Not all of us can be No Life Kings like yourself.
What is that supposed to mean?
Not all of us can be No Life Kings like yourself.
What is that supposed to mean?
Haha. Nothing.
The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956) sucked.
I thought Charles Foster Kane was doing the new OT
did anyone else notice a bunch of new faces in the latest thread? is there some kind of subconscious intimidation with joining a large thread like this one late in the game?
I'm not surprised: it took me a while to get acclimated with the in-jokes and going-ons of Movie-GAF. I wonder if we could link interesting posts/parts of conversations in the next thread's OP, so that new viewers can catch up. On the other hand, we'd start talking about that effort more than about the movies we're watching.did anyone else notice a bunch of new faces in the latest thread? is there some kind of subconscious intimidation with joining a large thread like this one late in the game?
did anyone else notice a bunch of new faces in the latest thread? is there some kind of subconscious intimidation with joining a large thread like this one late in the game?
I'm not surprised: it took me a while to get acclimated with the in-jokes and going-ons of Movie-GAF. I wonder if we could link interesting posts/parts of conversations in the next thread's OP, so that new viewers can catch up. On the other hand, we'd start talking about that effort more than about the movies we're watching.
I don't really feel like the people here are a tight knit group and certainly don't feel that there are many, if any, "in-jokes" here. People just say they've watched (hopefully watched and not watching at the point of posting, no?) a movie and then talk about it in whatever degree of detail that they choose. Occasionally, there's talk about events going on with a particular city (Fantastic Fest and Alamo going-ons in Austin) and non-movie talk sometimes.
I don't think many of the people that have started posting in the new topic (er, thread...whatever) will be consistent. But I'm often wrong.
Yeah there are only like four of us that actually chat off of gaf. Even though we only chat on gaf.
You always chat with swoon and never involve the rest of us on Twitter. I feel so left out. And then fucking sefskillz (it feels weird using handles at this point but whatever) keeps on letting me down with that cool domain. BUT WHATEVER
I wish I had friends who liked movies a lot, and maybe discuss one from time to time.
No one I've met even like to watch black and white movies. They wouldn't give one a chance, or older movies in general.
Same, bruv.I wish I had friends who liked movies a lot, and maybe discuss one from time to time.
No one I've met even like to watch black and white movies. They wouldn't give one a chance, or older movies in general.
You can be my friend.
AU I agree with your assessment of Hold Me While I'm Naked.
It is truly the greatest cinema may ever get.
Well: art-forms evolve with the people responsible, and most peeps I know these days want their shit now now now now now and they don't understand how to chill and enjoy some dead space. It's the darnedest shame, and I think my peer's lack of appreciation for history and understanding how earlier generations thought hurts their film-watching abilities. I can put myself in the shoes of a Gay Nineties child and, as a result, watch stuff like The Golem with ease. There's nothing wrong with older movies so long as one assumes they catered to a different mind-set back then.Yeah, everything has to have really fast pacing too. Otherwise many are bored to death![]()
Well: art-forms evolve with the people responsible, and most peeps I know these days want their shit now now now now now and they don't understand how to chill and enjoy some dead space. It's the darnedest shame, and I think my peer's lack of appreciation for history and understanding how earlier generations thought hurts their film-watching abilities. I can put myself in the shoes of a Gay Nineties child and, as a result, watch stuff like The Golem with ease. There's nothing wrong with older movies so long as one assumes they catered to a different mind-set back then.
That's what makes them even more interesting than some of the more contemporary films I've seen.
You're right, but I can't shake this weird feeling I got from the film. I think it's the kind of thing I just need to digest for a while.But isn't that the point?It's my favorite documentary of the year, though that means very little, as I've not seen much.The main character is an incredible artist, manipulating those around him. It's a nice touch to confuse the audience as well with the family, trying to suggest that the family did something to their actual son is, I thought, pretty clever. That final shot with them in the backyard digging up the ground while the camera shows the hole with nothing in it is pretty incredible.
Has anyone seen hope springs? I won't give it away but I have to sayI was surprised by Tommy Lees Jones character at the end of the movie. It really surprised me that he let his guard down like that. I honestly expected a divorce. His wife even talked about being seperated.
I guess part II just can't live up to part I. can't have a full climax. seems part II of this thread is no gremlins II.
Masters of Cinema has better transfers and cares more for the average cinephile than Criterion.everybody make something up
aint got to 20,000 posts yet, baby
quick, everybody make something up
Top Ten Movies Non-2012 Movies That I Could Remember Off the Top of My Head Having Seen In 2012:
Innocence
Man with a Movie Camera
Intimate Confessions of a Chinese Courtesan
The Company of Wolves
Sans Soleil
Space Adventure Cobra
Trouble Every Day
Pusher Trilogy
All the Boys Love Mandy Lane
Requiem for a Vampire aka Caged Virgins