Fun fact: Harold Ramis originally suggested that Phil was stuck in the loop for 9-10 years, but later decided it was closer to 30 or 40.
In the original script (which was much darker), it was closer to 10,000 years; Phil tracked time by reading a page of a book each day and had managed to read through the entire public library.
Thats cool and hten I started to think about what it would be like to actually be stuck in the same day for 30 years or even 10,0000 years. It kind of would take the movie into a really dark place.
Yeah, I can't seem to find the article I read, but the film was supposed to start off mid-loop and be very, very dark.
IIRC he talks about it on the DVD commentary.
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.
It doesn't need to explain anything. Just lay more subtle clues about how long it's been that people will only get if they're paying attention.I like that it remains ambiguous about things like that. When films try to explain things too much, it saps the momentum and energy out if it's not done just right. I like that we have no idea why or for how long he was stuck.
You know, you're absolutely right, now that I think about it. If I remember right, they discuss it during the darker part of the film when he's killing himself repeatedly.
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.
It doesn't need to explain anything. Just lay more subtle clues about how long it's been that people will only get if they're paying attention.
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.
I love the idea that he could have been stuck in a loop for 10,000 years. I wish they had touched on it more in the film.
Phil!
Yeah, I can't seem to find the article I read, but the film was supposed to start off mid-loop and be very, very dark.