George Oscar Bluth II
Banned
I'm a bit confused by the timeline here. Stryker is in his 20's in the 70's? But wasn't he involved with Logan in the 70's as a Major or Colonel?
Shhh, Origins doesn't exist.
I'm a bit confused by the timeline here. Stryker is in his 20's in the 70's? But wasn't he involved with Logan in the 70's as a Major or Colonel?
I'm a bit confused by the timeline here. Stryker is in his 20's in the 70's? But wasn't he involved with Logan in the 70's as a Major or Colonel?
Shhh, Origins doesn't exist.
Stryker's the one you're confused about? How has Toad only aged a couple of years between 1972 and 2000?
Reminds me of that Bungie event with all the people standing really awkwardly on stage.
He's rightMutants are regular people who happen to have powers.
They clothes are similar enoght to know that they are on the same side and what diferentiates then are their FACES, since they are people =P
Gambit's eyes are ALWAYS like that. They don't change. Also I do not consider headwear that literally hides none of your features a mask. He's not trying to hide his identity with that (it's publicly known in the comics). Neither is Jean Grey.
The only way masks and costumes work (specifically like people here are wanting where everyone gets something like the comic) is if they are literally going out with the express purpose of being superheroes. That's not something they ever did in the Singer-verse. They more or less kept to themselves, looked for more mutants to recruit, and fought enemy mutants when they had to. They're not out patrolling the rooftops looking for street crime. They're not out in the streets trying to be seen as flashy beacons of justice. In a reboot, they could, but them all of a sudden doing that in these movies would be a drastic shift. This is why even with some context (it's the future, things have gone to shit), the costumes for the future characters in DoFP look kind of cheesy even if they're mostly black. Maybe they'll explain it in the movie though.
They obviously don't care about being known about because they never wear masks in the movie and have no qualms about using their powers in public. I assume they disguise the school because all of the mutant hate and them not wanting hate riots outside their gates all the time. They did this in the comics too even when people knew who they were. I'm with you though, it's not that logical.You're correct about his eyes. For some reason I was thinking of the show(the teenager one) where his eyes were normal.
But the reason they aren't is because only X1 has really done anything involving saving the public. X-3 is horrible garbage that hopefully get's retconned. It's still very easy for them to say "we can't reveal who we are so we'll use costumes to hide our identity"
Why have a hidden mutant school if they didn't care about being known about?
They obviously don't care about being known about because they never wear masks in the movie and have no qualms about using their powers in public. I assume they disguise the school because all of the mutant hate and them not wanting hate riots outside their gates all the time. They did this in the comics too even when people knew who they were. I'm with you though, it's not that logical.
I supposed that's true.
Ugh I just want something in their costumes to standout. They were going to put Wolvie's mask in origins but changed their minds last minute.
oh god, i love my avatar. look at that goddamn face. like im bothering him or something.
Why does Blink look awesome, but Quicksilver look like an absolute joke? How can there be this big a discrepancy in the same movie?
I bet she'll be in the movie for five minutes and then killed off.
He's right
![]()
It's ironic that everyone in those panels is wearing a costume.
How does this say 'X-Men' to anyone? It doesn't even tell you anything about each of the people wearing them. They could change their clothes around with each other and it would still be the same thing.
He's right
![]()
It would be ironic if they were wearing a team uniform. Otherwise, no.
From recent interviews and press conferences, it's clear that Channing Tatum is a big X-Men fan. In particular, he loves Gambit, the charming Cajun card-thrower who starred in the comics, the '90s animated TV series and, unfortunately, X-Men Origins: Wolverine, where he was mangled by a throwaway role for Taylor Kitsch. Now, in our new X-Men: Days Of Future Past issue, we learned from X-Men producer Lauren Shuler Donner that a Tatum-led Gambit movie may be closer than you'd think.
"I'm dying to do a Gambit movie with Channing Tatum," Shuler Donner reveals. "That doesn't have to be a great big movie. It's a thief in New Orleans, it's a whole different story. He's on board, and I have to get the studio on board. How can anyone resist Channing? He's such a sweetheart."
That poster was agreeing with the argument that the superheroes don't need costumes.
They're fucking killing me with that Egoraptor Quicksilver.
Is that Wanda also? Christ.
Without totally revealing the answer, Singer surmised that Magneto could "reconstitute the adamantium claws [Wolverine] has a different relationship with Magneto, and perhaps Magneto could forge them."
Another question many fans have been asking is why Rogue was given an Empire cover even though it was announced that she would no longer be in the film, or will she be?
"It was one real sequence in the movie," Kinberg said. "We felt like it was taking tension out of the main story drive."
"It does not mean that we won't see her in the film," Singer adds. "Also, I hope to make the sequence available on the DVD as she was quite wonderful in it. She is an important part of the X-Men family. I 'm very pleased she will remain as one of Empire's anniversary covers."
And finally, in the latest issue of the magazine, the pair teased the upcoming follow-up film X-Men: Apocalypse.
"One thing that interests me is the notion of ancient mutants," Singer says. "What would people thousands of years ago, without the benefit of science, think mutants were? And more importantly, what would mutants thousands of years ago think they were? Gods? Titans? Angels? Demons? And if such mutants did exist thousands of years ago, what became of them? Did one survive?"
"Age of Apocalypse was one of my favorite stores," Kinberg added. "We like the stakes of it, and it feels like a story that could impact a lot of our favorite characters in big, dramatic ways. We feel it's a very different story from Days of Future Past. For starters, it's a very different villain, and the characters will be in very different places emotionally."
Singer noted that the film, slated for release May 27, 2016, is "more of a First Class sequel" and "It'll take place some time after this movie. What happens in this movie brings about what'll happen in that movie."
The director also spoke about those rumors that a "Days if Future Past" post-credit scene would see Magneto possessed by an alien, leading to him becoming Apocalypse. As if that didn't sound silly enough, Singer says they're not true.
"That's not the case, and nor will that particular thing be in the film. People were concerned we were making Apocalypse an alien. It's odd. I don't know where that came from.
Yay mutant jesus !
And ... so Rogue in reshoots ? =P
Also, can't stop thinking of "Now you are thinking with Portals" when I look at Blink xD
![]()
Jesus fuck.
Well, hello there!![]()
Jesus fuck.
lol still no cyclops. they've retconned so much shit they might as well throw him back in there. fuck :-(
You could easily have it make sense where they have their own costumes. Even soldiers customize their own armour.
Its hard to get how this feel is going to be, so many characters, are they going to have a line each.