Hey Zoukka, I'd like to respond to some of your points- have quoted you multiple times so your context doesn't get lost
Originally Posted by zoukka:
True and by purchasing a PS4 you support online paywalls compared to the preceeding platform and the Wii U.
I look at it the other way around- I didn't buy a PS3 at launch as the high price for free online made it feel like I was subsidising features I didn't want. I'd rather have a cheaper Playstation where those that want online can pay the extra subsidy.
Yep it's entirely possible to have a gimped PS4 while supporting the publisher that wants you to pay for the full experience.
I'll rephrase: "gimped to me and for most of the gamer populace".
I don't claim to have extensive knowledge on the matter, but you guys sure are adamant in trying to prove me wrong :b whatever the numbers may be, a PS4 without ps+ is a gimped ass device.
Also to my knowledge 9k of such a niche group is more than enough to form a valid quantitive poll.
I've had thousands of hours of play out of my PS3 without playing online once, and don't feel my console was 'gimped' or that my experience wasn't 'full' for preferring to enjoy quality single player games at the expense of online, the same way I have for almost 30 years. PS+ for online play on PS4 is optional, not required for 'a non-gimped-ass device', which is the way it should be, so that people like me aren't subsidising those that want the servers etc.
A huge amount of people don't care about online. As to your poll, that's just a US-only one. Even if 'way over half' of US gamers play online, that's very different to 'most of the gamer populace' worldwide. One of the reasons MS are in trouble is by extrapolating from US data and assuming their habits are true for the majority of gamers that don't live there. I actually agree with you about sample sizes, but even limiting the argument to only the US that's still 28% of the biggest market that don't play online in 2013. That's a very good reason to not make it mandatory.
While we are talking about features, why only make it about online play? I also don't use PS Home, Netflix, Lovefilm or any of the TV/music/film/social networking/PSP/Vita crossplay functions on the PS3 and wont use their equivalents on next-gen consoles either- to me they are all just as superfluous as online gaming. These days games consoles can do shitloads, if anyone genuinely uses them for 100% of their capability, they are in an extreme minority.
Any games console expecting me to automatically subsidise other people's online play is one I won't be buying, what on earth is wrong with PS4 being comparatively cheaper than PS3 while making online an optional extra? PS+ doesn't even sound like a bad deal if you like online play.