• Hey Guest. Check out your NeoGAF Wrapped 2025 results here!

PokéBOMB: Pokémon X and Y for 3DS (Coming October 2013 WW) - Lord Fennekin Ascends

Best starter?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
No. Most 3DS games actually don't change framerate or anything like that when switching between 2D/3D. The games that do are generally the exception to the rule. The IQ looks pretty clean on the battle shots at least, I'm willing to bet that going from 3D to 2D will net some kind of IQ increase like 2xAA.


Yeah, but they improved Luigi's mansion from sub-20 to 30. That's quite a small difference compared to going from low-20 to 60.
Oh, in that case I'd be fine with locked 30. Though to be honest, I couldn't care less about the look of the overworld -- for me, seeing the Pokemon during battles is where it's at.
 
Wha? Didn't even think of that. Fuck, I can't even link this freaking analysis? It has a cropped sliver of a scan, nothing more.

Awesome pic, btw -- note the eagle, stag and serpent (our three legendaries, no doubt):

tumblr_lp5h4foVRs1qky1tco1_500.jpg
I have a feeling I'm going to like the serpent even more then the two legendaries we already have.
 
Huh, that seems like a waste of processing power.
Well, it's a lot more complicated than just wasting processing power. It can be easier to do 3D at 30fps than 2D at 60fps, and so it's not always guaranteed that there will be an extra 30 frames to slap on. Usually developers find some kind of middle ground, like a low quality AA solution or some AF.
 
Can't wait for high-res art of the legendaries. I'm guessing when Coro Coro updates their site. Don't know why NOA drags their feet on this -- might as well upload it to their press sites so news sites can hype hype HYPE.
 
No. Most 3DS games actually don't change framerate or anything like that when switching between 2D/3D. The games that do are generally the exception to the rule. The IQ looks pretty clean on the battle shots at least, I'm willing to bet that going from 3D to 2D will net some kind of IQ increase like 2xAA.

I think most look and run the same just to keep things consistent, in some games it makes sense to improve framerate like fighting games. Nintendo sometimes doesn't bother, though I think OOT 3D did have some anti aliasing in 2D though.
 
Well, personally I think that they will only base Xerneas on this myth. I continue to believe that Yveltal is based on a wyvern..

Yeah, seems clear to me that it's a Wyvern.

Just google "Wyvern" and you see the horns and feet and hand wings and everything.

I could see it being Fire/ Dragon. Would be awesome if it's Dragon/ Fighting or fighting/ flying.

Can see the other being ... water/ psychic or steel/ psychic.

I also don't see there being a "Z" Pokemon. X and Y seem to be based on Chromosomes given the logos so I could see the 3rd being something that's also chromosome related (XX and XY forms?).
 
If there are any new evolutions introduced this generation, what lines would you guys like to see receive them? I'm personally hoping for evolutions to:

-Scrafty (so he can be OU)
-Absol
-Dunsparce
-Jynx (so it can be less horrifying)
-Galvantula (it would be awesome)

As long as I get a Heracross evolution, I'll be on cloud 9.
 
Yeah, seems clear to me that it's a Wyvern.

Just google "Wyvern" and you see the horns and feet and hand wings and everything.

I could see it being Fire/ Dragon. Would be awesome if it's Dragon/ Fighting or fighting/ flying.

Can see the other being ... water/ psychic or steel/ psychic.

I also don't see there being a "Z" Pokemon. X and Y seem to be based on Chromosomes given the logos so I could see the 3rd being something that's also chromosome related (XX and XY forms?).
It's more likely that they're based on the X and Y axis, which is how we drew the conclusion for Z; Referring to the Z axis.
 
It's more likely that they're based on the X and Y axis, which is how we drew the conclusion for Z; Referring to the Z axis.

As I've mentioned before, it's likely they're referencing both. There's DNA in the logo, this is the first fully 3D title and it's on the 3DS. It's not an either/or situation, in my opinion.
 
Yeah, seems clear to me that it's a Wyvern.

Just google "Wyvern" and you see the horns and feet and hand wings and everything.

I could see it being Fire/ Dragon. Would be awesome if it's Dragon/ Fighting or fighting/ flying.

Can see the other being ... water/ psychic or steel/ psychic.

I also don't see there being a "Z" Pokemon. X and Y seem to be based on Chromosomes given the logos so I could see the 3rd being something that's also chromosome related (XX and XY forms?).

Who's to say they aren't pulling from multiple influences, both for the legendaries and for the names of the games, I doubt they didnt do X and Y based on chromosomes AND the axes especially since we have a sky based "Y axis" legendary and a land based "X axis" legendary. Both legendaries clearly arent an "eagle" and "stag" straight from the norse mythology either. so yea.
 
If there are any new evolutions introduced this generation, what lines would you guys like to see receive them?

Fraxure, split evol into either a Dragon/ Fighting type or a Dragon/ Steel type (it's a battle axe faced dragon with armor plates ... either could have worked.)

Mawile.

Lopunny.
 
Yeah, seems clear to me that it's a Wyvern.

Just google "Wyvern" and you see the horns and feet and hand wings and everything.

I could see it being Fire/ Dragon. Would be awesome if it's Dragon/ Fighting or fighting/ flying.

Can see the other being ... water/ psychic or steel/ psychic.

I also don't see there being a "Z" Pokemon. X and Y seem to be based on Chromosomes given the logos so I could see the 3rd being something that's also chromosome related (XX and XY forms?).

It seems very likely they are based on that Norse myth, and that myth just happens to have 3 different mythical creatures in it. Too convenient for them not to use the third one.

My guesses:

Yveltal: Flying/Psychic. Flying because it's a bird. Psychic because the eagle it's based on can peer into souls. Psych means soul.

Xerneas: Rock/Fighting. Rock because of the gyms, fighting because stags are commonly seen as fighters.

Plus these types are fairly balanced against each other. Rock works against Flying/Psychic and Psychic works against Rock/Fighting. Flying Psychic has a slight advantage in that flying moves will be 1x effective against Xerneas whereas fighting moves will only be .25x effective against Yveltal, but both get a 2x effective tpye against each other.
 
The top of the "Needs an Evolution" list is this guy right here:

Absol_display.png


Think of the possible Yin Yang beast. Keeping the blade like crest on it's head. Would be amazing.


Like this ^.

Remove the things on the side of its head and extend the sharp point at the top and we have a fucking monster.
 
Farfetch'd was designed to not be useful? why?

The reason for its existance is to not be useful? That sounds.... Farfetch'd.

Farfetch'd's japanese name's origin, from Bulbapedia:

Bulbapedia said:
Kamonegi is a combination of 鴨 kamo (wild duck) and 葱 negi (spring onion). Additionally, 鴨葱 kamonegi is an abbreviation of the proverb 鴨が葱をしょって来る ("a duck comes bearing green onions"), which means 'something surprising but convenient'.

Farfetch'd is only worth something because he came with his own seasoning.
 
Farfetch'd was designed to not be useful? why?

Smogon:

I am of the opinion that as Pokemon Red and Blue were about to be released, Farfetch'd accidentally spilled some ink on the suit of one of the most important Game Freak staff members. Since then, they have hated Farfetch'd and did everything they could to make this thing suck as much as possible on the battlefield. No Base Stat over 65, a gazillion better Normal/Flying-types, some interesting moves (none of which can be employed to their full potential) and limited ways of obtaining it ever since the beginning of the Pokemon games. The best thing that can be said about Farfetch'd is that it got a personal item (Stick) which makes it get random critical hits. When you don't need them, usually.
 
So I just had someone offer me $50 for my DS Lite... it is still on ebay, in a bundle with White, for 3 days. I start the bidding at $40 with a buy it now of $70. There are 3 people watching it, which leads me to believe they will fight over it at the last minute....

I told the guy I had to think about it. What do I do?
 
So I just had someone offer me $50 for my DS Lite... it is still on ebay, in a bundle with White, for 3 days. I start the bidding at $40 with a buy it now of $70. There are 3 people watching it, which leads me to believe they will fight over it at the last minute....

I told the guy I had to think about it. What do I do?

Doesn't White go for about $20 on its own? I'm sure a DS Lite is worth more than $30 too.

Plus considering how high you started the bidding and that you've already got three watchers I'd say wait.

Though, for future reference, you tend to make more money if you start the bidding incredibly low.
 
Doesn't White go for about $20 on its own? I'm sure a DS Lite is worth more than $30 too.

Plus considering how high you started the bidding and that you've already got three watchers I'd say wait.

Though, for future reference, you tend to make more money if you start the bidding incredibly low.

I didn't want to risk losing the DS for really cheap. I'm bad at ebaying.

He offered me $50 for JUST the DS, so I don't know if I should take him up on it, then just ebay White, or just wait and see how the auction plays out.
 
So I just had someone offer me $50 for my DS Lite... it is still on ebay, in a bundle with White, for 3 days. I start the bidding at $40 with a buy it now of $70. There are 3 people watching it, which leads me to believe they will fight over it at the last minute....

I told the guy I had to think about it. What do I do?

Sell your DS Lite to him and sell White seperate? If you were happy with the $70 buy it now you'd probably get that anyway, but if he isn't desperate I'd wait for the listing on ebay to run out and have his offer as back up :P
 
Sell your DS Lite to him and sell White seperate? If you were happy with the $70 buy it now you'd probably get that anyway, but if he isn't desperate I'd wait for the listing on ebay to run out and have his offer as back up :P

Am I allowed to cancel the auction if I feel it won't net me enough money?
 
While a Maui Mallard evolution is pretty awesome, Farfetch'd being useful defeats the reason for his existence.

WTF dude. Farfetch'd can still exist. it's a choice to evolve it. I'm fine with having referential pokemon, but don't hinder their metagame usefulness because of it.
 
I didn't want to risk losing the DS for really cheap. I'm bad at ebaying.

Unless you do something terrible, like stick it in the wrong category and spell the name wrong, you're pretty much always guaranteed to sell gaming stuff at a reasonable price.

For some reason people always end up spending more when stuff starts at like 99p.
Even if it'd be cheaper in the long run to go with the buy it now. ¬_¬

He offered me $50 for JUST the DS, so I don't know if I should take him up on it, then just ebay White, or just wait and see how the auction plays out.

Ah, well if I was you I'd look at other auctions of similiar DS Lites - same colour, condition with whatever accessories you added (including the box)- and see how far off $50 they tend to be.
 
WTF dude. Farfetch'd can still exist. it's a choice to evolve it. I'm fine with having referential pokemon, but don't hinder their metagame usefulness because of it.

Farfetch'd is one of the coolest Pokemon. I wouldn't mind him being good. An evolution also wouldn't be bad.
 
While a Maui Mallard evolution is pretty awesome, Farfetch'd being useful defeats the reason for his existence.

Yeah this. It does its job well as a filler Pokemon.

Off topic question: Did you make your tag yourself?

And a Farfetch'd evolution is the most needed one. Heracross doesn't need an evolution at all, he's fine on his own imo

It's a filler Pokemon - it doesn't need any evo.

And it goes against its origin. "You're a sucker for getting this Pokemon that seems to be rare" parable.
 
Farfetch'd is one of the coolest Pokemon. I wouldn't mind him being good. An evolution also wouldn't be bad.

Yeah I love him too, But he really should be flying/fighting and get a stat buff. Fucking retcon him in that sense. I love him aesthetically though.
Yeah this. It does its job well as a filler Pokemon.



It's a filler Pokemon - it doesn't need any evo.

And it goes against its origin. "You're a sucker for getting this Pokemon that seems to be rare" parable.

Furries. They make no goddamn sense.
 
I wonder, would GF ever consider linking currently existing Pokemon together? Like, in gen VI Luvdisc can evolve into Alomomola?

Just a (probably stupid) thought
 
WTF dude. Farfetch'd can still exist. it's a choice to evolve it. I'm fine with having referential pokemon, but don't hinder their metagame usefulness because of it.

I don't think the metagame's going to be particularly moved by anything Farfetch'd will ever do.

I wonder, would GF ever consider linking currently existing Pokemon together? Like, in gen VI Luvdisc can evolve into Alomomola?

Just a (probably stupid) thought

They did it with Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee, but you could argue that they were always intended to be related.
 
I wonder, would GF ever consider linking currently existing Pokemon together? Like, in gen VI Luvdisc can evolve into Alomomola?

Just a (probably stupid) thought

Yeah. Things like that is what makes me hate B/W. Tauros should evolve into Boufallant or w/e afro buffalo's name is.
 
I wonder, would GF ever consider linking currently existing Pokemon together? Like, in gen VI Luvdisc can evolve into Alomomola?

Just a (probably stupid) thought
I was really hopeful Alomomola would be a Luvdisc evo. I'd be cool if they came up with a second form for Luvdisc that then evolved into Alomomola. The "missing link," if you would, and perhaps an intermediary stage in which you'd have the opportunity to learn some useful moves before it turns into Alomomola.
 
WTF dude. Farfetch'd can still exist. it's a choice to evolve it. I'm fine with having referential pokemon, but don't hinder their metagame usefulness because of it.

Well,not all pokemon are gonna be metagame useful or can be for that matter, or have to be in such a series. Some pokemon are just there to be funny or interesting or fun to collect.
 
They did it with Hitmonchan and Hitmonlee, but you could argue that they were always intended to be related.
Ah, I forgot about that!

I'd like to see Gen V Pokemon linked to other very similar Pokemon without relatives (Alomomola and Bouffalant for example)
 
I mean, if fucking remoraid can evolve into octillery, then clearly luvdisc and tauros can be easily slipped into pre-evo's for the B/W additions
KuGsj.gif
 
I mean, if fucking remoraid can evolve into octillery, then clearly luvdisc and tauros can be easily slipped into pre-evo's for the B/W additions
KuGsj.gif

Remoraid and Octillery are weapons, playing on the idea of super soakers. Remoraid's a pistol, Octillery's a tank. It fits thematically.
 
Well,not all pokemon are gonna be metagame useful or can be for that matter, or have to be in such a series. Some pokemon are just there to be funny or interesting or fun to collect.

And this is where I have to disagree. Stuff like making Pikachu viable with light ball means that pokemon can have a gimmick and at least have SOME trick. Have some oddball use. Farfetch'd stick was a start.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom