Exactly.
But it's the same with painters.
Now, I'm not very knowledgeable about the arts and stuff, but I imagine that as a painter, once you've sold your artwork it's sold. It has your name on it, but the original is no longer yours, it belongs to the buyer now and he/she can do with it as he/she deems fit, right?
Of course, you'd probably have contract with a byline stating that the buyer can't delibirately destroy it, but still. If the buyer eventually wants to sell it, the creator shouldn't be able to to stop it.
If anything, he/she should be glad someone else now has the ability to enjoy it, creating a possible new customer in the process.
Oh. fuck. no. Not even close.
If you paint something, that copyright is yours.
If you sell the painting, the copyright is still yours - you just sell the original piece out. They can sell the piece to someone else, but they can't duplicate the work unless given permission.
You as the artist still retain rights to the image: sell prints, tshirts, etc.
There has been an active copyright war between artists and companies because companies are actively stealing artwork and claiming they own the rights to it.
How fair is it for you to spend hundreds of hours on artwork, and then someone online comes along and sells it on tshirts and prints and tells YOU that you have no right to any of the profit generated? It's completely fucked.
The upside of sites like CGHUB and Deviantart is networking and exposure, but a lot of times people steal the artwork and sell it. If not online, in a local market. Some people even steal or re-appropriate other people's work into their portfolio.
It's fucking disgusting.