Who wants to tell me what this is about?
What's the source on the last part?
Yea the downports,it isn't even getting many current gen ports so just dream on.
Even taking into account for the controller I still can't fathom how the costs could be so high. Full tablets will retail for less than $100.
Its much more than that, 40W at 45 nm process equals to much less wattage at 28nm process.
Last month, Guerrilla Games mentioned that this year is possibly going to be their biggest ever since they released the first Killzone. So it's highly expected they will show something a la 2005. Make sure you have an extra pair of clean pants by then.
So then presumably you're expecting $599 again and/or ridiculous levels of loss leading for both Orbis and Durango.
They also bullshotted the hell out of uncharted vita
Looking forward to the target renders, EA sports bullshots and all the one million troops overselling of their laptop hardware.
Nothing. However, my (untrained) eye sees considerably more powerful and/or more costly tech than current guesstimation of the Wii U. With suggestions of controller gimmicks in the DS3 successor and the inclusion of Kinect 2.0.
This is a nice little example of how in today's multi-threaded development environment, more cores at a lower speed is a significant advantage over less cores at a higher clock rate.
It's relevant because tomorrows Jaguar CPU is at about the same level as yesterdays Phenom II, and given that the Radeon 5850 used in this test, will be blown away by the PS4 GPU.
So, if programmed by decent devs, those 8 low clocked Jaguar cores will provide all the grunt needed when combined with the 7970m class GPU.
Of course, getting 8 cores to work nicely together will still be a pain, but the potential is there.
This is a nice little example of how in today's multi-threaded development environment, more cores at a lower speed is a significant advantage over less cores at a higher clock rate.
It's relevant because tomorrows Jaguar CPU is at about the same level as yesterdays Phenom II, and given that the Radeon 5850 used in this test, will be blown away by the PS4 GPU.
So, if programmed by decent devs, those 8 low clocked Jaguar cores will provide all the grunt needed when combined with the 7970m class GPU.
Of course, getting 8 cores to work nicely together will still be a pain, but the potential is there.
Thank you. I figured I could google it buy I knew there would be some details better explained by people here.Wikipedia explains it well enough:
"In computing, FLOPS (or flops, for FLoating-point Operations Per Second, also flop/s, see below) is a measure of computer performance, especially in fields of scientific calculations that make heavy use of floating-point calculations, similar to the older, simpler, instructions per second."
It simply measures the peak number of floating point operations a computer can perform in an optimal case.
Of course in the real world the optimal case will barely be reached, and they don't tell you anything about other parts of a system such as memory bandwidth or other computing tasks (integer, branches..). That's why they can easily be misinterpreted by the layman.
Yet for example, they are a good indicator of shader performance when you compare different GPUs of the same or similar architecture.
Well,the gpu is 40, the cpu 45.So yes, more 40 than 45.
