. However, depending on your goals, you would want to eat more or less. I'm a fan of calories out vs calories in. Want to get bigger? Eat more. Want to lose fat? Eat less and lift heavy.
 
I've been on both sides of nutrition.

These:
tinas-red-hot-beef.jpg


Are like 2-3 for a dollar, and they're perfectly filling.

These:
totinos-frozen-pizza.jpg


Are anywhere from 50 cents to a dollar each, and are pretty damned filling.

I've seen Safeway have a Safeway branded bag of 100+ Pizza rolls for as little as 6 bucks. There is absolutely no way in hell I can eat this cheaply while eating healthy, I know, because I've been trying for the last few years. Sales, coupons, buying bulk and shopping across different stores for different things. It doesn't matter, it's not going to be this cheap.

Neither of those are filling. they satiate your hunger for a very short period, after which you are hungry again. That's one of the biggest differences between healthy eating and the alternative, just how long the food keeps you full.



I think we are starting to get a bit overboard as far as saying what is healthy. I lift 4 times a week. Hit the gym hard and want to get bigger and stronger. I want and need my carbs. That means rice, potatoes, pasta, oatmeal, and whatnot. The average person can eat this and be fine. There is no need to avoid carbs completely. However, depending on your goals, you would want to eat more or less. I'm a fan of calories out vs calories in. Want to get bigger? Eat more. Want to lose fat? Eat less and lift heavy.

Yeah, but you are Randy Savage and can therefor consume much more than us average plebeians.
 
I've been on both sides of nutrition.

These:
tinas-red-hot-beef.jpg


Are like 2-3 for a dollar, and they're perfectly filling.

These:
totinos-frozen-pizza.jpg


Are anywhere from 50 cents to a dollar each, and are pretty damned filling.

I've seen Safeway have a Safeway branded bag of 100+ Pizza rolls for as little as 6 bucks. There is absolutely no way in hell I can eat this cheaply while eating healthy, I know, because I've been trying for the last few years. Sales, coupons, buying bulk and shopping across different stores for different things. It doesn't matter, it's not going to be this cheap.
Okay. I am not saying you're wrong. I don't know where you live, and I don't know what the food prices are around you. I am speaking for myself when I say I have had a different experience.

Around me, a bag of Totino's Pizza Rolls is $5-6. That's 40 rolls, or about 20oz of food. I haven't checked single pizza prices so I can't speak to those except for what I see online (looks like $1-1.50 is the average). Those are about 10oz. Your Tina's burritos are 4oz each.

At ALDI, I can get a head of iceberg lettuce for $.69. Two tomatos for $.79. 3 onions for $.99. Less than three dollars, and I have a very hearty salad. It's $1.49 for a pound of edamame, which makes a good snack. Or $1.89 for a pound of sweet potato fries, if I wanted something a little heavier.

It would cost me $1.69 per pound of chicken breasts. So, about 1/3 the cost of a bag of pizza rolls if we are going by weight. Egg prices vary, but I would say $1.50 is a fair average. That is a little over one pound.

I already mentioned frozen vegetables and chicken quarters on the last page. Hopefully you see my experience has been different than yours.

Price is not an issue. Convenience is a slight issue, but even then it is a matter of a few minutes prep time.
 
When you begin a phrase with "just eat..." it is very likely you are providing poor diet advice.

There is no magic bullet. The problem needs to be dealt with holistically.
No, poor diet advice is advice that is wrong. I lost 15 pounds while not leaving the house on average probably 3/4 days a week. Pretty much all the studies done come out in favor of low carb.
I don't think that. What I mean to say is you can't compare the struggle of a people for who naturally are compared to those who choose to tax themselves and all of society with unhealthy habits.
Rational people don't choose to harm themselves.
I think there's two things to note about potatoes. One is that they're a bit high in carbs on their own, which isn't necessarily a dealbreaker. But two, the bigger issue is that they often aren't revered in just plain form. Fried potatoes are the most popular, and certainly not very healthy because of the frying. But beyond that, people often flavor them with stuff that isn't that great for you. Yeah, a baked potato may be fine, but they are often loaded with butter, sour cream, bacon bits, and other things. The same is true of mashed potatoes to some extent.

I often eat just plain baked potatoes, and I'm looked at as some kind of weirdo.
Those are completely fine for losing weight, the potato isn't. And this isn't based on anecdotal evidence, carbohydrates -> insulin response -> fat storage.
 
There's nothing you can do about your race or your sexual orientation.

However, unless you have genetic abnormality, losing weight is NOT that hard.

Consume 1500 calories a day instead of the 2500 your body burns daily and you are guarenteed to lose 2lbs every week (every lb is 3500 calories), without even having to exercise (though that definately helps keep your metabolism up and burn even more), and without hurting your appetie.

Just don't listen to all those fad/crap low carb diets. They may work but they leave you craving carbs all the time. Just count calories, and you are good, there is no sense in depriving yourself of any food group, as long you account for how many calories you're consuming daily.

If you must go on a fad diet, go on one that doesn't leave you craving carbs all the time. The subway/Jarrod diet is the easiest thing in the world. There's six 6 inch subs with under 400 calories (this is after accounting for all the veggies, bread and meat but not accounting for the sauses). You can eat up to 4 of those six inchers every day, and still lose 2lbs every week, 8lbs a month, 100lbs an year. Supplement them with those high protein canned shakes that leave you feeling full.
 
I don't necessarily disagree since I know I've had my fair share of, "Nope, need something different tonight" moments. That and I also enjoy cooking so I don't even dread preparing food. I just think that the whole, "Healthier eating == more expensive and bland" line of thinking is pretty false. I get the thought process, just saying that "correcting" that line of thinking should be one of the healthy eating goals for weight loss.

Ultimately, I do agree with you. I was just arguing that the transition from the "living out of your car" lifestyle to making an honest-to-goodness effort to buy legitimately healthy food and cook more isn't entirely as painless as some make it out to be. Honestly, I don't mind cooking, and love to grill. However, without having planned for the week in advance, I do think it's often just as cheap and often more convenient to just pick up takeout as opposed to wandering into the grocery store to buy ingredients with no good idea of what to make and how to make it. That is, of course, assuming that we are momentarily ignoring the prioritization of health.
 
Pretty sure im a fattist. I would just help them try to get better, but saying there is nothing wrong with being over weight is not answer.
 
No, poor diet advice is advice that is wrong. I lost 15 pounds while not leaving the house on average probably 3/4 days a week.

Those are completely fine for losing weight, the potato isn't. And this isn't based on anecdotal evidence, carbohydrates -> insulin response -> fat storage.

You can still eat potatoes and lose weight. Again, it depends on your goals and what works for you. Plenty of people can eat carbs and lose weight just fine. If you choose to avoid carbs, then that's fine. I'm just not a fan of this concept that starches are bad and must be avoided. This is not the truth at all.

Yeah, but you are Randy Savage and can therefor consume much more than us average plebeians.

macho9.gif
 
what exactly is your definition of healthy

im curious what your diet looks like

aside from an excess amount of sodium i dont see much at fault with a skinless chicken breast

I eat chicken. I just don't pretend its a particularly healthy food since it's got so much sat fat and cholesterol.
 
No, poor diet advice is advice that is wrong. I lost 15 pounds while not leaving the house on average probably 3/4 days a week. Pretty much all the studies done come out in favor of low carb.

It doesn't matter. Teaching that there is only one single way to lose weight is wrong. There are many options.
 
I think we are starting to get a bit overboard as far as saying what is healthy. I lift 4 times a week. Hit the gym hard and want to get bigger and stronger. I want and need my carbs. That means rice, potatoes, pasta, oatmeal, and whatnot. The average person can eat this and be fine. There is no need to avoid carbs completely. However, depending on your goals, you would want to eat more or less. I'm a fan of calories out vs calories in. Want to get bigger? Eat more. Want to lose fat? Eat less and lift heavy.

Nope, you're right. I just don't want to sugarcoat (haha) anything here. Carbs are not good for you if you are going to be doing what a majority of American teenagers will be: sitting around in school, then sitting around after school on the internet/playing games. People need carbs but they also need to eat less of them compared to what's available to us today.

I.......seriously doubt that.

There are some people who will do what they do regardless, but if this stuff is mentioned often once the children hit first grade (simplified of course), then they gain habits. When I went through school, no one ever told me pop will give you diabetes and you shouldn't be eating bread every day. We used to think juice was good for you, drink up! And it still happens today.

There's nothing you can do about your race or your sexual orientation.

However, unless you have genetic abnormality, losing weight is NOT that hard.

Consume 1500 calories a day instead of the 2500 your body needs and you are guarenteed to lose 2lbs every week (every lb is 3500 calories), without even having to exercise (though that definately helps keep your metabolism up and burn even more), and without hurting your appetie.

Just don't listen to all those fad/crap low carb diets. They may work but they leave you craving carbs all the time. Just count calories, and you are good, there is no sense in depriving yourself of any food group, as long you account for how many calories you're consuming daily.

If you must go on a fad diet, go on one that doesn't leave you craving carbs all the time. The subway/Jarrod diet is the easiest thing in the world. There's six 6 inch subs with under 400 calories (account for the veggies but not accounting for the sauses). You can eat up to 4 of those six inchers every day, and still lose 2lbs every week, 8lbs a month, 100lbs an year. Supplement them with those high protein canned shakes that leave you feeling full.

This isn't very popular here on Gaf, but the 1500 calorie diet worked for me. I lost 60 pounds off of it in about 5 months.
 
You can still eat potatoes and lose weight. Again, it depends on your goals and works for you. Plenty of people can eat carbs and lose weight just fine. If you choose to avoid carbs, then that's fine. I'm just not a fan of this concept that starches are bad and must be avoided. This is not the truth at all.
Yup, I'm eating a potato a day for lunch and still losing 3-4 pounds a week. They're not the horrible weight gain monster some people would like you to believe. They're also filled with nutritional value, something that £1 pizza wouldn't have.
 
I eat chicken. I just don't pretend its a particularly healthy food since it's got so much sat fat and cholesterol.

labelL295351.gif


????????

Nope, you're right. I just don't want to sugarcoat (haha) anything here. Carbs are not good for you if you are going to be doing what a majority of American teenagers will be: sitting around in school, then sitting around after school on the internet/playing games. People need carbs but they also need to eat less of them compared to what's available to us today.

Agreed. A lot of it comes from lack of education. It can be very overwhelming as there is a lot of information out there. Doing the research and finding out what you are most comfortable with is what matters the most.
 
I.......seriously doubt that.
sure they would, hell i would've if someone explained stretch marks to me. : (
Carbs are good. Preparation and the amount you eat per day is what you should look at.
not when you have a compromised metabolism (obesity.)
There's nothing you can do about your race or your sexual orientation.

However, unless you have genetic abnormality, losing weight is NOT that hard.

Consume 1500 calories a day instead of the 2500 your body needs and you are guarenteed to lose 2lbs every week (every lb is 3500 calories), without even having to exercise (though that definately helps keep your metabolism up and burn even more), and without hurting your appetie.

The subway/Jarrod diet is the easiest thing in the world. There's six 6 inch subs with under 400 calories. You can eat up to 4 of those six inchers every day, and still lose 2lbs every week, 8lbs a month, 100lbs an year. Supplement them with those high protein canned shakes that leave you feeling full.

Just don't listen to all those fad/crap low carb diets. They may work but they leave you craving carbs all the time. Just count calories, and you are good, there is no sense in depriving yourself of any food group, as long you account for how many calories you're consuming daily.
i'm sorry but the actual medical science is in favor of 'fad/crap' low carb diets. there's also indication that carbs are what make you crave more carbs, a vicious carb cycle.

i'd like to see a child try and stick to the diet you're recommending.
 
Yup, I'm eating a potato a day for lunch and still losing 3-4 pounds a week. They're not the horrible weight gain monster some people would like you to believe. They're also filled with nutritional value, something that £1 pizza wouldn't have.

You can also lose weight eating cookies everyday as long as you don't go over your rough BMR. Potatoes really aren't all that great compared to other foods unless you're an athlete and need to carb load.

I eat chicken. I just don't pretend its a particularly healthy food since it's got so much sat fat and cholesterol.

And here we go, more misinformation. Dietary cholesterol isn't bad for you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom