Jake Tower
Banned
That was Shaq's 3rd year in the league. Look at what Shaq did from 2000-2002. Pure domination.
Who were the big men he played head to head during that period, particularly in the playoffs?
That was Shaq's 3rd year in the league. Look at what Shaq did from 2000-2002. Pure domination.
Timmy got it easy as "PF" because being the best PF of all time was relatively easy. Before that it was about McHale, Barkley, Malone. As great as those guys are, they weren't in the league of historical great centers, great SF's (Baylor, Bird, Worthy) Pg's (Big O, Magic, Stockton) or 2 guard's (Jordan, West).
Timmy wouldn't be considered the best C of all time. He'd be in the conversation with 5 other guys. But "best PF" makes people think he's one of the top 5 in the league history and it's just not true.
oh you
lolI can't keep up with the jackass shit that guy says daily.
its all good
but your cavs are gonna be looking sharp soon, dat number 1 pick + bron bron getting homesick
- Accomplishments (which you listed)
- I give some weight to competition, but more on a team level not a head-to-head level
- Importance to position
- Longevity
- Ability on both ends of the floor
- Teammates
Top 3 are a wash to me. Duncan has the edge on point #4 (which you agree) and point #5. Point #5 can be argued more granularly. IE, is Tim Duncan's 20.2PPG AND defense more impressive compared to Shaq's 23.7PPG and lackluster defense? You gotta ask which was more important: What Duncan managed to do defensively and offensively, or does Shaq's extra 2.5PPG over their careers trump Duncan's defense?
That's my rationale. Head-to-head rarely is an indicator (unless it's what Hakeem did in 94-95 to Robinson and Ewing and Shaq) and something that is an individual sport (boxing, MMA) argument not a team-sport argument and ability to sustain a great career are more important to me.
Who were the big men he played head to head during that period, particularly in the playoffs?
Haven't watched.
Was it atleast a good game to watch?
Michael Jordan had it easy becoming the best shooting guard of all time.
Why are you doing this to yourself?
I think the most remarkable thing about Duncan's career is that he's never won Defensive Player of the Year. He even got beat by Bowen in the voting every single year from 2004-2007.
I think the most remarkable thing about Duncan's career is that he's never won Defensive Player of the Year. He even got beat by Bowen in the voting every single year from 2004-2007.
Interesting:
Kawhi Leonard guarded LeBron James on 6 of his 7 2nd half field goal attempts in Game 1 and held James to 2-of-8 shooting and 6 points overall in the game. James' average field goal attempt was 16.4 feet from the basket against Leonard. Against all other defenders, James went 5-of-8 from the field with 12 points and average shot distance of 8.9 feet.
Psy Intellect said:u mad you can't come 2nd this year?
Nope, I'm happy you will.
If Oscar is top 15/top 10 of all time, then CP3 probably is too (since the argument has to be purely stats focused with no regard to team success which is generally alright really but seems odd for Vag to go with).
It feels like Wade wasn't active enough without the ball in the second half...
33 year old Rik Smits (retired after the Finals), 35+ year old Sabonis (fused ankles), 34 year old Mutombo
If Kobe had 7 and 8 seed first round upsets on his résumé, they would be mentioned a lot more than they are for Duncan. Pretty much every one of kobe failures is referenced more. Hell his shooting percentage in a finals W is mentioned more (and Duncan does have a g7 shooting performance that was almost as bad iirc).Irrelevant and completely arbitrary. Those are your self imposed criteria that amount to nothing but message board fodd-- hey wait a minute!
Duncan > Shaq, that isn't even a question. Two of Shaq's rings have constellation-sized asterisks, Duncan got first team all nba at age 37, Duncan is in at least one Finals in 3 different decades.
Not sure why Duncan gets longevity. His last 2 seasons weren't impressive and Shaq had the same decline at the same time and also had a revival season at 36. Let's see if Duncan continues on the same exact path?
I do think Shaq's impact on offense there matters (and it was 3.5more ppg and bigger at comparable age) as he caused tons of fouls which helped teammates get to the line more.
And Shaq wasn't a bad defender at all.
I'd say overall impact was about the same (but give Shaq slight edge). But it's so close I have only head to head to look at left and other menial shit like being upset in the 1st round.
I'm not even involved in this conversation, but I have to ask- what?
Bowen beat him too! http://www.basketball-reference.com/awards/awards_2007.html#dpoyAs much as I hated the Nash MVP over Kobe and AI over Shaq, I've always believed Camby's DPOY over Duncan was the most unforgivable awards vote of all time.
2002 and 2006?I'm not even involved in this conversation, but I have to ask- what?
And last year? lolSo I think the last two times the home team lost game 1 of the finals and came back to win were Lakers/Sixers in '01 and Bulls/Lakers in '91....
![]()
If Kobe had 7 and 8 seed first round upsets on his résumé, they would be mentioned a lot more than they are for Duncan. Pretty much every one of kobe failures is referenced more. Hell his shooting percentage in a finals W is mentioned more (and Duncan does have a g7 shooting performance that was almost as bad iirc).
Duncan and the spurs' "no one cares about em" quality is actually beneficial to them in that people are only ever paying attention to them when they succeed (and sometimes not even then) and never when they fail. They get to enjoy all the praise of their successes while never really absorbing any flack for their failures.
1999 DPOTY - Spurs: 95.0 DRtg (1st); Tim @ 91
1. Alonzo Mourning (89)
2. Dikembe Mutombo (10)
3. Gary Payton (6)
4. David Robinson (3)
5. Theo Ratliff (2)
5. Tim Duncan (2)
2000 DPOTY - Spurs: 98.6 DRtg (2nd); Tim @ 95
No Spur even got a point
2001 DPOTY - Spurs: 98.0 DRtg (1st); Tim @ 94
1. Dikembe Mutombo (48)
2. Kevin Garnett (26)
3. Tim Duncan (14)
2002 DPOTY: Spurs: 99.7 DRtg (2nd); Tim @ 96
1. Ben Wallace (116)
2. Kevin Garnett
3. Kobe Bryant
3. Dikembe Mutombo
....no Spur got a point
2003 DPOTY: Spurs: 99.7 DRtg (3rd); Tim @ 94
1. Ben Wallace (531)
2. Ron Artest (122)
3. Kevin Garnett (121)
4. Tim Duncan (90)
5. Doug Cristie (85)
2004 DPOTY: Spurs: 94.1 DRtg (1st); Tim @ 89
1. Ron Artest (476)
2. Ben Wallace (325)
3. Theo Ratliff (90)
4. Bruce Bowen (76)
5. Andrei Kirilenko (67)
6. Kevin Garnett (36)
7. Tim Duncan (8)
2005 DPOTY: Spurs: 98.8 DRtg (1st); Tim @ 93
1. Ben Wallace (339)
2. Bruce Bowen (247)
3. Marcus Camby (168)
4. Tim Duncan (81)
2006 DPOTY: Spurs: 99.6 DRtg (1st); Tim @ 94
1. Ben Wallace (420)
2. Bruce Bowen (308)
3. Andrei Kirilenko (121)
4. Ron Artest (65)
5. Marcus Camby (55)
6. Tim Duncan (42)
2007 DPOTY: Spurs: 99.9 DRtg (2nd); Tim @ 94
1. Marcus Camby (431)
2. Bruce Bowen (206)
3. Tim Duncan (158)
2008 DPOTY: Spurs: 101.8 DRtg (3rd); Tim @ 97
1. Kevin Garnett (493)
2. Marcus Camby (178)
3. Shane Battier (175)
4. Bruce Bowen (80)
5. Kobe Bryant (40)
6. Josh Smith (34)
7. Dwight Howard (24)
7. Chris Paul (24)
9. Tim Duncan (22)
Because Duncan's defense is arguably one of the best in the NBA in 2013 whereas Shaq's defensive effort post Lakers three-peat was LOL.
You're doing that Trax shit again.
I'd argue Shaq in his athletic prime isn't as good as Duncan has been these playoffs.
Menial is right!
The gap will grow between the two on points unless you think duncan will average 20ppg next year or however long he plays. My only point for mentioning that.
That's fine. Shaq score 18 ppg on 60% shooting at the age of 36. Goes both ways. Also you overstate Shaq's poor D. 2005 and 2006 Miami he was still fine. Phx who knows, he played next to Nash and Amar'e.
Dwight and Pau
Lee and Bogut
Randolph and Marc
Bosh and diarrhea
So I think the last two times the home team lost game 1 of the finals and came back to win were Lakers/Sixers in '01 and Bulls/Lakers in '91....
Duncan and Splitter, these playoffs, have faced:
Dwight and Pau
Lee and Bogut
Randolph and Marc
Bosh and diarrhea
And outside of Lee and Bogut, did anyone give the Spurs frontline (and Duncan specifically) the edge in any of those series?
CP3 and Oscar have the same rebounding rate, Oscar just played way more possessions because the 60s were stupid fast and CP3 plays very slow.
You are using terms like "not bad" and "fine" when compared to an all time defensive great. I think you're underestimating Duncan's defensive impact.
Again, let me iterate:
Lee played!?
This conversation is obviously over.
reilo said:And outside of Lee and Bogut, did anyone give the Spurs frontline (and Duncan specifically) the edge in any of those series?
And no one ever sweeps the three games at home and we did it twice. In the big three era the 3 times we started a series 0-1, we have won each series 4-1. Team that wins first game wins 70% of the time but both times we won the Finals we lost game 1.
truth truth truth truth truth.
Duncan's career has gone like this:
"Do the Lakers have a team good enough to win a chip"? If yes, 80% of the time they'll be in the Finals whereas I'll be sitting at home in June, even if I had the #1 seed in the WC and home court advantage.
"Are the Lakers reloading and not good enough to win right now"? If yes, time for me to shineeeeeeeee
No one cares old man retire with cloving alreadyNBA-GAF needs to get better through the draft.
I've literally been gone for months and the exact same "arguments" are still being had....
And no one ever sweeps the three games at home and we did it twice. In the big three era the 3 times we started a series 0-1, we have won each series 4-1. Team that wins first game wins 70% of the time but both times we won the Finals we lost game 1.