Resident Evil 6 - Review Thread | Activist Reviews and the Hate Patrol Destroy Truth™

Meta 79 for the PS3 and 69 for the 360? I've come to accept that PS3 scores tend to get inflated despite being the worse, but that is a bit much.

Wonder how bad a game has to be for game journalists to as an aggregate give a game a 69? Or was this case of Capcom sending such a small check that game journalists got offended?
 
I watched the totally rad show review and I find it interesting how they were saying that the gameplay is really bad when from playing the demo It seemed like an evolution of RE5 and I didn't have an issue with it, I know I haven't played it the full game yet but is it that big of a change?
 
I think it will still sell really well, even all those crap RE movies have made over $850 million worldwide and are still popular, people love Zombies more than ever.
 
I can certainly vouch for you love of the series man. I remember several lengthy discussions we had over our difference of opinion regarding RE5.

I'm not happy on this side of the fence. Not happy at all. But hey, Red Dwarf is back on Thursday, so not everything is ruined forever.
 
I watched the totally rad show review and I find it interesting how they were saying that the gameplay is really bad when from playing the demo It seemed like an evolution of RE5 and I didn't have an issue with it, I know I haven't played it the full game yet but is it that big of a change?

Was it unanimous dislike between the three of them?

EDIT: I want to see two people argue over this game on a podcast or something. Doubt I'll get it.
 
Everything about this game sounds so bad that I went from possible pre order to maybe buy on sale to gamefly to not touching with a 100 foot pole.

I have to say the break downs from certain fanboys makes it worth while anyways.
 
You have to look at the person writing the review. That doesn't exactly save any reviewer's image (maybe aside from Tom Chick, in some areas) for me in particular, but that is how it has to work (and why Edge magazine doesn't work).

That said, GAF is funny when they pull out the score comparisons. This thread will be over 20 pages, 2,000 replies, but tomorrow we'll talk about how review scores are useless.

Pretty much. You're right in that its best to look at who is reviewing the game and not the site/mag as a whole.
 
Now that its been critically panned, I eagerly await the reboot. Go back to your roots and focus on the atmosphere and horror aspect. We really dont need this over the top multiplayer action.
 
Everything about this game sounds so bad that I went from possible pre order to maybe buy on sale to gamefly to not touching with a 100 foot pole.

I have to say the break downs from certain fanboys makes it worth while anyways.

If you like RE enough to consider a preorder then at least rent it.

I have a feeling that RE6 is going to be a case of "it wasn't THAT BAD" in the near future...

UNLIKE FFXIII, Riposte.
 
The conspiracy bullshit is bullshit is bullshit. I've also got a track record of calling people out for second guessing other peoples opinions, be it positive or negative. I get what you're saying about how 'and other people would be saying the positive reviews were a conspiracy bleep de bloop' but i find it very hard not side against the group accusing reviewers of lying about a game because they are all apparently racist.

i don't see how anyone reads that and goes 'yeah but other people would be being dumb if things were the other way around'. the expected reaction is 'what the fuck is wrong with you?'

to see other people that don't like it accused of only not liking it for being racist... as someone who it pains to be siding with the people seriously disappointed... that shit is just undefendable and the outcry towards it is not something i see any sense at all in second guessing or minimising or rationalising away, or anything.

do you understand what i mean? i've loved a lot of games that generally got bad reviews before and if i end up loving RE6 someday, the one thing i'm not going to do is think everyone who didn't love it just had an agenda.

even the positive reviews are listing numerous faults, just saying that 'ultimately they don't hurt the experience' and for *those* reviewers, that's true. but clearly if a game has numerous flaws, for other reviewers it's going to absolutely hurt the experience and we shouldn't be coming out with racist conspiracy bullshit in reaction to it.

I still dont understand why you are talking to me but you are saying that what the people said in this thread about "racism" is so horrible no one should try to defend it? I am not defending it, they are wrong. I am saying I have seen the same kind of stuff in the opposite way with other games like MGS4, ME3, etc.

In no way do I think that people that don't like the game have an agenda. I am saying the whole reaction to reviews in general, for all games, is a mess on both sides. Frankly I have no clue why you are posting to me about it.
 
If you like RE enough to consider a preorder then at least rent it.

I have a feeling that RE6 is going to be a case of "it wasn't THAT BAD" in the near future...

UNLIKE FFXIII, Riposte.

I bet you FFXIII gets the same treatment to some extent at some point. (P.S. I don't even love FFXIII or anything, I just dislike Final Fantasy more).

Resident Evil 5 certainly is.

But you liked 5, right?

Looks like more of the same, from what I've seen in reviews.

It is quite different from 5.
 
Now that its been critically panned, I eagerly await the reboot. Go back to your roots and focus on the atmosphere and horror aspect. We really dont need this over the top multiplayer action.

Before getting our hopes up for a reboot, we should probably wait for the October NPDs to come out. Ultimately, that's what Capcom cares about.
 
Next up: Dead Space 3. At least RE got more than a few games in before going to hell.
 
If you like RE enough to consider a preorder then at least rent it.

I have a feeling that RE6 is going to be a case of "it wasn't THAT BAD" in the near future...

UNLIKE FFXIII, Riposte.
FFXIII isn't as bad as some say it is and I agree with you that I think this is a case of it wasn't that bad in the future but I still have to play it and go from there.
 
It's... a very good game. What the hell? Sure, there's a lame segment or two, but this is not the game many on the internet say it is.

I've never understood the hate for RE5. It isn't RE4 and there are lots of poor design decisions (the inventory management, shoot-the-orange-spot boss fights, turret sections etc.), but the game mechanics were solid and fun and the level design was good. Not great, but good. Yet people on the Internet NeoGAF say the game is literally a garbage.
 
If you like RE enough to consider a preorder then at least rent it.

I have a feeling that RE6 is going to be a case of "it wasn't THAT BAD" in the near future...

UNLIKE FFXIII, Riposte.

Too many good games and to waste the slot in my que or waste the time playing it.

Literally every single thing I've read/seen has made it look worse to me.

I have given too many awful games a chance this gen and wasted time/money I gave up doing that awhile ago.
 
I've never understood the hate for RE5. It isn't RE4 and there are lots of poor design decisions (the inventory management, shoot-the-orange-spot boss fights, turret sections etc.), but the game mechanics were solid and fun and the level design was good. Not great, but good. Yet people on the Internet NeoGAF say the game is literally a garbage.

I'll only agree with you on the turret sections. The boss were hit and miss, but "weak points" isn't a bad mechanic by my judgment (makes the most sense in a game about precision shooting vs a giant target). The inventory system was kind of great.

NeoGAF is way too passionate and way too dogmatic at times. Certain posters are sort of ridiculous in the scope that they hate certain games, often poisoning the discussion by insulting the opposition (with the opposition spitting back). Leads to ugliness.
 
In no way do I think that people that don't like the game have an agenda. I am saying the whole reaction to reviews in general, for all games, is a mess on both sides. Frankly I have no clue why you are posting to me about it.

because the part in bold intentionally or not sounds like downplaying the ridiculous accusations of racism as if that's normal.

i do not remember such things being a common theme in any review thread. the reaction in this thread is a mess on another level. mentioning previous messes as if they are anyway equivalent just doesn't strike me as counter productive. the only people anyone needs to be trying to calm down are the crazy people who were slinging baseless accusations of racism.

edit: brain fart. you can't highlight stuff in a quote with italics.
 
Some crazy scores in there, it's all over the place.
I dunno, seems fairly clear-cut to me.

Giantbomb, Gamespot, EDGE, Eurogamer and Polygon

vs

Famitsu, GameInformer, GameTrailers, IGN and Playstation: the official magazine


You tell me which group has more credibility.
 
Resident Evil 5 is the second best third person shooter this generation (behind Vanquish).
Huh_.jpg
 
I dunno, seems fairly clear-cut to me.

Giantbomb, Gamespot, EDGE, Eurogamer, Polygon

vs

Famitsu, GameInformer, GameTrailers and Playstation: the official magazine


You tell me which side has more credibility in your eyes.

EDGE and Eurogamer only, however if review scores fluctuate this much something must be up. I'll be waiting for GAF impressions.
 
I dunno, seems fairly clear-cut to me.

Giantbomb, Gamespot, EDGE, Eurogamer and Polygon

vs

Famitsu, GameInformer, GameTrailers, IGN and Playstation: the official magazine


You tell me which side has more credibility.

Neither inspires confidence in me. I don't mind Eurogamer time to time (if you are forcing me to rank publications).

I didn't expect Polygon to be in that group after everyone made a big deal they were being sponsored.
 
I dunno, seems fairly clear-cut to me.

Giantbomb, Gamespot, EDGE, Eurogamer and Polygon

vs

Famitsu, GameInformer, GameTrailers, IGN and Playstation: the official magazine


You tell me which group has more credibility.

Why are you acting like Edge and Eurogamer giving it 6/10 is the same thing as GiantBomb calling it "garbage" and Gamespot & Polygon giving it 4.25/10?

Edge also gave The Witcher 2 6/10 and they didn't hate that game either. But Giant Bomb, GS and Polygon think RE 6 is awful.
 
A quote from the RE5 Thread that I think holds up with 6

The negatives of the game are probably the little things that most RE fans (whether they enjoyed the old games, RE4, or both), tend to ignore anyway.

It doesn't matter whether the game gets 9's or 7's. RE5 is simply another case of "you already knew you were going to buy it." People who've been looking forward to it will most definitely have fun, and that's what matters in the end.

Screw these gigantic hype-trains.
If you were genuinely excited about the game prior to seeing the critical reception, then go about your business and buy the game as planned. Someone else's opinion shouldn't take away from your excitement.
 
The RE6 defenders' uncritical and unreflected perception of the criticism displayed in this thread is making my head hurt. It's amazing how irrational people can be, although the comments might be interesting for an anthropological study on people's ability to wilfully neglect and deny reality.

It's good to see the press think sensibly when reviewing a game, now apply to all the other games and games journalism may get some crediability.

Pretty much agreed. Too bad I'm not expecting this trend to continue in the future.
 
Top Bottom