RobotMafia
Banned
I assume Gaikai will be DRM, but not disk based games.
But Gakai is just for PS3 games isn't it? There isn't any reason to use it for PS4 games.
I assume Gaikai will be DRM, but not disk based games.
But, if Sony comes out with, its up to the pubs, what then?
Isn't it the same shit?
I don't have your faith.No worries. Word of mouth will spread. Sure, a few ignorant consumers will buy "the new Xbox" based on name alone, not really knowing what they are getting themselves into, but most of them will sure as hell be pissed once they come to learn about all the draconian limitations that Microsoft has implemented. Lots of these people will return the system, and they will tell their friends, relatives and acquaintances about how much of a shit product it is. Microsoft is going to fail with this, badly. And oh man, am I dying to see it happening...
The consumer base that doesn't know right now will know shortly after getting an Xbox, that's why I'm not that worried about initial sales. The backlash is going to be huge. Yeah Microsoft could get strong sales at launch, but the more they sell the more stories they get on news channels. It'll be like the anti-Wii.
Trying to confuse everyone about the issue seems short-sighted as hell.
Because the only way to make money is the way MS does it.It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever that they wouldn't when MS is.
Mother of fuck, DRM has a Stage fucking 2?
The ride never ends!
oh shit.
now to translate
If DRM was MS idea from the get go, why do people think Sony will automatically have it? Its not like the publishes pushed this on MS. Yea some might SUPPORT it, but it doesnt mean they wont release games without it on another platform.
Haven't read the whole thread, but am I to believe Mirror's Edge 2 and a new Prince of Persia will appear at MS' conference, but not be exclusive?
Haven't read the whole thread, but am I to believe Mirror's Edge 2 and a new Prince of Persia will appear at MS' conference, but not be exclusive?
For reals. We should all be talking to the gamers we know and telling them about this stuff.Friends don't let friends buy xbone
I think you have lost your own plot. Those games would still be on the system, just with publisher drm.
By. The. Millions.I don't have your faith.
I think some people will learn to take it, as long as they get to play their COD.
There IS the possibility they get it in their head that as MS is doing this that Sony can jump in too! And try to pressure them to adopt similar. This is the basis of the feelings (for me) that Microsoft was going to have to go if they went down this path (which they did), because them trying to push it can cause it to spread and be unable to be shaken off, doubly so if they succeed but perhaps even if they don't. A complete throttling, should Sony only maintain the status quo anyway, would probably set back efforts to implement this kind of DRM outside of the PC space for quite awhile, especially as Steam's not even half as bullshit as this.If DRM was MS idea from the get go, why do people think Sony will automatically have it? Its not like the publishes pushed this on MS. Yea some might SUPPORT it, but it doesnt mean they wont release games without it on another platform.
But Gakai is just for PS3 games isn't it? There isn't any reason to use it for PS4 games.
Because the only way to make money is the way MS does it.
You thought that the DRM boss only had one stage?
The worst part is how there isn't a checkpoint between each stage, so you have to kill the first stage form and over until you can kill the second form!
Several people have confirmed that ME2 will not be exclusive.
PoP may or may not be exclusive, as the OP does not explicitly say either way.
Well, CBOAT didn't comment on the exclusivity.
I would be shocked if they were exclusive though.
I don't have your faith.
I think some people will learn to take it, as long as they get to play their COD.
If DRM was MS idea from the get go, why do people think Sony will automatically have it? Its not like the publishes pushed this on MS. Yea some might SUPPORT it, but it doesnt mean they wont release games without it on another platform.
No, man. At some point pubs have had meetings with MS and Sony about piracy, ect. Is it too crazy to think that each company would have a plan in place too appease the pubs?
MS has theirs at a system level, and Sony has the pubs put it in their games.
Is it crazy to speculate that?
Either way, johnny madden is gonna be fucked with either console, right?
CBOAT I actually love you man.
It may be a hard position to negotiate from. Take a look at it using game theory. What can the publishers do without revealing Microsoft's position and thereby giving Sony a reason to defect in this prisoner's dilemma?If DRM was MS idea from the get go, why do people think Sony will automatically have it? Its not like the publishes pushed this on MS. Yea some might SUPPORT it, but it doesnt mean they wont release games without it on another platform.
It would be interesting if pulling this shit when the industry was set to contract ends up leading to a full on crash. No success at expanding user base, and a lot the user base that is there just up and leaves over this stuff rather than putting up with it, at least in great enough numbers that the games that they're throwing this crap on simply can't make enough to justify their development. It really isn't the best time to be dicking around with user rights at any rate....assuming it has none of this draconian DRM bullshit, of course. If it does, both Sony and Microsoft can go die in a fire.
At this point, I'm taking a wait and see approach.
But I don't have this romantic idea of Sony being superman and saving the day from the evil clutches of MS.
I'm sure the agreements they have in place with the publishers have clauses that forbid them from announcing titles without publisher consent.What is to stop Sony just announcing these titles in their preser anyway?
Microsoft surely pissed away money here.
Well, this year they'll play it on their current gen systems. Next year, if the market rejects the xbone they'll play it on PS4 or their current gen systems. The ubiquity and market presence of COD is one gen old; it won't automatically make the Xbone a success.I don't have your faith.
I think some people will learn to take it, as long as they get to play their COD.
Oh my god.
- What if Silver members for Xbox One don't even get 24 hours for authentication, instead you have to be online at all times just to launch the game after installing it.
- You have to digitally re-install the game after a month for up to date authentication
- If a game isn't updated, you can't play it, period.
- You have to be a gold member to buy DLC.
- Silver members have up to a month for keeping saves, must be a gold member to keep saves for a longer period. All save games are required to be placed on the cloud, Silver members get less space or slots in the cloud.
Just rattling off ideas on how the DRM situation could get even worse.
Isn't COD: Ghosts confirmed to be an Xbox One timed exclusive? That could have a big impact, but hopefully not a lasting one.They don't have to take it, though. They can just get their COD fix on the PS4. As negative word of mouth about the XBOne spreads, so will positive word of mouth spread about the PS4, eventually becoming the console of choice for both hardcore and casual gamers.
...assuming it has none of this draconian DRM bullshit, of course. If it does, both Sony and Microsoft can go die in a fire.
Some are being really optimistic admittedly, or that's the impression I get. I'm being cautiously optimistic; I suspect at worst it's going to still be the more appealing Digital platform than the X1, even if retail games are fucked up.Everyone is in the "wait and see" approach.
I read it well! Awesome. I should translate future CBOAT's posts.
Isn't COD: Ghosts confirmed to be an Xbox One timed exclusive? That could have a big impact, but hopefully not a lasting one.
Isn't COD: Ghosts confirmed to be an Xbox One timed exclusive? That could have a big impact, but hopefully not a lasting one.
We can figure sony's position on DRM from 3. If this was MS idea from the start and they went to 3rd party devs for support surly Sony would have been building the PS4 without DRM in mind until EA and Ubi came up to them and said "hey can we do this on the PS4, MS is doing it?"
Hopefully Sony would have told them no PS4 won't make it mandatory but if you want your games to support that we can add that freature for you.
So from that is it safe to assume that PS4 will support DRM if the pub wants it and it won't be mandatory or as restrictive like xb1?
About money hatting devs to not mention their PS4 games, that's just some low down dirty shit. I hope those games bomb.
If the 299 price point is true, xbone definitely will not failNo worries. Word of mouth will spread. Sure, a few ignorant consumers will buy "the new Xbox" based on name alone, not really knowing what they are getting themselves into, but most of them will sure as hell be pissed once they come to learn about all the draconian limitations that Microsoft has implemented. Lots of these people will return the system, and they will tell their friends, relatives and acquaintances about how much of a shit product it is. Microsoft is going to fail with this, badly. And oh man, am I dying to see it happening...
You're right.
'Your bitter tears are my bidet' is funnier than any line I've ever heard.
Simply incredible.
its true
my source at sony burkina faso (who's info was subsequently confirmed by a higher up guy from sony kyrgyzstan) has told me sony has nothing and that we're getting 30 minutes of gt6 hd+