Titanfall requires Origin.

lol, people who are rah rah anti-origin weren't going to buy the game anyways.

the internet being the internet.

Let's try not to characterize people too broadly; this thread shows a pretty diverse range of opinions.

I consider myself somewhat anti-Origin in that I'll buy my games on Steam whenever possible, but I don't find Origin sufficiently terrible to scare me away from buying a game that requires it. I like to think that I've done a decent job of rationalizing these views for reasons other than me liking Valve and disliking EA.
 
No single player. No Aussie servers. Forced Origin. Ugh. I can't find any reasons why I'd want to pay money to put myself through this ordeal.
 
Not a PC gamer, but from reading this thread, the biggest issue with Origin seems to be the ease they can ban you from the service and essentially cut you off from the games. I don't see that being mentioned enough. Is it not as big an issue as it would seem to an outsider?
 
My conclusions regarding Steam formed a decade ago and have been proven right thus far. i guess in an age of superstring theory and god particles anything is possible and i might change my mind regarding Steam but i doubt it.
 
I'm also expecting a wave of accounts being hacked for Titanfall since it will use the same service as Fifa Ultimate Team, and a number of people are still reporting hacks as a result of using EA services.
 
Hell one of the reasons I'm interested in this game is no shitty tacked on single player. Who wants resources diverted to something that's clearly on afterthought.
 
To be fair though, Steam took 5 years before it even had its first friends functionality (or any non-purely sell games functionality), and 3 years after beta launch (called beta but required for CS, so wasn't really a beta) before it had its' first third party title. Steam was made primarily as a way to push patches out, add online DRM, and deal with counter-strike cheating (CS cheating was the biggest reason tbh). The 3rd party publishing thing sorta happened accidentally.

Don't feel like Origin has gotten 5 years to develop any functionality beyond selling things.

Also, you can get Titanfall in non PC ways - couldn't with HL2 for several years afterward.

I agree with you about most of this, but your timeline is a off. HL2 had a (not very good) Xbox port a year after the PC launch. The delay on coming to Xbox 360 and PS3 was more a matter of Valve waiting for a good opportunity with the Orange Box rather than trying to keep it exclusive for as long as possible. (Since it had gone non-exclusive already.) Steam also had friend and chat functionality before 2007, assuming you're using 2002 as the start date. 2007 was the year Steam got groups and a pretty big community overhaul, but chat and friends existed before then.
 
I honestly would love an explanation that didn't sound half crazed. I can understand not buying because it's EA but just because it's on Origin being a deal breaker, sounds crazy on multiple levels.

Gamers like to complain about everything and anything.

People have managed to whine a ton about Titanfall's playercount somehow, even though not once was the game promised to be some large-area battlefield-esque game.

They've also managed to whine about there being 3 mechs when the game launches, as if there were supposed to be more options available (which was also never stated previously).

etc etc.

Sometimes I wonder why I even read these threads.
 
Given how many games I already have, I can afford to be pretty lazy. I find it weirder how many people will put up with annoyances like origin just for one or two games.

Do you live such a hard life that clicking on an icon on your desktop will prevent you from playing a video game?

Man, I feel bad for you.
 
I'm also expecting a wave of accounts being hacked for Titanfall since it will use the same service as Fifa Ultimate Team, and a number of people are still reporting hacks as a result of using EA services.

People aren't hacked through EA's service, they're hacked because Ultimate team allows them to convert money on hacked accounts into real money through the service. It's their atm, but the itself isn'tt whats hacked.
 
Do you live such a hard life that clicking on an icon on your desktop will prevent you from playing a video game?

Man, I feel bad for you.

Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.
 
Wasn't sold on the game yet either, as the gunplay looks identical to CoD. Looked like a maybe for a 40$ or less purchase. But this news ensures I won't be buying it at all.
 
Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.

It's like owning a xb1 and a ps4 the horror.

Do you also think their should only be one console, because it's the same principle.
 
Theres more to it,principles. Cant trust EA,also why should games be spread around,makes it a hassle. its like having ps4 or xbox one games separated for no reason.

If clicking an icon on your desktop is too much of a psychological barrier to overcome you could always add a non-Steam game to Steam.
 
I mean can't I just make a Steam Shortcut of Titanfall?
>Steam
>Add non-steam game to library
>Titanfall.exe
>Put on the tile image of choice
>game opens, less clicks, most likely that Steam Menu shift+tab will work to save screens.
>Origin ctrl+tab to set up streaming.

This is possible right?

EDIT: Beaten.

This shouldn't be an issue.
 
It's like owning a xb1 and a ps4 the horror.

Do you also think their should only be one console, because it's the same principle.

No really,i don't have time for multiple systems honestly even though i can get them. EA took someones games away over saying something,not going to mess with them.
 
I like origin, haven't had any issues with it. Yes it's not optimal to not have all the games on one platform but it's hardly anything. Steam can be a bitch sometimes too, mostly because of the way it installs the games.
 
I agree with you about most of this, but your timeline is a off. HL2 had a (not very good) Xbox port a year after the PC launch. The delay on coming to Xbox 360 and PS3 was more a matter of Valve waiting for a good opportunity with the Orange Box rather than trying to keep it exclusive for as long as possible. (Since it had gone non-exclusive already.) Steam also had friend and chat functionality before 2007, assuming you're using 2002 as the start date. 2007 was the year Steam got groups and a pretty big community overhaul, but chat and friends existed before then.

Ahh, kk. I must have not thought much of friends prior to the overhaul then, as I remember thinking "non functional" and must have conflated it with "non-existent". My bad.

HL2 got an Xbox port? Owww that must have been bad.
 
Origin is 1 of the 3 clients that i use (steam, origin, battle.net) so its no big deal to me.

i was gonna wait until it hits about 50% off ($30) anyway tho, because i'll be playing Dark Souls 2 and Diablo3: Reaper of Souls (both PC) for quite a while anyway next month.

and what likely amounts to a small amount of lost sales due to being Origin exclusive will be made up in EA gaining the full profits ...rather than having to give Valve a 30% cut.

Origin always worked well for me, btw ...i don't like it as much as i do Steam ...but its a decent enough platform.
 
I like origin, haven't had any issues with it. Yes it's not optimal to not have all the games on one platform but it's hardly anything. Steam can be a bitch sometimes too, mostly because of the way it installs the games.

It's also a bitch to get games to run administrator, and just mess around in general. It's closed as fuk in that regard even in comparison to Origin which I have no issues with.
 
No really,i don't have time for multiple systems honestly even though i can get them. EA took someones games away over saying something,not going to mess with them.

i might be wrong but didnt Steam change banned users access to games after EA did that for Origin first?
 
No really,i don't have time for multiple systems honestly even though i can get them. EA took someones games away over saying something,not going to mess with them.

You honestly don't have 15 seconds to spare when you're on the computer?

Then what are you doing on gaf?
 
I've never really had a problem with the Origin client itself (especially when it allowed custom install paths before Steam did from what I remember). Most of the Origin complaints I've heard of seem to be more related to EA/Origin's servers. Like how some people had problems playing stuff like FIFA or Dead Space 3 online/co-op.

I wonder if Titanfall is gonna use a system similar to Battlelog. Battlefield 4 is definitely a lot of things (a lot of them not very good), but Battlelog is at least one of the better things to come out of it and improved as well.
 
Competition, reasons for Valve to improve itself and comparison point for consumers.

It's a software that loads up and plays games. I don't get the vitrol against it. Is it a virus? does it lose your saves? does it cost money. Why is it a sin for it to exist. Business have started up on far less.

Competition is only competition when there's some actual competing going on. EA's given Valve no reason to compete since Origin was renamed and yet Steam has done nothing but add features in this 2+ year span while EA sits on their hands and twirl in their computer chairs.
 
Is a 30% cut fair to developers? It is higher than average compared to consoles.

What percentage would you consider too high?

Please correct me if I'm wrong but everything I heard says that Microsoft takes the same 30% cut from any digital sale on the Xbox Live Marketplace that Valve does. From what I understand Sony is about the same. I've even heard Apple take a 30% cut for it's digital sales. It seems like a 30% cut of digital sales is pretty much the industry standard.

Not only that, but Valve gives away free keys for retail sales of games and sales of keys outside of Steam on sites like Amazon. That seems pretty fair to me, from what I understand Microsoft takes a license fee of around $8-10 for each retail game sold. Of course the retail PC market is pretty small but I imagine the market for selling keys on sites like Amazon is larger.
 
What on earth did I just walk in on?

For the uninformed who have never installed Origin, what are the big issues? Is that the service that was deleting save files for a while?
 
It's a EA game so it was a no-buy anyway

EA Partners is not EA.

They just distribute the game.

Respawn is totally independent an EA has no say in how they create Titanfall.

I'm shocked that people don't understand this.

Well not really, since people just love complaining about everything relating to EA
 
What on earth did I just walk in on?

For the uninformed who have never installed Origin, what are the big issues? Is that the service that was deleting save files for a while?

Origin is merely functional. It doesn't offer a lot of core features that Steam does. Many see it as an inconvenience due to their already-large Steam libraries.

It also seems that a lot of people consider it dishonorable or whatever to make exclusive games and don't consider exclusive games to be compelling features for a game distribution service.
 
Competition is only competition when there's some actual competing going on. EA's given Valve no reason to compete since Origin was renamed and yet Steam has done nothing but add features in this 2+ year span while EA sits on their hands and twirl in their computer chairs.

This is pretty much your opinion, do you know for a fact that Origin hasn't influenced Valve at all.

Also there's nothing inherently wrong with a business competing even if it's shit competition it's annoying to consumers when the product is a piece of crap and forced onto users, but aside from it being a me too I haven't seen much offensively wrong with it.

Business cash in all the time, it's part of many a business portfolio, hell it's what the majority of business are. I just see no fundamental issue with this concept. Valve only exists because Gabe cashed in after seeing Doom's success it's a fact of business.
 
I mean can't I just make a Steam Shortcut of Titanfall?
>Steam
>Add non-steam game to library
>Titanfall.exe
>Put on the tile image of choice
>game opens, less clicks, most likely that Steam Menu shift+tab will work to save screens.
>Origin ctrl+tab to set up streaming.

This is possible right?

EDIT: Beaten.

This shouldn't be an issue.

For Origin games this will likely launch Origin rather than launching the game in question.
 
I'll buy it when it goes on Steam and not a minute before. Origin is a frustrating piece of junk every single time I've tried to use it.
 
Do you live such a hard life that clicking on an icon on your desktop will prevent you from playing a video game?

Man, I feel bad for you.

Do you live such an easy life that any amount of hassle is worth it to play the "NEXT BIG GAME" from EA or whoever else? If not, what is your limit?

Maybe it's a principle that few people share, but if it takes 5 minutes for me to load up/set up Origin (assuming all my Steam friends were magically there already), that's fucking 5 minutes of my time that I wasted just so EA could suck a little more money out of the PC ecosystem. Money, that unlike with Valve and Steam, is exceptionally unlikely to enhance PC gaming in the slightest.

If Titanfall were somehow the only game coming out that looked any good, I'd probably roll over and buy it too, but there is anything but a lack of good games to play on PC right now, so I get to be choosy. An Origin requirement is an easy way for me to see that the dev/publisher don't care enough to put the game where I want to buy it. That's their choice, and it's my choice not to chase after them desperate to buy their game. Simple as that.
 
Which is fair enough there's literally thousands of companies that do this. Hell console wars exist explicitly for this reason.

Why is this some sin now.

I don't consider it a mortal sin, but I don't think EA is doing a particularly good job of selling Origin as a competitor to Steam.
 
I'll buy it when it goes on Steam and not a minute before. Origin is a frustrating piece of junk every single time I've tried to use it.

A lot of people say this.

But every time I use Origin, I click the icon, it starts, then I click the game and play it.

Never once failed me.
 
For Origin games this will likely launch Origin rather than launching the game in question.

When you launch a game like this (Origin required), it will launch Origin in taskbar mode and then auto launch the game - at most (if set correctly) you'll see a quick "logging in" message (while it logs into Origin) and that's it.

With the most recent update, you can also make it auto shutdown Origin when you close the game to.
 
Top Bottom