water_wendi
Water is not wet!
Nobody could convince you of anything. Same with me. Weve picked our sides already.Well you sure convinced me!
Nobody could convince you of anything. Same with me. Weve picked our sides already.Well you sure convinced me!
lol, people who are rah rah anti-origin weren't going to buy the game anyways.
the internet being the internet.
Nobody could convince you of anything. Same with me.
No single player. No Aussie servers. Forced Origin. Ugh. I can't find any reasons why I'd want to pay money to put myself through this ordeal.
Nobody could convince you of anything. Same with me. Weve picked our sides already.
My conclusions regarding Steam formed a decade ago and have been proven right thus far. i guess in an age of superstring theory and god particles anything is possible and i might change my mind regarding Steam but i doubt it.Oh yeah?
To be fair though, Steam took 5 years before it even had its first friends functionality (or any non-purely sell games functionality), and 3 years after beta launch (called beta but required for CS, so wasn't really a beta) before it had its' first third party title. Steam was made primarily as a way to push patches out, add online DRM, and deal with counter-strike cheating (CS cheating was the biggest reason tbh). The 3rd party publishing thing sorta happened accidentally.
Don't feel like Origin has gotten 5 years to develop any functionality beyond selling things.
Also, you can get Titanfall in non PC ways - couldn't with HL2 for several years afterward.
I honestly would love an explanation that didn't sound half crazed. I can understand not buying because it's EA but just because it's on Origin being a deal breaker, sounds crazy on multiple levels.
Given how many games I already have, I can afford to be pretty lazy. I find it weirder how many people will put up with annoyances like origin just for one or two games.
I'm also expecting a wave of accounts being hacked for Titanfall since it will use the same service as Fifa Ultimate Team, and a number of people are still reporting hacks as a result of using EA services.
Do you live such a hard life that clicking on an icon on your desktop will prevent you from playing a video game?
Man, I feel bad for you.
Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.
Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.
It's like owning a xb1 and a ps4 the horror.
Do you also think their should only be one console, because it's the same principle.
I agree with you about most of this, but your timeline is a off. HL2 had a (not very good) Xbox port a year after the PC launch. The delay on coming to Xbox 360 and PS3 was more a matter of Valve waiting for a good opportunity with the Orange Box rather than trying to keep it exclusive for as long as possible. (Since it had gone non-exclusive already.) Steam also had friend and chat functionality before 2007, assuming you're using 2002 as the start date. 2007 was the year Steam got groups and a pretty big community overhaul, but chat and friends existed before then.
I like origin, haven't had any issues with it. Yes it's not optimal to not have all the games on one platform but it's hardly anything. Steam can be a bitch sometimes too, mostly because of the way it installs the games.
No really,i don't have time for multiple systems honestly even though i can get them. EA took someones games away over saying something,not going to mess with them.
No really,i don't have time for multiple systems honestly even though i can get them. EA took someones games away over saying something,not going to mess with them.
Competition, reasons for Valve to improve itself and comparison point for consumers.
It's a software that loads up and plays games. I don't get the vitrol against it. Is it a virus? does it lose your saves? does it cost money. Why is it a sin for it to exist. Business have started up on far less.
Is a 30% cut fair to developers? It is higher than average compared to consoles.
What percentage would you consider too high?
It's a EA game so it was a no-buy anyway
Yupgg no buy
i might be wrong but didnt Steam change banned users access to games after EA did that for Origin first?
Respawn is totally independent an EA has no say in how they create Titanfall.
What on earth did I just walk in on?
For the uninformed who have never installed Origin, what are the big issues? Is that the service that was deleting save files for a while?
Competition is only competition when there's some actual competing going on. EA's given Valve no reason to compete since Origin was renamed and yet Steam has done nothing but add features in this 2+ year span while EA sits on their hands and twirl in their computer chairs.
I mean can't I just make a Steam Shortcut of Titanfall?
>Steam
>Add non-steam game to library
>Titanfall.exe
>Put on the tile image of choice
>game opens, less clicks, most likely that Steam Menu shift+tab will work to save screens.
>Origin ctrl+tab to set up streaming.
This is possible right?
EDIT: Beaten.
This shouldn't be an issue.
Do you live such a hard life that clicking on an icon on your desktop will prevent you from playing a video game?
Man, I feel bad for you.
Which is fair enough there's literally thousands of companies that do this. Hell console wars exist explicitly for this reason.
Why is this some sin now.
I'll buy it when it goes on Steam and not a minute before. Origin is a frustrating piece of junk every single time I've tried to use it.
Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.
We'll all complain but I'm sure most will still buy it, justifying EA's bullshit.
For Origin games this will likely launch Origin rather than launching the game in question.