XANDER CAGE
Member
just meant Konami as a whole. there are clearly some talented facial artists working for the company.
That's not really how publishers work, but okay.
just meant Konami as a whole. there are clearly some talented facial artists working for the company.
Kojima is a Twin Peaks fan I take it?
Also to the CG theorists, why would they go through the trouble of a CG interview when they can hire anyone off the street and bandage up their head? It's such a ridiculous waste of resources
Kojima is a Twin Peaks fan I take it?
![]()
Also to the CG theorists, why would they go through the trouble of a CG interview when they can hire anyone off the street and bandage up their head? It's such a ridiculous waste of resources
Also to the CG theorists, why would they go through the trouble of a CG interview when they can hire anyone off the street and bandage up their head? It's such a ridiculous waste of resources
It is easy to take a still frame and say it is CG.
But that interview was not a still frame.
It was a man talking. I don't care how realistic your skin is, it is about the eye movement, mouth movement, and that was NOT cg. I know you guys want to believe so fucking much. But it just isn't.
..but....but.....believe....
Give me a game that trolls me at the same level as MGS2!
Pardon me if someone already covered this on here, but I'm just copying what someone said on Destructoid, because it was somewhat relevant to this.
I figured out why it's called Moby Dick Studios!
Moby Dick was written by Melville. Filmmaker Jean-Pierre Melville took that author's name because he was a fan of Melville and Moby Dick. Jean-Pierre Melville's second film?
Les Enfants Terribles!
It is easy to take a still frame and say it is CG.
But that interview was not a still frame.
It was a man talking. I don't care how realistic your skin is, it is about the eye movement, mouth movement, and that was NOT cg. I know you guys want to believe so fucking much. But it just isn't.
Everyone's wrong.
He's totally a robot. They just need more matching skin to finish his face.
![]()
Remember this FOX engine teaser? One is real one is FOX engine.
They are called CG steps. They occur when you divert 99% of your power of the engine to make the head and face look and move ultra realistic. The 1% is used for the rest of the frame.Anyone know what the deal is with the shadow of the railing here:
![]()
Everyone's wrong.
He's totally a robot. They just need more matching skin to finish his face.
This image is silly. It's way too small to have a chance to tell which is which(even though I can see what appear to be freaking jaggies on the right images) and, conveniently, no high-res versions of this were released.
This image is silly. It's way too small to have a chance to tell which is which(even though I can see what appear to be freaking jaggies on the right images) and, conveniently, no high-res versions of this were released.
Ehh, sharp hocks 6/10 would not mount.Look at the horse above and tell me it doesn't look magnificent.
They are called CG steps. They occur when you divert 99% of your power of the engine to make the head and face look and move ultra realistic. The 1% is used for the rest of the frame.
Anyone know what the deal is with the shadow of the railing here:
![]()
Yes, because a big burning whale wasn't enough....
found this Fox Engine screenshot online from gamesradar. that the eyes kind of resemble how the Joakim Mogren are angled, not saying its him just saying this is an early render
static.gamesradar.com/images/mb/GamesRadar/us/Daily/2011/08-Aug/18/Fox%20Face/hkfaces--article_image.jpg
An early render from 2011. Right.
..
GAF kill me now.
Anyone know what the deal is with the shadow of the railing here:
![]()
Seriously. I don't want to live on this CG planet anymore.
Seriously. I don't want to live on this CG planet anymore.
Presumably this is sarcasm. Hard to tell on days like this.
Well my sarcasms are rendered with the FOX engine, so that's why they are hard to tell. CG Sarcasms!
It's so glaringly obvious which is real and which is fake in these
If that's CG, color me impressed.
![]()
![]()
B is rendered. Outside of shading, lighting and reflective differences, the frames on B have jaggies and are practically painted onto the wall.Can you tell me which is which?
Not even joking, I can't tell.
B is rendered. Outside of shading, lighting and reflective differences, the frames on B have jaggies and are practically painted onto the wall.
And wtf at the guy saying you can't move your upper eyelids without moving the lower ones, does that mean I'm a mutant? I should give CG Professor X a call.