Reggie confirmed for Spike VGX appearance [Up: "new look at an upcoming Wii U game"]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Consumers watching this show do not give a crap about Nintendo, period.

I think the whole thing is a demographic mismatch. Nothing they could show would rouse the interest of anyone who was not specifically watching for it.

I see your point, but I do think Zelda still is pretty viable in North America for a percentage of gamers who will be watching. It isn't COD, but I think it has a lot more potential than another 2D platformer.
 
Honestly, if it is DKCTF, it would be pretty disappointing (because that game isn't coming out for a while) and pretty good progress for Nintendo (because that game isn't coming out for a while).

I am disinterested in the content, since I feel like I already know everything I need to about that game, anyway, and still think it's good for them that they're finally trying to advertise a game months before release like everyone else in the industry.

What if it's a new Mario Kart 8 trailer where a new course is shown and you race on Bayonetta's body???
 
Yeah, if anything, Bayonetta 2 proved that Nintendo haters will happily shut up and just accept that a game they want to play is on a system they had no intention to buy.

That's why I believe they're going to show Bayonetta 2. It will turn some heads. They won't have any way of playing the game except on the Wii U.
 
I hope you realize that comparing GameCube numbers to Wii U makes just as little sense as comparing Wii numbers to Wii U, unless we are supposed to draw up numbers for Mario compared to on the Gamecube and conclude that it too was a waste of resources.

Seems like it only makes sense if people are justifying the existence of Tropical Freeze. In other words, "DKCR sold over four million on the Wii so it makes sense to release that on Wii U," as opposed to, "you can't compare the Wii U to the GCN due to sales differences." Why is one better than the other? Truth is, Nintendo needs Metroid from Retro for more reasons than just sales potential.
 
For the people who are mad it the surprise being "FUCKING CRANKY KONG", what realistic reveal would have been good enough for you?

Personally X would have been awesome. I also want to see more smash in motion.
 
If that's the case and what you said is true then there is no point in showing up to this event to begin with

KTzJg3p.png


AND LINKHERO WINS THIS ROUND
 
Its gonna be DK, we can wish for something else special but prepare to be disappointed.

As far as Retro go, I loved DKCR I finished it 100% and thought it was amazing... but initially when it was revealed they were just working on the sequel I was disappointed. Yes TF will probably be amazing again but I don't think it was a game Nintendo needs right now.

Maybe the pressure of a 'big HD' new title or whatever people expected from Retro was too much for them and they decided to go an easier option for now. Maybe they're not as big a deal studio talent and capability wise right now as we imagine?

Either way Nintendo and these award things really don't seem like a good fit. I dunno why, just seems like Reggie will be there going "Hey everyone how is the night going?? Pretty cool aye! Well none of those games are coming to our system but here is a new trailer for DK!"
 
For the people who are mad it the surprise being "FUCKING CRANKY KONG", what realistic reveal would have been good enough for you?

Personally X would have been awesome. I also want to see more smash in motion.
Something that we haven't seen much of, I think we've seen quite a bit of DKCTF, but it doesn't matter to most of the VGX audience.
 
Oh yes, because every Nintendo hater is a member of GAF who owned and loved the first Bayonetta.

Bayonetta did bomb pretty hard but it's an action game in the same class as DMC and God of War. I don't remember a single advert for Bayonetta. If I still bought games based off the cover like most people still do then I probably would have skipped Bayonetta as well. There was almost no advertising for the game. That's why I believe exposing a game like Bayonetta 2 or X would be great. At least give them some exposure and room to breathe.

KTzJg3p.png


AND LINKHERO WINS THIS ROUND

But there is a point in them showing up. Free advertising is still advertising. It's probably more wise for them to go with something other than DKC to be quite frank.
 
Something that's not 2D honestly.
Pretty sure Donkey Kong uses polygons.

I'd say Smash is the exception, it's a game still appeals to a core gamer audience.
Well then maybe the "core gamer audience" should a) get better taste. b) stop changing their taste every two seconds. Seriously when did Donkey Kong stop being a core game? When Returns was first shown people were whooping and clapping their hands.
 
Cranky Kong would've worked a lot better if he hadn't found out about it already. It's actually a pretty cool 4th character. A realistic reveal? What's realistic in this case (or regarding Nintendo in general)?

Yeah Amazon took the wind out of the sails for sure.

And by realistic I mean things that aren't POKEMON MMO level crazyness
 
I hope you realize that comparing GameCube numbers to Wii U makes just as little sense as comparing Wii numbers to Wii U, unless we are supposed to draw up numbers for Mario compared to on the Gamecube and conclude that it too was a waste of resources.

NSMB Wii was a runaway hit and sold much better than DKC on the Wii. It's effect on WiiU sales, while being a better game than the Wii version, has been rather marginal. Yet you will surely agree with me, that both games cater to the same target audience. Looking back at Gamecube sales, and those of an other excellent Donkey Kong platformer as well as Metroid Prime, we see that on a smaller userbase, void of the more casual gamer, it was not a success for Donkey Kong. So saying no other studio could do a great, fresh DK game is false, as proven by Jungle Beat. Saying it was the right decision because DK would sell more than a more "core-oriented" game on WiiU remains to be seen. I again refer to NSMBU, on Wii U and Metroid Prime & Jungle Beat on Gamecube. I think WiiU is more in the position GCN was in, than that of Wii. It is a fact though, that Nintendo does not have a plethora of studio's that can handle a game like Metroid Prime (not Metroid Prime per se) other than Retro, and that the genre is lacking on the platform. Otherwise, it is a fact that Nintendo does have other studio's that could handle a follow up Donkey Kong game.
 
Bayonetta did bomb pretty hard but it's an action game in the same class as DMC and God of War. I don't remember a single advert for Bayonetta. If I still bought games based off the cover like most people still do then I probably would have skipped Bayonetta as well. There was almost no advertising for the game. That's why I believe exposing a game like Bayonetta 2 or X would be great. At least give them some exposure and room to breathe.



But there is a point in them showing up. Free advertising is still advertising. It's probably more wise for them to go with something other than DKC to be quite frank.

Bayonetta 2 WILL bomb pretty hard unless Nintendo advertises the fuck out of it, and even then it still mite. Playing TW101 you can tell that it was certainly not an inexpensive game to make, and Nintendo was beyond stupid to not even try to advertise it on TV. I hope that they will not make the same mistake with Bayonetta 2.
 
Bayonetta 2 WILL bomb pretty hard unless Nintendo advertises the fuck out of it, and even then it still mite. Playing TW101 you can tell that it was certainly not an inexpensive game to make, and Nintendo was beyond stupid to not even try to advertise it on TV. I hope that they will not make the same mistake with Bayonetta 2.

I don't disagree with you. I was predicting a bomb the moment they announced it exclusively for the Wii U, but I hope it does relatively well. I think they spent a shitload of money on it compared to W101 so I think it would be problematic for them if it does bomb. That's why I feel they need to advertise it in such outlets as the VGX. Directs won't cut it since mainly the core Nintendo fan follows directs.
 
For those honestly thinking Crankster is the big reveal, Im looking forward to watching you eat a big steaming hot bowl of doo doo butter on Saturday night. Salty crackers sprinkled on top of course.
 
Look, at this point, it's pretty obvious that no amount of software will save the U. People just flat out don't want the console. It could end up with the best exclusives library of all three and it will still come in last. Nintendo should just show support for those that have bought in with the titles that are yet to come from here on out and regroup to approach the mass market again in the next generation. Approaching each new title or reveal with the mindset of "Can this singlehandedly turn the console around?!?" is just not realistic, regardless of what Nintendo brings to the table.

Bayonetta 2 WILL bomb pretty hard unless Nintendo advertises the fuck out of it, and even then it still mite. Playing TW101 you can tell that it was certainly not an inexpensive game to make, and Nintendo was beyond stupid to not even try to advertise it on TV. I hope that they will not make the same mistake with Bayonetta 2.

Bayo 2 will bomb hard even if Nintendo brings out the biggest marketing blitz of all time. It's a hardcore action title on a dead console with a female lead.
 
For the people who are mad it the surprise being "FUCKING CRANKY KONG", what realistic reveal would have been good enough for you?

Personally X would have been awesome. I also want to see more smash in motion.

Almost any up coming WiiU game, we already seen a lot of DK and it was suppose to be out this week.

I mean its the only 1st party WiiU game with a release date for next year and its freaking Dec already. Nintendo needs to get on the ball and give out some info on their upcoming games, Black Friday is over your big Holiday game is out, time to talk about next years games.
 
Nintendo has already shown a willingness to shrink when they feel their free media day will be encroached upon by other competition. This is the very definition of that.
I'm personally not sure what to expect, but I'm curious if you could elaborate on this line. Are you inferring this based on Nintendo's absence at other high-profile, non-E3 events like Spike's awards in past years? Or has Nintendo actually indicated their absence at those venues was due to them wishing to avoid anything that would draw attention away from their own products?

As for what I think -should- happen, I think that even if Spike's audience is full of "Nintendo haters" (which I don't think is entirely true), new trailers for Smash and Mario Kart would help drive momentum this holiday season. Anyone who is the least bit tempted to pull the trigger on WiiU, amid all the positive press and word-of-mouth for 3D World, might do so quicker if they see two of Nintendo's most popular franchises in fine form. Even if they're expected at this point. Sometimes you have to work with what you have, and the holidays make people do funny things.

An optimistic outlook, I guess, but I keep thinking back to how popular Smash and Mario Kart were in my college dorm days, and how that crowd probably counts for a good chunk of Spike's viewership.
 
I don't disagree with you. I was predicting a bomb the moment they announced it exclusively for the Wii U, but I hope it does relatively well. I think they spent a shitload of money on it compared to W101 so I think it would be problematic for them if it does bomb. That's why I feel they need to advertise it in such outlets as the VGX. Directs won't cut it since mainly the core Nintendo fan follows directs.

I know, I was just expanding on your comment and was in agreement with you to begin with. It's Shocking Alberto who believes it pointless to show off Bayo and X there.
 
It probably went

Geoff: Hey, Reggie, we want to do a video at NOA about upcoming games.
Reggie: Sounds good, I love free advertising!
Geoff: Also, if you want, we have an open spot at the VGX (and you are literally the last person we asked) if you want to save something for that.
Reggie: Well Zelda and Mario will already be out then, but maybe we can figure something out.

People apparently think it went like this

Iwata: REGGIE-CHAN WE HAVE AMAZING BOMBS TO DROP
Reggie: IS IT TIME TO HIT THE NUCLEAR OPTION IWATA-DONNO
Iwata: IT IS, CONTACT KEIGHLY-KUN IMMEDIATELY, WE MUST INFORM FANS OF CALL OF DUTY OF THE NEW ZELDA X METROID FPS
Reggie: FINALLY



the caps mean urgency

This is basically what it is, I'd imagine. The former, not the latter obviously.
 
My feelings are someone like Monster Games could have handled a DKCR sequel if Nintendo felt it was something we really needed, maybe with a little help while Retro's full efforts were utilised elsewhere.

But like I've said maybe Retro just aren't the big bad super-studio we imagine them to be and our hype sorta over-estimated things as usual?

Their 'mythical' Wii U game was hyped up because they had been quiet for awhile. "Oh they must be working on something badass because its so secret.... oh nvm its DK again."
 
Look, at this point, it's pretty obvious that no amount of software will save the U. People just flat out don't want the console. It could end up with the best exclusives library of all three and it will still come in last. Nintendo should just show support for those that have bought in with the titles that are yet to come from here on out and regroup to approach the mass market again in the next generation. Approaching each new title or reveal with the mindset of "Can this singlehandedly turn the console around?!?" is just not realistic, regardless of what Nintendo brings to the table.



Bayo 2 will bomb hard even if Nintendo brings out the biggest marketing blitz of all time. It's a hardcore action title on a dead console with a female lead.

Oh whatdaya know, another Wii U doom post. C'mon people, it's been one year. It does not look good, I won't argue that, but give Nintendo at least another year to turn it around.
 
I'm personally not sure what to expect, but I'm curious if you could elaborate on this line. Are you inferring this based on Nintendo's absence at other high-profile, non-E3 events like Spike's awards in past years? Or has Nintendo actually indicated their absence at those venues was due to them wishing to avoid anything that would draw attention away from their own products?

It is a combination of Nintendo not showing up at events that everyone else is at, a focus on Nintendo Directs and their own media days as opposed to other big things, and the fact that Iwata has directly said they don't really see the need to spend millions to fight for the spotlight at events.
 
Okay, let me put it this way.

Bayonetta 2 had new, incredibly impressive content at E3.

How much did you read about it in comparison to everything else? Or anything else on next-gen systems?
 
"Doing their own thing," in Nintendo's case, would probably be a Direct + media summit. Which is preaching to the choir. They need to put interesting-looking things in front of an audience of non-Nintendo people. It may not translate to direct sales but it will increase awareness that these things exist. And really, when you think about some of the new IPs that have been unveiled in formats similar to this, they're not too far removed in style or quirkiness from X or Bayonetta. They're more "Western," by and large, but the point is people may be more receptive to shiny new things than we give them credit for. Heck, if they were particularly artful they would roll out the trailers and conceal the fact it's for WiiU until the very end. Maybe a person or two in the audience would think, "What's a WiiU!"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom