Asik/Gibson are a much better defensive force because boozer is one of the worst defenders in the league.
Which is also why Noah has ended up in foul trouble a fair bit recently. Covering for boozer.
It's pretty dumb because noah has great feet, can guard the post, is probably only second behind chandler at PnR defense, rebounds, plays hard, and is a good passer.
Noah also anchors the bulls defense and is great at calling out rotations.
Ibaka makes blocks.
Noah is a much much MUCH better player than Ibaka.
If you've watched 100+ bulls games and haven't noticed that, you should pay more attention.
Noah post/man defense really isn't that good, Dwight or other legit offensive threat big usually destroy him.. If someone calling Ibaka for that its should apply for Noah too. Noah can very useful on defense because he can switch to guard perimeter player all the time and Thibs defensive scheme demanding that, I think Ibaka actually not bad at doing this..
And like I said before Noah's short arm make him less effective as defensive anchor... there is noticeably more easy basket opportunity for opposition when Noah on the floor, Imagine if Ibaka can cover that.. Both are liabilities on offense, but at least Ibaka not have silly tendency like Noah that often trying beat his marker by dribble or some shit..
Ibaka will look much better if Scott Brook isn't such a mediocre coach... And actually have elite defensive scheme, He's averaging 4 BPG afterall n its not like he doing that without great defensive awareness, read, and timing.
I've seen CJ Watson - Korver -Brewer - Gibson - Thomas play much better defense than what thunder doing in Finals. I'm sure Thibs don't have problem with Ibaka or Perkins (no matter how bad he is now) too.