Yes, I think they expect the game to sell more than DMC4, that's the whole point to try to bring the game to a broader audience.
No they expect less than DMC4 which was 2.6 million.
Yes, I think they expect the game to sell more than DMC4, that's the whole point to try to bring the game to a broader audience.
It would mean this was a failed experiment because the whole point in the change of direction was to break the 1-2 mill sales ceiling.
Now whether a failed experiment means "let's go back to regular DMC" or "let's take this to the backshed where we took Mega Man" is the real question.
Maybe long term. Maybe the short term goal was getting 2M at a relatively low cost.
That would mean that DmC is here to stay and DmC2 is inevitable.Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
Then Congratz to Capcom and NT, hopefully people will stick with it come DmC2.Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
That would mean that DmC is here to stay and DmC2 is inevitable.
Might as well start listing ways they can improve DmC since it will be upon us next-gen and hope Capcom/NT listen.
Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
That's why he said hypothetical.It wont.
Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
That's why he said hypothetical.
Yeah there is also the possibility of Capcom acquiring NT and making them Capcom UK/Cambridge.
It could just mean that fans are hungry for more after DMC4. DMC2 outsold DMC3, IIRC. The DMC sales after this one are the real indicator.Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
Judging how the taliban fanatics critized it even before playing it, I think Capcom will go back to the DMC5, DMC6, DMC7 reskin of DMC4 formula even if it turns to be a masterpiece with great ideas and better sales.Hypothetically lets say DmC sells more than DMC4 especially out the gate. What would that mean to everyone?
Capcom should be really proud of his work in titles like Dark Void and Bionic Commando, then.Remember "westernization" was Inafunes baby.
That's why he said hypothetical.
Yeah there is also the possibility of Capcom acquiring NT and making them Capcom UK/Cambridge.
Does Capcom have a history of acquiring studios? I'm drawing a blank.
No they expect less than DMC4 which was 2.6 million.
That's not what they say in the link. They said they expect the game sell 2 million by the end of the current fiscal year, not in its entire lifetime.
Does Capcom have a history of acquiring studios? I'm drawing a blank.
To focus into the western market and to develop or co-develop games with western studios was a corporate strategy and plan during years. Inafune didn't rule Capcom so he didn't decide it, he followed the strategy.
He was a nice guy for the interviews but he wasn't God and didn't decide all Capcom ideas and projects. Same goes with Mikami, who said that he would cut off his head if RE4 was ever released on PS2.
Capcom put out a note to investors that their game plan was to work with studios, find partnerships that worked, and then consider acquisitions.
They've lately noted that they also intend to grow internal staff by 1000.
Given that Capcom has consistently bemoaned the lack of developers in Japan, I'm not convinced they intend to do that all in their home region, so by adding a UK studio, they would actually be able to have internal development operations in North America, Europe, and Japan to grow from.
Of course, Ninja Theory would also have to be willing.
He didn't rule but those games were a project of his approach.
What I think you will see from Capcom doing going forward is "buying" western IP to publish, like Remember me, or what SE did with Sleeping dogs.
I don't see them passing out any more IP to western studios to sequalise, except blatant western facing series like Lost planet and Dead rising. Maybe a RE:ORC sequel.
Same goal, different approach.
Man is there a breakdown of those megaman games. It looks kind of sad by comparison.Look at the lifetime sales of Capcom franchises. DMC has always been in the top 5.
NT seems rather ambitious. Can't imagine they would be happy to become the Devil May Cry studio even if this project was a bit of a coup for them.
I do think an internal DmC2 is the most likely outcome here.
I believe that 9/10 review is from X360 Magazine, which got confused with OXM.OXM UK is saying they haven't put out the review yet on NT's Twitter.
I guess there is some confusion on reviews because they all sound the same in their name.
So where did people get the notion that it got 9/10 from there?
Here's Game Informer's Test Chamber for this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7FL5TDTctg
They're only playing the demo level, but the guy reviewing it is giving you his opinion on the full game. Safe to say that it's going to get a high score from them based on what he says.
"Beneath" NT? Laughable. However, just from my standpoint, I wouldn't want to spend a large part of my career as a creative director working on someone else's IP. Given the way Ninja Tam talks about himself and NT, I'm sure he feels the same way. Just a guess though.Capcom games tend to get movies and I could see Tameem salivating at the prospect of his DmC being adapted into a movie. Though it seems interesting that one minute DMC is huge franchise, but now it is beneath NT.
That fucking gameplay is shameful. And these will be the guys swearing the game retains the depth of the original series.
Don't act like you have never spammed a single move or combo in DMC before :3my god, is that the reviewer playing? he's spamming rebellion 1 combo. :lol
Don't act like you have never spammed a single move or combo in DMC before :3
I <3 stinger
That fucking gameplay is shameful. And these will be the guys swearing the game retains the depth of the original series.
Bad player. Check.Here's Game Informer's Test Chamber for this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7FL5TDTctg
They're only playing the demo level, but the guy reviewing it is giving you his opinion on the full game. Safe to say that it's going to get a high score from them based on what he says.
Well, I don't know about you, but I can't bust out overly techinical shit WHILE trying to do a running commentary. Give the guy a break, jeesh...
Well, I don't know about you, but I can't bust out overly techinical shit WHILE trying to do a running commentary. Give the guy a break, jeesh...
And used alot of holy waterMaybe I spammed the triangle button when I played DMC1 the first time and didn't know what I was doing...![]()
Overly technical? My man, he used the basic mash triangle combo and didn't dodge at all. I don't expect the guy to play like Brea but come on.
Why are game journalists acting like every feature of DmC is some kind of innovative feature that Ninja theory introduced? It's almost like they are letting the games PR tell them what to think and aren't as familiar with the series they claim to be.
Was gonna bring that up.Like Vergil introduced teleporting to the series, even if Trickster allowed that in DMC3 >_>
Like Vergil introduced teleporting to the series, even if Trickster allowed that in DMC3 >_>
I don't think it's bad to have reviewers of this level, it does everyone a service to have the more casual side rep'd as well.Fact is that reviewer is an example of a true casual DMC fan. Someone that enjoys the games but is oblivious to the technical and gameplay underpinnings and pretty much forgets a lot about them after he's done with them. Which is fine, got a friend like that.Not sure if it's fine for someone that gets paid to review games.
Why do game journalists act like the double currency system is a DmC invention? DMC4 had the same thing.
Reviewers should still be held to a certain standard. At the very least they should have their facts straight. No one is asking them to bust out SSS combos or get high ranks in all missions but it's not too much to ask for informed opinions.
I don't think it's bad to have reviewers of this level, it does everyone a service to have the more casual side rep'd as well.
I don't however think that gives them the right to talk shit about people who have problems or try make comments about how the depth is or isn't there when they are seem to be casual and barely scratch any depth the combat system may or may not have.