2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Blackace said:
I pretty sure he could have been a year earlier if he wasn't forced to risk his entire career playing for the NCAA without making a legal penny...
At least he got the chance. Like I said, it's a waste of time trying to make me feel sympathy for someone getting paid millions to play basketball. His life is not so much more horrible than mine or yours for having to play one free year of basketball that it justifies cheating.
 
Branduil said:
They got million-dollar contracts from NBA teams. It doesn't matter what the system "should" be in this particular case. You can argue against the one year rule all you want, I have no argument with that and think it should be gotten rid of. My issue is with the entitled kids who think that because something is wrong with the system that means it's okay to cheat or take bribes.

Again the school should be paying them.. That would cut down on the bribes... They work full time for almost nothing and are demanded to keep their scores up.... The system is broken and the schools themselves are to blame... Who the fuck do you think bribes the kids in the first place.. They aren't taking money from complete strangers these are people connected to the school.. Who sets up the tutors to take their test and do their homework? It isn't the players it's the schools.. But the players are spoiled brats. lawl..
 
cuevas said:
They pay their dues and do what they have to do to get through the year that they should be making money but instead get nothing in college.

Drose would have more money if he didn't go to school. And Im aren't asking for you to pity these players, just for you to see that your reason for rooting against them isn't really fair.
Dude, we root against players just because they arbitrarily play for a franchise we dislike. Why the crap would you bring up the fairness of rooting for or against someone in a sports thread?

Blackace said:
Again the school should be paying them.. That would cut down on the bribes... They work full time for almost nothing and are demanded to keep their scores up.... The system is broken and the schools themselves are to blame... Who the fuck do you think bribes the kids in the first place.. They aren't taking money from complete strangers these are people connected to the school.. Who sets up the tutors to take their test and do their homework? It isn't the players it's the schools.. But the players are spoiled brats. lawl..

They both share the blame... the players are not innocent angels just because they didn't initiate the bribery. Plenty of players don't take bribes so there's no defense.
 
etiolate said:
Ok, not getting paid for what has become a professional business is unfair, but thats different than saying a free college education is being taken advantage of.
Its absurd that a guy can have a billboard right in the middle of Charlotte are not even have enough money to put gas in his tank and drive home for the holidays.

That TV deal, the jersey sales, the bowl game... that definitely equals exactly 1 college degree. That same degree thats depreciated in value for every year since the 70s...
Branduil said:
They got million-dollar contracts from NBA teams. It doesn't matter what the system "should" be in this particular case. You can argue against the one year rule all you want, I have no argument with that and think it should be gotten rid of. My issue is with the entitled kids who think that because something is wrong with the system that means it's okay to cheat or take bribes.
So you kick out everyone who ever cheated on an accounting test too? Geez... at least the one and done guys didn't ever want to be college in the first place. Most of the time, schools are the ones facilitating it (enabling it at least) and if they're out the door into a different field, the actual job that they do want, then whats the issue? Its not like they're cheating on med exams then rushing off to surgery.
 
linsivvi said:
It's extremely hypocritical of the NBA to set an age minimum. It's not like going to college for one year on an athlete scholarship will do anything to take care of a player's future. They never graduated and most employers are going to be wary about how legit their GPA is. If the NBA really cared so much, offer a free scholarship to all players who can't stay in the league beyond their rookie contracts.

They don't care about their education or post career . They care about the players being better prepared for a career IN the NBA. And it's true, players with a year of college under their belts will be better prepared to contribute in the NBA. If anything they should be playing 2 years minimum.
 
pilonv1 said:
They don't care about their education or post career . They care about the players being better prepared for a career IN the NBA. And it's true, players with a year of college under their belts will be better prepared to contribute in the NBA. If anything they should be playing 2 years minimum.
I agree. It should either be 2 years min or nothing at all. As it is right now, it just shits up the NCAA and caters to a corrupt system.
 
DY_nasty said:
So you kick out everyone who ever cheated on an accounting test too?

I don't know what school you went to but cheating on an exam for mine would certainly be grounds for possible expulsion, depending on the circumstances.

Geez... at least the one and done guys didn't ever want to be college in the first place. Most of the time, schools are the ones facilitating it (enabling it at least) and if they're out the door into a different field, the actual job that they do want, then whats the issue? Its not like they're cheating on med exams then rushing off to surgery.
The issue is I don't like cheaters. How is that hard to understand?
 
Branduil said:
Dude, we root against players just because they arbitrarily play for a franchise we dislike. Why the crap would you bring up the fairness of rooting for or against someone in a sports thread?
Rooting against a player because they are on a team you don't like? Fair.

Rooting against a player because he had to game a faulty system by haveing someone take a test for him or otherwise fall off the face of the earth and lose millions? Laughable.
 
Branduil said:
They both share the blame... the players are not innocent angels just because they didn't initiate the bribery. Plenty of players don't take bribes so there's no defense.

I can promise you every student player has taken a bribe at sometime.. Be it a free meal, free tank of gas, free tutoring, 10,000$ where do you set the bar?
 
Branduil said:
The issue is I don't like cheaters. How is that hard to understand?
If you don't like cheaters, then you should definitely have a much bigger beef with the institutions over the players.
 
cuevas said:
Rooting against a player because they are on a team you don't like? Fair.

Rooting against a player because he had to game a faulty system by haveing someone take a test for him or otherwise fall off the face of the earth and lose millions? Laughable.
He didn't "have" to game the system. He's not entitled to be a millionaire.

Blackace said:
I can promise you every student player has taken a bribe at sometime.. Be it a free meal, free tank of gas, free tutoring, 10,000$ where do you set the bar?

Cheating on exams and accepting thousands of dollars.

DY_nasty said:
If you don't like cheaters, then you should definitely have a much bigger beef with the institutions over the players.

I don't know where I said I didn't. Still doesn't excuse the players.

I don't know why you guys care about me disliking Derrick Rose so much. :lol
 
Blackace said:
I can promise you every student player has taken a bribe at sometime.. Be it a free meal, free tank of gas, free tutoring, 10,000$ where do you set the bar?
In a frat too?

Sheeeeeeeeeit.
 
Branduil said:
.



Cheating on exams and accepting thousands of dollars.

Ok so accepting hundreds of dollars and getting "help" on exams is ok..

Or they should never be able to earn a living... The funny thing is you want to compare them to you or me, but you want to be millions of times harsher on them if they break the rules which is ridiculous
 
DY_nasty said:
In a frat too?

Sheeeeeeeeeit.

Naw Washington lacks black frats.. There are some but they were more clicky than the white ones.. I was goodI
 
Blackace said:
Ok so accepting hundreds of dollars and getting "help" on exams is ok..

Or they should never be able to earn a living... The funny thing is you want to compare them to you or me, but you want to be millions of times harsher on them if they break the rules which is ridiculous
I didn't say it was okay. But some things are naturally more severe than others. I really don't think disapproving of cheaters is some morally outrageous position. I can promise you I would get punished much more harshly than Derrick Rose for cheating on a test.
 
Branduil said:
I didn't say it was okay. But some things are naturally more severe than others. I really don't think disapproving of cheaters is some morally outrageous position. I can promise you I would get punished much more harshly than Derrick Rose for cheating on a test.

I said you wanted student players to be banned from the only career they can do... If you were caught cheating you could still work in the field you wanted to right?

Disaproving of cheating isn't the issue but trying to see a complex problem in binary is where everyone is getting in your ass..
 
Blackace said:
Naw Washington lacks black feats.. There are some but they were more clicky than the white ones.. I was good
You know its a lot different in the south.

I was always eating.
 
Blackace said:
I said you wanted student players to be banned from the only career they can do... If you were caught cheating you could still work in the field you wanted to right?

Disaproving of cheating isn't the issue but trying to see a complex problem in binary is where everyone is getting in your ass..
It doesn't have to be a permanent ban... even a couple of years would be a pretty effective deterrent. A heck of a lot better than the current situation, where there are absolutely no negative consequences for a guy cheating.
 
Branduil said:
It doesn't have to be a permanent ban... even a couple of years would be a pretty effective deterrent. A heck of a lot better than the current situation, where there are absolutely no negative consequences for a guy cheating.
You can't make money off a guy on the sideline :P
 
Branduil said:
It doesn't have to be a permanent ban... even a couple of years would be a pretty effective deterrent. A heck of a lot better than the current situation, where there are absolutely no negative consequences for a guy cheating.

Because there is no real benefit for him being there for a year so it all balances out...
 
Branduil said:
Yeah, and that's why nothing will change. The least I can do is root against the players who blatantly disregard the rules and the institutions that encourage, support, and facilitate them.
fixed for balance
 
Branduil said:
I don't know what school you went to but cheating on an exam for mine would certainly be grounds for possible expulsion, depending on the circumstances.

Not agreeing completely with Branduil (everyone makes mistakes) but this is most certainly true where I went to school.
 
In France, in theory, if you cheat to a national exam, you can not take one again in the following 5 years... That includes the driver's license exam, all public universities, etc.
In practice, I've seen my students cheat and well, the worse they'll get is a 0.
 
etiolate said:
Going to college is now being taken advantage of? I know the SEC is full of some fucked up greedy mentalities, but college isn't some torture chamber. It's useful if you use it.

It is being taken advantage of when a person's biggest asset is his youth. It's not like you cannot go to college and get a degree when you're in your 30s.
 
Branduil, I think it's weird that you think athletes need to be role models in other aspects of life. Frankly, I don't give a shit whether Rose is a fucking serial killer as long as he plays like he does. Okay, bad example... he probably shouldn't be allowed to play if he's a serial killer because he is a menace to society and should be behind bars. But you know what I mean.

On another note: the Clippers-Kings game was the best-officiated game I've watched this season, no joke. Not because the refs were exceptionally gifted at detecting fouls, but because (since the Kings and Clippers are probably the two teams Stern cares about least in this league) they weren't. They called super obvious charges, blocking fouls, travels, etc., but they allowed a ton of contact at both ends of the floor and didn't halt play every other second for ticky-tacky fouls or meaningless bullshit. That was especially nice down the stretch, when I got to watch both teams play basketball and not "who forgot to pay off the refs" ball. I wish the refs from that game officiated every game. Thank you, Greg Willard, Mark Ayotte, and Leroy Richardson.
 
Happy Birthday Larry! Having a Big-33 today in your honor!

tTerX.jpg
 
Kevin Love now averaging 20 and 15.

If Chris Bosh can be an all-star on some garbage Raptors teams, Kevin Love can be one on a garbage Wolves team.
 
Dressed in sweaters and jackets as they prepared to head out into a frigid Wisconsin night, it felt more like three guys hanging out in a dorm room than a news conference.

"This was the first time tonight I got booed on the road, I haven't heard those boos all year," James joked after his 17-point performance.

"Luckily D. Wade and CB showed up tonight, I was very distracted. They were able to help me through the night."

Rim shot.

Before the game when Wade was talking about his retired No. 3 Marquette jersey that hangs in Bradley Center rafters, James told Wade he remembered watching him lose to Kansas in the Final Four.

"You weren't watching the game, you were riding around in your Hummer," Wade said.

"Yeah, I know, I watched it in there," James said. "I had satellite."

After the game Wade, who had another strong performance with 25 points playing in front of his old Marquette fan base, made the mistake of bringing up the banner again.

"I took a moment earlier to make LeBron look up at my banner in the rafters," Wade said.

"Oh, you mean the one that said Glenn Rivers?" James shot back.

Zing.

Up next: the topic of Wade's career-high 14 rebounds, several of which were credited to his stat line after Bosh, who had 16 points and 12 rebounds, tapped them out to him.

Wade: "I stole about one rebound from him."

Bosh: "One?"

Wade: "Maybe two."

James: "Uh, huh."

Wade to James: "You're not really fighting down there, either. Don't even act like you do. As I told [Udonis Haslem], he should take his time [coming back from injury]. Don't even rush to come back, there's a new rebounder in town. "

Aw. How cute.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
Kevin Love now averaging 20 and 15.

If Chris Bosh can be an all-star on some garbage Raptors teams, Kevin Love can be one on a garbage Wolves team.
Love and Westbrook will probably both make it, at least as coaches' selections.

Those UCLA teams were ridiculously stacked in retrospect:

Westbrook
Collison
Mbah a Moute
Afflalo
Love
 
Can't blame Toronto for the loss against the Pacers. It was the tail end of a Back-To-Back, and you need at least a week to game plan for Brandon Rush in this league.

ph33nix said:
Aw. How cute.

Ugh. They talk like a 13 year old's fanfiction or some shit.
 
You're a fool if you think college did anything for guys like Rose or Mayo. They would have been top picks without playing a year of college. All playing in college did for them is take away one year of earnings from them. They didn't learn anything on or off the court. They went to their schools and put butts in the seats, especially Mayo because his team was nothing special.

Bottomline is that the schools and the NBA gain more from the kid that goes to college than the kids themselves.
 
I´m brazilian, so i still think some sports stuff are weird in the U.S.

I don´t get why people in general aren´t upset with NCAA.

It´s highway robbery. They have the same network deals the NBA and others have, and they don´t have to pay the players.

It´s absurd.

If there was any logic, then they could not receive cash from the networks to air their games.

If i was any good, i would pull a Jennings and basically say "fuck you" to those greedy bastards.
 
Blackace said:
Again the school should be paying them.. That would cut down on the bribes... They work full time for almost nothing and are demanded to keep their scores up.... The system is broken and the schools themselves are to blame... Who the fuck do you think bribes the kids in the first place.. They aren't taking money from complete strangers these are people connected to the school.. Who sets up the tutors to take their test and do their homework? It isn't the players it's the schools.. But the players are spoiled brats. lawl..

They also get tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to bounce a rubber ball.

How many struggling students or people whose lives have been crushed under the weight of student loans do you think would happily take the same deal? If you introduce salaries to college sports you introduce a whole other layer of ugliness and complications to what is - let's face it - meant to be an extra curricular club.
 
charsace said:
Bottomline is that the schools and the NBA gain more from the kid that goes to college than the kids themselves.

The same thing is true of every single job that requires a degree or certificate. Why do we suddenly feel bad for basketball players as oppressed figures being forced to get an education, but if somebody wants to be a social worker all that sacrifice - and for longer, I might add - is just expected of them? Why is the NBA expected to pay millions to train guys who aren't ready?

Like 1% of NCAA players end up getting to the NBA, but 100% have a shot at an education which will change their life. I just can't agree with the perspective that these guys are exploited or more hard done by than anybody else. These are educational institutions, they're not for profit corporations.
 
I think the bigger question is:

How hard is it to pass a SAT? Even if it takes you multiple times, then do it. No shame in that.

On the subject of bribes, it's a bit of a grey area in my opinion. Nobody would have looked at Joakim Noah funny if he was driving a $60-100k Mercedes to class because of who his father is. Nobody looks funny at any of the other trust-fund kids when they stroll to campus wearing Lacoste and $80k cars bought by their parents.

But if some rich dude wants to throw a little cash towards a "student"-athlete who comes up from a poor background in return for something mutually beneficial to the both of them down the line? Meh, I say.

The line I draw in the sand is when a booster from the school throws some cash at a "student"-athlete before they declare for a school. But on the other hand, isn't a free scholarship a bribe to begin with? Free housing, free food, free facility access, free freshman coeds, etc.

LiveFromKyoto said:
These are educational institutions, they're not for profit corporations.
I would argue that.
 
LiveFromKyoto said:
They also get tens of thousands of dollars in tuition to bounce a rubber ball.

How many struggling students or people whose lives have been crushed under the weight of student loans do you think would happily take the same deal? If you introduce salaries to college sports you introduce a whole other layer of ugliness and complications to what is - let's face it - meant to be an extra curricular club.
Tens of thousands to be in an extra curricular club? That's one way to put it if you ignore something like the NCAA signing an 11 billion dollar tv deal for just the basketball tournament.

Athletes have talents I don't have and can't learn. But maybe if I grew 6 inches and got some speed...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom