Too late man,even thuway change his mind most of "them" will treat it like fact lol
About a month ago I was told by an unnamed source that Microsoft was having heating issues with the Xbox One. There wasnt enough details to go forward with a story so it was kept under wraps until more information surfaced on this issue. Today, a completely different source close to the Xbox One project, informed me that Microsoft will have to under clock the Xbox One about 100-200mhz to fix the systems heating issues.
What does this mean to developers? Well we already know that the PS4 is more of a powerhouse than the Xbox One. It has faster RAM and bus bandwidth than the Xbox One already. Under clocking the system will widen the gap between the two consoles, but at the same time will keep the failure rate on the Xbox One very low. The last thing we need is another RRoD fiasco. In terms of games, you will see a significant difference in multiplatform titles. Lower clock speed means lower frame rates. This means that a game running 60fps on PS4 may only run at 30fps on Xbox One. Even given the current specs, this would probably still be the case except now we are under clocking the GPU. This could affect other things like the Peak Shader Throughput. If Minecraft were to be released for both Xbox One and PS4, youd see no difference. A game like Battlefield 4 my run at a lower framerate on the Xbox One than it does on the PS4. We still dont know how much the eSRAM is going to boost or hinder performance of the Xbox One. We also cant leave out the fact that every developer, every game and every engine runs differently. They could theoretically boost frame rates on the Xbox One to match PS4 by turning off AA effects and lowering resolution.
Ive received this information from two different sources, but I would still chalk it up as a rumor until we are able to get more information from Microsoft. Things could still change between now and launch. I wouldnt worry too much about this problem because under clocking the system is the safest route to go when issues like this arise. The biggest test will be when Digital Foundry gets their hands on the first multiplatform next generation title.
1. You're more of a junior then I am.
2. Everything they showed could have been CG. The Quantum Break game, the EA stuff, CoD and Forza. Whether it was actually CG or not doesn't matter, the point is nothing came close to feeling like a real tangible game you could play. When Sony showed Deep Down, even though it was obviously CG it still felt like a game, and that get's the gamer juices boiling.
Btw,you sure about that?FordGTGuy does have a valid point, though. Sure, people's expectations might have gone crazy, and who can blame people for hoping and praying, contrary to what was said by Aaron Greenberg on that podcast 3 to 4 days before the reveal, that the event would end up being packed with many more games and big game related announcements than what Greenberg made it sound like.
He said it, we knew what it sounded like, but we all hoped that there would be some megatons regardless. And, to be honest, it gets drowned out amidst all the other stuff, but Quantum Break was a massive announcement in my eyes. It was great to see that Microsoft is committing to that kind of new ip, and from Remedy no less. I almost felt like it was their way of saying to gamers "Yea, we know we're going to bombard you with a lot of stuff you may not want to see right now, but, seriously, we aren't fucking around and this new Remedy IP is just a small taste of what's to come."
I genuinely felt it was tossed in there to be their "mini-megaton" of the reveal event, and it sure as hell was for me. That doesn't mean it's all of a sudden sufficient, because it isn't and gamers always want more, and we aren't necessarily wrong for wanting that. But all that aside, Microsoft really and truly couldn't have been anymore clear regarding their intentions for that reveal event. I don't think Microsoft is completely free from some fault, but they were honest about what they were going to do, and they followed through precisely as they said they would. Maybe we all felt Microsoft was somehow trying to purposely decrease our expectations, because they knew they had something huge to drop on us, or maybe they really and truly wanted to dial back our expectations for the reveal.
The way Greenberg talked about their E3 show sounded like a preemptive apology for what was going to be shown at the reveal. It really did come off that way, and now we know why that is. But, again, we have not seen the full vision of what they want the new Xbox to be. They always said it was a two part story they were telling. We saw part one.
The reveal event was headlined with "A New Generation of Entertainment." E3 is titled "A New Generation of Games."
Well seeing as it's already been confirmed that the Forza 5 trailer was in fact not CG and even a month old at the time of reveal...
It's insane to think that the CoD footage was CG as it really didn't look that great.
Even worse, the rumor is on the web now:
http://www.stfuandplay.com/story/co...-clocking-xbox-one-by-100-200mhz#.Ua66B8mFCpp
Why are we still talking about old crap when E3 is right around the corner? Keep the unnecessary negativity out of this thread, it is literally the only tolerable place on NeoGAF to discuss X1 right now.
Those twitter posts that confirmed that were removed.Well seeing as it's already been confirmed that the Forza 5 trailer was in fact not CG and even a month old at the time of reveal...
It's insane to think that the CoD footage was CG as it really didn't look that great.
Those twitter posts that confirmed that were removed.
Not sure about that, but the IQ in the screenshots and trailer looked to good to be true.We will know soon enough seeing as E3 is days away.
It's odd that it would be CG when Phil Spencer said it was a month old at the time of the reveal, why even mention the age when it's CG?
Not sure about that, but the IQ in the screenshots and trailer looked to good to be true.
Those twitter posts that confirmed that were removed.
All the people laughing at the other thread, it is sad and frustrating...
Nothing's been confirmed, it's not worth getting upset about yet.
I say this as a PS3-only user who spent this gen reading about how inferior the ports I was playing were. ;-/
Nothing's been confirmed, it's not worth getting upset about yet.
I say this as a PS3-only user who spent this gen reading about how inferior the ports I was playing were. ;-/
Well, I think it's 1.6 billion transistors (quick guess), I haven't bothered to look it up or anything. So, no doubt without ESRAM you could have more CUs, but then you'd have a much too powerful GPU that has far more power than it has available bandwidth to properly utilize, and the last thing you want is a badly balanced GPU. For all the kicks in the ass that Microsoft are getting for going with the design that they have, they have an incredibly well balanced GPU that, if you compare to the most similar GPUs on the PC, can be said to have quite a bit more bandwidth than it necessarily needs.
So, under the scenarios that Microsoft were in, their choice was a much more powerful GPU whose power largely goes wasted because it doesn't have nearly enough bandwidth to feed all the execution resources, or they go for something a bit more conservative that they can much better supply with the bandwidth it needs, can ensure much greater efficiency from, and has really good, much more manageable TDP levels. I've said it before, but everybody is apparently going to be afraid of this system until they see some games that give them less of a reason to doubt the system's power, and I feel pretty strongly that we will see such games. Once people see those one or two games that gives them a favorable idea of what the system is capable of, pretty soon afterwards the power discussion will be for anyone still somehow interested in keeping score, but the games will command more of the attention.
Whew buddy tonight has been vicious, I'm officially lowering my expectations.
Not to mention it would be the first time Turn 10 ever released such a large gallery of images of CG...
Soooo, I'm in a dilemma.
I'm in Phoenix for my wedding next weekend and a week ago I entered the drawing for 250 Xbox E3 tickets just on a whim assuming I wouldn't win...
I just got the email with my ticket to the event today. I'm so pumped but LA is a 6 hour drive from Phoenix and money is kinda tight...but I want to go so damn bad! I still haven't decided if/how I would go.
/first world problems
Uhh holy shit don't go, you goober.Soooo, I'm in a dilemma.
I'm in Phoenix for my wedding next weekend and a week ago I entered the drawing for 250 Xbox E3 tickets just on a whim assuming I wouldn't win...
I just got the email with my ticket to the event today. I'm so pumped but LA is a 6 hour drive from Phoenix and money is kinda tight...but I want to go so damn bad! I still haven't decided if/how I would go.
/first world problems
Remember the days when you would open up a copy of Electronic Gaming Monthly or Die Hard Gamefan and you saw a bunch of games that looked awesome on a new system and you thought that you had to have it. There were no articles about yield problems or DDR3 vs GDDR5. No talking points about how many teraflops there are. It was about what system had the better games. Anybody hung up on this crap needs to get over it. Wait until E3 and see if the games are games that you would want to play. It's really that simple. I can't wait!
Haha so you'd be on your honeymoon? Whats your fiancee soon to be wife got to say about this trip?
Is she cool with the idea?
Haha, true. Sometimes I wonder if I wouldn't appreciate gaming more without the gaming community. I'm not sure gamers were completely oblivious to tech specifications back then, but I sure was (I had no idea there were performance differences between a SNES and a Megadrive, for example).
The amount of negativity and FUD on this forum is getting sad, I don't remember anything like it since the Dreamcast days. In fact the sad part is that many people seem to enjoy it. I had the naive opinion that we were here because we all liked similar things, but at the moment it's more about hating than loving.
Anyway, I'll stop ranting now since it's not a positive attitude either.![]()
Hey, why not. E3 is more about all consoles, but since the Xbox is opening the show, let's get hyped for it.![]()
That's better now isn't it?
Screw the haters. I'm on as well! This is going to be the best E3 ever.
One ticket for the hype train please!
Screw the haters. I'm on as well! This is going to be the best E3 ever.
One ticket for the hype train please!
We need a motto, something like "forget the specs, just take the games" xD
Wii U users know a lot of this.
Honestly those of use with gaming PCs really couldn't care less about these power claims, as long as the Xbox One can pull off some alright looking graphics I'll be fine with it.
Haha, true. Sometimes I wonder if I wouldn't appreciate gaming more without the gaming community. I'm not sure gamers were completely oblivious to tech specifications back then, but I sure was (I had no idea there were performance differences between a SNES and a Megadrive, for example).
The amount of negativity and FUD on this forum is getting sad, I don't remember anything like it since the Dreamcast days. In fact the sad part is that many people seem to enjoy it. I had the naive opinion that we were here because we all liked similar things, but at the moment it's more about hating than loving.
Anyway, I'll stop ranting now since it's not a positive attitude either.![]()
@XboxP3 Hi Mr.Phill Spencer, the 15 exclusives are going to be present at E3 conference?
Phil Spencer Phil Spencer ‏@XboxP3 2h
@HugodrAndrade E3 show is all games but we'll still have more exclusives to announce post E3. I expect GamesCom to be a good event.
Uhh ..We need a motto, something like "forget the specs, just take the games" xD
Wii U users know a lot of this.
Not all 15 at E3?
Not all 15 at E3?
Not all 15 at E3?