Margaret Thatcher has died

Status
Not open for further replies.
Even if it's been posted, still worth sharing:

BHVQEMvCUAAkoWR.jpg:large
 
It's because of the sheer hatred they have of her, the language they would have to use to describe her would get them banned. It's nothing to do with sexism, its just if they didn't keep their emotions in check, what they would say would seem grossly offensive.

Its easy to underestimate how much hate Thatcher does receive, and justifiably so in some senses.


There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.

This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.
 
I guess what I'm getting at is, how do you prevent people from selling their own houses? Landlords couldn't acquire properties that weren't willingly sold. They didn't buy them directly from the council at a discounted rate, they brought them from private sellers at a price that 'the market' felt was perfectly fair.

I'm swamped with work at the moment so I'm probably overlooking some huge and obvious loophole or predatory acquisition or something. I'll do some more reading later on.

You can't stop people selling things its a free market after all but at the very least Maggie should never have allowed profiteering, if someone was sold a council house at a discount that discount should have been repayable to the council whenever the house was sold not just in the first five years
 
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.

This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.

There are people who have saved special bottles of drink for decades, in the event of her death. The hatred is pure and unrelenting. I don't think any President in the US has been hated with a hatred of this nature.
 
So, I heard Man United and Man City are playing a Derby tonight...

I can totally see there being an impromtu minute's silence and the Northern fans kicking off about it.

AP says the Premier League will not ask clubs to hold a minute's silence for Thatcher. I cannot see United decide themselves to hold one, given the kind of response it will get from the fans.

Bear in mind this weekend is the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster, and given Thatcher's role in its cover-up, there will be some kind of response to her death because of that.


There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.

This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.

There are people who have saved special bottles of drink for decades, in the event of her death. The hatred is pure and unrelenting. I don't think any President in the US has been hated with a hatred of this nature.

Its not what they'll say is sexist or racist either, it'd most likely be a polemic interspersed with expletives, but on GAF that may warrant the attention of a mod.

Kavinsky's got it in one, the level of hate she receives is unprecedented.
 
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.

This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.

The fuck are you even talking about?
 
AP says the Premier League will not ask clubs to hold a minute's silence for Thatcher. I cannot see United decide themselves to hold one, given the kind of response it will get from the fans.

Bear in mind this weekend is the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster, and given Thatcher's role in its cover-up, there will be some kind of response to her death because of that.






Its not what they'll say is sexist or racist either, it'd most likely be a polemic interspersed with expletives, but on GAF that may warrant the attention of a mod.

Kavinsky's got it in one, the level of hate she receives is unprecedented.

A minutes cheering is far more likely
 
CHEEZMO™;53129511 said:
The fuck are you even talking about?

Exactly, he thinks people are holding back sexist remarks and / or racist remarks ......... why?


I just can't let full flow the full range of curse words I would use, nothing more.
 
She had big, proud, iron balls. Her time was before mine but the country still feels the effects of what her and her party legislated. For good or bad.

RIP.
 
Two faced champagne socialist.

Whines about social inequality being caused by Thatcher, so what does he do..fucks off to live in America, the very definition and home of social inequality.

No time for these celebrity cunts.

Champagne socialists are socialists who can afford champagne. You and your friends are no different and would do the same if you had the money, just like nearly every fucking leftist there is. Chomsky is a fucking millionaire for heaven's sake.

You want to stick to your beliefs, give your money to those poorer - and that includes people OUTSIDE your country. When you talk of the human family and uniting the human race and all that bullshit and more talk of the 'world's wealth' like it belongs to everybody and the rich ones simply were lucky because the wealth fairy decided to drop in, then you can't believe in borders. But no, you're here on your computer and internet connection denouncing 'champagne socialist.' Too fucking stupid to realize what a shameless sanctimonious hypocrite you are.
 
It suggests that the opinion is a result of where you're born. Is that the case? All these people who dislike her, they'd have thought she was great if they'd been born in the South, instead? Is that how your thought process works? Hating someone because of where you're from is silly.

Edit: To clarify, it's the idea that "I'm from X area therefore I think Y" that I think is silly. The world is more nuanced than that.

I disagree. I think it's perfectly reasonable to base your opinion on what you see, hear and experience in your direct surroundings.

If you ask somebody from a Yorkshire or North East mining community, somebody who lost their job as a result of Thatcher's policies or otherwise suffered as a result of the decline in the community, what they thought of Margaret Thatcher, what do you think their answer would be?

If you ask somebody from Liverpool, a City which experienced great personal tragedy in 1989 with the Hillsborough disaster, what their opinion of Thatcher is following on from the release of documents which confirm a massive state cover up happened under her watch, what do you think their answer would be?

Their opinion would likely be very, very different to that of someone who lives in the home counties, for example. Why is that silly?

Me saying "I'm from Sheffield therefore I don't like Margaret Thatcher" isn't just down to some postcode lottery, as your post seems to suggest you think is happening. It's because the things I have seen and hear around me, sometimes on a daily basis for as long as I can remember, have educated me on how and why Thatcher was bad for my part of the world. I have family who live in former mining communities. Broken mining communities. Family who lost livelihoods and watched communities collapse. I've seen and lived in and with the impact of that.

Like I said earlier, my wife is of Chilean descent. Her family came to this country as a result of the Pinochet regime. Thatcher's support of what occurred in Chile and of Pinochet is and was a disgrace. They despise her for it. They hate her just as much as anyone in this thread, who might come from a Northern town which either felt or is still feeling the repercussions of her stint in charge.

To suggest this is only about "hating someone because of where you come from" is naive and short sighted. For a lot of people posting in this thread, it's got nothing to do with that.
 
What the Liverpool fans do on Saturday at Reading will be interesting as well; as posted earlier
213330129-soccer-fa-cup-semi-final-liverpool-v-everton-wembley-stadium.jpg

We've got a chant that says 'we're gonna have a party when Maggie Thatcher dies'. I usually don't sing it, not that I don't see her as the horrible, spiteful, nasty woman that she was, but because it just doesn't sit right with me. I expect the away support to be belting that out for large portions of the match, I've heard it get the most airing at away games.

As has probably been said she was a cruel piece of work that threw the working class, and less fortunate Britons under a rock to further her own political gain and serve those already well off. I understand there's a degree of humility needed for any dead person, whoever they are, but given what my family tell me about Thatcher I've got none whatsoever.
 
There are people who have saved special bottles of drink for decades, in the event of her death. The hatred is pure and unrelenting. I don't think any President in the US has been hated with a hatred of this nature.

That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.

I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
 
A friend shared this with me:

http://thequietus.com/articles/11886-margaret-thatcher-obituary

Your celebrations at Margaret Thatcher's death are misplaced, says David Stubbs, for "Thatcherism never died, it was never truly even un-elected"

[...]

What needs addressing as a matter of absolute urgency right now, however, is that Thatcher 's legacy is one of gross, almost comically staggering inequality. We are not all in this together.
 
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.

I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.

Read the thread, what she's done has been posted over and over again by numerous people
 
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.

I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
?

This has literally nothing to do with sexism. No one hates her for her gender at all. No one, on either side, drags her gender into this in any debate concerning her whatsoever.
 
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.

I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.

Stop talking about things that aren't happening.
 
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.

I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
...where has anyone brought sexism into this thread (except yourself, of course)? You're projecting. I don't know enough curse words to describe my hate for the woman. but I certainly don't hate her because she is one. She would've done the same shit as a man.

Oh, and thanks for calling me a sexist, that's really made my day, that has. >:(
 
Blog excerpt going around that simply nails it:

Condolences to the industrial workers who lost their livelihoods, the millions unemployed who had to live on a pittance, the pensioners who saw their standards of living heavily reduced, the children born into a state of poverty and the black South Africans and Chileans who lived in a state of constant fear due to regimes backed by Reagan and Thatcher.
 
It does apply, if you dont get over 50%, don't behave like you did get 50%. What a shit fucking system.

This isn't America where 2 parties reign supreme, so expecting a 50% majority is simply barmy.

You are right though, the system is shit as its heavily weighted towards Labour.

Some facts...

In the 10 smallest constituency's, with a population between 45k to 55k. 9 are held by the Labour party, 1 by the Lib Dems.

In the 10 largest, population 85k to 95k, 7 are held by Conservative's, 3 by Lib Dems.

Its BS like this which is why in the general election 2005, the Conservative's had 10k more votes than Labour in England but Labour had nearly 100 more English MP's.

What kind of bullshit is that?
 
My friends and family in Iraq are pretty happy about it. Can't say I'm too upset either.

I'm guessing this is about the gulf war - your friends and family supported Saddam's invasion of Kuwait? Can't say I'm too upset for what happened to your country if many people like that populate it.
 
Read the thread, what she's done has been posted over and over again by numerous people

I'm referring to the string of responses at the beginning that had people saying they would get banned if they posted what they thought of her. It seemed to still be drawing questions near this end of the thread.


What sexism are you talking about?


I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. Surely, we've had unkind words for politicians here before. It's not even like Thatcher was on the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. The admin even endorses the word "cunt". How much worse can their rant be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.
 
Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.

Eh? Not seen anything of the sort here. I imagine there's a lot here who don't want to be banned for saying very harsh words over someone who gained huge notoriety here and hasn't even been dead for a day.
 
Was only as old as 8 when she was in office, so I don't have any real opinion on her legacy, my similarly aged friends on facebook are posting pretty hateful stuff right now, I guess they were political activists when they were children...

That or they just have an adept grasp of history and its implications in the present day.

God forbid you ever judge Adolf Hitler harshly. You weren't alive during WWII, so you don't know.

There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.

This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.

It's because GAF is sometimes sensitive to bashing the dead, not because they're holding back sexist remarks.
 
I'm referring to the string of responses at the beginning that had people saying they would get banned if they posted what they thought of her. It seemed to still be drawing questions near this end of the thread.





I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.

They just mean they want to do a huge expletive ridden rant, its fairly clear and obvious
 
The irony is, the majority of GAFfers posting negatively in this post, have directly benefited from the more service-industry orientated approach that Thatcher brought to Britain. Pre-Thatcher Britain was a lot bleaker than post-Thatcher. Quite frankly, the unions had far too much power and the industries that Britain was built on were outdated and in desperate need of an overhaul. She took care of both of these issues.

Seems ridiculous that the celebratory scroats weren't even around to remember what it was like yet still enjoy jumping on the extreme left let's-be-oh-so-controversial bandwagon.
 
I'm referring to the string of responses at the beginning that had people saying they would get banned if they posted what they thought of her. It seemed to still be drawing questions near this end of the thread.





I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.

The dots don't connect themselves, otherwise a vocal majority would be aware of just what the fuck you're referring to. What's actually happened is you've connected the dots yourself in a bespoke fashion that leans towards a fallacy you've created, rather than the extremely valid reasons people have given.

The hate Thatcher inspires within reasoned, law abiding citizens with a sound moral compass should demonstrate the scale of hurt she produced, and tell you that this goes way above gender.
 
I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.

People have been banned for far, far less than expressing the amount of hate she gets from certain areas.
 
The irony is, the majority of GAFfers posting negatively in this post, have directly benefited from the more service-industry orientated approach that Thatcher brought to Britain. Pre-Thatcher Britain was a lot bleaker than post-Thatcher. Quite frankly, the unions had far too much power and the industries that Britain was built on were outdated and in desperate need of an overhaul. She took care of both of these issues.

Seems ridiculous that the celebratory scroats weren't even around to remember what it was like yet still enjoy jumping on the extreme left let's-be-oh-so-controversial bandwagon.
You mean the service industry that we are trying to get away from? 'March of the makers'
 
Awesome clip on ITV just there.

Showed Thatcher supporting some Tory in his local election in 2000 and walking through some parade.

Woman walks up to her: 'You're a wonderful lady'

Bloke walks up to her, glasses on, shirt and tie, every bit the modern worker: 'I think you're the most evil woman on the planet. Evil!'
 
What does that entail exactly? Permission to walk into a Primark and pick the shellsuit of his choice? The right to steal any car stereo he chooses?

That sums you up that post, pompous, patronising and ignorant. No better than the "scroats" as you put it.

Makes me laugh how much that city gets shit jibes thrown at it, considering crime and poverty rates are worse in other areas.
 
What does that entail exactly? Permission to walk into a Primark and pick the shellsuit of his choice? The right to steal any car stereo he chooses?

Between this and your Hillsborough remark the other day I'd be banned for saying what I truly thought of you.

For posterity:

Relax, guy. Everyone makes mistakes.

Two facts to consider:

1 - Everyone working at the Sun with direct responsibility for that article is long gone. It's the same paper in name only.

2 - Whilst the Liverpool fans certainly WERE NOT the catalyst of the disaster, you can hardly say they were entirely blameless.

Speechless at the bolded, in a post that quotes a man that would've faced charges had he not resigned to save his own skin and his pension.

Try this for a starter: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ices-job-harder-says-Sir-Norman-Bettison.html

Matches other articles on the disaster I read in that the fans had no responsibility in the cause of the disaster, but were a hindrance through their subsequent actions.
Ultimately, wasn't most of the outrage with the Sun at the time caused by a (false) accusation that the fans were stealing from corpses inside the ground?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom