He was also saying that games would be tied to the console which is absolutely wrong and hilariously ironic considering he spoke of the Wii U in glowing terms in the very same paragraph. Hypocrisy of the highest order.
I'm sure it's been mentioned but if they are going code
activation for individual games tied to a system what happens
with bricked systems? You now have a two-fold headache. Dead
system and jumping through hoops to prove you own the game tied
to the system that is bricked.
If you're gonna throw "hypocrisy" around, better learn how to read better
and comprehend what I actually wrote, not what you want it to be.
I never once said they would be tied to the system. Read it again.
*If* they are going game codes tied to systems. Hypothetical based
on the OP sourced article.
Good. This industry needs a good cleaning. It's like the scene at the end of The Day After Tomorrow where the astronauts look down on Earth and one of them says " I've never seen it so clear." We need to get this "used games are the devil" mentality out of the way so we can get back to an industry where gamers make games for gamers.
Good. This industry needs a good cleaning. It's like the scene at the end of The Day After Tomorrow where the astronauts look down on Earth and one of them says " I've never seen it so clear." We need to get this "used games are the devil" mentality out of the way so we can get back to an industry where gamers make games for gamers.
So are you implying this tactic is good because it gets rid of used games or are you implying you hope it leads to the console market crashing down?
I'm totally against the no used games idea but I believe we're headed for a crash anyway, so I say we get all of the misguided hatred for used games out of the way before the shit hits the fan. I'm ready to see the reactions from the industry when blocking used games doesn't save the day.
Rumor has been popping up about both parties for a long time now. Either it is just testing the waters or not the full implementation is out there.I still would advise people to wait for something official before getting too emotional. Certainly IMO, this represents a worse-case scenario, but something about the whole situation seems unlikely.
Neither MS or Sony have even officially confirmed there is a new console coming outNo Microsoft official comment yet?
Neither MS or Sony have even officially confirmed there is a new console coming out
I still would advise people to wait for something official before getting too emotional. Certainly IMO, this represents a worse-case scenario, but something about the whole situation seems unlikely.
I know.I see, so you're wanting the scapegoats to be out of the picture so the companies have no bullshit excuse to make? They'll just come up with more bullshit excuses.![]()
I still would advise people to wait for something official before getting too emotional. Certainly IMO, this represents a worse-case scenario, but something about the whole situation seems unlikely.
Eh, if all of this is true, and if PS4 will block second hand games too, I could see Nintendo handhelds being considered as THE alternative that most will follow in the console gaming space (Steambox will be the alternative outside console gaming). It's just everything so absurd, we could see many Western publishers suffering while Japanese publishers shining again.
The attach ratios are going to be fuckinghorribleFUCKING BRUTAL!
All those mid-tier games will literally vanish
Well the Big-Big Publishers will enjoy some cash flow, but titles will get truncated and focus grouped to hell and fucking back
Most will by 1-5 titles a year, the most content worthy, *cough*COD, BF, Ass Creed, "Darling", "Dark Horse"*cough*
What will happen with the rest?
Eh, if all of this is true, and if PS4 will block second hand games too, I could see Nintendo handhelds being considered as THE alternative that most will follow in the console gaming space (Steambox will be the alternative outside console gaming). It's just everything so absurd, we could see many Western publishers suffering while Japanese publishers shining again.
No Microsoft official comment yet?
Why would folks go NIntendo handheld when they could go Wii U, or stick with PS3? One impact of this (assuming the worst case scenario) is I suspect folks would just carry on with the current gen for longer, especially smaller devs.
I hate how reasonable, feasible and probable you make this sound. I hate it!!Granted we don't know if this is true or not. But entertaining the idea, I could see Microsoft going down this road.
The most valued consumer is the core gamer. The core gamer plays the first party franchises, and those games all have an online component. The core gamer most likely pays the subscription for Live and has done so from the beginning. Outside of the paywall itself, the core gamer likely has paid for the services behind the paywall that already have online connectivity requirements (Netflix, Hulu, various sports packages). XBLA exists only for online connected individuals. There are those who don't have internet, but how avid a gamer are they? How tethered are they to Live, their main revenue source.
This new generation begins with the core gamer. MS is the market leader among the core in US and EU. I'm sure for many its the defacto console. Lock folks into the service now. You lose some in the transition, but while at the top of your game, you lock folks in. You groom those consumers.
I don't think this stops gamers from leaning towards MS. I think gamers will complain now, see the games, realize its sitting on a shelf at launch, and that nothing is inhibiting them from playing their Halos, Cods, Forzas, etc, but their will...and cave in...if they don't succumb to preordering first.
I'm not sure how this will effect the industry, and ultimately I want what's best for it and the consumer...but I just don't see gamers as a whole doing something or making some stand against this. I would really be surprised if this translates into any significant amount of people choosing a competitor for this sole reason.
One concern I do have about the current gen- when will MSFT/Sony shut off PS3/360 online play? Microsoft did shut off online play for the Xbox a couple years back.
Let's say these rumors are true. Need to be online, games tied to consoles, DRM.
I (reluctantly) buy my library of games digitally.
Xbox720 (for example) does poorly next gen, due to their prohibitive practices.
Microsoft pulls out of the console business, like many others before them.
They pull the plug on Xbox Live services (kinda like they did with Xbox1 games.)
Then, my Xbox720 dies (RROD.)
What happens to all the games I bought?
One concern I do have about the current gen- when will MSFT/Sony shut off PS3/360 online play? Microsoft did shut off online play for the Xbox a couple years back.
Without BC, that could leave many games in the dark.
I could see the shutoff happening earlier this gen if the consoles struggle out of the gate.
One concern I do have about the current gen- when will MSFT/Sony shut off PS3/360 online play? Microsoft did shut off online play for the Xbox a couple years back.
Without BC, that could leave many games in the dark.
No Microsoft official comment yet?
Good. This industry needs a good cleaning. It's like the scene at the end of The Day After Tomorrow where the astronauts look down on Earth and one of them says " I've never seen it so clear." We need to get this "used games are the devil" mentality out of the way so we can get back to an industry where gamers make games for gamers.
I don't see this is true. What will happen is that companies will only make "safe." games that they know will sell. Yeah this bodes well for COD and maddens of the gaming world but not good for companies who want to take a risk and put something different out.
I still would advise people to wait for something official before getting too emotional. Certainly IMO, this represents a worse-case scenario, but something about the whole situation seems unlikely.
People saying Sony or Microsoft should comment on this are deluded. It's like saying Apple should comment before the next iPhone is out. We all know it is coming and in the case of the iPhone see pictures beforehand but that doesn't make a blind bit of difference.
There's not a cat in hells chance that either Microsoft or Sony are confirming or denying rumours for consoles that don't even officially exist.
The only people that are discussing this are people on forums like this. Do you think anybody else has any idea what the hell is being rumoured? No. 99% of the gamers that want these consoles will find out the facts after they're announced.
There are lots of ways for Major Nelson to say this without explicitly announcing a new Xbox is coming. Such as "don't always believe things you read on the internet".
That simple statement would send the signal to the online community that the day's big story isn't true, thus putting this whole thing to bed. They chose not to do that.
So that tells me they're not saying shit because it's true, or they're floating the idea out there to see what the reaction is, and maybe they don't make their final decision for another month or two. Either way they chose not to shut down the furor today.
Microsoft does not comment on rumours or speculation. We are always thinking about what is next for our platform, but we dont have anything further to share at this time.
We already have that in the budgets where it's relevant, which have basically pared down to "shooter with RPG progression", "RPG with shooter controls", "popular sport sim", "Assassin's Creed", and "Final Fantasy". Back down on earth in the $5m-$10m range, where a lot of PC and domestic-market Japanese console titles live, there's plenty of room for experimentation and variety.
They wouldn't comment on rumours and speculation.No Microsoft official comment yet?