2010/11 NBA Dec |OT| of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u7lMXXaUaIo PEACE

Status
Not open for further replies.
Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Srsly said:
Again, why do people waste their time arguing with DY_nasty? He's one of the most ignorant basketball fans I've seen on the internet.

Derp.
 
Srsly said:
Nobody has an actual argument :lol
What do you want us to argue? The fact that Magic had more assists, more rebounds, higher field-goal percentage, higher TS%, higher eFG%, better rebound percentage, same WS/48 and much lower USG%? But what's the point when you are ignorant of the overall game of basketball?

I mean, fuck, if you want to argue stats, we can get into this all day long, but fact of the matter is, there are some quantitative statistical analysis that even the best of NBA statisticians cannot account for because of the game of basketball is far too complex to measure in such nuance -- unlike baseball or football.

What really matters as the end of the day is that Magic has 5 rings, three Finals MVPs, three regular season MVPs, and a lot more hos. Check those $tat$.
 
ryutaro's mama said:
You are either trolling (horribly) or a moron.

It matters because this wasn't some 48 point that ultimately became a meaningless game. It was a TITLE CLINCHING GAME. In the Finals, on the biggest stage, without the best player, Magic got it done.

LeBron got SWEPT dude.

He has been knocked out every year he has played.

And before you bu-bu-but he had no help..Hakeem was surrounded by role players. No legit superstar along side him and he won.

Twice.

LeBron hasn't won a single Finals game as "the man".

To even further this, Gilbert got LeBron everything he wanted. He made trades and signed players to LeBrons liking. LeBron is a glorified role player, plain and simple.
 
Pistons tonight? I'll be damned...
ryutaro's mama said:
You are either trolling (horribly) or a moron.

It matters because this wasn't some 48 point that ultimately became a meaningless game. It was a TITLE CLINCHING GAME. In the Finals, on the biggest stage, without the best player, Magic got it done.

LeBron got SWEPT dude.

He has been knocked out every year he has played.

And before you bu-bu-but he had no help..Hakeem was surrounded by role players. No legit superstar along side him and he won.

Twice.

LeBron hasn't won a single Finals game as "the man".
^Not an actual argument.

Doesn't compensate for 'luck', etc.
 
ryutaro's mama said:
You are either trolling (horribly) or a moron.

It matters because this wasn't some 48 point that ultimately became a meaningless game. It was a TITLE CLINCHING GAME. In the Finals, on the biggest stage, without the best player, Magic got it done.

LeBron got SWEPT dude.

He has been knocked out every year he has played.

And before you bu-bu-but he had no help..Hakeem was surrounded by role players. No legit superstar along side him and he won.

Twice.

LeBron hasn't won a single Finals game as "the man".
You seem to have forgotten that:

A) basketball is a team game.

B) LeBron never played with a bonafide All-Star before this year

C) LeBron played against one of the best team defenses of all-time when he made it to the finals, and the 2nd best player on LeBron's team was mediocre by any reasonable standards.

And Hakeem had much better teammates that LeBron ever had (before this year) in the years that he won the 2 championships. Otis Thorpe would have been a massive upgrade to any of LeBron's Cleveland teams. Maxwell was the 2nd creator that LeBron lacked against the Spurs. The Rockets had a roster of guys that could drain threes out of the double-teams that Hakeem drew.
 
I can't sit here and agree with you Srsly, but I will say that your argument is not as crazy as everyone is making it seem. It is a little crazy though.

The issue is twofold, namely that people look back at past players with rose tinted glasses, and that Lebron hasn't won yet. Furthermore, Lebron and Magic excel(led) at slightly different things- Lebron is a pure scorer, while Magic was a beast at orchestrating an offense. Despite that, I hate the playoffs argument, because Lebron is still in his prime and has plenty of time to win. People said the same shit about Peyton... and look what happened.
 
DY_nasty said:
1) In what way does Miami play better with Bosh? He doesn't rebound or defend nearly as well as Haslem, no one will debate that, and his offense, although much better, has been reduced to barely more than that of Big Z in Cleveland. He is easily a better scorer, but is he going to be asked to do that with Wade and Lebron? No. And even when both Wade and Lebron are off the court, Bosh isn't able to maintain the pace alone. Even against shitty teams.

2) :lol

Bosh is a better rebounder than people give him credit for..

But he has seemed to settle into the role player role waaaaaay too easily. Has a PF fallen this far from grace since Vin Baker?
 
peterb0y said:
I can't sit here and agree with you Srsly, but I will say that your argument is not as crazy as everyone is making it seem. It is a little crazy though.

The issue is twofold, namely that people look back at past players with rose tinted glasses, and that Lebron hasn't won yet. Furthermore, Lebron and Magic excel(led) at slightly different things- Lebron is a pure scorer, while Magic was a beast at orchestrating an offense. Despite that, I hate the playoffs argument, because Lebron is still in his prime and has plenty of time to win. People said the same shit about Peyton... and look what happened.
He choked for years until he played one of the most turnover prone and poorly run offenses in the league?

But back to Lebron and his epic defense, no one could've stopped Hedo and Shard that year. No one.
 
Srsly said:
Nobody has an actual argument :lol
Why is Lebron better than Dr J, Larry Bird, Rick Barry and Baylor? I would like to hear your reasons why. IMO all of these guys were more complete players than Lebron.

Lebron doesn't have a post game and half of the times that he freezes a defender is because he is traveling. Never seen a player get away with the things he gets away with. And the rules allow him to go ape shit. The foul circle inflates his stats. Lebron looks great because no one can punch him in the mouth on a drive like they used to be able to do and only get a foul called. Lebron has the league backing him and rules that promote his style of play. His effectiveness would go down if you could funnel him with your hands and didn't have to worry about automatic fouls in the circle.


peterb0y said:
I can't sit here and agree with you Srsly, but I will say that your argument is not as crazy as everyone is making it seem. It is a little crazy though.

The issue is twofold, namely that people look back at past players with rose tinted glasses, and that Lebron hasn't won yet. Furthermore, Lebron and Magic excel(led) at slightly different things- Lebron is a pure scorer, while Magic was a beast at orchestrating an offense. Despite that, I hate the playoffs argument, because Lebron is still in his prime and has plenty of time to win. People said the same shit about Peyton... and look what happened.
No, its a crazy argument. Lebron is not better than Magic. Magic in his prime could play any position on the court. Lebron isn't the best sf ever. No way is he an all time great.
 
Srsly said:
You seem to have forgotten that:

A) basketball is a team game.

No I haven't.

B) LeBron never played with a bonafide All-Star before this year

Bonafide All-Star...ok...and then you say:


C) LeBron played against one of the best team defenses of all-time when he made it to the finals, and the 2nd best player on LeBron's team was mediocre by any reasonable standards.

And he got swept. He wasn't good enough to gut one game out. Wade gutted out 1 game last spring against one of the hardest defenses in the league.

Next excuse.

And Hakeem had much better teammates that LeBron ever had (before this year) in the years that he won the 2 championships. Otis Thorpe would have been a massive upgrade to any of LeBron's Cleveland teams. Maxwell was the 2nd creator that LeBron lacked against the Spurs. The Rockets had a roster of guys that could drain threes out of the double-teams that Hakeem drew.

Were any of those players around Hakeem "All-Star" caliber?

I mean, as you said earlier, "bonafide all-stars"?
 
This thread so deserves someone actually arguing that some player in this era is better than Magic fucking Johnson.

That sort of thing is only possible in NBA-Age.
 
Rodeo Clown said:
I'm excited. Slow, busted shameball is old hat. Exciting, fast paced shameball is what's hot. Paul Silas, coach of the forever.
Shameball is a thing of the past. An uptempo offense in Charlotte? Something that hot can only be called Sexball.

Prepare your body.
Blackace said:
Bosh is a better rebounder than people give him credit for..

But he has seemed to settle into the role player role waaaaaay too easily. Has a PF fallen this far from grace since Vin Baker?
He settled into it the before he even signed the papers. Those hamburgers that he was eating with Wade during the off-season? Bosh paid and tipped.
 
Srsly said:
You seem to have forgotten that:

A) basketball is a team game.

B) LeBron never played with a bonafide All-Star before this year

C) LeBron played against one of the best team defenses of all-time when he made it to the finals, and the 2nd best player on LeBron's team was mediocre by any reasonable standards.

And Hakeem had much better teammates that LeBron ever had (before this year) in the years that he won the 2 championships. Otis Thorpe would have been a massive upgrade to any of LeBron's Cleveland teams. Maxwell was the 2nd creator that LeBron lacked against the Spurs. The Rockets had a roster of guys that could drain threes out of the double-teams that Hakeem drew.

Wait what? The Rockets were a good team, but LBJ had some great players in Cleve..

Mo Williams is a better player than Mad Max... And Thorpe wasn't much better than AV..

I think the Rocket teams were better on the whole, mostly because Mario was a beast but the Dream was a better gamer than LBJ is at this point.
 
Srsly said:
You seem to have forgotten that:

A) basketball is a team game.

B) LeBron never played with a bonafide All-Star before this year

C) LeBron played against one of the best team defenses of all-time when he made it to the finals, and the 2nd best player on LeBron's team was mediocre by any reasonable standards.

And Hakeem had much better teammates that LeBron ever had (before this year) in the years that he won the 2 championships. Otis Thorpe would have been a massive upgrade to any of LeBron's Cleveland teams. Maxwell was the 2nd creator that LeBron lacked against the Spurs. The Rockets had a roster of guys that could drain threes out of the double-teams that Hakeem drew.
lol what. The team Lebron had the last 2 years was built to win a title. They had shooting, team defense and rebounding. If you put a decent volume scorer on the cavs right now they would be in the playoff hunt.
 
charsace said:
Why is Lebron better than Dr J, Larry Bird, Rick Barry and Baylor? I would like to hear your reasons why. IMO all of these guys were more complete players than Lebron.

Lebron doesn't have a post game and half of the times that he freezes a defender is because he is traveling. Never seen a player get away with the things he gets away with. And the rules allow him to go ape shit. The foul circle inflates his stats. Lebron looks great because no one can punch him in the mouth on a drive like they used to be able to do and only get a foul called. Lebron has the league backing him and rules that promote his style of play. His effectiveness would go down if you could funnel him with your hands and didn't have to worry about automatic fouls in the circle.



No, its a crazy argument. Lebron is not better than Magic. Magic in his prime could play any position on the court. Lebron isn't the best sf ever. No way is he an all time great.

Shit LBJ isn't nearly as good as any of those players. He isn't even as good of a scorer as Wilkins or King...
 
charsace said:
I didn't add them because Lebron is around the level of those two right now.

He is a bit more rounded than them.. But both are better pure scorers than him...
 
peterb0y said:
I can't sit here and agree with you Srsly, but I will say that your argument is not as crazy as everyone is making it seem. It is a little crazy though.

The issue is twofold, namely that people look back at past players with rose tinted glasses, and that Lebron hasn't won yet. Furthermore, Lebron and Magic excel(led) at slightly different things- Lebron is a pure scorer, while Magic was a beast at orchestrating an offense. Despite that, I hate the playoffs argument, because Lebron is still in his prime and has plenty of time to win. People said the same shit about Peyton... and look what happened.

I agree that people look at the "good old days" differently. My biggest beef with Lebron happened last year. That was the saddest performance I have ever seen. Lebron is supposed to be the best basketball player on the planet, but he quit on his team. In my mind it's no longer about wining one championship with Lebron. He now has to win multiple championships while being the best player on the floor. Until he can do that I will never consider him a top 10 player.

There is no way in hell Lebron is the best pure scorer in basketball. His game is one dimensional. Ask yourself this what is Lebron great at doing? He isn't a great shooter, he isn't a great passer, he has no post up game, etc... His game is all driving to the basket. Once in a while he gets hot shooting the ball. Also pure scorer is so damn vague anyways.
 
Holy shit

Gerald Henderson will be starting tonight. Larry Brown rolling around on top of a dead stripper's grave.
 
Jamesfrom818 said:
I'd take The Human Highlight Film over Lebron every day of the week.

You and me both... Wilkins would have taken Cle to the promise land
 
Srsly said:
Then why does Miami play much better with Bosh at PF than Haslem if Haslem supposedly gives Miami everything they need from their PF better than Bosh?

Yes, LeBron is better than Magic ever was. LeBron can do everything Magic could, is a much better defender and finisher, and actually has a decent shot -- something Magic didn't acquire until the tail end of his career. Magic had the luxury of joining arguably the best center of all-time his rookie year and consistently playing with a team stacked all the way down the line-up.

n3sx12.jpg


Wait, wait...I missed this:

Lebron is a pure scorer

:lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol :lol
 
god damn Magic is an overrated piece of trash but an easy-bake oven could play basketball better than Lebron. At least Magic knows how to pass to players better than him. That puts him right up there with Chris Quinn, and I am not sure Lebron is quite at that level yet.
 
The Crimson Blur said:
god damn Magic is an overrated piece of trash but an easy-bake oven could play basketball better than Lebron. At least Magic knows how to pass to players better than him. That puts him right up there with Chris Quinn, and I am not sure Lebron is quite at that level yet.

This whole post was constructed just so you could name drop Chris Quinn.
 
The Crimson Blur said:
god damn Magic is an overrated piece of trash but an easy-bake oven could play basketball better than Lebron. At least Magic knows how to pass to players better than him. That puts him right up there with Chris Quinn, and I am not sure Lebron is quite at that level yet.
:lol :lol :lol

I love NBA-GAF
 
The Crimson Blur said:
god damn Magic is an overrated piece of trash but an easy-bake oven could play basketball better than Lebron. At least Magic knows how to pass to players better than him. That puts him right up there with Chris Quinn, and I am not sure Lebron is quite at that level yet.

Go sit on the other end of the bench. That trolling was garbage. Come on man. Just run the offense. Don't be trying to do your own thing out there.
 
ryutaro's mama said:
This whole post was constructed just so you could name drop Chris Quinn.

I actually started a post about Quinn, scrolled up and read the shit you guys have been talking about all day, and changed my post

:lol

Jamesfrom818 said:
Go sit on the other end of the bench. That trolling was garbage. Come on man. Just run the offense. Don't be trying to do your own thing out there.

Lebron-esque

no coach would bench Lebron, now would they? I'd give you a strong bump on my way to the bench if you did. And then you'd know I'm pissed.
 
It's like we have a streaker running through NBA-GAF today.


Blackace said:
Wait what? The Rockets were a good team, but LBJ had some great players in Cleve..

Mo Williams is a better player than Mad Max... And Thorpe wasn't much better than AV..

I think the Rocket teams were better on the whole, mostly because Mario was a beast but the Dream was a better gamer than LBJ is at this point.

Teams far worse than the Cavs have made the Finals and even won a couple of games. One of the major problems with the Cleveland teams the past couple of years is that they didn't really run a proper offense, especially in crunch time. It's basically just LeISOs, which reduce the teammates to spectators. And Lebron's offensive game doesn't have enough variety to consistently break down a good defensive team.

In just about every series Cleveland lost the 3-4 years, Lebron had at least 3 games where he shot under 40%. He consistently gets shutdown by good teams. Contrast this with Wade, he had a garbage supporting cast yet he played out of his mind against Boston last year. Even guys like T-Mac played great through almost the entire series when their team's lost.

Lebron does well in meaningless statement games in the regular season because usually teams don't have much time to prepare and they can't make adjustments. Whereas in the playoffs, good teams (with good coaches) have time to make adjustments and to limit Bron's game. And Lebron lacks the skillset to properly make his own adjustments. His solution is to just chuck contested 3 pointers and long twos, hoping to hit a hot streak.

Having said all of that, Lebron's offensive deficiencies might have been manageable if Cleveland learned to run meaningful plays for the other players. Yeah Mo Williams played like garbage in the playoffs but it was partly because he had to create a shot with just 5-6 seconds on the shot clock. The Cavs didn't run plays to hit him in his sweet spots. The role players were reduced to garbage collection off Lebron double teams. But when teams don't double team Lebron, the role players never got good looks.

That's another major difference between Magic and Lebron. Magic could hit his role-players in the flow of offense even with just single coverage. Whereas Lebron holds the ball for 10-15 seconds and passes it off once the double team is coming. It works against weaker teams, but not always against teams with quality defense.

IMO, the Heat are in trouble if the ball is in Lebron's hand 80% of the time in crunch time during the playoffs. Even during the recent streak, the Heat looked like ass in the few close games. You had Chris Bosh taking 3 pointers. :lol That's a sign of a directionless offense.
 
The Chosen One said:
I'm liking how the Pistons have been playing lately. You're in trouble.
I honestly don't care if Detroit wins or not, Bobcats have 17 pts and it isn't even the 2nd quarter yet.
 
reilo said:
I mean, fuck, if you want to argue stats, we can get into this all day long, but fact of the matter is, there are some quantitative statistical analysis that even the best of NBA statisticians cannot account for because of the game of basketball is far too complex to measure in such nuance -- unlike baseball or football.

Wait... what? Football statistics are even more pointless than basketball stats, and that's saying something. If you're using numbers to evaluate players in either league, you're doing it wrong. A players' impact on the game goes far beyond mere numbers in both sports.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom