Messofanego
Banned
Even if it's been posted, still worth sharing:
For those who don't read Spanish it says "pope use his magic Christian powers to exact vengeance on Margaret Thatcher".Argentinians seem to be happy about the news.
http://www.clarin.com/mundo/Murio-Margaret-Thatcher_0_897510394.html
It's because of the sheer hatred they have of her, the language they would have to use to describe her would get them banned. It's nothing to do with sexism, its just if they didn't keep their emotions in check, what they would say would seem grossly offensive.
Its easy to underestimate how much hate Thatcher does receive, and justifiably so in some senses.
Is she getting a state financed funeral?
I guess what I'm getting at is, how do you prevent people from selling their own houses? Landlords couldn't acquire properties that weren't willingly sold. They didn't buy them directly from the council at a discounted rate, they brought them from private sellers at a price that 'the market' felt was perfectly fair.
I'm swamped with work at the moment so I'm probably overlooking some huge and obvious loophole or predatory acquisition or something. I'll do some more reading later on.
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.
This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.
So, I heard Man United and Man City are playing a Derby tonight...
I can totally see there being an impromtu minute's silence and the Northern fans kicking off about it.
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.
This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.
There are people who have saved special bottles of drink for decades, in the event of her death. The hatred is pure and unrelenting. I don't think any President in the US has been hated with a hatred of this nature.
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.
This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.
AP says the Premier League will not ask clubs to hold a minute's silence for Thatcher. I cannot see United decide themselves to hold one, given the kind of response it will get from the fans.
Bear in mind this weekend is the anniversary of the Hillsborough disaster, and given Thatcher's role in its cover-up, there will be some kind of response to her death because of that.
Its not what they'll say is sexist or racist either, it'd most likely be a polemic interspersed with expletives, but on GAF that may warrant the attention of a mod.
Kavinsky's got it in one, the level of hate she receives is unprecedented.
CHEEZMO;53129511 said:The fuck are you even talking about?
CHEEZMO;53129511 said:The fuck are you even talking about?
Two faced champagne socialist.
Whines about social inequality being caused by Thatcher, so what does he do..fucks off to live in America, the very definition and home of social inequality.
No time for these celebrity cunts.
A minutes cheering is far more likely
It suggests that the opinion is a result of where you're born. Is that the case? All these people who dislike her, they'd have thought she was great if they'd been born in the South, instead? Is that how your thought process works? Hating someone because of where you're from is silly.
Edit: To clarify, it's the idea that "I'm from X area therefore I think Y" that I think is silly. The world is more nuanced than that.
What the Liverpool fans do on Saturday at Reading will be interesting as well; as posted earlier
![]()
There are people who have saved special bottles of drink for decades, in the event of her death. The hatred is pure and unrelenting. I don't think any President in the US has been hated with a hatred of this nature.
Your celebrations at Margaret Thatcher's death are misplaced, says David Stubbs, for "Thatcherism never died, it was never truly even un-elected"
[...]
What needs addressing as a matter of absolute urgency right now, however, is that Thatcher 's legacy is one of gross, almost comically staggering inequality. We are not all in this together.
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.
I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
I'm wondering if that will change in 20-30 years.
?That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.
I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.
I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
What sexism are you talking about?
...where has anyone brought sexism into this thread (except yourself, of course)? You're projecting. I don't know enough curse words to describe my hate for the woman. but I certainly don't hate her because she is one. She would've done the same shit as a man.That's fine, but it doesn't call for sexism, which is irrelevant. Are people who hate Obama justified in saying "it's called the white house for a reason..." because they hate his policies so much? It's dumb and disintegrates any sort of political opinion they're expressing.
I'd rather people say something mean and give us a reasoned account of why her policies made her a terrible, hated leader (there seems to be plenty to draw upon). Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
Condolences to the industrial workers who lost their livelihoods, the millions unemployed who had to live on a pittance, the pensioners who saw their standards of living heavily reduced, the children born into a state of poverty and the black South Africans and Chileans who lived in a state of constant fear due to regimes backed by Reagan and Thatcher.
It does apply, if you dont get over 50%, don't behave like you did get 50%. What a shit fucking system.
My friends and family in Iraq are pretty happy about it. Can't say I'm too upset either.
Read the thread, what she's done has been posted over and over again by numerous people
What sexism are you talking about?
Coming in to say "I'm a gutless sexist who doesn't want to get banned" tells me nothing about Thatcher.
Blog excerpt going around that simply nails it:
Was only as old as 8 when she was in office, so I don't have any real opinion on her legacy, my similarly aged friends on facebook are posting pretty hateful stuff right now, I guess they were political activists when they were children...
There have been criticisms of other politicians on this board without resorting to sexism or racism, or even typical 'libtard/repug' bashing. Please, I think we're grown up enough to make strong points about her policies without resorting to sexism.
This forum is mostly liberal, too. I'm pretty sure most people won't have a problem with disagreeing with conservatism.
The dots connect themselves
I'm referring to the string of responses at the beginning that had people saying they would get banned if they posted what they thought of her. It seemed to still be drawing questions near this end of the thread.
I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.
Considering the state of The Sun sales in Liverpool, Thatcher will not be idolised outside of Conservative Party HQ.
I'm referring to the string of responses at the beginning that had people saying they would get banned if they posted what they thought of her. It seemed to still be drawing questions near this end of the thread.
I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.
I asked what was so taboo and bannable about expressing a political opinion on GAF. It's not even the political side that GAF tends to align with. GAF also doesn't ban for language unless you're personally attacking or harassing another member. So what else could it be? The response has been 'People just hate her so much', which doesn't answer the question. The dots connect themselves, but I'm still waiting on responses.
I'm guessing this is about the gulf war - your friends and family supported Saddam's invasion of Kuwait? Can't say I'm too upset for what happened to your country if many people like that populate it.
Wonder what Michael Heseltine makes of it all, wasn't he given the Freedom of the City in Liverpool last year?
You mean the service industry that we are trying to get away from? 'March of the makers'The irony is, the majority of GAFfers posting negatively in this post, have directly benefited from the more service-industry orientated approach that Thatcher brought to Britain. Pre-Thatcher Britain was a lot bleaker than post-Thatcher. Quite frankly, the unions had far too much power and the industries that Britain was built on were outdated and in desperate need of an overhaul. She took care of both of these issues.
Seems ridiculous that the celebratory scroats weren't even around to remember what it was like yet still enjoy jumping on the extreme left let's-be-oh-so-controversial bandwagon.
What does that entail exactly? Permission to walk into a Primark and pick the shellsuit of his choice? The right to steal any car stereo he chooses?
What does that entail exactly? Permission to walk into a Primark and pick the shellsuit of his choice? The right to steal any car stereo he chooses?
Relax, guy. Everyone makes mistakes.
Two facts to consider:
1 - Everyone working at the Sun with direct responsibility for that article is long gone. It's the same paper in name only.
2 - Whilst the Liverpool fans certainly WERE NOT the catalyst of the disaster, you can hardly say they were entirely blameless.
Try this for a starter: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ices-job-harder-says-Sir-Norman-Bettison.html
Matches other articles on the disaster I read in that the fans had no responsibility in the cause of the disaster, but were a hindrance through their subsequent actions.
Ultimately, wasn't most of the outrage with the Sun at the time caused by a (false) accusation that the fans were stealing from corpses inside the ground?