2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
A few (paraphrased) things from Brian Robinson, founder of Save Our Sonics, to get Blackace's hopes up:

“I hate to say there's been progress on a new arena behind closed doors because we've been there before, but there's been real progress on a new arena behind closed doors.”

“The business community in Seattle is very close-knit, all the rich guys know each other. If Steve Ballmer didn't want to bring an NBA team to Seattle, we'd know. In fact, I've heard just the opposite, that he's as committed as ever.”

“Ballmer wants to bring the NBA back, but he doesn't want to be a villain somewhere else. He'll never have another chance like this, to buy the team from the NBA, who will have already publicly exhausted their options in New Orleans. His hands will be clean.”
And he ended by saying he thinks Ballmer ultimately buys the Hornets. Probably a lot of wishful thinking, but he'd also have a decent idea of the goings on.
 
giri said:
You can roll your eyes all you want, but you still don't dispute the truth of it. University isn't meant to be easy, i worked part time while i got my degree 25 hours a week, so i could pay for my gas, and assorteds, and walked out of there with a $35k debt. I'm sure the poor athlete on scholarship who had to train for 25 hours a week incurring no debt for his time in the system is horribly disadvantaged. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for me to cry in sympathy for them.

As an adendum, you realise all the people on academic scholarships have to put in a huge workload to keep them also, and regularly work on research for their lecturers for free. But i don't here anyone saying that they should be given a cut of the research grant?

They all chose the path they took.

Oh, so they watched him on his steady decline and at his lowest put him into rehab. I thought they were keeping him on a short leash, and looking after him? letting him build up or continue a drug habbit to the point he needs to go to rehab is "a short leash".

Next thing i know, Lohan really doesn't deserve to be punished for all the stupid shit she's done on drugs, the studios had her on a short leash.

What bullshit. Most NBA teams won't give a crap aslong as you keep your self out of jail, and able to show up to practice. Example, Earl Clarke. Fuck, i'd rather clarke was off running with some thugs, maybe then he'd stop being such a giant vagina on the court and body up.
I roll my eyes because I'm one of the athletes thats been stuck with a bill.

Those 20-25 hours that you have to put into living expenses is time that athletes are putting into their job - a job that isn't all that secure and doesn't provide more than the most basic of living expenses. If you actually eat like a man who has two-a-days, then odds are you won't be able to eat on just what the school gives you. You're going to need outside support. The irony of that is many student athletes are the ones that are doing the supporting of their families. A lot of players aren't even allowed to get actual part-time jobs - the ones that are provided by the school are alumns are usually bogus too (ie we put your name down, and you get paid on the side - and if anyone finds you, you alone get screwed). And don't get injured... DON'T - because the lengths that schools go to make sure that you don't seek healthcare outside of their own networks is borderline criminal.

All this so that a new library can get built and the players who attracted the applicants and generated the revenue won't have their name on it. The students went on to become doctors and lawyers aren't the ones that built Miami University into what it is today.

And the overwhelming majority of NBA rookies are looked after. There is no opening orientation and prep seminar when you're getting off the plane in Greece. There's no player development coach who's tasked with personally looking out for you. There's no FO thats in touch with your family. Of course guys are going to fall off the track, but no system is perfect, but its still much better than a high school kid taking a year long trip to Europe by himself.

Most of what your saying is 'guys should know better than to do x and y and expect not to be met with consequences - they should be grateful for the opportunity', and in some cases that makes sense, but for the overwhelming majority its just large institutions encouraging, supporting, and enabling in a system where they have relatively no liability while receiving 99% of the benefits.
 
giri said:
I can only think KD is injured, or thorougly exhausted after the worlds, because he's been playing very average of late.

But Hedo is in the top 50?

Roy at 17 with the news about his knees?

Yao?
What knees?
 
Manu has been the best player up until this point so I don't understand how he isn't in the top 5? He's the MVP right now. Bosh is too high. Billups and Joe Johnson are also too high. Wade and Lebron haven't been top five. They should be right outside the top 5.
 
Local radio bashing KO'C for drafting Hayward because "He's not ready to play" while ignoring the fact that the only guy in the entire draft picked after Hayward who would break this rotation had some people saying he shouldn't be picked in a four round draft when he was picked 39th. Ugh.
 
ItWasMeantToBe19 said:
Local radio bashing KO'C for drafting Hayward because "He's not ready to play" while ignoring the fact that the only guy in the entire draft picked after Hayward who would break this rotation had some people saying he shouldn't be picked in a four round draft when he was picked 39th. Ugh.
Eric Bledsoe would have been a better pick-up for Utah than Earl Watson.
 
ItWasMeantToBe19 said:
Local radio bashing KO'C for drafting Hayward because "He's not ready to play" while ignoring the fact that the only guy in the entire draft picked after Hayward who would break this rotation had some people saying he shouldn't be picked in a four round draft when he was picked 39th. Ugh.
landry-fields.jpg

"Dey be hating. Don't listen to them."
 
reilo said:
Eric Bledsoe would have been a better pick-up for Utah than Earl Watson.
Xavier Henry with a real coach.

*sigh*

But yeah, Paul George would've been nice... I still don't know why the Pacer picked him up.
 
DY_nasty said:
I roll my eyes because I'm one of the athletes thats been stuck with a bill.

Those 20-25 hours that you have to put into living expenses is time that athletes are putting into their job - a job that isn't all that secure and doesn't provide more than the most basic of living expenses. If you actually eat like a man who has two-a-days, then odds are you won't be able to eat on just what the school gives you. You're going to need outside support. The irony of that is many student athletes are the ones that are doing the supporting of their families. A lot of players aren't even allowed to get actual part-time jobs - the ones that are provided by the school are alumns are usually bogus too (ie we put your name down, and you get paid on the side - and if anyone finds you, you alone get screwed). And don't get injured... DON'T - because the lengths that schools go to make sure that you don't seek healthcare outside of their own networks is borderline criminal.

All this so that a new library can get built and the players who attracted the applicants and generated the revenue won't have their name on it. The students went on to become doctors and lawyers aren't the ones that built Miami University into what it is today.

And the overwhelming majority of NBA rookies are looked after. There is no opening orientation and prep seminar when you're getting off the plane in Greece. There's no player development coach who's tasked with personally looking out for you. There's no FO thats in touch with your family. Of course guys are going to fall off the track, but no system is perfect, but its still much better than a high school kid taking a year long trip to Europe by himself.

Most of what your saying is 'guys should know better than to do x and y and expect not to be met with consequences - they should be grateful for the opportunity', and in some cases that makes sense, but for the overwhelming majority its just large institutions encouraging, supporting, and enabling in a system where they have relatively no liability while receiving 99% of the benefits.

No support? Jennings team found his mum a job, gave her classes in the language (i'm not sure she kept the job) put his brother up in one of their best private schools, and found his housing and all that. There's support over there the same way there is here, if you want it the team will make it happen. And he got paid on top of it. What more could a first year kid want?

You got left with a bill, was it over 10k for one years education? because that was my bill, just for the tuition, not for the books, fuel, my food (i had to practically live on campus for the last 18months to get out with the grades i did), or for my entertainment. I'm not belittling you or your acomplishments (you've got to be a decent athlete to even make it that far). But i will not in anyway accept that if you want to, you can get more out of that experience than anyone else, and i will not feel sorry for anyone in that situation at all. You accept a scholarship, you know whats expected.

I knew several honours students who were on PARTIAL scholarships who had to spend hours each week (15 or so) helping their lecturer with his research. The reasearch was into concurrent storage on multiple drives over multiple locations spread across a network that the university was given millions for. It was from microsoft, that tech is in use today in their server environment. Those students didn't get any money from it, only on a partial scholarship, and still had every single everyday expense, and an honors workload. But it certainly would never have been ok them to cheat on a test because if was ok because they worked on the grant that brought in money.

Those guys also weren't running around deciding which one of their 4 girlfriends they were going to fuck that night.

Am i saying that its' right that the students don't get a cut of the NCAA money or the money the college makes off the back of them? Hell no, they most definitely should.

Am i saying that it's right that all the colleges exploit the living hell out of these programs? no.

Am i saying that large portions of the whole system are shady? No. The whole things fucked.

What i am saying is that everyone in those programs are on scholorships, what you do in that program with that oportunity is entirely up to you. You're being given a chance most people wont ever have, so to hear people whinge and bitch about the "poor student athlete" makes a mockery of everyone else who has busted their ass in university and come out the other side.

"Oh but he didnt want to be there", then don't go there.

"Oh but it's ok he cheated, he didn't want to be there" then don't go there.

"Its ok he cheated, he brought in money for libraries and buildings" This is the only line i can't really defend, the upside probably out weighs the downside, one guy cheating versus increased resources for all. It still doesn't make cheating right.
 
DY_nasty said:
Xavier Henry with a real coach.

*sigh*

But yeah, Paul George would've been nice... I still don't know why the Pacer picked him up.
Memphis is coached badly. Too much iso when they have a true pg in Conley that I think could run the team. What isn't the coaches fault is Henry missing open shots. He has looked bad shooting the ball for a guy that a lot of people thought was the best shooter in the draft.
 
giri said:
No support? Jennings team found his mum a job, gave her classes in the language (i'm not sure she kept the job) put his brother up in one of their best private schools, and found his housing and all that. There's support over there the same way there is here, if you want it the team will make it happen. And he got paid on top of it. What more could a first year kid want?

You got left with a bill, was it over 10k for one years education? because that was my bill, just for the tuition, not for the books, fuel, my food (i had to practically live on campus for the last 18months to get out with the grades i did), or for my entertainment. I'm not belittling you or your acomplishments (you've got to be a decent athlete to even make it that far). But i will not in anyway accept that if you want to, you can get more out of that experience than anyone else, and i will not feel sorry for anyone in that situation at all. You accept a scholarship, you know whats expected.

I knew several honours students who were on PARTIAL scholarships who had to spend hours each week (15 or so) helping their lecturer with his research. The reasearch was into concurrent storage on multiple drives over multiple locations spread across a network that the university was given millions for. It was from microsoft, that tech is in use today in their server environment. Those students didn't get any money from it, only on a partial scholarship, and still had every single everyday expense, and an honors workload. But it certainly would never have been ok them to cheat on a test because if was ok because they worked on the grant that brought in money.

Those guys also weren't running around deciding which one of their 4 girlfriends they were going to fuck that night.

Am i saying that its' right that the students don't get a cut of the NCAA money or the money the college makes off the back of them? Hell no, they most definitely should.

Am i saying that it's right that all the colleges exploit the living hell out of these programs? no.

Am i saying that large portions of the whole system are shady? No. The whole things fucked.

What i am saying is that everyone in those programs are on scholorships, what you do in that program with that oportunity is entirely up to you. You're being given a chance most people wont ever have, so to hear people whinge and bitch about the "poor student athlete" makes a mockery of everyone else who has busted their ass in university and come out the other side.

"Oh but he didnt want to be there", then don't go there.

"Oh but it's ok he cheated, he didn't want to be there" then don't go there.

"Its ok he cheated, he brought in money for libraries and buildings" This is the only line i can't really defend, the upside probably out weighs the downside, one guy cheating versus increased resources for all. It still doesn't make cheating right.
The only reason they gave a damn about Jennings was because of his under armour backing.

My bill is 20+. Because the man who offered me my scholarship wasn't legally able to do so (although the school was all too happy to give me money at first - the AD was fully aware of everything that was going on). I actually switched sports at my ADs suggestion, but because of my 'involvement' with that coach, I was just too much of a hassle to keep around and before I knew it, I wasn't allowed to practice anymore. My school essentially snatched the rug out from under me and when I appealed to NCAA, they responded with "lol, tough titties - but you can have those two years of eligibility back! on the house! :D"

I know at least two guys here actually saw me riding pine through my conference tourney. I don't mind not cutting the nets down nearly as much as getting banned from taking pictures.

So yeah, I'm kind of biased when it comes to blaming the player first without acknowledging how screwed the institution is beforehand. Cheating is bad, yeah, but when you've got an entire establishment encouraging it to the point where the individual isn't even aware that what they're doing is wrong, then the majority of the blame shouldn't be falling on that one person - its like certain people started blaming homeowners for the economy going to shit.
 
giri said:
No support? Jennings team found his mum a job, gave her classes in the language (i'm not sure she kept the job) put his brother up in one of their best private schools, and found his housing and all that. There's support over there the same way there is here, if you want it the team will make it happen. And he got paid on top of it. What more could a first year kid want?

You got left with a bill, was it over 10k for one years education? because that was my bill, just for the tuition, not for the books, fuel, my food (i had to practically live on campus for the last 18months to get out with the grades i did), or for my entertainment. I'm not belittling you or your acomplishments (you've got to be a decent athlete to even make it that far). But i will not in anyway accept that if you want to, you can get more out of that experience than anyone else, and i will not feel sorry for anyone in that situation at all. You accept a scholarship, you know whats expected.

I knew several honours students who were on PARTIAL scholarships who had to spend hours each week (15 or so) helping their lecturer with his research. The reasearch was into concurrent storage on multiple drives over multiple locations spread across a network that the university was given millions for. It was from microsoft, that tech is in use today in their server environment. Those students didn't get any money from it, only on a partial scholarship, and still had every single everyday expense, and an honors workload. But it certainly would never have been ok them to cheat on a test because if was ok because they worked on the grant that brought in money.

Those guys also weren't running around deciding which one of their 4 girlfriends they were going to fuck that night.

Am i saying that its' right that the students don't get a cut of the NCAA money or the money the college makes off the back of them? Hell no, they most definitely should.

Am i saying that it's right that all the colleges exploit the living hell out of these programs? no.

Am i saying that large portions of the whole system are shady? No. The whole things fucked.

What i am saying is that everyone in those programs are on scholorships, what you do in that program with that oportunity is entirely up to you. You're being given a chance most people wont ever have, so to hear people whinge and bitch about the "poor student athlete" makes a mockery of everyone else who has busted their ass in university and come out the other side.

"Oh but he didnt want to be there", then don't go there.

"Oh but it's ok he cheated, he didn't want to be there" then don't go there.

"Its ok he cheated, he brought in money for libraries and buildings" This is the only line i can't really defend, the upside probably out weighs the downside, one guy cheating versus increased resources for all. It still doesn't make cheating right.

What the fuck is this shit? lol

You make decent points and then drop stereotypical BS in there as well..

As for Jennings, I think he has opened the door for the one and dones to go to Europe to play and get paid.. When the rule was added nobody had done it before so who knew how it would turn out.

Going to school for one year is meaningless.. and going to school for four years is way too much of a risk for a Rose like player so all of the "it's what you make out of it." is pointless. Rose was there because he didn't have any known choices at the time.. You sit a year and your stock drops out of the lottery, you go to school for a year and make the school millions while you risk blowing out a knee with nothing to show for it..

Also I love how ALL the blame of cheating and bribes falls on the players.. who are 18 year old kids and are getting these chances to do such things from the schools themselves..

I was recruited in highschool and the schools are dirty.. I also blew my ankles and didn't go to basketball.. and paid for my education on my own.. and the people making a mockery of the students who "busted their ass to get through" isn't the student player it is the school themselves...
 
DY_nasty said:
The only reason they gave a damn about Jennings was because of his under armour backing.

My bill is 20+. Because the man who offered me my scholarship wasn't legally able to do so (although the school was all too happy to give me money at first - the AD was fully aware of everything that was going on). I actually switched sports at my ADs suggestion, but because of my 'involvement' with that coach, I was just too much of a hassle to keep around and before I knew it, I wasn't allowed to practice anymore. My school essentially snatched the rug out from under me and when I appealed to NCAA, they responded with "lol, tough titties - but you can have those two years of eligibility back! on the house! :D"

I know at least two guys here actually saw me riding pine through my conference tourney. I don't mind not cutting the nets down nearly as much as getting banned from taking pictures.

So yeah, I'm kind of biased when it comes to blaming the player first without acknowledging how screwed the institution is beforehand. Cheating is bad, yeah, but when you've got an entire establishment encouraging it to the point where the individual isn't even aware that what they're doing is wrong, then the majority of the blame shouldn't be falling on that one person - its like certain people started blaming homeowners for the economy going to shit.
What made them pull your eligibility in the first place?
 
Rodeo Clown said:
A few (paraphrased) things from Brian Robinson, founder of Save Our Sonics, to get Blackace's hopes up:


And he ended by saying he thinks Ballmer ultimately buys the Hornets. Probably a lot of wishful thinking, but he'd also have a decent idea of the goings on.

Ballmer smash!!!
 
charsace said:
Liquor, weed and maybe even some coke or prescription drugs. Then plan what you will do on thursday.

charsace said:
Manu has been the best player up until this point so I don't understand how he isn't in the top 5? He's the MVP right now. Bosh is too high. Billups and Joe Johnson are also too high. Wade and Lebron haven't been top five. They should be right outside the top 5.

<3
 
reilo said:
What made them pull your eligibility in the first place?

spending too much time deciding which of his 19 girlfriends to fuck..
 
DY_nasty said:
The only reason they gave a damn about Jennings was because of his under armour backing.

My bill is 20+. Because the man who offered me my scholarship wasn't legally able to do so (although the school was all too happy to give me money at first - the AD was fully aware of everything that was going on). I actually switched sports at my ADs suggestion, but because of my 'involvement' with that coach, I was just too much of a hassle to keep around and before I knew it, I wasn't allowed to practice anymore. My school essentially snatched the rug out from under me and when I appealed to NCAA, they responded with "lol, tough titties - but you can have those two years of eligibility back! on the house! :D"

I know at least two guys here actually saw me riding pine through my conference tourney. I don't mind not cutting the nets down nearly as much as getting banned from taking pictures.

So yeah, I'm kind of biased when it comes to blaming the player first without acknowledging how screwed the institution is beforehand. Cheating is bad, yeah, but when you've got an entire establishment encouraging it to the point where the individual isn't even aware that what they're doing is wrong, then the majority of the blame shouldn't be falling on that one person - its like certain people started blaming homeowners for the economy going to shit.

You got completely dicked over.

Blackace said:
What the fuck is this shit? lol

You make decent points and then drop stereotypical BS in there as well..


As for Jennings, I think he has opened the door for the one and dones to go to Europe to play and get paid.. When the rule was added nobody had done it before so who knew how it would turn out.

Going to school for one year is meaningless.. and going to school for four years is way too much of a risk for a Rose like player so all of the "it's what you make out of it." is pointless. Rose was there because he didn't have any known choices at the time.. You sit a year and your stock drops out of the lottery, you go to school for a year and make the school millions while you risk blowing out a knee with nothing to show for it..

Also I love how ALL the blame of cheating and bribes falls on the players.. who are 18 year old kids and are getting these chances to do such things from the schools themselves..

I was recruited in highschool and the schools are dirty.. I also blew my ankles and didn't go to basketball.. and paid for my education on my own.. and the people making a mockery of the students who "busted their ass to get through" isn't the student player it is the school themselves...

That was just a cheapshot at DY :lol

I don't just blame the students, at 18 you still dunno shit. The whole fucking thing is completely absurd. I'd say the only way to control it is for ALL revenue raised to go to a central fund, that gets equally dstributed, and all funds must be distributed no hoarding, a portion to specific academic resources on every campus, and a large chunk into a trust fund for each player playing in that sport, that they get access too once they finish college. And that fund is the only authority that can sell the rights for sponsorship, tv rights, everything, from the ground up. But it of course will never stop the back room shenannigans, nothing can really.
 
The M.O.B said:
Terrible early slate of games.

Only game worth watching today is PHX vs POR, and maybe GS and DAL.

Nah, HOU/DET game will go to 3OT with T-Mac sinking the gw three over Ish Smith.
 
Martell Webster was cleared today for game action by team physicians. The veteran swingman met with the physicians to get an update on his recovery from back surgery on Oct. 25.
The return of a historically average wing player has me legitimately excited. Timberwolves basketball!
 
Rodeo Clown said:
The return of a historically average wing player has me legitimation excited. Timberwolves basketball!

The Seattle Prep superstar has returned
 
reilo said:
What made them pull your eligibility in the first place?
They didn't exactly pull it, so to speak. They just made it so that my first two years wouldn't really count against me in the future.

Its really stupid... what they gave me was essentially a safeguard against some rare case that has zero chance of happening in the future.
Blackace said:
spending too much time deciding which of his 19 girlfriends to fuck..
I am not a crook.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
And the Wolves are going to force him to play out of position at SG. We're comin!

He should be able to play SG.. but when he was with Roy he was more comfortable standing around the arc..
 
Rodeo Clown said:
And the Wolves are going to force him to play out of position at SG. We're comin!

Wouldn't martell play sf, and wes SG?

Oh, then where would beas bee i guess.

Here's a statement you probably never expected to hear, part of the rotation problem there is Darko and Beasley are playing too well to be dropped.
 
Blackace said:
He should be able to play SG.. but when he was with Roy he was more comfortable standing around the arc..
I expected him to be a disaster at SG, but his handle looked alright in preseason. But then it was just preseason.
 
Sho_Nuff82 said:
SMH at Lopez staring off into space while ZaZa grabs his own FT miss. Why can't we close out quarters?
At times it looks like Lopez has already tuned out this season. He looked that way 5 games in.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
I expected him to be a disaster at SG, but his handle looked alright in preseason. But then it was just preseason.

I would worry about him on D at SG more than on O..
 
giri said:
At times it looks like Lopez has already tuned out this season. He looked that way 5 games in.
Lopez gave up on this team last season. I don't think he will work out in NJ. At the last rookie sophmore game he was trying hard to get a win.
 
The Frankman said:
landry-fields.jpg

"Dey be hating. Don't listen to them."
He really needs to improve his three ball, he had open looks many times during the wolves game and missed most/or all of them. Other then that he seems like a good all around player.
 
did anybody make a gif of bosh holding his face..?
also i think kobe deserves one last mvp but he is not the mvp this season.
chanses of him getting it in stead of durant are pretty low
 
woodchuck said:
list is a fucking joke. Dirk should be top 5. he's shooting 55% right now
Dirks probably the MVP at the moment.

But i guess the list isn't an "of the moment" but over the whole season including play offs.

Though dirk should still be Top 5 based on his start and others poor start, this season.
 
Omiee said:
did anybody make a gif of bosh holding his face..?
also i think kobe deserves one last mvp but he is not the mvp this season.
chanses of him getting it in stead of durant are pretty low

At the rate Durant's going he's not even going to be MVP of his team (surely that'll change but still).

Dirk or Manu for me at the minute.
 
SamuraiX- said:
Perfect.

Now all Miami has to do is just start actually beating +.500 teams and Heat fans go to fucking town with that. :lol


Hey, man, they beat the Hawks recently. Those guys are contenders and who cares if the 126 dollar man was out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom