Well it's Groundhog Day...again...

Status
Not open for further replies.

jimi_dini

Member
Too early for flapjacks?

groundhog%2Bday%2Bbill%2Bmurray.jpg
 

Retro

Member
Fun fact: Harold Ramis originally suggested that Phil was stuck in the loop for 9-10 years, but later decided it was closer to 30 or 40.

In the original script (which was much darker), it was closer to 10,000 years; Phil tracked time by reading a page of a book each day and had managed to read through the entire public library.
 

Escape Goat

Member
Fun fact: Harold Ramis originally suggested that Phil was stuck in the loop for 9-10 years, but later decided it was closer to 30 or 40.

In the original script (which was much darker), it was closer to 10,000 years; Phil tracked time by reading a page of a book each day and had managed to read through the entire public library.

Thats cool and hten I started to think about what it would be like to actually be stuck in the same day for 30 years or even 10,0000 years. It kind of would take the movie into a really dark place.
 

Retro

Member
Thats cool and hten I started to think about what it would be like to actually be stuck in the same day for 30 years or even 10,0000 years. It kind of would take the movie into a really dark place.

Yeah, I can't seem to find the article I read, but the film was supposed to start off mid-loop and be very, very dark.
 

Retro

Member
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.

I like that it remains ambiguous about things like that. When films try to explain things too much, it saps the momentum and energy out if it's not done just right. I like that we have no idea why or for how long he was stuck.
 

The Real Abed

Perma-Junior
I like that it remains ambiguous about things like that. When films try to explain things too much, it saps the momentum and energy out if it's not done just right. I like that we have no idea why or for how long he was stuck.
It doesn't need to explain anything. Just lay more subtle clues about how long it's been that people will only get if they're paying attention.
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
You know, you're absolutely right, now that I think about it. If I remember right, they discuss it during the darker part of the film when he's killing himself repeatedly.

I only remember it because it's the only commentary I've ever listened to more than once.

I think Ramis did a great job with the premise of this movie. I also like the almost unknown TV movie 12:01 from the same year.
 

rCIZZLE

Member
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.

I like that it remains ambiguous about things like that. When films try to explain things too much, it saps the momentum and energy out if it's not done just right. I like that we have no idea why or for how long he was stuck.
 
Just watched the movie again today in HD. Such a fucking amazing movie.
Its perfect.


It doesn't need to explain anything. Just lay more subtle clues about how long it's been that people will only get if they're paying attention.

I see what you did there.

I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.

I see what you did there.
 
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.

The bad thing about the 10,000 years is that by the end of the scrip he is no longer a real person but Jesus Christ, plus it is kind of weird that it takes him this long to become a good enough person to escape, when at the same time at the end he is basically a perfect individual.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom