I actually think channel ORANGE is a better album than Kendrick's by a country mile. Neither are remotely close to 9.5 Pitchfork caliber, but I could certainly make a case for Frank Ocean's debut album.
good kid, m.A.A.d. city is hokey, melodramatic tripe that favors hip-hop gimmickry over substance. The mere presence of an overarching storyline doesn't justify the lavish praise. MBDTF had a clear thematic coherence without shoving rap operatic nonsense down the listener's throat. The skits on Kendrick's album are intrusive and are generally of no intellectual worth.
Sure, Kendrick "goes hard" on m.A.A.d. city, but the people claiming vicarious thrills and touting the authenticity of his lyricism are identical to pseudo-intellectual buffoons constantly parroting the same unctuous talking points about The Wire.* In isolation from the self-indulgent story over the album, which provides nothing novel or substantive in my opinion, the beats are notably weaker than on section.80. I ultimately think there are moments of sporadic brilliance on the album: I really like Swimming Pools and Money Trees and Good Kid, for instance. Other than that, though, a completely ordinary hip-hop album that probably won't make my top 10 hip-hop albums of the year list.
*I do want to clarify that I'm not likening the quality of The Wire to this album, if such a cross-medial comparison were even feasible. The Wire is obviously a masterful show, but the overwrought rhetoric on the internet about the show is so exhausting and pervasive that it very nearly adulterates my viewing experience. I feel my perhaps unfair criticism of this album stems, in part, from the ridiculously gushing and homogenous praise for this album. My thoughts are best encapsulated by the TMT review posted tonight.